Do You Split Lanes?
#26
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,520
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1435 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
221 Posts
In addition, it sets a horrible precedent for children.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 1,771
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro 20, Trek 7000, old Huffy MTB, and a few others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In the city I live in, drivers get VERY annoyed when they see a bicycle riding in any lane. If that line is not the rightmost line, they go berserk. However illogical it may seem, it is nicer to ride in the lane for turning right (blocking cars wanting to turn right), then to move to the lane for going straight.
To the OP: No, I don't split traffic. The area I ride in has a high enough moving speed with a single lane in each direction. I'm not going to cause the same driver to pass me twice without good reason. They may have been slightly annoyed by any delay I caused them the first time they passed me. They will likely be more annoyed the second time. Besides, when traffic is most backed up at lights, it's caused by people coming from out of town for the summer attractions. I've seen people turn right or merge into the turn lane unexpectedly for me to be comfortable being next to them.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,606
Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 626 Post(s)
Liked 701 Times
in
418 Posts
I believe here in Seattle it's not legal, however I will on a rare occasion do it if cars are completely stopped with a long line and it's visibly safe for me to go on ahead at a slow speed to the right, assuming the middle/forward moving lane has no cars or moving slowly enough where I can be considered a vehicle. I want to give as little reasons to motorists to hate or want to run me over!
#29
Banned
I this dialogue is going in the wrong direction and probably not fit for BF, but your definition of "think for themselves" is very subjective.
There's really no difference between undergoing/not undergoing chemotherapy based on statistical data and running a red light or not based on statistical data. In both cases, there are huge data sets based on environmental conditions about what is a statistically a more successful course of action.
You'd probably listen to oncologist but run the red light based on your personal preferences and knowledge horizon.
However, statistically, you'd be wrong run the red light based on the statistical evidence that I posted (albeit in German, namely because they love statistics and efficiency and have some of the most fascinating databases to peruse.)
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 794
Bikes: Trek 7.3FX, Diamondback Edgewood hybrid, KHS Montana
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In most of the downtown areas where there are both bike lanes and right turn lanes here; the bike lane is removed and sharrows are placed on the through lane.
example approaching an interstate overpass w/access road:
example approaching an interstate overpass w/access road:
Last edited by FenderTL5; 02-21-13 at 11:34 AM.
#32
Banned
This is one of the nicest intersections I've ridden through in a while, based on the huge volume of traffic that goes through it.
https://maps.google.com/maps?q=frank...,+Germany&z=20
#33
Crawler
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Austin, Texas
Posts: 919
Bikes: 2010 Origin8 CX700, 2003 Cannondale Backroads Cross Country, 1997 Trek mtn steel frame converted commuter/tourer, 1983 Univega Sportour, 2010 Surly LHT, Others...
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
12 Posts
I think our new bike lanes that split motorist lanes, only at these unique intersections, might offer some sort of solution.
In the absence of these, it looks like pick your poison.
Hold the right hand turn lane from the middle of the lane, holding up auto traffic behind you.
Or.
Split the lanes responsibly, letting cars turn right and then getting ahead of any other traffic w/ the light change, after checking cross traffic out of sync with the light, of course.
Last edited by AusTexMurf; 02-22-13 at 11:40 AM.
#36
20+mph Commuter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greenville. SC USA
Posts: 7,520
Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1435 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
221 Posts
Since you are skillful at searching statistics, think you could separate (statistically speaking) what percentage of cyclists get hit running reds as opposed to cyclists getting hit crossing busy intersections that do not have any traffic lights to deal with?
My point here is not to be a smarta.. but to get people thinking about things they never experience while cycling because they blindly follow rules. OK, back to my point:
In the course of my commute I try to avoid intersections with traffic signals whenever possible. This causes me to cross those big streets and highways - sometimes six lanes across - without hope of ever getting a green light. So I must LOOK carefully for traffic in both directions, pay close attention, know my capabilities, know potential "invisible' hazards (like a speeding sports car "hiding" behind a bus), trust my bike is in good condition and the chain won't break under acceleration, then cross when possible.
When I run a red light, I still do all of that^^. The ONLY difference is some piece of furniture with colored lights is also present. There is absolutely no difference in technique for crossing a street with or without a traffic signal. Look both ways, cross when it is safe to do so. God, it is so easy.
So back to your statistics. Can you show that a lot of cyclists get clobberd running red lights because more cyclists use intersections "protected" by lights? Perhaps intersections with lights are somehow more dangerous to cross than a large, busy intersection with only a stop sign? Are people more cautious when they are not "protected" by traffic signals? Are the cyclists getting hit drunk or somehow mentally compromised? Are they thinking about crossing the street or something else? It's hard to ask a dead cyclist what they were thinking about for your statistics isn't it?
All we really know based on your existing statistics is the fact that a significant number of cyclists are getting maimed crossing busy intersections without exhibiting due care. If they were running the red properly, they would not ride into the path of a speeding car, regardless of a piece of lighted furniture being present, would they?
I know "zee rules are zee rules" in your community, so perhaps I should have left it at "Free your mind and the rest will follow" in my first post.
Last edited by JoeyBike; 02-21-13 at 12:01 PM.
#37
Banned
#38
Banned
CHP gave me a ticket doing that in rush hour, 4 lane parking lot.. they had a motorcycle too.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Austin, Texas
Posts: 919
Bikes: 2010 Origin8 CX700, 2003 Cannondale Backroads Cross Country, 1997 Trek mtn steel frame converted commuter/tourer, 1983 Univega Sportour, 2010 Surly LHT, Others...
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
12 Posts
I like all of your different perspectives. Lively thread.
Thanks, folks.
One thing everyone seems to agree on, possibly.
Don't hug the curb, naively setting yourself up for the Right Hook, at least in the US.
Ride. Lots. Be Safe. Have Fun.
Thanks, folks.
One thing everyone seems to agree on, possibly.
Don't hug the curb, naively setting yourself up for the Right Hook, at least in the US.
Ride. Lots. Be Safe. Have Fun.
Last edited by AusTexMurf; 02-21-13 at 12:18 PM.
#40
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 217 Times
in
131 Posts
I this dialogue is going in the wrong direction and probably not fit for BF, but your definition of "think for themselves" is very subjective.
There's really no difference between undergoing/not undergoing chemotherapy based on statistical data and running a red light or not based on statistical data. In both cases, there are huge data sets based on environmental conditions about what is a statistically a more successful course of action.
You'd probably listen to oncologist but run the red light based on your personal preferences and knowledge horizon.
However, statistically, you'd be wrong run the red light based on the statistical evidence that I posted (albeit in German, namely because they love statistics and efficiency and have some of the most fascinating databases to peruse.)
When I run red lights, I always make sure I'm safe, as well as other drivers are not inconvenienced by me (I can move fast in front of a car, without making the driver slow down, but he doesn't know that and jumping like that would make people scared, panic - so I never do that). When there's no traffic, I run red lights. I also totally disregard all the other traffic regulations, since they are a complete nonsense where I come from. You can double speed limit and be totally safe in many places (they forget to remove signs after constructions, so you have a motorway that says 20 km/h?!?).
I rely on my eyes and brain in order to bee safe. Rules are not carved in stone.
I let them be annoyed. I'm not concerned about being nice, I'm concerned about being safe. If I'm not in the straight through lane, it's a reasonable assumption for people to think I'm turning right. That puts me at risk. When I"m in the straight lane, there should be no confusion about my intention.
To the OP: No, I don't split traffic. The area I ride in has a high enough moving speed with a single lane in each direction. I'm not going to cause the same driver to pass me twice without good reason. They may have been slightly annoyed by any delay I caused them the first time they passed me. They will likely be more annoyed the second time. Besides, when traffic is most backed up at lights, it's caused by people coming from out of town for the summer attractions. I've seen people turn right or merge into the turn lane unexpectedly for me to be comfortable being next to them.
To the OP: No, I don't split traffic. The area I ride in has a high enough moving speed with a single lane in each direction. I'm not going to cause the same driver to pass me twice without good reason. They may have been slightly annoyed by any delay I caused them the first time they passed me. They will likely be more annoyed the second time. Besides, when traffic is most backed up at lights, it's caused by people coming from out of town for the summer attractions. I've seen people turn right or merge into the turn lane unexpectedly for me to be comfortable being next to them.
Making drivers annoyed can result in being run off the road, or beaten. So not a good thing.
#41
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,415
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6243 Post(s)
Liked 4,262 Times
in
2,387 Posts
There are two ways to get right hooked. One is for the car to pass you and turn in front of you. The other is to be passing a line of cars on the right and have one of them turn right in front of you. There's not much you can do, other than be aware of your surroundings in the former. You have complete control in the latter case.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2953 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Yes, I do where it makes sense. I try to ride as safely, efficiently, predictably, and legally as I am able. In that order.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Austin, Texas
Posts: 919
Bikes: 2010 Origin8 CX700, 2003 Cannondale Backroads Cross Country, 1997 Trek mtn steel frame converted commuter/tourer, 1983 Univega Sportour, 2010 Surly LHT, Others...
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
12 Posts
There are two ways to get right hooked. One is for the car to pass you and turn in front of you. The other is to be passing a line of cars on the right and have one of them turn right in front of you. There's not much you can do, other than be aware of your surroundings in the former. You have complete control in the latter case.
Guess we need to call it something else for our European counterparts, though. Or maybe they already do.
Acidfast ?
Last edited by AusTexMurf; 02-21-13 at 01:14 PM.
#44
SERENITY NOW!!!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In the 212
Posts: 8,738
Bikes: Haro Vector, IRO Rob Roy, Bianchi Veloce
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I split lanes all the time. Otherwise, I'd never get anywhere.
__________________
HHCMF - Take pride in your ability to amaze lesser mortals! - MikeR
We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!
HHCMF - Take pride in your ability to amaze lesser mortals! - MikeR
We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!
#45
Banned
It's not impossible though I've seen it almost happen once in a residential area.
Just call it "Scheiße!"
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Austin, Texas
Posts: 919
Bikes: 2010 Origin8 CX700, 2003 Cannondale Backroads Cross Country, 1997 Trek mtn steel frame converted commuter/tourer, 1983 Univega Sportour, 2010 Surly LHT, Others...
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
12 Posts
It's pretty rare as most urban areas have a segregated lane with parked cars/fence in between the street and bike lane. In addition, they use separate signals. Most rural areas have a separated bike path almost like an MUP. Riding on the a busy street is somewhat uncommon in cities and the Autobahn and train tracks don't do level crossings. So, a "right hook" is almost prevented by design.
It's not impossible though I've seen it almost happen once in a residential area.
Just call it "Scheiße!"
It's not impossible though I've seen it almost happen once in a residential area.
Just call it "Scheiße!"
This greatly decreases the chance of a right hook from turning traffic.
I agree.
And many areas in the US are creating separate MUP type paths in less developed areas between towns. The first ones that I remember using were in Colorado in the 90's.
Last edited by AusTexMurf; 02-22-13 at 11:42 AM.
#47
Banned
Yeah, but the Dutch are upset because they used it first.
Also, the Copenhagen-style bicycle "Superhighways" have been in use in the Netherlands for quite a while now.
I just think the Danish are much better at marketing (among other things.)
Also, you guys have to really got to change the name of that "veloway."
:/
Also, the Copenhagen-style bicycle "Superhighways" have been in use in the Netherlands for quite a while now.
I just think the Danish are much better at marketing (among other things.)
Also, you guys have to really got to change the name of that "veloway."
:/
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 705
Bikes: Bianchi circa late 1980s, Surly Cross Check, Kona Blast
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
..I don't ever run red lights though.
#49
Banned
Also, people really take the "Don't do it because the kids are watching signs" signs very seriously as most kids over 7-8 walk/ride to school on their own.
Last edited by acidfast7; 02-21-13 at 01:22 PM.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: South Austin, Texas
Posts: 919
Bikes: 2010 Origin8 CX700, 2003 Cannondale Backroads Cross Country, 1997 Trek mtn steel frame converted commuter/tourer, 1983 Univega Sportour, 2010 Surly LHT, Others...
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
12 Posts
Way different levels of pedestrian predictability and responsibility compared to German/Austrian/Dutch/Swiss/Scandanavian cultures.......
Last edited by AusTexMurf; 02-21-13 at 01:25 PM.