Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
Reload this Page >

Sizing Advisory Warning on Cross Bikes - Ridley X-Fire

Search
Notices
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational) This has to be the most physically intense sport ever invented. It's high speed bicycle racing on a short off road course or riding the off pavement rides on gravel like : "Unbound Gravel". We also have a dedicated Racing forum for the Cyclocross Hard Core Racers.

Sizing Advisory Warning on Cross Bikes - Ridley X-Fire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-09, 04:00 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 789

Bikes: 09 Pinarello Prince, 09 Cervelo P3, 10 Stevens Team Carbon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sizing Advisory Warning on Cross Bikes - Ridley X-Fire

The stand over heights are quite tall and can be problematic. I ride a size 59.5 or size 60 road bike. Yesterday I took delivery of a size 58 Ridley X-Fire and it appears that it is one size too tall for me. When I straddle the bike I just barely clear the top tube. When I mount and dismount I have a hard time clearing the saddle with my leg. I am now offering my brand new, size 58 X-Fire frameset for sale at $1100 including continental US shipping and insurance.
pharding is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 05:53 AM
  #2  
Oh The Huge Manatee
 
Lithuania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: mabra
Posts: 4,528
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
it sounds like you just need to work on your remount. standover height is such a minor detail. i have no clearance when i stand over my ridley but it fits me really good and I have no remounting issues. I believe the bottom bracket on my crosswind is even higher than the xfire unless i am mistaken
Lithuania is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 06:06 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ridley bases their sizes on seattube center-to-center. The size 58 seattube is 62cm center-to-top. Did you check the geometry chart before ordering?

I agree with Lithuania, standover is irrelevant. The important dimensions are effective top tube and headtube length.
flargle is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 11:14 AM
  #4  
Double Secret Probation
 
R900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Eastern Indiana
Posts: 2,578

Bikes: Madone 6 series SSL, Cannondale CX9, Trek TTX, Trek 970, Trek T2000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Ridley lists stand over height on their web site. I might be a little concerned, but if reach and saddle height are good, it may be hard to get a better fit with a Ridley.
__________________
Time to Ride...
R900 is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 11:21 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pharding
The stand over heights are quite tall and can be problematic. I ride a size 59.5 or size 60 road bike. Yesterday I took delivery of a size 58 Ridley X-Fire and it appears that it is one size too tall for me. When I straddle the bike I just barely clear the top tube. When I mount and dismount I have a hard time clearing the saddle with my leg. I am now offering my brand new, size 58 X-Fire frameset for sale at $1100 including continental US shipping and insurance.
how tall are you, and what is your inseam?
dc.cyclocross is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 11:32 AM
  #6  
shoot up or shut up.
 
isotopesope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 1,961

Bikes: yes please.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lithuania
it sounds like you just need to work on your remount. standover height is such a minor detail. i have no clearance when i stand over my ridley but it fits me really good and I have no remounting issues. I believe the bottom bracket on my crosswind is even higher than the xfire unless i am mistaken
i completely agree.

the crosswind has a 4mm higher bb than the x-fire.

i also ride a crosswind and have very little standover clearance, but it fits me super well. i'm riding a 60 c-c, fwiw. it has not caused me one single issue while commuting, trail riding, racing, remounting, or even wrecking. are you going to ride the bike or fred flintstone it around the course?
isotopesope is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 11:53 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 789

Bikes: 09 Pinarello Prince, 09 Cervelo P3, 10 Stevens Team Carbon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
6' 1" and 34" inseam.
pharding is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 12:15 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
I bought a frame based on TT length. Once I built it up with 34mm tires, I noticed that it was a good 8-9 cm (3.5-4in) taller than my roadie with identical reach. I'm fairly short-legged so I basically sit on the toptube if I straddle it. But in real-life, it's not really a big deal since I don't spend much time straddling my bike.
caloso is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 01:40 PM
  #9  
shoot up or shut up.
 
isotopesope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 1,961

Bikes: yes please.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pharding
6' 1" and 34" inseam.
i just remembered you were the guy that wanted a full on race bike for only riding on dirt paths, due to a back injury.

did you even bother to check the geometry on ridley's site? i'm assuming you did not. they list the standover for that frame at 880mm, which is 34.65".
isotopesope is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 02:15 PM
  #10  
Overacting because I can
 
SpongeDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Mean Streets of Bethesda, MD
Posts: 4,552

Bikes: Merlin Agilis, Trek 1500

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My CX frame is definitely a crotch rubber when I'm standing over it - but for riding it makes no difference. The contact points are all fine. When I remount, I'm landing on the saddle not the top tube (hopefully). The height of the saddle doesn't have anything to do with the top tube height.

Now, if you're riding a CX bike as some sort of hack around town bike (as I also do), the lack of standover can be a annoying.

I think that for similar top tube measurements, a Kona Major Jack is has a bit more standover than a Ridley (but I was comparing the small frames).
__________________
“Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)

"I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)
SpongeDad is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 02:57 PM
  #11  
All Bikes All The Time
 
Sawtooth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 2,343

Bikes: Giant TCR 0, Lemond Zurich, Giant NRS 1, Jamis Explorer Beater/Commuter, Peugeot converted single speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=SpongeDad;9864402]My CX frame is definitely a crotch rubber when I'm standing over it - but for riding it makes no difference. QUOTE]

+1, my Major Jake is all up in my junk but it rides/races like a champ.
Sawtooth is offline  
Old 10-15-09, 04:21 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Cross bikes traditionally have a tall bottom bracket for clearance. Perhaps this is why the standover height is a bit higher than normal. How does it feel when riding? It shouldn't affect dismounts, but you'll have to jump higher to remount if that's the case.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 10-19-09, 04:42 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
The usual rule of thumb is to go one size down with a CX bike. If you ride a 56 cm road bike you'll want a 54 cm in a CX bike to compensate for the tall bottom bracket.
NormanF is offline  
Old 10-20-09, 06:46 AM
  #14  
shoot up or shut up.
 
isotopesope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: colorado springs, co
Posts: 1,961

Bikes: yes please.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NormanF
The usual rule of thumb is to go one size down with a CX bike. If you ride a 56 cm road bike you'll want a 54 cm in a CX bike to compensate for the tall bottom bracket.
then you wind up with a bike with too short of a headtube. the bb height has no effect on the fit when you're riding, only when you're standing over the bike. are you going to ride the bike or walk around with it in your crotch?
isotopesope is offline  
Old 10-20-09, 10:27 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
In that case, one goes with the same size as the road bike if the smaller CX size leaves one feeling too cramped.
NormanF is offline  
Old 10-20-09, 02:42 PM
  #16  
abandoning
 
fly:yes/land:no's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
really, you just need to evaluate each bike's geometry on a case by case basis. unfortunately, cx bike sizing is drastically different between brands. some run long tt to ht, some have high bb's, some have long st's, etc.
fly:yes/land:no is offline  
Old 10-21-09, 12:34 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
That's true. You can't assume the rule will hold true with every bike brand so you may need to stay with your usual road bike size if that is dictated by the CX bike's geometry.
NormanF is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.