Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Giving up

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Giving up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-12 | 09:57 AM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 12
From: Gaseous Cloud around Uranus
You mean after all this time,I'm suppose to be actually listening to the cagers??? Well crap.....
Booger1 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 10:18 AM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 489
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, Ohio

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Le Tour (x2), '83 Bianchi, '96 Trek 820, '96 Trek 470, '99 Xmart Squishy Bike, '03 Giant Cypress

Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Trolling, as I see it, would be advising the OP to buy a gun because his feelings get hurt when people yell at him.

hAHA, yeah, that was a weirdly aggressive suggestion for the OP's problem. I like guns, and I thought that was inappropriate...
Wolfwerx is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 10:24 AM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: East of Atlanta

Bikes: Trek Verve 1

Originally Posted by wphamilton
Not true. Staying 'out of the way' is often the least safest. I'd rather be alive AND right than either of your choices. That you believe that "to be inconvenienced than dead or injured" are our only options is disturbing.

What you should be saying - or at least accepting - is that the larger and most dangerous vehicles should be doing all they can to stay safely out of the way of all other vehicles. Which especially means yielding to other vehicles, even when you think by right of the superior threat you shouldn't have to.

When you think about it, that attitude about what the 'vulnerable' vehicles should do, instead of what you should do, is exactly why cyclists joke and fantasize about being conspicuously armed. That would make YOU equally vulnerable, and perhaps lead to an attitude adjustment.
My belief is that everyone should follow the traffic laws and be aware of their surroundings, however, that is not reality. Prudence would suggest that the most vulnerable should take the most care to avoid trouble, even if they are in the right, because they are the ones most likely to get hurt in the event of an accident. That's just a fact that cannot change. It doesn't matter who is right, a 30 pound bike will lose every time against a 3000 pound car. I'm not saying to be inconspicuous, just extra vigilant, because we know motorists are not often very alert to their surroundings.

And if you think having a gun with you on your bike makes motorists equally vulnerable, you're wrong. Not only might they be armed also, but they're still in a 3000+ pound car and can squash you. If you want to be armed for self defense against theives, robbers, etc, that's fine with me and I think you should have that right, but to do it in the hopes it'll disuade a motorist from being rude or oblivious is wishful thinking. If they are intentionally being rude, they are obviously beligerent and could escalate matters by trying to run you over or shoot first. If they're oblvious, they'll likely have no idea why you're flashing a gun and try to run you over or shoot first, or they may just call the cops. In either instance, you'll have a hard time proving you had just cause to flash or pull your weapon unless you have witnesses, and even then unless there has been an obvious intentional threat to run you over, you'll have no legal reason to do so.

Last edited by homechicken; 08-22-12 at 10:28 AM.
homechicken is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 11:10 AM
  #54  
alan s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,977
Likes: 191
From: Washington, DC
Hey OP, I think you are just looking for an excuse to quit. Unless your route is unsafe and you have no alternative routes, just keep going. What do you care what others think of you? So what if you are the only one who rides a bike in your town? So what if every car that passes you honks or yells? Just by hopping on a bike, you're already crazier than most of the people driving, but in a good way.
alan s is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 11:14 AM
  #55  
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
Been Around Awhile
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,658
Likes: 1,977
From: Burlington Iowa

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Originally Posted by homechicken
In either instance, you'll have a hard time proving you had just cause to flash or pull your weapon unless you have witnesses, and even then unless there has been an obvious intentional threat to run you over, you'll have no legal reason to do so.
A problem some of our bicycling colleagues have is that they perceive any motorist action that requires the cyclist to make an evasive maneuver or have to use their brakes as a deliberate attempt to cause harm to the cyclist, and merits an arrest for assault or reckless endangerment. With that mindset, these cyclists would likely feel justified to brandish/use a gun for "self defense" against an army of assaulting motorists threatening their lives every day. See the closed thread in A&S for details https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...a-driver-today.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 11:30 AM
  #56  
wphamilton's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,278
Likes: 342
From: Alpharetta, GA

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Back to the topic, I don't think anyone can tell OP he shouldn't give up, or validate his decision, without at least having ridden there. Even then, what other factors are involved, not necessarily related to cycling?

All I can say is it IS dangerous, and can be vexing - if it's not worth it just stop.

Originally Posted by homechicken
My belief is that everyone should follow the traffic laws and be aware of their surroundings, however, that is not reality. Prudence would suggest that the most vulnerable should take the most care to avoid trouble, even if they are in the right, because they are the ones most likely to get hurt in the event of an accident. That's just a fact that cannot change. It doesn't matter who is right, a 30 pound bike will lose every time against a 3000 pound car. I'm not saying to be inconspicuous, just extra vigilant, because we know motorists are not often very alert to their surroundings.

And if you think having a gun with you on your bike makes motorists equally vulnerable, you're wrong. Not only might they be armed also, but they're still in a 3000+ pound car and can squash you. If you want to be armed for self defense against theives, robbers, etc, that's fine with me and I think you should have that right, but to do it in the hopes it'll disuade a motorist from being rude or oblivious is wishful thinking. If they are intentionally being rude, they are obviously beligerent and could escalate matters by trying to run you over or shoot first. If they're oblvious, they'll likely have no idea why you're flashing a gun and try to run you over or shoot first, or they may just call the cops. In either instance, you'll have a hard time proving you had just cause to flash or pull your weapon unless you have witnesses, and even then unless there has been an obvious intentional threat to run you over, you'll have no legal reason to do so.
The bolded is wrong, legally, morally, and in practice. The only part that is true is that the cyclist is in the most danger. It's not even true that "a 30 pound bike will lose every time"!

Obviously, everyone should look out for themselves. Yet, the people who should take the most care are those who can cause the most damage.

I also find it highly dubious that a motorist, feeling secure enough in their anonymity and equipment to threaten another person or to even assume that the potential entitles them, would be so belligerent seeing the other party armed. Do you really think you, or any belligerent motorist, would disregard a sidearm until the person draws and shoots it??

It is a mute point though, since we mostly don't ride with open carry. Hence the jokes, and fantasy.

Last edited by wphamilton; 08-22-12 at 11:50 AM.
wphamilton is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 12:11 PM
  #57  
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 7
From: baned from foo so for sure im not there .

Bikes: Felt nine flow

there is no other route unless i take my bike in a boat and cross the lake
windhchaser is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 12:26 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: East of Atlanta

Bikes: Trek Verve 1

Originally Posted by wphamilton
The bolded is wrong, legally, morally, and in practice. The only part that is true is that the cyclist is in the most danger. It's not even true that "a 30 pound bike will lose every time"!

Obviously, everyone should look out for themselves. Yet, the people who should take the most care are those who can cause the most damage.

I also find it highly dubious that a motorist, feeling secure enough in their anonymity and equipment to threaten another person or to even assume that the potential entitles them, would be so belligerent seeing the other party armed. Do you really think you, or any belligerent motorist, would disregard a sidearm until the person draws and shoots it??

It is a mute point though, since we mostly don't ride with open carry. Hence the jokes, and fantasy.
Again, prudence is the key word. The guy with the most to lose has to be the most careful because he can't rely on everyone else to do what they are supposed to. That may not be the ideal world, but its the real world.

In most states open carry is illegal, so the motorist should never know if the cyclist is armed. If the cyclist makes a move to purposely show his weapon to the motorist, that could be construed as an obvious attempt to intimidate, that is brandishing the weapon in a threatening manner, which is also illegal. Unless the motorist has actually threatened to run you over, you are in the wrong for brandishing your weapon.
homechicken is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 12:28 PM
  #59  
Doohickie's Avatar
You gonna eat that?
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14,917
Likes: 543
From: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

I gave up last summer. Just keep riding.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 12:54 PM
  #60  
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 703
From: Layton, UT

Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile

Originally Posted by juggleaddict
This sounds crazy but after just yesterday I'm pretty sure my new commuter pannier makes people nicer. I guess they figure you're carrying a lot so they expect you to be slower or something? Put some big ole bags on the back, and fill them with pillows, or this:

Nice. I thought about putting something like that on my commuter. I would make it about 6 inches shorter than the 3 foot minimum here in WA, but make it flexible enough that if it was hit, it didn't knock me over. Now, to add something on the end that will leave a nice mark in their paint.....
Notso_fastLane is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 01:03 PM
  #61  
alan s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,977
Likes: 191
From: Washington, DC
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Back to the topic, I don't think anyone can tell OP he shouldn't give up, or validate his decision, without at least having ridden there. Even then, what other factors are involved, not necessarily related to cycling?
No one is trying to tell the OP what to do, only expressing their opinion, as requested by the OP. Seeing as how the OP is the only cyclist in his town, presumably no one here has ridden there, so by your logic, no one can express an opinion?
alan s is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 01:19 PM
  #62  
wphamilton's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,278
Likes: 342
From: Alpharetta, GA

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Originally Posted by alan s
No one is trying to tell the OP what to do, only expressing their opinion, as requested by the OP. Seeing as how the OP is the only cyclist in his town, presumably no one here has ridden there, so by your logic, no one can express an opinion?
We can all have an opinion about it, but by my logic none of them can amount to much.

I don't want to see anyone giving up on something they like to do, just because it's challenging, any more than anyone else does. But looking at it straight, I don't know what his challenges really are. It may be a bit nihilistic but that's my honest opinion.
wphamilton is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 01:23 PM
  #63  
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 7
From: baned from foo so for sure im not there .

Bikes: Felt nine flow

Every other city i have lived in including downtown Cleveland was way better then this town. south fla was also way better.south ga sucked but it was better.There just is something about this town and there hatred of bikers The onbly road i can ride on is a huge road with 4 lanes of trafic that is bumper to bumper in some times of the day HAs tons of 18 wheelers going to and from the poultry plants(this is the poultry capital of the world..There is no other road for me to take
windhchaser is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 01:36 PM
  #64  
alan s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,977
Likes: 191
From: Washington, DC
Originally Posted by windhchaser
Every other city i have lived in including downtown Cleveland was way better then this town. south fla was also way better.south ga sucked but it was better.There just is something about this town and there hatred of bikers The onbly road i can ride on is a huge road with 4 lanes of trafic that is bumper to bumper in some times of the day HAs tons of 18 wheelers going to and from the poultry plants(this is the poultry capital of the world..There is no other road for me to take
No idea where you live and the route you take, but if you posted the route (without showing the exact start and end point, of course), perhaps you would get some specific recommendations that would help. Not saying you are wrong in thinking you have no options, but there may be reasonable alternatives you haven't considered.
alan s is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 01:45 PM
  #65  
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 7
From: baned from foo so for sure im not there .

Bikes: Felt nine flow

There is no other roads I live on a lake so a course i cant go towards lake lol.If i recall the lake is like 500 miles a shoreline
windhchaser is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 02:02 PM
  #66  
alan s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,977
Likes: 191
From: Washington, DC
Sounds like you have already given up.
alan s is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 02:11 PM
  #67  
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
Been Around Awhile
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 30,658
Likes: 1,977
From: Burlington Iowa

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Originally Posted by wphamilton
I don't know what his challenges really are.
Given the content/format of the OP's various posts I imagine there are several challenges involved.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 02:35 PM
  #68  
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 7
From: baned from foo so for sure im not there .

Bikes: Felt nine flow

Ill just give up for 2 weeks .So at least i am able to not react to these jerks who make it unsafe to ride here.

Last edited by windhchaser; 08-22-12 at 02:41 PM.
windhchaser is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 02:42 PM
  #69  
genec's Avatar
genec
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 27,072
Likes: 4,533
From: West Coast

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Originally Posted by homechicken
My belief is that everyone should follow the traffic laws and be aware of their surroundings, however, that is not reality. Prudence would suggest that the most vulnerable should take the most care to avoid trouble, even if they are in the right, because they are the ones most likely to get hurt in the event of an accident. That's just a fact that cannot change. It doesn't matter who is right, a 30 pound bike will lose every time against a 3000 pound car. I'm not saying to be inconspicuous, just extra vigilant, because we know motorists are not often very alert to their surroundings.

And if you think having a gun with you on your bike makes motorists equally vulnerable, you're wrong. Not only might they be armed also, but they're still in a 3000+ pound car and can squash you. If you want to be armed for self defense against theives, robbers, etc, that's fine with me and I think you should have that right, but to do it in the hopes it'll disuade a motorist from being rude or oblivious is wishful thinking. If they are intentionally being rude, they are obviously beligerent and could escalate matters by trying to run you over or shoot first. If they're oblvious, they'll likely have no idea why you're flashing a gun and try to run you over or shoot first, or they may just call the cops. In either instance, you'll have a hard time proving you had just cause to flash or pull your weapon unless you have witnesses, and even then unless there has been an obvious intentional threat to run you over, you'll have no legal reason to do so.
You do realize that in a couple of those posts we were talking about fake guns... right?

Also interesting argument... and I'll use your commentary about guns to show you the problem with your motoring thinking. If we are to think as you, then those who are not armed should always work to give way to those that are armed. But the fact is in society, we require those with weapons to be prudent in the use of the weapons so as to not harm others. We don't tell those who are armed to just shoot away while the vulnerable have to duck and take cover.
genec is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 02:45 PM
  #70  
genec's Avatar
genec
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 27,072
Likes: 4,533
From: West Coast

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Originally Posted by windhchaser
Every other city i have lived in including downtown Cleveland was way better then this town. south fla was also way better.south ga sucked but it was better.There just is something about this town and there hatred of bikers The onbly road i can ride on is a huge road with 4 lanes of trafic that is bumper to bumper in some times of the day HAs tons of 18 wheelers going to and from the poultry plants(this is the poultry capital of the world..There is no other road for me to take
Sadly those situations do exist. Have you considered an off road route?
genec is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 02:48 PM
  #71  
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 7
From: baned from foo so for sure im not there .

Bikes: Felt nine flow

Originally Posted by genec
Sadly those situations do exist. Have you considered an off road route?
Yeah i do think of that a lot .But at some times of the year the grass is like 3 feet high on the side of the road.Now its pretty short maybe ill try it
windhchaser is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 03:32 PM
  #72  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: East of Atlanta

Bikes: Trek Verve 1

Originally Posted by genec
You do realize that in a couple of those posts we were talking about fake guns... right?

Also interesting argument... and I'll use your commentary about guns to show you the problem with your motoring thinking. If we are to think as you, then those who are not armed should always work to give way to those that are armed. But the fact is in society, we require those with weapons to be prudent in the use of the weapons so as to not harm others. We don't tell those who are armed to just shoot away while the vulnerable have to duck and take cover.
Yes, I included fake guns in my original post because someone else before me had brought them up. What you may know to be fake may look very real to someone else and that can lead to all kinds of trouble as well, legal and otherwise. As to the rest, enough said, I'll debate it no more. I've stated my position in different ways multiple times. If you still don't understand, then we'll have to agree that we have differing views on the matter and I hope you have many more years of happy cycling and never come to understand that what I'm saying is right! .

As to the OP, I hope you stick with it. It sucks when someone gives up something that they should enjoy because of the bad behavior of others.
homechicken is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 03:40 PM
  #73  
Mark Stone's Avatar
Tractorlegs
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,185
Likes: 60
From: El Paso, TX

Bikes: Schwinn Meridian Single-Speed Tricycle

Why use guns or fake guns when you can use pacifiers? Keep a small supply of pacifiers in a handlebar bag, and then when a cager pulls up next to you and yells something, toss him a "binkie" and say "Looks like you can use one of these partner!"
__________________
********************************
Trikeman
Mark Stone is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 06:27 PM
  #74  
genec's Avatar
genec
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 27,072
Likes: 4,533
From: West Coast

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Originally Posted by homechicken
Yes, I included fake guns in my original post because someone else before me had brought them up. What you may know to be fake may look very real to someone else and that can lead to all kinds of trouble as well, legal and otherwise. As to the rest, enough said, I'll debate it no more. I've stated my position in different ways multiple times. If you still don't understand, then we'll have to agree that we have differing views on the matter and I hope you have many more years of happy cycling and never come to understand that what I'm saying is right! .

As to the OP, I hope you stick with it. It sucks when someone gives up something that they should enjoy because of the bad behavior of others.
What you are saying is that might makes right and that anything/anyone smaller best just stay out of the way. That is the road attitude of much of the 3rd world. That attitude also tends to come from folks that feel they own the road. It is NOT the attitude expressed by the laws that govern the use of the road... otherwise large tractor trailer rigs would dominate any and all lanes on the freeway.
genec is offline  
Reply
Old 08-22-12 | 07:34 PM
  #75  
Thread Starter
Banned.
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 643
Likes: 7
From: baned from foo so for sure im not there .

Bikes: Felt nine flow

I said **** it and went out tonight.I know i could kick these jerks asses and it would feel nice to do so but that will just make me a loser who cant handle his temper so ill just ignore them and keep rideing.I thought about headphones because there is nothing they can block out other then people who hate us bikers
windhchaser is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.