Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

New Dynamo Light Announced - B&M IQ-X, 100 lux, Aluminum Casing, Redesigned Reflector

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

New Dynamo Light Announced - B&M IQ-X, 100 lux, Aluminum Casing, Redesigned Reflector

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-16, 08:35 AM
  #251  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
3 LED in the Eyc T senso , 2 flat ones are day running & stand light, the focused single point LED comes on @ night, in motion.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 09:28 AM
  #252  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
did you sayin an earlier post that the side lights light up with the standlight?
If the light is on in any mode, the side marker lights are on.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 10:05 AM
  #253  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
I have a cyo premium which I just installed. I'll have to get the IQ-X installed and then compare
that would be interesting. I once owned the 40 lux iq fly which I thought was very bright. when the cyo came out I upgraded it to the 60 lux cyo. not much brighter really hardly noticeable. those 2 lights shared the same reflector. then once again an upgrade to the 80 lux cyo premium which showed a lot of improvement due to the reflector re-design to the wider beam, not really brighter, or maybe just slightly, but just a larger patch of lit road vs the old cyo. I'm sure the 100 lux light will show a little improvement, but I'm trying decide if that justifies spending $150.00 on another light just for a modest improvement, seeing there was not much improvement between the fly & old cyo. it's all about the beam design really..... all pics are hard to judge by as some show vastly different beam shapes & brightness...

people's opinions vary also as one poster here said he didn't like the iq-x beam & want's to go back to the luxos rated at a lower lux....

Last edited by saturnsc2; 04-08-16 at 10:12 AM.
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 10:11 AM
  #254  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
3 LED in the Eyc T senso , 2 flat ones are day running & stand light, the focused single point LED comes on @ night, in motion.
same here with the cyo premium, but they don't completely shut down just dim & get bright as required.... 4 led's are daytime running. 2 of them are the standlight & 1 is the main beam.
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 11:11 AM
  #255  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times in 2,518 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
I'm sure the 100 lux light will show a little improvement, but I'm trying decide if that justifies spending $150.00 on another light just for a modest improvement, seeing there was not much improvement between the fly & old cyo. it's all about the beam design really..... all pics are hard to judge by as some show vastly different beam shapes & brightness...

people's opinions vary also as one poster here said he didn't like the iq-x beam & want's to go back to the luxos rated at a lower lux....
I really like the Luxos beam. I messed up the bike it was on and so I haven't been using it. And they went through some growing pains with that light, so I haven't been motivated to get it on another bike. The problem with brighter lights is that your eyes have to adjust to contrast anyway, so a big difference in lux may not translate to something you will notice. The thing that I really noticed with the Luxos was that going around corners at speed was never an issue. With a lot of other lights I end up changing my line so I can see around the corner.

I just bought the Premium from a friend, and I wanted to use a B&M taillight on the bike it's now on, so it was natural to retire the supernova that was on there. The IQ-X is going on my randonneuring bike, where it's nice to have a lot of light

Last edited by unterhausen; 04-08-16 at 11:14 AM.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 12:48 PM
  #256  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
I really like the Luxos beam. I messed up the bike it was on and so I haven't been using it. And they went through some growing pains with that light, so I haven't been motivated to get it on another bike. The problem with brighter lights is that your eyes have to adjust to contrast anyway, so a big difference in lux may not translate to something you will notice. The thing that I really noticed with the Luxos was that going around corners at speed was never an issue. With a lot of other lights I end up changing my line so I can see around the corner.

I just bought the Premium from a friend, and I wanted to use a B&M taillight on the bike it's now on, so it was natural to retire the supernova that was on there. The IQ-X is going on my randonneuring bike, where it's nice to have a lot of light
I like the cyo & luxos beam photos on the b&m site the best, but I know that in real life that's a different story...

how are the beams of the supernova? I have heard they are pretty narrow. it looks that way on peter white's site...
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 01:30 PM
  #257  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
that would be interesting. I once owned the 40 lux iq fly which I thought was very bright. when the cyo came out I upgraded it to the 60 lux cyo. not much brighter really hardly noticeable. those 2 lights shared the same reflector. then once again an upgrade to the 80 lux cyo premium which showed a lot of improvement due to the reflector re-design to the wider beam, not really brighter, or maybe just slightly, but just a larger patch of lit road vs the old cyo. I'm sure the 100 lux light will show a little improvement, but I'm trying decide if that justifies spending $150.00 on another light just for a modest improvement, seeing there was not much improvement between the fly & old cyo. it's all about the beam design really..... all pics are hard to judge by as some show vastly different beam shapes & brightness...

people's opinions vary also as one poster here said he didn't like the iq-x beam & want's to go back to the luxos rated at a lower lux....
Both the IQ-X, and Cyo work great in all environments, but if I were trying to decide between the two, I would go with the Cyo for an urban environment, and the IQ-x for suburban and country.

The IQ-X is significantly brighter and wider beyond 75' making it much better for the open road, lots of oncoming traffic, and fast descents. The standlight is more focused, and stands out better in the distance.
The Cyo's beam being less bright, and focused in the distance gives a little more peripheral light in sharp turns. It's standlight is more of a floodlight, and is more noticeable up close like for pedestrians in a crosswalk.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 02:26 PM
  #258  
Senior Member
 
southpawboston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somerville, MA and Catskill Mtns
Posts: 4,134
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
that reflector is pretty interesting. In the past, there have been more facets. Still haven't hooked mine up, tomorrow maybe
I suspect the facets contribute to artifacts and bright spots within the field of illumination. With each new iteration of their focusing mirror, the facets have gotten less sharply defined.
southpawboston is offline  
Old 04-08-16, 03:39 PM
  #259  
aka Tom Reingold
 
noglider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,471 Times in 1,435 Posts
Originally Posted by kickstart
At 2 mph, or a brisk walk it starts emitting a dim, but usable light via the standlight.
At 3 mph it transitions to the main beam.
It continues to brighten, and at 5 mph its casting the full beam.
At 8 mph its at full output.
I rarely roll at less than 8 mph. I consider that to be quite slow. When I'm going less than 8 mph, I expect I'll be able to see by any light and often with no light at all. So this sounds good to me.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Old 04-09-16, 11:23 PM
  #260  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times in 2,518 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
how are the beams of the supernova? I have heard they are pretty narrow. it looks that way on peter white's site...
the supernova beams are really second-rate. The only thing they have over other brands is their hardware and housings, which was why I was using one on my gravel bike.

Originally Posted by southpawboston
I suspect the facets contribute to artifacts and bright spots within the field of illumination. With each new iteration of their focusing mirror, the facets have gotten less sharply defined.
yeah, that's why I mentioned it. I'm sure it's easier to cover a space with facets. Getting such an amazing beam with a totally smooth reflector is impressive.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 04-10-16, 10:42 AM
  #261  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
B&M the bright LED faces down.. Engineering that, is how they shaped the beam & cut off .


A light source in the center of the reflector is akin to a flashlight..

At least Mag lights pull the bulb in and out changing the beam from wider to narrower.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 04-10-16, 02:16 PM
  #262  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
the supernova beams are really second-rate. The only thing they have over other brands is their hardware and housings, which was why I was using one on my gravel bike.

yeah, that's why I mentioned it. I'm sure it's easier to cover a space with facets. Getting such an amazing beam with a totally smooth reflector is impressive.
ya the supernove beams pictured on peter white's site look unfocused & narrow, bright, but unfocused. the b&m beams are focused where ya need them most.
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-10-16, 02:19 PM
  #263  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
to the people who bought the iq-x light how is that plastic band mount on the light itself? is it pretty strong? will it fit any mount bracket? I have an old steel light mount on my bike for many years. so far it held the iq-fly, cyo, & cyo premium in addition to other various old dynamo bulb type lights. just wondering if the iq-x mount is like a different size where it clamps into the bike bracket mount, or will it just mount like any other light....
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-10-16, 05:11 PM
  #264  
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
I'm using my steel Cyo mount. Much more stable than the one included with the IQ-X, though no cable management and its not adjustable. Same bolt fits both.
znomit is offline  
Old 04-10-16, 08:24 PM
  #265  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulRivers
...Don't know how well the iq-x will do, but 80 lumens to 100 lumens I don't think will be a huge increase.
Confusing units of measurement here? The upgrade is supposedly to 100 Lux - not 100 lumens. I've seen mention somewhere the the IQ-X could be in the order of 400-500 lumens.

Presuming you meant to refer to Lux, you could be right of course...

Sam.
savvas is offline  
Old 04-10-16, 10:45 PM
  #266  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by savvas
Confusing units of measurement here? The upgrade is supposedly to 100 Lux - not 100 lumens. I've seen mention somewhere the the IQ-X could be in the order of 400-500 lumens.

Presuming you meant to refer to Lux, you could be right of course...

Sam.
Yes, 100 Lux, and about as bright as a typical 500 lumen bicycle light, but with greater range.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-10-16, 10:49 PM
  #267  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
to the people who bought the iq-x light how is that plastic band mount on the light itself? is it pretty strong? will it fit any mount bracket? I have an old steel light mount on my bike for many years. so far it held the iq-fly, cyo, & cyo premium in addition to other various old dynamo bulb type lights. just wondering if the iq-x mount is like a different size where it clamps into the bike bracket mount, or will it just mount like any other light....
Seems plenty strong, and I'm using an alternate B&M mount. If your mount works with the other B&M lights, there should be no reason it won't work with the IQ-X as they're all basically the same.
kickstart is offline  
Old 04-11-16, 09:37 AM
  #268  
Senior Member
 
southpawboston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somerville, MA and Catskill Mtns
Posts: 4,134
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
to the people who bought the iq-x light how is that plastic band mount on the light itself? is it pretty strong? will it fit any mount bracket? I have an old steel light mount on my bike for many years. so far it held the iq-fly, cyo, & cyo premium in addition to other various old dynamo bulb type lights. just wondering if the iq-x mount is like a different size where it clamps into the bike bracket mount, or will it just mount like any other light....
It mounts the same way. It has the same 10mm wide base with drilling for an M6 bolt, same as almost all if not all previous B&M lights. But it differs in that the base is not hard-cast into the housing like their older lights. It's part of a separate ring, and it's split at the base so you can remove it and install it facing up (for a hanging light) or facing down (conventional installation). The ring locks to the light in place when the split base is pinched together between the bracket arms.

Here it is installed on a little fender widget of my own design (I sell them through my web store, velolumino.com).



southpawboston is offline  
Old 04-11-16, 11:29 AM
  #269  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by southpawboston
It mounts the same way. It has the same 10mm wide base with drilling for an M6 bolt, same as almost all if not all previous B&M lights. But it differs in that the base is not hard-cast into the housing like their older lights. It's part of a separate ring, and it's split at the base so you can remove it and install it facing up (for a hanging light) or facing down (conventional installation). The ring locks to the light in place when the split base is pinched together between the bracket arms.

Here it is installed on a little fender widget of my own design (I sell them through my web store, velolumino.com).



does that silver color have a clear coat over it or is the light bare aluminum?
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-11-16, 03:23 PM
  #270  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times in 2,518 Posts
Finally took mine out of the package over the weekend. The finish looks like brushed aluminum to me, no anodizing. I could be wrong.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 04-11-16, 06:57 PM
  #271  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
Finally took mine out of the package over the weekend. The finish looks like brushed aluminum to me, no anodizing. I could be wrong.
I thought I seen an online description as them saying it was anodized...
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-11-16, 07:09 PM
  #272  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times in 2,518 Posts
the black one is obviously anodized. Looking at mine again, the silver one is probably anodized too. The surface isn't brushed, it's turned.

Somebody mentioned on the randonneuring email list that their IQ-X died. Hopefully that is pretty rare.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 04-11-16, 07:18 PM
  #273  
Senior Member
 
saturnsc2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 392

Bikes: 1982 Huiffy 10-speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
the black one is obviously anodized. Looking at mine again, the silver one is probably anodized too. The surface isn't brushed, it's turned.

Somebody mentioned on the randonneuring email list that their IQ-X died. Hopefully that is pretty rare.
could be a just a defect not unheard of. oh well they should replace it as it's new....
there are some experimental dynamos out there & those could damage the light. you going to post some beam shots when installed? it's a cool looking light. I heard these are actually pretty small lights. smaller than the cyo?
saturnsc2 is offline  
Old 04-11-16, 09:50 PM
  #274  
Senior Member
 
southpawboston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somerville, MA and Catskill Mtns
Posts: 4,134
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
the black one is obviously anodized. Looking at mine again, the silver one is probably anodized too. The surface isn't brushed, it's turned.
What's the difference between brushed and turned? I get that it's turned on a CNC mill and the cutting blade produces the fine lines, but isn't there a final brushing/deburring step on the mill as well?
southpawboston is offline  
Old 04-11-16, 09:51 PM
  #275  
Senior Member
 
kickstart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Kent Wa.
Posts: 5,332

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnsc2
I heard these are actually pretty small lights. smaller than the cyo?
The Cyo is approximately 2 1/2" long, and 2" in diameter not including the DRL housing. The IQ-X is slightly smaller at approximately 2 1/4" long, and 1 3/4" in diameter.
kickstart is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.