![]() |
Purpose of shorts chamois
Is the chamois for padding or sweat absorption?
|
it keeps your "arss" from being abraded. It also provides some padding. I suppose it absorbs all kinds of things. Thats why you need to wash your shorts before they become a science project.
|
Originally Posted by RISKDR1
(Post 17180516)
it keeps your "arss" from being abraded. It also provides some padding. I suppose it absorbs all kinds of things. Thats why you need to wash your shorts before they become a science project.
|
Originally Posted by jrickards
(Post 17180507)
Is the chamois for padding or sweat absorption?
|
& to do so It doesn't have to be a thick pad . thin without seams is sufficient.
|
Originally Posted by jrickards
(Post 17180507)
Is the chamois for padding or sweat absorption?
|
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 17180803)
Sweat absorption was the original purpose.
If the padding adds comfort for you, that's fine, but if you need it, then you'll need padded shorts every time you ride, no? Remember that you can condition your butt, with practice, to require little or no padding in your shorts OR on your saddle. |
Dang! Wish I had known what it was for. All this time I've been wearing mine as a muzzle.
|
Originally Posted by cycle_maven
(Post 17180887)
Dang! Wish I had known what it was for. All this time I've been wearing mine as a muzzle.
|
Originally Posted by noglider
(Post 17180879)
Yes! It's a good thing you asked. Nowadays, people want padding. Seems to me that it makes more sense to put padding in the seat if you need it. It also seems to me that the market demands padded shorts because so many misconstrued what the chamois was there for in the first place.
If the padding adds comfort for you, that's fine, but if you need it, then you'll need padded shorts every time you ride, no? Remember that you can condition your butt, with practice, to require little or no padding in your shorts OR on your saddle. Given that the sweat produced in the region is primarily central, I wonder why manufacturers haven't produced any that are similar in shape to some women's menstrual pads. Without "padding" for seasoned butts, chamois "with wings" may be sufficient for people who only need sweat absorption. |
Originally Posted by bbbean
(Post 17180844)
Both, but mainly to keep your butt dry.
I wear the padding for comfort on long rides. For less than about 10 miles I often just wear some thin shorts. |
Contrary to popular belief, it's there primarily to keep bulging to a minimum. Sort of smooths out the package, if you know what I mean.
|
Wipe down your bike after a sweaty ride for a streak free shine?....:)
Remember,original cycling shorts were wool..... |
Originally Posted by Walter S
(Post 17180959)
Not good for that purpose. The pad absorbs your sweat and then sits there wet with sweat right against your skin. Not very dry. Thin quick drying fabric would keep your butt dryer than a pad will.
I wear the padding for comfort on long rides. For less than about 10 miles I often just wear some thin shorts. |
Originally Posted by alan s
(Post 17180973)
Contrary to popular belief, it's there primarily to keep bulging to a minimum. Sort of smooths out the package, if you know what I mean.
|
Originally Posted by bbbean
(Post 17181159)
You think people have a probolem with butt bulge (where most of the padding is)?
|
Originally Posted by Walter S
(Post 17180959)
Not good for that purpose. The pad absorbs your sweat and then sits there wet with sweat right against your skin. Not very dry. Thin quick drying fabric would keep your butt dryer than a pad will.
|
Originally Posted by bbbean
(Post 17180844)
Both, but mainly to keep your butt dry. FWIW, modern "chamois" is greatly superior to the actual chamois we used to use when I first started riding back in the 70s. I recently found an old pair of bike shorts from the early 80s and wore them on the trainer for an hour. While they were still more comfortable than wearing normal street shorts with underwear, the differences between them and my modern bibs were VERY noticeable.
Chamois leather - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Don't need no padded shorts to ride recumbent bikes.) |
Originally Posted by bbbean
(Post 17181158)
If your chamois aren't keeping your butt dry, you need new chamois!
|
Originally Posted by jrickards
(Post 17180935)
Given that the sweat produced in the region is primarily central, I wonder why manufacturers haven't produced any that are similar in shape to some women's menstrual pads.
|
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 17180803)
Sweat absorption was the original purpose.
|
Originally Posted by Thulsadoom
(Post 17183375)
I thought that the original purpose of a chamois was to cut down on the amount of chaffing from the old wool shorts.
I agree with Alan that it's there to smooth out the area, but we're not talking about hiding your genitals. The point is that there are no bulky seams between your body and the saddle. More important, I think, the chamois provides a non-slip layer between the outer clothing and the body, so there is no chafing on the skin. If there's any rubbing, it's between the outer clothing and the saddle. You should be able to wear a hole through your shorts without getting saddle sores. I can't believe this thread is in the commuting forum. Does anyone really commute on a chamois? |
Originally Posted by rhm
(Post 17183396)
I can't believe this thread is in the commuting forum. Does anyone really commute on a chamois?
My tights and winter garb has none. |
Yes, I commute in chamois. It is usually a 30+ mi RT, asymmetric.
|
Originally Posted by rhm
(Post 17183396)
I can't believe this thread is in the commuting forum. Does anyone really commute on a chamois?
|
Wow. Well, if that works for you, that's great. I'm a middle aged guy in cotton. I've tried shorts with a chamois and haven't found one that works for me. It has nothing to do with the distance; I regularly ride 100+ miles in 'street clothes' with cotton briefs.
|
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
(Post 17180803)
Sweat absorption was the original purpose.
Originally Posted by JanMM
(Post 17182819)
To clarify for the youngsters......"chamois" used to be chamois leather but as the leather got replaced by synthetic materials in bike shorts the chamois name stuck, which of course is a perversion of language but what can you do?
Chamois leather - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Chamois was originally... and is still used to prevent blisters. It doesn't matter whether you're rubbing your underwear clad gym short wearing bottom across a saddle.... or whether you're wearing gloves to protect your hands from hard labor... the soft chamois leather works perfectly as it sticks to (by soaking up the sweat) the skin. The layers of soft leather originally used in cycling shorts isolated the movement between the saddle and the skin in the loosely stitched layers of sheep skin (chamois). Think about it for a second. New cyclist don't complain about their bottoms sweating. They complain about getting the skin rubbed off the tender areas. Or if they're lucky about getting a sore bum. |
Originally Posted by Marcus_Ti
(Post 17182838)
...Or it is 40C and 95% humidity with a 27C dewpoint ;)
|
Originally Posted by rhm
(Post 17183657)
Wow. Well, if that works for you, that's great. I'm a middle aged guy in cotton. I've tried shorts with a chamois and haven't found one that works for me. It has nothing to do with the distance; I regularly ride 100+ miles in 'street clothes' with cotton briefs.
I find that cotton blend hiking shorts work very well, and my work uniform shorts are fairly good too. |
Originally Posted by rhm
(Post 17183657)
Wow. Well, if that works for you, that's great. I'm a middle aged guy in cotton. I've tried shorts with a chamois and haven't found one that works for me. It has nothing to do with the distance; I regularly ride 100+ miles in 'street clothes' with cotton briefs.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:42 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.