Carbon Fiber Pros and Cons?
#1
Life Feeds On Life
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hondo,Texas
Posts: 2,146
Bikes: Too many Motobecanes
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4457 Post(s)
Liked 4,573 Times
in
3,061 Posts
Carbon Fiber Pros and Cons?
I知 looking at carbon fiber gravel/cx bikes and I知 wondering about the pros and cons of carbon fiber. I understand if it cracks it is shot and that can be the whole frame. How do they ride compared to other materials such as titanium and cromoly etc etc. Suggestions?
#2
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Providence
Posts: 732
Bikes: Specialized tarmac sl2 giant tcx zero
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 319 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Im pretty sure carbon is 100% percent repairable. With the right shop you can refurbish it for less than new frame .. metal is more durable but cant be repaired once cracked .
#3
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,751
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11080 Post(s)
Liked 7,666 Times
in
4,271 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,764
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1975 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times
in
173 Posts
Carbon is a lot stronger than people think, and except for certain areas can almost always be repaired. I ride carbon because it was the lightest choice and tube shaping could be optimized for carrying etc and wanted less weight on my back. I crash my bike almost every weekend during the race season and other than some chips and scratches to the paint its still chugging along strong along with the hundreds of other carbon race bikes I see at every race.
#6
Senior Member
I've owned one CF bike and enjoyed the feel and definitely appreciate some of the properties as a frame material. Even so, while I don't think of it as being fragile and see why it's the material of choice by professional racers, those who arguably know as much or more about it than anyone-- Trek... seems to have gone out of the way to redesign the seat post / seat tube interface to eliminate a weakness in using the CF material in a manner that is not a problem when using alloy or cromo.
Similarly, many have zero trepidation when using a stem extender on a alloy steerer tube of a fork. I, however, would feel a bit uneasy using a stem extender on a CF steerer tube... more so than have a lot of exposed CF seatpost (but, I'd rather have less).
Similarly, many have zero trepidation when using a stem extender on a alloy steerer tube of a fork. I, however, would feel a bit uneasy using a stem extender on a CF steerer tube... more so than have a lot of exposed CF seatpost (but, I'd rather have less).
#7
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,751
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11080 Post(s)
Liked 7,666 Times
in
4,271 Posts
#8
Senior Member
i always tell people if they have any concerns about carbon fiber's toughness or durability to stop by their LBS when they are destroying a frame for a manufacturer's warranty. i have seen massive people jumping up and down on the rear triangle of a cf frame without causing any damage (except to the paint). if you can't do that, check youtube for some of the cycle-test rigs mfgs use to stress test their frames.
most frame materials are far stronger than anything anyone will ever dish out. buy what makes you happy and ride the snot out of it.
most frame materials are far stronger than anything anyone will ever dish out. buy what makes you happy and ride the snot out of it.
#9
Banned
is it safe?...
carbon is the hot trend, so you get more strokes from your mates.
More than buying Titanium? Maybe, but I don't know who your riding buddies are..
note ; all the threads asking is it cracked, ? (or scratched with only a phone picture to go on,
and how do I get it fixed if it is..
...
More than buying Titanium? Maybe, but I don't know who your riding buddies are..
note ; all the threads asking is it cracked, ? (or scratched with only a phone picture to go on,
and how do I get it fixed if it is..
...
Last edited by fietsbob; 10-07-18 at 05:01 PM.
#10
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,751
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11080 Post(s)
Liked 7,666 Times
in
4,271 Posts
I'll clarify.
- I repair each frame never. Not sure why you asked how often as that has nothing to do with if cromoly frames are repairable.
- I don't repair each frame because see point 1. I haven't needed to repair my frames.
- while I enjoy steel frames, I am not a retrogrouch. I have modern drivetrains, modern wheels, etc. I am not sure what 'making good on it' means.
- frames of all sorts can be damaged. Whether I have high level steel or low level steel, both can be damaged. High level aluminum, titanium, and carbon can also be damaged. The level quality of tubing or a frame overall has nothing to do with if it can be damaged. That's obvious so I'm not sure why you are saying/suggesting i have a cheap frame mentality.
I have watched multiple steel frames be fixed. Lugs were heated up, the brass or silver was liquefied, and the damaged tube was pulled. New tube is prepped and fitted in.
these were handbuilt road frames and quality mass production franes.
I picked up on some hostility and am not sure why. All I have said up to now is that steel frames can be repaired and clarified that it isnt just low level steel frames that can be repaired.
that is accurate, yet I sense contempt and am responding to a post that makes little sense to me accusing me of...well I am not sure what.
Last edited by BillyD; 10-06-18 at 05:04 PM. Reason: Cleanup
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,315 Times
in
707 Posts
I also thought the hi ten comment was unnecessarily argumentative. Not sure why.
I own hi ten, chromoly, and aluminum/carbon bikes and find each has its place. I don't know about CF but the repairability of steel bikes is self evident in how common it is to have brake bosses and attachment points added post production and how frames are chopped and reshaped by alternative bike builders.
I assume Aluminum is the same though that type of welder is a little harder to find sometimes.
I own hi ten, chromoly, and aluminum/carbon bikes and find each has its place. I don't know about CF but the repairability of steel bikes is self evident in how common it is to have brake bosses and attachment points added post production and how frames are chopped and reshaped by alternative bike builders.
I assume Aluminum is the same though that type of welder is a little harder to find sometimes.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 8,138
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7143 Post(s)
Liked 11,326 Times
in
4,839 Posts
Back to the OP's question about the pros and cons of carbon fiber bike frames.
Pros: Tends to be lighter than other materials, and ride quality can be 'tuned' in a way that is not as possible with metals -- so, can be stiff where needed and compliant where needed.
Cons: Not as easily repaired as steel, but still repairable. (Bear in mind that it is unusual to break a frame, and most riders would simply get a new one - perhaps through mfr's crash replacement program.)
Pros: Tends to be lighter than other materials, and ride quality can be 'tuned' in a way that is not as possible with metals -- so, can be stiff where needed and compliant where needed.
Cons: Not as easily repaired as steel, but still repairable. (Bear in mind that it is unusual to break a frame, and most riders would simply get a new one - perhaps through mfr's crash replacement program.)
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Merry Old England
Posts: 772
Bikes: Muddyfox Evolve 200, Bicycles4u Paris Explorer, Raleigh Twenty Stowaway, Bickerton California, Saracen Xile, Kona Hoss Deluxe, Vertigo Carnaby, Exodus Havoc, Kona Lanai, Revolution Cuillin Sport, Dawes Kingpin, Bickerton, NSU & Elswick Cosmopolitan
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
25 Posts
the hiten comment apparently hit a nerve.
you'd all buy a steel bike because it is *cough* repairable. Yet 99% of ya'll will NEVER repair or modify the bike you ride in the lifetime of your ownership of said bike.
Neither will the people that you are trying to talk into buying a steel bike.
the Pro of Carbon over any other material is simple. 1. Lighter 2. Fatigue resistant!
steel frames flex, the joints are the weak point, flex it enough and you'll crack the frames at the welds. A carbon bike won't do this!
buy the Carbon that fits fatter tires. Run current generation supple tires tubeless at a lower PSI and enjoy a ride that is comparable to steel at greater reduction in weight, oh and be rust free!!!
you'd all buy a steel bike because it is *cough* repairable. Yet 99% of ya'll will NEVER repair or modify the bike you ride in the lifetime of your ownership of said bike.
Neither will the people that you are trying to talk into buying a steel bike.
the Pro of Carbon over any other material is simple. 1. Lighter 2. Fatigue resistant!
steel frames flex, the joints are the weak point, flex it enough and you'll crack the frames at the welds. A carbon bike won't do this!
buy the Carbon that fits fatter tires. Run current generation supple tires tubeless at a lower PSI and enjoy a ride that is comparable to steel at greater reduction in weight, oh and be rust free!!!
Carbon is a pointless expense and upgrade for myself I'm a heavy rider who doesn't competitively cycle and it serves no purpose except to lower the safety level of my cycling. It's a good material if you put lightness and speed above everything else and can look after the bike well wherever it goes. I think it's important to make sure you need a carbon bike and it makes sense for you. Sometime back I drove past many cyclists in some sort of race or event and it was clear at the back of the pack was the most elderly cyclists but they also had the nicest most expensive carbon bikes. I think in their situation I would of preferred a worse bike so I could have at least partially blamed the bike when I came in last. Like most forms of transport it's mainly about the engine.
Last edited by BillyD; 10-06-18 at 05:05 PM. Reason: Cleanup
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,315 Times
in
707 Posts
I found this video interesting:
Near the end he gives some thoughts as to pairing the material to the intended use which t paraphrase: If you want a very light bike carbon makes sense, if you plan to crash a lot perhaps something other.
To me the issue is two fold.
If one seriously crashes either a CF or Al bike one probably won't repair it. Same with Steel as well although, as mstateglfr pointed out, steel tubes can be removed and replaced if the frame is particularly meaningful to the owner. But these days I would not buy a frame based solely on repairability unless I planned to crash a lot or travel in some remote region of the world.
Smaller damage is more likely to be the issue IMO and there it's a bit of what one is comfortable with in regards to aesthetics and risk. I have a Chromoly mtb with a dent in the top tube that I have ridden extensively, having no fear that it will fail. Could I do the same with CF or a crack in Al. I don't know. I know I could DIY a non critical CF repair because people build bamboo bikes using resin and cf fiber all the time but would one be comfortable with the kludgy look on an otherwise expensive bike? Personal choice.
In diving we talk a lot about the failure modes of Al vs steel in regards to HP tanks. Both serve well and Al is by far the more prevalent material. However, on the rare occasions that it fails, Al does so far more catastrophically, fracturing into parts while steel tends to rupture but remain intact. For bikes that translates into Al cracking and then failing completely while steel can sustain damage yet still maintain structural integrity longer.
But.. as I said. I own bikes with all three materials and add no weight to material based on down the road repairability that way. I prefer steel personally as it is a material I am familiar with and thus can work on creatively in my own shop but that's just a hobbyist's perspective.
Near the end he gives some thoughts as to pairing the material to the intended use which t paraphrase: If you want a very light bike carbon makes sense, if you plan to crash a lot perhaps something other.
To me the issue is two fold.
If one seriously crashes either a CF or Al bike one probably won't repair it. Same with Steel as well although, as mstateglfr pointed out, steel tubes can be removed and replaced if the frame is particularly meaningful to the owner. But these days I would not buy a frame based solely on repairability unless I planned to crash a lot or travel in some remote region of the world.
Smaller damage is more likely to be the issue IMO and there it's a bit of what one is comfortable with in regards to aesthetics and risk. I have a Chromoly mtb with a dent in the top tube that I have ridden extensively, having no fear that it will fail. Could I do the same with CF or a crack in Al. I don't know. I know I could DIY a non critical CF repair because people build bamboo bikes using resin and cf fiber all the time but would one be comfortable with the kludgy look on an otherwise expensive bike? Personal choice.
In diving we talk a lot about the failure modes of Al vs steel in regards to HP tanks. Both serve well and Al is by far the more prevalent material. However, on the rare occasions that it fails, Al does so far more catastrophically, fracturing into parts while steel tends to rupture but remain intact. For bikes that translates into Al cracking and then failing completely while steel can sustain damage yet still maintain structural integrity longer.
But.. as I said. I own bikes with all three materials and add no weight to material based on down the road repairability that way. I prefer steel personally as it is a material I am familiar with and thus can work on creatively in my own shop but that's just a hobbyist's perspective.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Merry Old England
Posts: 772
Bikes: Muddyfox Evolve 200, Bicycles4u Paris Explorer, Raleigh Twenty Stowaway, Bickerton California, Saracen Xile, Kona Hoss Deluxe, Vertigo Carnaby, Exodus Havoc, Kona Lanai, Revolution Cuillin Sport, Dawes Kingpin, Bickerton, NSU & Elswick Cosmopolitan
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 297 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times
in
25 Posts
https://www.britishcycling.org.uk/kn...me-Materials-0
Also a great image from fuji-ta the world's largest bicycle manufacturer who make many frames for top brands including 6069/6061 aluminium frames and carbon frames for the likes of companies like Cannondale.
I pretty much see merit in most bikes but do feel carbon fibre frames are the wrong choice for a lot of people who don't really benefit from them or the extra expense of buying them and may actually be detrimental to their safety.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,857
Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 298 Times
in
214 Posts
that is an interesting twist to the pro/con talk.
It would be fun to see the size, shape, and fitness of the people behind the arguments. I am going to guess it would be very "telling".
It would be fun to see the size, shape, and fitness of the people behind the arguments. I am going to guess it would be very "telling".
#20
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,105
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 326 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12031 Post(s)
Liked 6,803 Times
in
3,550 Posts
and how often do you repair each frame? do you even repair each frame?
Or are you a retro grouch that regurgitates the 'speech', but never makes good on it?
If you are making good on the repair thing, maybe you should start buying higher end frames and give up on the cheap frame mentality?
Or are you a retro grouch that regurgitates the 'speech', but never makes good on it?
If you are making good on the repair thing, maybe you should start buying higher end frames and give up on the cheap frame mentality?
And this remark edges you very close to the precipice -
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,857
Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 298 Times
in
214 Posts
Technically the Topic is pros/cons of Carbon Fiber. If the steel guys wish to go make their 'own' pros/cons of steel frames topic that would be great, and best for all?
#23
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,849
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1174 Post(s)
Liked 936 Times
in
619 Posts
MOD NOTE TO ALL..... In case anyone missed it, the thread topic is "Carbon Fiber Pros and Cons?"
Nowhere in the title does it refer to discussing other BF members.
Nowhere in the title does it refer to discussing other BF members.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#24
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,751
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11080 Post(s)
Liked 7,666 Times
in
4,271 Posts
it seems you think i am on a side here. I am not. Read my posts so far- I simply clarified twice that steel can be repaired and you then went overboard and ranted at me.
but since i have steel frames, I am guessing you think i have an argument for them and therefore against carbon.
I have nothing against carbon as a frame material.
I'll take the bait and discuss myself as I have nothing to hide when it comes to my body type.
I am 6'5 and weigh 230#. I ride 64/65cm frames. I will never be a featherweight due to my body type and I enjoy offering suggestions based on experience to others here who are similar sized(ht or wt) since its a tough category for the cycling market to serve.
I used to be extremely active and am now more active than many and less active than many.
This is from a gravel race where i didnt place first and didnt come in last.
#25
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,751
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11080 Post(s)
Liked 7,666 Times
in
4,271 Posts