Brooks B-67 w/ drops
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Bikes: 1991 Eddie Merckx Corsa, 1991 Cannondale 3.0 Road Race, 2008 Bianchi Pista
This sounds more like a frame geometry issue ... meaning it sounds like you need a different geometry and that you're attempting to compensate for this with drop bars. why do you think that the issue is in the hand position and radiating to the shoulders, versus being in the shoulder and radiating to the hands?
Edit: I should also add that on any bike with any style of bars, if I restrain myself to any one hand position for an extended period, these problems arise again. It's a pretty clear cause-and-effect relationship.
Last edited by MNTC; 08-22-12 at 03:28 AM.
#27
Fat Guy on a Little Bike


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
My problems are alleviated by switching hand positions fairly regularly, regardless of fit or handlebar style. Drop bars simply offer the most hand positions of any bar. I am perfectly comfortable on bullhorn and trekking style bars as well. I do not experience any bike fit issues.
Edit: I should also add that on any bike with any style of bars, if I restrain myself to any one hand position for an extended period, these problems arise again. It's a pretty clear cause-and-effect relationship.
Edit: I should also add that on any bike with any style of bars, if I restrain myself to any one hand position for an extended period, these problems arise again. It's a pretty clear cause-and-effect relationship.
#28
To me drop bars are designed first to provide multi hand positions and positions that place the wrist midway in its ability to rotate. And contact points in the meaty part of the palm and away from sensitive nerves. The combination of all these things and being a wrapped griping surface that will allow padding to be placed under the wrap gives the most options for changing overall body posture during a ride and also the lesser strain on hands wrists and arms.
The ability to be aero is a secondary function of the bars. They may have been designed to race but so was derailleur gearing, thin high pressure tires and overall lightness of every component on the modern bike. We are bombarded with images and marketing that make us see things like drop bars as a racer only option. But there is nothing wrong with a French fit frame and or a shorter and steeper stem and bringing the bars into the location needed by most normal casual riders. I have mine at a height that suits my needs and the hoods are above the saddle height and the drops are below. With the higher drops that is my position of greatest control and my riding is split about 50/50 I can’t come close to flat back position but can get aero enough when heading into a wind to make a difference. Shifting back a little in the saddle allows for a little elbow bend that will get me flat for a fast downhill if I want that.
I have what most would call an upright saddle and it works fine with drop bars set to be comfortable. The problem is most shop fittings are done by people used to thinking about drop bars in the racing model. So you may have to learn about your own best fit if this is how you want to ride.
The ability to be aero is a secondary function of the bars. They may have been designed to race but so was derailleur gearing, thin high pressure tires and overall lightness of every component on the modern bike. We are bombarded with images and marketing that make us see things like drop bars as a racer only option. But there is nothing wrong with a French fit frame and or a shorter and steeper stem and bringing the bars into the location needed by most normal casual riders. I have mine at a height that suits my needs and the hoods are above the saddle height and the drops are below. With the higher drops that is my position of greatest control and my riding is split about 50/50 I can’t come close to flat back position but can get aero enough when heading into a wind to make a difference. Shifting back a little in the saddle allows for a little elbow bend that will get me flat for a fast downhill if I want that.
I have what most would call an upright saddle and it works fine with drop bars set to be comfortable. The problem is most shop fittings are done by people used to thinking about drop bars in the racing model. So you may have to learn about your own best fit if this is how you want to ride.
#29
Been Around Awhile

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,657
Likes: 1,975
From: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
#30
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
#31
Been Around Awhile

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,657
Likes: 1,975
From: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Sure drop bars "could" be comfortable, as could an ass-hatchet saddle. Some cyclists swear they like 'em, though I doubt it is because of the comfort factor, but rather in spite of the lack of same. After all, ain't that what the The Real Serious Cyclists™ (and those who wish to emulate them) like?
#32
Fat Guy on a Little Bike


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Sure drop bars "could" be comfortable, as could an ass-hatchet saddle. Some cyclists swear they like 'em, though I doubt it is because of the comfort factor, but rather in spite of the lack of same. After all, ain't that what the The Real Serious Cyclists™ (and those who wish to emulate them) like?
As a point of fact, I was riding an upright bike as my primary commuter for about 2 years and was surprised that my back pain was worse. I switched to drops and it cleared up - stretching out is more comfortable for me and is better for my back. Additionally, a more upright position puts more pressure on your derriere...stretching out can relieve that and spread the weight out.
You are the worst kind of elitist - the anti-elitist more full of his own dogma than any racer.
PS - most roadies I know have multiple bikes, depending on their needs. It isn't us/them unless you want it to be. It's possible to enjoy road bikes, touring bikes, mountain bikes and even cruisers. It's even possible that weekend warriors are riding bikes that make sense for them; they don;t want to commute (and commuting for many of them wouldn't make sense). They want to ride fast with friends and buy bikes that let them do it. The nerve.
#33
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Sure drop bars "could" be comfortable, as could an ass-hatchet saddle. Some cyclists swear they like 'em, though I doubt it is because of the comfort factor, but rather in spite of the lack of same. After all, ain't that what the The Real Serious Cyclists™ (and those who wish to emulate them) like?
Drop bars and leather saddles are the most comfortable options I've tried, so you can take your aspersions and shove 'em.
#34
Been Around Awhile

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,657
Likes: 1,975
From: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
As if "roadies" are anything but a relatively small slice of the bicycle riding public, even in the U.S and especially those who ride to work. Including those unworthy types who ride on department store bikes without an LBS provenance. Perhaps you should venture away from the BF enthusiast clique and your bicycling club comrades to note who rides what and for what reason.
#35
Descends like a rock
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 16
From: Fort Worth, TX
Bikes: Scott Foil, Surly Pacer
For me, the real test of comfort is what works on a 100+mi ride. If I'm riding 8 or 12 hrs in a day, its going to be on drop bars. It has nothing to do with wanting to be like a racer or any of that. There's no room for nonsense like that on a long day on the road. For short rides, where comfort doesn't really matter much, you can use whatever bars you want.
As for the Brooks, I think it will depend on your saddle to bar drop. If they are at fairly equal heights, it might work. If you like your bars lower, I expect it will be a problem. I have a swift on one of my bikes and I'm glad its the one with the bars at the higher position. If I stay in the drops for a while, I can feel it.
As for the Brooks, I think it will depend on your saddle to bar drop. If they are at fairly equal heights, it might work. If you like your bars lower, I expect it will be a problem. I have a swift on one of my bikes and I'm glad its the one with the bars at the higher position. If I stay in the drops for a while, I can feel it.
Last edited by pallen; 08-22-12 at 02:36 PM.
#36
Saddles are always a personal thing based on individual physiology and bike setup. I have drop bars on a commuter, with about a 1" drop. The VO Model 6 saddle ended up being too narrow at 150mm; a Brooks B17 was too wide at 175mm, but the Brooks Professional (alpe d'Huez edition!) is just right at 160mm. There's no way I'd run a B67 on anything where I wasn't pretty much bolt upright with rise from the saddle to the bars and swept back bars... which is exactly none of my bikes right now.
YMMV, but the B67 at 205mm just seems too wide for the application you're describing. I'd go for the standard B17 or the Flyer.
YMMV, but the B67 at 205mm just seems too wide for the application you're describing. I'd go for the standard B17 or the Flyer.
#37
Fat Guy on a Little Bike


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Saddles are always a personal thing based on individual physiology and bike setup. I have drop bars on a commuter, with about a 1" drop. The VO Model 6 saddle ended up being too narrow at 150mm; a Brooks B17 was too wide at 175mm, but the Brooks Professional (alpe d'Huez edition!) is just right at 160mm. There's no way I'd run a B67 on anything where I wasn't pretty much bolt upright with rise from the saddle to the bars and swept back bars... which is exactly none of my bikes right now.
YMMV, but the B67 at 205mm just seems too wide for the application you're describing. I'd go for the standard B17 or the Flyer.
YMMV, but the B67 at 205mm just seems too wide for the application you're describing. I'd go for the standard B17 or the Flyer.
#38
B17N is at 151mm width -- wouldn't work for me, and since OP is looking for a wider saddle to go with some drop bars, I recommended the B17 at 175mm. But certainly an Imperial cut with either the B17 or Flyer would work. I like the Team Pro because it is basically right in between Brooks's B17 (too wide) and their narrower (too narrow) saddles, all around 150mm. Love to get a Colt, but don't want to take the chance ($$$) with the width. Never going to be setting up a bike with drop enough to go narrower...
#39
Been Around Awhile

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,657
Likes: 1,975
From: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
#40
Sure drop bars "could" be comfortable, as could an ass-hatchet saddle. Some cyclists swear they like 'em, though I doubt it is because of the comfort factor, but rather in spite of the lack of same. After all, ain't that what the The Real Serious Cyclists™ (and those who wish to emulate them) like?
Let your arms drop to your sides and hang loose. How are your hands oriented?
If I grab something roughly the size of a handlebar and hold it in a vertical orientation, it feels natural through a wide range of arm positions. A 5-10 degree rotation is even better, maybe as far as 30 degree would work. However, if I turn it horizontal, I can feel tension somewhere in my arm until it's within about a foot of my chest.
For me, it's absolutely a comfort issue. Flat bars hurt my wrists. I can fix the problem with bar ends, and I imagine trekking bars would work too, but neither of those configurations puts the controls where I'd want them when my wrists are comfortable.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#41
Fat Guy on a Little Bike


Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
B17N is at 151mm width -- wouldn't work for me, and since OP is looking for a wider saddle to go with some drop bars, I recommended the B17 at 175mm. But certainly an Imperial cut with either the B17 or Flyer would work. I like the Team Pro because it is basically right in between Brooks's B17 (too wide) and their narrower (too narrow) saddles, all around 150mm. Love to get a Colt, but don't want to take the chance ($$$) with the width. Never going to be setting up a bike with drop enough to go narrower...
#42
Wallbike has some kind of Brooks return/refund policy you might want to check out...
#43
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
There's a guy offering some brooks saddles he has. He said 50 for a b17. It sounds like he has quite a number of other ones that I could probably check out as well. Should I bring my bike to try them or would it be just as good to try them on the bike he probably has?
#44
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
I'd say bring your bike! Measure the distance between one of your pedals at the lowest point and the spot where you sit on the saddle and use that as a starting point for the B17. The saddle will probably need a tiny bit of nose-up tilt.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tiiger
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
46
06-16-14 01:45 PM






