Encounter with LA Sheriff on my commute to work.
#77
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 38
Bikes: Ibis Mojo SL; De Rosa Giro de Italia; We the People Trust; All City Big Block; Genesis Croix de Fer; Ritchey Road Logic 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In Oregon I not only have a legal right to a full sharrowed lane but a full legal right to the entire lane if I am moving at "the normal speed of traffic". On 95% of my commute you will find me in the vehicle lane on the left side.
I have absolutely no problem with "holding motorists back" when I am exercising my legal right of way at normal traffic speeds.
I always ride like I am at the top of the food chain.
Completely irrelevant. Google "shared roadway marking MUTCD".
I have absolutely no problem with "holding motorists back" when I am exercising my legal right of way at normal traffic speeds.
I always ride like I am at the top of the food chain.
Completely irrelevant. Google "shared roadway marking MUTCD".
I've read and re-read the notes about sharrows & have not changed my opinion that they're only a heads-up guideline and not really a yield to bikes indicator for motorists. Apparently I'm in a vast minority with my interpretation of this rule. I still feel that when possible one should be to the right and out of the way, but that you're also allowed to temporarily take the lane as road conditions necessitate, returning to the out of the way position when safe to do so. That's how I interpret the rule, that the stay to the right applies in all situations but that the sharrow signals to motorists that a cycle may come into the lane temporarily.
I think it's irritating when I'm overtaking another cyclist who's way out on the left part of the lane, over the sharrow, or even to the left of it. To overtake this rider one must either go out even farther left, a potentially unsafe pass on the right, or roll up behind and ask them to move over & see if they actually do. Often I'll just roll by quietly on the right since they've left me like 10 feet of space there.
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hawthorne NJ
Posts: 377
Bikes: Surly LHT, Wabi Special, All City Big Block, 1933 Iver Johnson Mobicycle, Giant TCR Advanced
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#80
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
...
I've read and re-read the notes about sharrows & have not changed my opinion that they're only a heads-up guideline and not really a yield to bikes indicator for motorists. Apparently I'm in a vast minority with my interpretation of this rule. I still feel that when possible one should be to the right and out of the way, but that you're also allowed to temporarily take the lane as road conditions necessitate, returning to the out of the way position when safe to do so....
I've read and re-read the notes about sharrows & have not changed my opinion that they're only a heads-up guideline and not really a yield to bikes indicator for motorists. Apparently I'm in a vast minority with my interpretation of this rule. I still feel that when possible one should be to the right and out of the way, but that you're also allowed to temporarily take the lane as road conditions necessitate, returning to the out of the way position when safe to do so....
The overtaking vehicle must always pass at a safe distance, and the overtaken vehicle gives way to the right. This is regardless of whether either vehicle is a bike or motor vehicle.
All FRAP laws basically state that the bike should stay as close as is practicable to the right side, whenever it is safe to do so, so you're spot on about that. The question arises, when is it unsafe to stay right? Vehicular Cycling advocates will typically take the full lane whenever the lane is too narrow for two vehicles, OR when there are periodic obstructions in the lane, reasoning that weaving around obstructions is more dangerous than is the more frequent interaction with faster traffic. They have a pretty good point with that, although personally when I'm slower than other traffic I'll stay to the right side even when "taking the lane" for appearances sake. Out just far enough that they still have to at least partially change lanes to get around me that is.
#81
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 38
Bikes: Ibis Mojo SL; De Rosa Giro de Italia; We the People Trust; All City Big Block; Genesis Croix de Fer; Ritchey Road Logic 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't care about sharrows, but there is no hierarchy of vehicles with respect to right of way.
The overtaking vehicle must always pass at a safe distance, and the overtaken vehicle gives way to the right. This is regardless of whether either vehicle is a bike or motor vehicle.
All FRAP laws basically state that the bike should stay as close as is practicable to the right side, whenever it is safe to do so, so you're spot on about that. The question arises, when is it unsafe to stay right? Vehicular Cycling advocates will typically take the full lane whenever the lane is too narrow for two vehicles, OR when there are periodic obstructions in the lane, reasoning that weaving around obstructions is more dangerous than is the more frequent interaction with faster traffic. They have a pretty good point with that, although personally when I'm slower than other traffic I'll stay to the right side even when "taking the lane" for appearances sake. Out just far enough that they still have to at least partially change lanes to get around me that is.
The overtaking vehicle must always pass at a safe distance, and the overtaken vehicle gives way to the right. This is regardless of whether either vehicle is a bike or motor vehicle.
All FRAP laws basically state that the bike should stay as close as is practicable to the right side, whenever it is safe to do so, so you're spot on about that. The question arises, when is it unsafe to stay right? Vehicular Cycling advocates will typically take the full lane whenever the lane is too narrow for two vehicles, OR when there are periodic obstructions in the lane, reasoning that weaving around obstructions is more dangerous than is the more frequent interaction with faster traffic. They have a pretty good point with that, although personally when I'm slower than other traffic I'll stay to the right side even when "taking the lane" for appearances sake. Out just far enough that they still have to at least partially change lanes to get around me that is.
#82
Senior Member
I can understand a regular patrol deputy not being familiar with sharrows but there's no excuse for a deputy assigned to traffic.
We have the same problem with the new SDSO sergeant in Leucadia. They've cited at least one person for riding on the sharrows.
We have the same problem with the new SDSO sergeant in Leucadia. They've cited at least one person for riding on the sharrows.
#84
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,788
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
paulypro, alan s : you two are SOOO wrong, it's just unfortunate that the LEGION on people here on this thread who have corrected you had no impact. I won't waste a pile of keystrokes to reiterate their good points. I will only say this: in matters of law and rights in society, YOUR OPINIONS AND FEELINGS DO NOT MATTER. WHAT YOU "THINK" IS MEANINGLESS. READ, LEARN, EDUCATE YOURSELF, *KNOW* THE STUFF. Knowledge trumps opinion EVERY TIME.
#85
Eric C.
Vehicular Cycling advocates will typically take the full lane whenever the lane is too narrow for two vehicles, OR when there are periodic obstructions in the lane, reasoning that weaving around obstructions is more dangerous than is the more frequent interaction with faster traffic. They have a pretty good point with that...
#86
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 38
Bikes: Ibis Mojo SL; De Rosa Giro de Italia; We the People Trust; All City Big Block; Genesis Croix de Fer; Ritchey Road Logic 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
paulypro, alan s : you two are SOOO wrong, it's just unfortunate that the LEGION on people here on this thread who have corrected you had no impact. I won't waste a pile of keystrokes to reiterate their good points. I will only say this: in matters of law and rights in society, YOUR OPINIONS AND FEELINGS DO NOT MATTER. WHAT YOU "THINK" IS MEANINGLESS. READ, LEARN, EDUCATE YOURSELF, *KNOW* THE STUFF. Knowledge trumps opinion EVERY TIME.
Silly little bike arrows on the roads.... What percentage of non-cycling motorists do we think are educated about the intent of sharrows? I'll estimate off the cuff that this figure is well below 20% nationally and probably around a more pathetic 7% really. Do we want to put our life in the hands of their understanding that this symbol means you own the road?
As I've said, knock yourselves out but I'm not going to be surprised if you end up getting harassed for sharrow abuse
#87
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 600
Bikes: All-City Space Horse!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the pep talk. I 'know' that the rules surrounding the sharrows are vague & easily abused. Can't say I stand corrected as I've not changed my view on the matter & have not been convinced by others' opinions which are also just that, even if in an overwhelming majority here. In fact reading up on the official guidelines has only reaffirmed how I've interpreted the rules.
Silly little bike arrows on the roads.... What percentage of non-cycling motorists do we think are educated about the intent of sharrows? I'll estimate off the cuff that this figure is well below 20% nationally and probably around a more pathetic 7% really. Do we want to put our life in the hands of their understanding that this symbol means you own the road?
As I've said, knock yourselves out but I'm not going to be surprised if you end up getting harassed for sharrow abuse
Silly little bike arrows on the roads.... What percentage of non-cycling motorists do we think are educated about the intent of sharrows? I'll estimate off the cuff that this figure is well below 20% nationally and probably around a more pathetic 7% really. Do we want to put our life in the hands of their understanding that this symbol means you own the road?
As I've said, knock yourselves out but I'm not going to be surprised if you end up getting harassed for sharrow abuse
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,067
Bikes: 84 Pinarello Trevisio, 86 Guerciotti SLX, 96 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2010 Surly Cross Check, 88 Centurion Prestige, 73 Raleigh Sports, GT Force, Bridgestone MB4
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 278 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
56 Posts
The whole point is to allow the cyclist to take command of a lane like any vehicle when needed rather than being crowded off into the curb. Obviously common sense would have the cyclist be courteous and allow cars to pass by riding to the right, as much as practical and safe, but in this case, the cyclist was doing nothing wrong. The cop is the typical bully. And LEs wonder why they get no community support or votes for raises.
LC
LC
#89
Senior Member
I respect your opinions, but disagree. No one but a few zealots think that arrows showing which direction bikes are supposed ride really mean bikes should ride over them. Maybe a different symbol would communicate your desired goal, whatever that is.
#90
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 600
Bikes: All-City Space Horse!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
- Alert motorists of the lateral location bicyclists are likely to occupy within the traveled way
They are literally used to show motorists where to expect cyclist to be riding. And to show cyclists where to ride to avoid door hazards. That is why they are required to be painted X number of feet out in the lane and past parking. If they were just to show the direction of travel, then there would be no reason to have them required to be out a certain number of feet from parked cars and the curb. But I guess I'm a zealot.
https://ladotbikeblog.wordpress.com/2...rows-are-good/
Also from LADOT:
- Sharrows be implemented no less than 12 feet from the curb. Beyond this minimum distance, however, Sharrows should also be aligned in a way that creates a straight line of travel for bicyclists. This helps ensure a bicyclist doesn’t weave as street widths change, making them safer and ensuring drivers will be able to react to bicyclists more predictably.
Last edited by weshigh; 07-25-13 at 07:40 PM. Reason: added LADOT info
#91
I don't get out enough
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: las vegas
Posts: 270
Bikes: Gary Fisher Marlin, Bike E rx, Diamondback Centurion Expert TG, early 80's steel bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How is it vague? Even the Sheriff's Office corrected themselves. The ordinance was even posted here. We're just keep pointing out that the law says the OP was following the law.
#92
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: North County San Diego
Posts: 1,664
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You mean they're citing people for riding the full lane with the sharrows?
#93
Senior Member
I don't need or want the government telling me how to ride my bike. I am a far greater expert in the matter than they will ever be.
#94
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 600
Bikes: All-City Space Horse!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thats fine, and you don't have to follow the suggestion, but you said only zealots think that. LADOT is for sure not a zealot when it comes to bike lane positioning.
#95
Senior Member
#96
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 38
Bikes: Ibis Mojo SL; De Rosa Giro de Italia; We the People Trust; All City Big Block; Genesis Croix de Fer; Ritchey Road Logic 2.0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#98
Super-spreader
That cop is a complete moron! I can't believe there is actually a "debate" going on here.
#99
Cycle Year Round
He is the first person I know of that has claimed sharrows are ONLY direction indicators. A clear clue he has never looked at the history of sharrows and is just flinging BS here.
__________________
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
Land of the Free, Because of the Brave.
#100
Eric C.
At this point paulypro and alan s are being so contrary in the face of obvious facts that I'm going to guess they're enjoying acting the troll. Don't feed the trolls people.