Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Commuting
Reload this Page >

Tires: Width and patterns

Commuting Bicycle commuting is easier than you think, before you know it, you'll be hooked. Learn the tips, hints, equipment, safety requirements for safely riding your bike to work.

Tires: Width and patterns

Old 02-10-15, 02:00 PM
  #1  
Santaria
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Santaria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brownsville, TX
Posts: 2,174

Bikes: Surly CC

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tires: Width and patterns

I'm trying something a little different.

Rider: 6', 250 lbs.
Bike: Surly CC (stock complete).
Tires: Surly Knards (41c)

I'm using the bike as my all-purpose steed at the moment. During the week she is my commuter, and on that commute I generally attempt to keep above 12-13 mph average over the 6 mile trip (each way). I also use the bike to do varied-terrain riding at 50 mile distances on average. Up until this coming weekend, that mileage has been exclusively on roads. I have ridden in a supported group ride (50 miler) on the tires and can say that while I love them - they're just worthless as a road tire. So I'm looking at setting myself up with a better day-to-day tire and putting them on reserve for truly epic caliche trail days. I've ridden a variety of road and CX tires but I'm not sure where that sweet spot is, nor am I an expert on which tire has made the difference in my ride.

I'm looking at a couple sets of tires:

1.Clement LAS
2.Continental Travel Contact
3.Panaracer Tourguard Plus

I don't think I want to go below a 32c; I've ridden Fyxation Session 700s in 28 and they were okay - but the contact patch was iffy with some of the silt/sand road conditions I sometimes encounter. I've ridden the Clement LAS before and was happy with it, but am not sure if it is a great tire, or if I'm just not familiar with what a great tire should feel like. I'm thinking anywhere between a 32-35c gives me a quality commuter tire that I can still do group rides on, right? I think anything in the 40+c range is going to be just too much tire.

I have heard great things about Gatorskins, but then I've heard they're harder than bricks and roll like turds, so I haven't considered them up to this point.

So what are your suggestions? I assume I'm right in my feelings about my Knards being great tires, just being used with the entirely wrong application.
Santaria is offline  
Old 02-10-15, 02:16 PM
  #2  
NormanF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,734
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My tires are Michelin City Pilot 35c - which is the largest size that can fit under fenders.

No problems with them to date.
NormanF is offline  
Old 02-10-15, 02:19 PM
  #3  
MRT2
Senior Member
 
MRT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 5,875

Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast, 1997 Bianchi Advantage, 1994 Trek 930.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 828 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
I have been using Panaracer Ribmo 32c for the last 2 1/2 years on my Salsa Casseroll. Just replaced the back one and moved the front tire to the back. It has been more than decent and I could easily see someone using them for a mix of commuting and recreational riding.

I hear great things about Schwalbe Marathon Supreme, but they are expensive. Maybe next year, I might switch to those just to change things up.
MRT2 is offline  
Old 02-10-15, 03:54 PM
  #4  
mconlonx 
Str*t*gic *quivoc*tor
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,563
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6843 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 14 Posts
I've always liked Panaracer T-Serv as a nice compromise between weight, performance, and flat protection. But for my regular commute where I want a bit more flat protection at the expense of weight and a bit of performance, I've been using RiBMo for a few years now.
__________________
I know next to nothing. I am frequently wrong.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 02-10-15, 05:21 PM
  #5  
ThermionicScott 
hungry
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 18,295

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)

Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1961 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times in 35 Posts
A buddy of mine had 44-622 Specialized Borough XC's like this on his Cross-Check, which I borrowed for a while. They felt surprisingly fast for their size and weight: Specialized Bicycle Components



(I guess if I could read I would have noticed you didn't want tires this big. But eh, I still liked them. )
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp View Post
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498

Last edited by ThermionicScott; 02-10-15 at 05:27 PM.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 02-10-15, 08:06 PM
  #6  
AlTheKiller
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Napa, California
Posts: 471
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Width ain't everything. As long as the engine is up to snuff there's no reason a slick 40 couldn't serve you well on many group rides. It's more about the tread/rubber/build for on road speed. There are slick, lightweight 35-40 size tires that will absolutely outperform a 32 cyclocross tire, because of their lack of tread.
Hell, I have smooth 2.35" wide tires which seem to roll easier than a knobby cyclocross tire.

I'd go more volume and less tread for on road, where reasonable. Every time. But I really like some knob if I'm doing spirited off roading (you can limp wrist it off road with just a slick tire most of the time). Might need two sets of tires and need to get fast at switching them out
AlTheKiller is offline  
Old 02-11-15, 11:24 AM
  #7  
Leebo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 5,412

Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 738 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Knards, too knobby for pave. I'm on my second set of panaracer passella tourguards, 700 x35. Work well , roll nicely. Reasonably light.
Leebo is offline  
Old 02-11-15, 04:44 PM
  #8  
Mr Pink57
Did I catch a niner?
 
Mr Pink57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: a van down by the river
Posts: 542

Bikes: Vassago Fisticuff/Surly Ogre/Surly Pugsley/Surly Pugsley 29+

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Take it from someone about your dimensions on a frame that accommodate very large 700c tires. The fenders are going to be the most annoying part of it all. On larger tires you need a larger fender and I've found they do not come in small increments of width.

If I was going larger I would look at the Little Big Ben it's a nice tire rolls smooth and has grip on some dirt.

In all my years of doing gravel races and just rides I have used Pasela's and now T-Servs. The grip is fine for this and they have a semi nice soft plush feel, plus smooth on road sections.
Mr Pink57 is offline  
Old 02-12-15, 03:55 AM
  #9  
seldomsean
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: vagabond
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hope I'm not hijacking the thread. I have a bike being sent to me that comes with 700x25 tires and can take up to 28s with a fender (32 or 35 without). My question: is there a significant difference between 25s and 28s? Enough difference to justify spending money on a set of tires?
seldomsean is offline  
Old 02-12-15, 10:00 AM
  #10  
MichaelW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,952
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For everyday commuting I use Schwalbe Marathon, not Plus or Supreme.
I find 32mm is fine for roads, trails, loads.


25/28mm:
28mm tyres are a good option on a road bike for winter riding, and you can switch back to your 25mm in summer.
28mm is probably the width designation with the most variation in actual width/tread/weight.
MichaelW is offline  
Old 02-12-15, 10:14 AM
  #11  
Jiggle
Senior Member
 
Jiggle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhere in TX
Posts: 2,269

Bikes: BH, Cervelo, Cube, Canyon

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Clement LAS center tread is not going to hold up to pavement. If you want those side knobs for trail riding, look at the Ritchey Speedmax comp. I've been riding them for years on the pavement and the center tread holds up really well. It's also pretty good off road except for mud. The 700x40mm version is 35mm wide on 15mm id rims with a 100mm bead to bead distance. They are also only $20.

But what you really should do is have two sets of wheels. One for mixed riding, another dedicated to road riding.
Jiggle is offline  
Old 02-12-15, 06:45 PM
  #12  
SlowJoeCrow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Central Oregon
Posts: 395

Bikes: Redline Conquest Pro, Kona Cinder Cone, Trek Fuel EX8

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just swapped my bike to Panaracer Pasela PT folding bead tires in the fall and they roll very nicely. For a slightly left field option, my son really likes his Conti Cyclocross Speed file tread tires and they are surprisingly flat resistant.
SlowJoeCrow is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.