Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Increasing chain ring from 42 to 44

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Increasing chain ring from 42 to 44

Reply

Old 12-19-12, 09:27 PM
  #1  
fwh32720
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Increasing chain ring from 42 to 44

I just started commuting with a mountain bike with slicks, and have been spinning through gears. LBS said I can increase chain ring from 42 to 44 teeth. Would this be worth the expense for the performance?
fwh32720 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-12, 09:55 PM
  #2  
Medic Zero
Senior Member
 
Medic Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vancouver,Washington
Posts: 2,254

Bikes: Old steel GT's, for touring and commuting

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Originally Posted by fwh32720 View Post
I just started commuting with a mountain bike with slicks, and have been spinning through gears. LBS said I can increase chain ring from 42 to 44 teeth. Would this be worth the expense for the performance?
I'd be tempted to go even higher. If it has a Shimano front derailer and he said that because it is rated for 44, it can actually handle at least two teeth more. You'd feel more of a difference going up to a 46 than you would just going up two to 44, which I suspect you'd hardly notice. It's quite likely you could move up to a 48 without changing front derailers too.

Of course, the other thing you can do is change the rear cassette. If it isn't an 11- something, you can get more high speed cruising by moving to a cassette with an 11 tooth cog as its smallest.

Last edited by Medic Zero; 12-19-12 at 09:59 PM. Reason: clarity
Medic Zero is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-12, 10:08 PM
  #3  
mtbikerinpa
Shimano Certified
 
mtbikerinpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 1,718

Bikes: 92 Giant Sedona ATX Custom

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I have one bike with 44 and one with biopace 48 and there is definitely a difference. The thing to keep in mind is what your primary terrain is. If you have flatter terrain or extended downhills, the higher gear can have an advantage. If the hills are sharper or steeper a 44 will be decent. The place where the higher gearing can be nice is descending hills. A couple mph faster on the top end if your legs can push it.
mtbikerinpa is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-12, 10:10 PM
  #4  
peterw_diy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 336
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Originally Posted by fwh32720 View Post
I just started commuting with a mountain bike with slicks, and have been spinning through gears. LBS said I can increase chain ring from 42 to 44 teeth. Would this be worth the expense for the performance?
No. That's only a 4.8% increase in your top gear. By comparison, if your two smallest rear cogs have 11 and 12 teeth, that last jump with your current gears is an increase of 9%. So moving to a 44t chainring would be like adding only a half gear more.

What pedals and shoes are you wearing? Do you have any idea what your cadence is? I would expect your top gear to be about 99 inches, which would put you over 26 miles per hour if you spun at 90rpm. 26 mph is plenty fast for most commuters (double what many of us average). If your 99 inch gear isn't enough, I think your first step is seeing if you can increase your cadence -- it sounds like you're either very strong with a really fast, clear route or you're not spinning the cranks very quickly. Clipless pedals and cycling shoes are IMO the easiest way to facilitate spinning.

It would make more sense to replace your crankset (which I assume is something like 22-32-42) with a 26-36-48 crankset (plus get a correspondingly longer chain) than to merely switch to a 44t big ring. Moving to 26-36-48 would increase your top gear by 14.3%, nearly as much as adding two higher gears.
peterw_diy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-12, 10:13 PM
  #5  
noglider 
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Village, New York City
Posts: 35,291

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1973 Raleigh Twenty, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 364 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4362 Post(s)
That's less than a 5% increase.
__________________
Tom Reingold, [email protected]
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

ďWhen man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.Ē ó Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-12, 10:35 AM
  #6  
fwh32720
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Originally Posted by peterw_diy View Post
No. That's only a 4.8% increase in your top gear. By comparison, if your two smallest rear cogs have 11 and 12 teeth, that last jump with your current gears is an increase of 9%. So moving to a 44t chainring would be like adding only a half gear more.

What pedals and shoes are you wearing? Do you have any idea what your cadence is? I would expect your top gear to be about 99 inches, which would put you over 26 miles per hour if you spun at 90rpm. 26 mph is plenty fast for most commuters (double what many of us average). If your 99 inch gear isn't enough, I think your first step is seeing if you can increase your cadence -- it sounds like you're either very strong with a really fast, clear route or you're not spinning the cranks very quickly. Clipless pedals and cycling shoes are IMO the easiest way to facilitate spinning.

It would make more sense to replace your crankset (which I assume is something like 22-32-42) with a 26-36-48 crankset (plus get a correspondingly longer chain) than to merely switch to a 44t big ring. Moving to 26-36-48 would increase your top gear by 14.3%, nearly as much as adding two higher gears.
Wow...great info. Darn--just bought a new chain too. Can a chain be extended or just buy a new one?
fwh32720 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-12, 01:49 PM
  #7  
no1mad 
Thunder Whisperer
 
no1mad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NE OK
Posts: 8,865

Bikes: '06 Kona Smoke

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 269 Post(s)
Plug the numbers into a gear calculator, like Sheldon's. That should give you a better idea of what type of (if at all) upgrade would be practical for your goals. My OEM is 42x11 on 26x1.5" slicks and I still can't spin fast enough to hit top speed. I can cruise at 20 mph with minimal effort- assuming the wind, traffic, and stop lights cooperate .
no1mad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-12, 01:54 PM
  #8  
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 36,175

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5228 Post(s)
Next cassette , get one with an 11t High gear, if you can.. that will up your top gear.
fietsbob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-12, 02:19 PM
  #9  
droy45
tougher than a boiled owl
 
droy45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rocky Coast of Maine
Posts: 1,125

Bikes: Fetish Cycles Fixation / Fuji S12S / Gary Fisher MTB / Raleigh Grand Prix / Ross Professional / Kent comfort cruiser

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Definitely change the cassette instead. It makes a world of difference. I'm running a 34-11 9spd cassette with a single 39T drive chainring and I can't spin it out in 9th unless going down a very steep hill and that puts me at around 30mph which is getting too fast IMO. the 34 makes climbing easier.
droy45 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-12, 03:29 PM
  #10  
gerv 
In the right lane
 
gerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 9,569

Bikes: 1974 Huffy 3 speed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
I'm swapping out a 42/52 double to a 36/48. Rear cog is 12/34. That should make a huge difference. But from 42 to 44... I wouldn't do it unless I just happened to have a 44 in my bin.
gerv is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-12, 04:17 PM
  #11  
Leisesturm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,545
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 958 Post(s)
Originally Posted by peterw_diy View Post
No. That's only a 4.8% increase in your top gear. By comparison, if your two smallest rear cogs have 11 and 12 teeth, that last jump with your current gears is an increase of 9%. So moving to a 44t chainring would be like adding only a half gear more.

What pedals and shoes are you wearing? Do you have any idea what your cadence is? I would expect your top gear to be about 99 inches, which would put you over 26 miles per hour if you spun at 90rpm. 26 mph is plenty fast for most commuters (double what many of us average). If your 99 inch gear isn't enough, I think your first step is seeing if you can increase your cadence -- it sounds like you're either very strong with a really fast, clear route or you're not spinning the cranks very quickly. Clipless pedals and cycling shoes are IMO the easiest way to facilitate spinning.

It would make more sense to replace your crankset (which I assume is something like 22-32-42) with a 26-36-48 crankset (plus get a correspondingly longer chain) than to merely switch to a 44t big ring. Moving to 26-36-48 would increase your top gear by 14.3%, nearly as much as adding two higher gears.
This! Its all here in this answer. A big top gear makes it fun to blast downhill, it should never be used for level ground cruising. Spin, spin, spin...
Leisesturm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-12, 05:55 AM
  #12  
bud16415
Senior Member
 
bud16415's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Erie Penna.
Posts: 1,141
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
I have a big ring of 45t and a center ring of 42t so I see the comparison every time I shift and in your case I don’t think the 2t change would be enough to notice. In my case I have a wide spaced cassette that gives me maybe a 10% jump between gears and having that slight change in between fills the gap. But if I only had to have one it wouldn’t really matter much 42 or 44.

The suggested crank replacement above sounds like a better way to go.
bud16415 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-12, 07:52 AM
  #13  
krobinson103
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Incheon, South Korea
Posts: 2,836

Bikes: Nothing amazing... cheap old 21 speed mtb

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had a 42 on my commuter mtb. Hated it. Changed out for a new crank with a larve 48 and its great. I don't use the top 2-3 gears often, but its good to have them. I noticed that a 21 speed drivetrain benefits a lot more than a 27.With the overlap between the middle and large rings I often forget which chainring I'm spinning unless I meet a long downhill.
krobinson103 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-12, 10:57 AM
  #14  
Dilberto
Senior Member
 
Dilberto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 950
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
I run a 10-speed 46-38 Cyclocross front and 9-speed 11-34 cassette. It works great for ALL terrain...especially the flats.
Dilberto is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-12, 12:30 PM
  #15  
gerv 
In the right lane
 
gerv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Des Moines
Posts: 9,569

Bikes: 1974 Huffy 3 speed

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Dilberto View Post
I run a 10-speed 46-38 Cyclocross front and 9-speed 11-34 cassette. It works great for ALL terrain...especially the flats.
I just found a 48/36 crankset to replace the ancient 1982 swaged 52/42 on my commuter. That kind of range is pretty good on flats, but it also depends on the rider, weight of the bike, road conditions.

I know I very seldom got to use the 52 chain ring...
gerv is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-13, 09:37 PM
  #16  
Medic Zero
Senior Member
 
Medic Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Vancouver,Washington
Posts: 2,254

Bikes: Old steel GT's, for touring and commuting

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Originally Posted by fwh32720 View Post
Wow...great info. Darn--just bought a new chain too. Can a chain be extended or just buy a new one?
I'd be tempted to track down one long enough that when you made it small enough for your new set-up you'd have enough left over the lengthen the one you have. Some places that sell chains online list the lengths. You'll need a new chain in a few thousand miles anyway. Better to replace the chain as soon as it is worn rather than have the worn chain wear out the more expensive cassette and chainrings. If you don't have one, you'll need a chainbreaker, which is a good tool to have anyway, and a masterlink. I tend to carry a chainbreaker (as part of a multi-tool) and a spare masterlink anyway.
Medic Zero is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-13, 01:13 AM
  #17  
Leisesturm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,545
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 958 Post(s)
Originally Posted by Gnosis View Post
Up to now, Iíve put off ordering the 24 tooth granny chainring because I donít need it when commuting more locally. Yes, there are some steep ascents locally, but they arenít nearly as long as the oneís Iíve elected to ascend via my hilly century rides. But the time has come to order that 24 tooth granny, as century riding weather will soon be upon me (as early as March 14[SUP]th[/SUP] last year, went up to 68įF that day, perfect century riding temperature and daylight was already significantly longer).
Our road tandem had a Truvativ Elita Triple (30/42/52) and a 9sp (12 - 27) cassette. Tandems aren't the best climbers because of the difficulty in getting out of the saddle. A 26T granny would have been an improvement but I figured as long as I was going through all the trouble why not a 24T. An FSA 24T has graced the inside position of our triple crankset for a couple of seasons. The rear cassette is unchanged. The 24/27 is more than enough to get up the steepest hills. A 24/32 IMO will require some super fine bike handling due to the extremely low forward speed from that low a gear. Or are you riding a tadpole trike? Mind you, our 24/27 is turning a 700C wheel so the resulting gear is even higher than if you used the same combination. If we can spin that, so can you.

I don't know where you are from but the "accepted" way of expressing gear ratio's in most of the free world is "gear inches". A lot of information was conveyed just by stating the chainwheel tooth count and the rear sprocket tooth count but to seal the deal you compute the gear inches and look like you really are a gearhead. The Sheldon Brown calculator can help. Nice post anyway.

H
Leisesturm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-13, 01:32 AM
  #18  
ThermionicScott 
Hammer and tongs
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 17,380

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1605 Post(s)
Putting a handkerchief under your helmet would be a good idea on those hot sunny days...
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply With Quote

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service