only suckers commute with a load in the rear
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA
Bikes: Trek 830 Mountain Track Drop bar conversion
I've got a front rack and a rear rack, and I occasionally throw my panniers on the front to mix things up, but I'm generally a sucker, I guess... ;-)
#5
Just Keep Pedaling
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,355
Likes: 67
From: Lakewood, CA
Bikes: 99 Schwinn Mesa GS MTB, 15 Trek Domane 5.9 Dura-Ace, 17 Trek Emonda SL6 Pro & 18 Bianchi Vigorelli
#6
Senior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA
Bikes: Ridley
#7
Trunk bag goes on first, given its lower aero impact. Extra load goes on top of the trunk bag with a bungee. Weight up front affects steering and handling more than in the rear, so if you have to go with front or rear first, go with rear.
#8
well, I'll admit I i was being snarky. This doesn't work well with a bike that isn't designed to carry a front load. You want something with a low trail fork and proper geometry. That said front load gives a better front to rear weight ratio which makes the bike more stable. It also allows the rider to see the load which can be nice - have you ever lost something off the rear of your bike because you didn't see it fall? I have. Being able to easily reach into your bag without getting off the bike is nice too. Lastly, the large front rack allows me to carry large awkward shaped objects.
__________________
I have some bikes.
I have some bikes.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
It also allows the rider to see the load which can be nice - have you ever lost something off the rear of your bike because you didn't see it fall? I have.
But seriously though, I can't even imagine turning the front wheel with all the crap on my bike (yes I realize touring bikes do this all the time)
#10
aero? Ha, the aerodynamic drag of a front bag wont slow you down in your commute. Are you going 80 mph? Aside from that I cant really comment having no idea what you're riding. All I can say it bikes designed for front loads handle it very well and have a few advantages.
__________________
I have some bikes.
I have some bikes.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA
Bikes: Ridley
well, I'll admit I i was being snarky. This doesn't work well with a bike that isn't designed to carry a front load. You want something with a low trail fork and proper geometry. That said front load gives a better front to rear weight ratio which makes the bike more stable. It also allows the rider to see the load which can be nice - have you ever lost something off the rear of your bike because you didn't see it fall? I have. Being able to easily reach into your bag without getting off the bike is nice too. Lastly, the large front rack allows me to carry large awkward shaped objects.
Was about to say that rear panniers might also help with the rain seeing that you don't have fenders on, but then I saw where you live
#12
thats cool that you've never made a mistake or had something come undone while riding. I ride daily carrying all sorts of things and sometimes it happens to me.
I carry rear loads on many of my bikes too btw.
__________________
I have some bikes.
I have some bikes.
#13
i ran fenders for the first 8 months I lived here but after It didnt rain once I took them off. We do get rain for about a month in the winter though, at which time they will go back on.
__________________
I have some bikes.
I have some bikes.
#14
aero? Ha, the aerodynamic drag of a front bag wont slow you down in your commute. Are you going 80 mph? Aside from that I cant really comment having no idea what you're riding. All I can say it bikes designed for front loads handle it very well and have a few advantages.
#15
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,299
Likes: 16
#16
I do ride yes, thanks for asking! I can't say i've experienced any 30 mph winds here lately. Back east yes, and it still worked pretty well.
__________________
I have some bikes.
I have some bikes.
#17
#18
I challenge you to ride across the 14th Street Bridge (over the Potomac River) with the wind blasting out the NW at 30 mph on the narrow sidewalk. You'll be walking or picking yourself up with that load up front, guaranteed.
#19
that said, I've ridden many a cross wind with a fully loaded bike (front and rear). I can't say they've ever knocked me over but if that for some reason makes you feel better thinking it would, please feel free Sparky.
__________________
I have some bikes.
I have some bikes.
#20
clearly you're offended by front loads. That's ok. I don't recall saying they were perfect for every scenario. They work very well for my needs right now here in San Jose.
that said, I've ridden many a cross wind with a fully loaded bike (front and rear). I can't say they've ever knocked me over but if that for some reason makes you feel better thinking it would, please feel free Sparky.
that said, I've ridden many a cross wind with a fully loaded bike (front and rear). I can't say they've ever knocked me over but if that for some reason makes you feel better thinking it would, please feel free Sparky.
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
From: Chicago!
Is that a Soma porteur rack you have? I've been itching for a porteur rack that will easily take panniers in addition to whatever I feel like putting on top.
And while the wording of the original post may not have been the most artful, some of these responses are a bit...well, I'm not sure what to call them. What I do know is that I ride my bikes with front loads, rear loads, and every possible permutation of both. Low trail, medium trail, high trail. Wind, hills, flats, commuting, errand-running, touring. And really, you can get used to almost anything, within reason. No reason to try to make hard and fast rules for other people on how you ride a bicycle, just ride the damn thing.
And while the wording of the original post may not have been the most artful, some of these responses are a bit...well, I'm not sure what to call them. What I do know is that I ride my bikes with front loads, rear loads, and every possible permutation of both. Low trail, medium trail, high trail. Wind, hills, flats, commuting, errand-running, touring. And really, you can get used to almost anything, within reason. No reason to try to make hard and fast rules for other people on how you ride a bicycle, just ride the damn thing.
#22
#25
Is that a Soma porteur rack you have? I've been itching for a porteur rack that will easily take panniers in addition to whatever I feel like putting on top.
And while the wording of the original post may not have been the most artful, some of these responses are a bit...well, I'm not sure what to call them. What I do know is that I ride my bikes with front loads, rear loads, and every possible permutation of both. Low trail, medium trail, high trail. Wind, hills, flats, commuting, errand-running, touring. And really, you can get used to almost anything, within reason. No reason to try to make hard and fast rules for other people on how you ride a bicycle, just ride the damn thing.
And while the wording of the original post may not have been the most artful, some of these responses are a bit...well, I'm not sure what to call them. What I do know is that I ride my bikes with front loads, rear loads, and every possible permutation of both. Low trail, medium trail, high trail. Wind, hills, flats, commuting, errand-running, touring. And really, you can get used to almost anything, within reason. No reason to try to make hard and fast rules for other people on how you ride a bicycle, just ride the damn thing.
It is a soma. And geeze, this was meant to just show the cool front rack I've been using. I didn't really expect people to take it so seriously. This is the internet right? I'm not trying to convert anyone.
If it helps, here's other bikes i regularly ride:
notice the rear loads...
ok this one is front but its rear too! this was the only day it rained..
so clearly i'm a sucker too. But at least I have a sense of humor about it
__________________
I have some bikes.
I have some bikes.




