Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Miles Per "Gallon"?

Search
Notices
Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Miles Per "Gallon"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-05 | 07:50 AM
  #26  
darkmother's Avatar
Get the stick.
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,543
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, ON

Bikes: 12 Y.O. Litespeed MTB, IRO Jamie Roy fixie, Custom Habanero Ti 'Cross, No name SS MTB, Old school lugged steel track bike (soon)

Originally Posted by velogirl
I don't think that one would burn 1,000 calories biking 20 miles. But I like your concept.
I'm pretty sure I would, and then some. Depends how much you weigh, and how fast you ride.
darkmother is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-05 | 08:50 AM
  #27  
billh's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
From: St Louis, MO
Originally Posted by noisebeam
It is complicated by the fact that those calories you consume took oil to make and transport to you.

(unless you are a self sufficient farmer who only uses manual labor and no outside energy/food sources)

Al

I've heard that and I think it's not fair to account for oil for calories that cyclists consume and not oil for calories that motorists burn, eg. a motorist who goes to the gym to workout instead of commute. One would have to account for the oil for calories "above and beyond" what the average motorist burns in the course of their day. No one calculates mpg that way.
billh is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-05 | 10:23 AM
  #28  
cyccommute's Avatar
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,114
Likes: 6,149
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by billh
I've heard that and I think it's not fair to account for oil for calories that cyclists consume and not oil for calories that motorists burn, eg. a motorist who goes to the gym to workout instead of commute. One would have to account for the oil for calories "above and beyond" what the average motorist burns in the course of their day. No one calculates mpg that way.
Add to that the amount of oil that is consumed in distilling the oil, cracking it, catalyzing the formation of higher octane fuel and shipping it both to and from the refinery. All these steps are highly energy intensive and far higher than the fuel costs of shipping and growning food.

Another place were people don't account for the fuel needed to keep cars on the road is in the construction of the road itself, nor in the fuel used to protect the oil. Any consumption of oil derived or supported products by cyclists becomes vanishingly small in comparison.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline  
Reply
Old 04-11-05 | 10:46 AM
  #29  
JohnBrooking's Avatar
Commuter
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 0
From: Southern Maine

Bikes: 2006 Giant Cypress EX (7-speed internal hub)

Originally Posted by cyccommute
Add to that the amount of oil that is consumed in distilling the oil, cracking it, catalyzing the formation of higher octane fuel and shipping it both to and from the refinery. All these steps are highly energy intensive and far higher than the fuel costs of shipping and growning food.
I also read somewhere that long before we have completely extracted all the oil that we know is still in the ground, we will reach the point where it will take more energy to extract it than we will get from, so it won't even be economically feasible anymore.
JohnBrooking is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.