Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

singlespeed vs geared for bay area riding?

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

singlespeed vs geared for bay area riding?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-07, 01:03 AM
  #1  
brooklyn bike rider
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 140

Bikes: bmw park bike, tonic fab supernaut, chromag stylus, traitor ruben

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
singlespeed vs geared for bay area riding?

so i just moved to the bay area and figured a cross bike would be a perfect choice
for commuting in the hills, riding in the parks, and singletrack jaunts.

i'm coming from a bmx and ss (street) mtb background.
i'm at home on one gear, and i'm coming from new york city,
where i was quick and anywhere with 30:13 on a 24" fat tire on a 31lb bike.
in any case, fast wheels on a light bike are definitely inviting.

i don't want to spend more than $1000.
so for the price, i'm looking at the fuji cross comp,
which i testrode and thought it was pretty comfy, fast, well-specced.
aero and cross levers (powerful!), sti shifting on 105 was buttery.
but i'm also looking at the specialized tricross single.
a ss cx bike with a carbon fork, rack/fender mounts, and matte paint? very nice.
i'm basically digging the tricross a LOT, gonna testride it tomoro hopefully.
will i be kicking myself (and walking up the hills) if i don't get gears?
it seems like there are plenty of ss riders out here so maybe it's a non-issue?

thanks for any and all help.
-nate
mosplat is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 08:21 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 328
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Check out he Bianchi San Jose if you are interested in SS. $650 is not bad for a complete bike. As for if you will regret not choosing gears, I have never been to the bay area, but I can say its a choice I have never regretted. Gearing will always be a compromise, but a SS will allow you to coast down the hills, so a lower gear can be easier to deal with. For my part, I have to converted fixed, cross bikes, and I love them. I needed something I could ride 5 miles to work and hit the tamer trails afterwards. Its what I ended up with, and I love them. YMMV

-ROb.
robcycle is offline  
Old 09-11-07, 08:37 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If you want to ride in some of the more picturesque locales (Marin headlands, Mt Tam, Tilden, etc) it would be nice to have some gears.

Check out the writeup for the Harris Bianchi San Jos8. The San Jose plus the geared rear wheel would keep you within your budget.
flargle is offline  
Old 09-12-07, 07:47 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
sfcrossrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,760

Bikes: Steelman eurocross, Surly CrossCheck, IRO Rob Roy...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For riding in SF a single will due. If you want to ride the epic rides ^^^^ I'd get a bike with gears (a crosscheck is a great choice for under 1,000).
sfcrossrider is offline  
Old 09-12-07, 01:27 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd also recommend a bike with gears. There are some great rides in Marin just across the Golden Gate bridge that have some pretty good climbs. Plus it's nice to be able to motor along the flats on your way to other rides. But if you're strong enough to ride 'em on a single speed then all the power to you. I have a single speed mtn bike that I took on some of these rides once before I got my cross bike (geared) and will not be doing it again.
ebbett is offline  
Old 09-12-07, 08:12 PM
  #6  
brooklyn bike rider
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: brooklyn
Posts: 140

Bikes: bmw park bike, tonic fab supernaut, chromag stylus, traitor ruben

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
testriding the tricross single went so well i rode it out.
i decided i'd deal with the lack of gears, i've been doing that all my life.
been riding all around oakland and san francisco and so far so good;
walked one hill (foerster) but otherwise i've been okay.
man i'll be in great shape when i return to new york.
thanks for the input peeps.
mosplat is offline  
Old 09-13-07, 06:22 AM
  #7  
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
 
jfmckenna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The edge of b#
Posts: 5,476

Bikes: A whole bunch-a bikes.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 76 Posts
I would not want to climb the hills of SF with one gear. I see lots of SS fixed gear riders out there but for me personally it's just to hilly. The hills are not long but steep as hell. And it's not just the climbing but descending. If you like to go fast get the gears. If you like the challenge of one gear then go for it but if you want the practicality then go geared, then you can always try to climb up to Nob Hill in your 39X15.
jfmckenna is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.