![]() |
It doesn't matter
All of the information here is good, but whichever way you go, it doesn't matter much. Not only that, it's not a permanent decision. You can switch any time you want.
|
Either is OK, but just be sure to use the right chain lube! You're in for real trouble using the wrong stuff :)
Seriously, it makes little difference, if the wheels you have use presta then use presta, if they're sized for schraders use schraders. |
depending on the pressures needed an air nozzle used to blow dust and a rubber hose work well to fill a presta valve if one doesn't need high pressures. This is how I cheat when I take the 29er down to the tire store for a quick fill up.
|
The Presta valve was designed for narrower bicycle rims where drilling a larger hole would reduce rim strength and because they are also easier to fill with a hand pump, especially those frame pumps of yesteryear. They are also immune to contamination from dirt and this is why Shrader valves needs caps, Presta valves only need them for storage to keep the point of the valve screw from puncturing the tube.
There is less resistance at the valve stem with a presta and this can be tested by trying to blow up a presta tube by mouth and then trying to blow up a Shrader. From a functional point of view they both work equally well on bicycles, everywhere else in the world Shrader valves are used on everything where high pressures are required... like compressors and jet airplane tyres. I run them both depending on the wheels and carry the appropriate pump... if the bike runs Shrader valves I also carry a modern pump which makes filling them easier |
Originally Posted by noglider
(Post 16967311)
All of the information here is good, but whichever way you go, it doesn't matter much. Not only that, it's not a permanent decision. You can switch any time you want.
|
Ditto "Appropriate Pump"
Bike with P/V tubes has a P/V pump, on it , likewise the opposite way around, if tubes on bike are S/V.. |
Originally Posted by Roopull
(Post 16965108)
If you're commuting, sealant in your tubes is a must.
|
Originally Posted by MattFoley
(Post 16967582)
Dang, and after all those years commuting on unsealed 23c road tires with no problems, I now realize I've been doing it wrong :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Sixty Fiver
(Post 16967432)
There is less resistance at the valve stem with a presta and this can be tested by trying to blow up a presta tube by mouth and then trying to blow up a Shrader.
|
Originally Posted by noglider
(Post 16967782)
How is this a valid comparison? A spring holds a Schrader valve closed. Is it even possible to inflate a Schrader tube by mouth?
|
Watched a guy blow out a side wall of an 10 year old MTB tire using a compressor on a Schrader valved tube. Scared the jeepers out of both of us, then the humor of it set in. He had his own pump the next time we met. Not sure the need for Schrader valves on a any bike tire. Get a little sand in one when you pump it up and the valve core is almost always ruined, in my case anyway. I was raised using Presta and all of the pumps at my home and on my bikes are set up for them. They are available at just about anywhere I buy cycling supplies.
|
Originally Posted by Roopull
(Post 16965108)
The bad side of Prestas for commuting or long distance riding is the fact that every automobile air pump/compressor in the US is Schrader. As other have pointed out, if you don't have an adapter or your own pump, and you get a flat, you're just out of luck.
Originally Posted by Roopull
(Post 16965108)
If you're commuting, sealant in your tubes is a must. Cycle snobs will bash you for using it, but I've been riding on Slime for years & have yet to have a flat with the stuff in my tubes.
|
OMG! Presta, without a doubt! They are so much more streamlined, lightweight, and aerodynamic. It's like the difference between carbon fiber and hi-tensile steel. Swear to God, as soon as I switched to Presta valves I knocked 30 mins. off my commute.
|
Originally Posted by Rootman
(Post 16967319)
Either is OK, but just be sure to use the right chain lube! You're in for real trouble using the wrong stuff :)
|
Originally Posted by Roopull
(Post 16967710)
Thanks for confirming what I said directly after the line you quoted.
|
Originally Posted by Roopull
(Post 16965108)
Another bad thing about Prestas is that it's difficult to put tube sealants in them. If you're commuting, sealant in your tubes is a must. Cycle snobs will bash you for using it, but I've been riding on Slime for years & have yet to have a flat with the stuff in my tubes.
|
Presta tubes and Mr Tuffy liners for me.
|
Originally Posted by wolfchild
(Post 16967995)
Could you explain what you mean by the "right chain lube"
|
Originally Posted by Roopull
(Post 16965108)
If you're commuting, sealant in your tubes is a must.
If I got another bike with Slime in the tubes, I wouldn't ride it a foot without replacing the tubes with ones without that horrible cr4p in them. |
Originally Posted by mrblue
(Post 16967983)
OMG! Presta, without a doubt! They are so much more streamlined, lightweight, and aerodynamic. It's like the difference between carbon fiber and hi-tensile steel. Swear to God, as soon as I switched to Presta valves I knocked 30 mins. off my commute.
Yeah, OK, sure, I suppose the without a doubt essential carbon fiber knocked another 30 minutes off your commute and you get to work before you even leave home. |
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
(Post 16968669)
30 minutes off your commute, eh, Swear to God? :rolleyes:
Yeah, OK, sure, I suppose the without a doubt essential carbon fiber knocked another 30 minutes off your commute and you get to work before you even leave home. |
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
(Post 16968669)
30 minutes off your commute, eh, Swear to God? :rolleyes:
Yeah, OK, sure, I suppose the without a doubt essential carbon fiber knocked another 30 minutes off your commute and you get to work before you even leave home. |
Originally Posted by Roopull
(Post 16965108)
...If you're commuting, sealant in your tubes is a must.
Cycle snobs will bash you for using it... You can try and characterize me as a bike snob for disagreeing, but you'll have a hard time making it stick, as I ride a very Fredly, low-end, old mountain bike that has been converted for city riding and do it in a goofy mix of clothes. Once I switched to tires with good flat protection, I have had almost no problems with flats. One puncture and one slow leak in the past year and half/4500 miles. With that level of rarity for flats, I'd never consider messing around with sealant, much less a "must". As far as the original question goes, I'm slowly converting our fleet over to Schrader. I have to top off my Airzoundz horn every couple of days and it uses a Schrader valve, so I'd prefer to not be messing around with putting the adapters on and off the tires or messing around with the guts of the pump head of the floor pump I have everyday. I also just prefer Schrader, partially because it seems quicker and easier to not be messing around with unscrewing the valve to air up, or with the retaining nut when changing a tube. With Schrader, you also don't have to worry about ending up with a goofy looking freakishly long valve, had an LBS hand me a couple of these one time and I didn't notice until I went to mount one of them later. I still always put an adapter into my patch kits so that I have one with me, whether it is for myself or someone else. I've only used a gas station pump twice that I can recall in the past three years, but when you need it, you need it. Unfortunately, a lot of times, the gas station pumps fitting at the end of it has been ran over so many times it is hard to get a seal, adapter or no. |
No Dunlop valve fans?
|
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
(Post 16969217)
No Dunlop valve fans?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:32 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.