Rear lights - Anywhere on bike/ body/ clothing - Law
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Rear lights - Anywhere on bike/ body/ clothing - Law
Guys
Is it law and regulation that my rear light MUST be placed, for example on the post below my seat? - Or could i have a rear red rear light placed anywhere on my bike, person/ clothing / helmet? - as long as its red and facing in the rear direction?
Is there anywhere particular i can find out the actual regulation for the UK, USA and other countries in Europe?
Many thanks
Is it law and regulation that my rear light MUST be placed, for example on the post below my seat? - Or could i have a rear red rear light placed anywhere on my bike, person/ clothing / helmet? - as long as its red and facing in the rear direction?
Is there anywhere particular i can find out the actual regulation for the UK, USA and other countries in Europe?
Many thanks
#2
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: downtown Bulverde, Texas
Posts: 2,717
Bikes: '74 Raleigh International utility; '98 Moser Forma road; '92 Viner Pro CX upright
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 939 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
That is going to vary by states and cities.
I run a solid mounted tail light (and headlight) on the bike in different ways - clipped to bag or rack - and a helmet blinkie. I turn on front and rear helmet blinkie for intersections or along with a hand signal when I'm going to cross lanes to make a left turn. I live in my helmet mirror and would be naked without it.
I run a solid mounted tail light (and headlight) on the bike in different ways - clipped to bag or rack - and a helmet blinkie. I turn on front and rear helmet blinkie for intersections or along with a hand signal when I'm going to cross lanes to make a left turn. I live in my helmet mirror and would be naked without it.
#3
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,399
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,699 Times
in
2,519 Posts
the way I read the laws, it has to be mounted on the bicycle. this would include mounting it to a bag or rack that is mounted to the bicycle.
Hooking it up to something that moves is a bad idea in my experience. I have never seen this done where it actually points back where you want it. And that would probably be a problem with the law as well, they almost all require lights to be visible for 500 feet
Hooking it up to something that moves is a bad idea in my experience. I have never seen this done where it actually points back where you want it. And that would probably be a problem with the law as well, they almost all require lights to be visible for 500 feet
#4
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Laws in the USA will vary by state and locality. There is no single US law.
I've never heard of US state or local laws which restrict rear lights only to the bike or prohibit rear facing lights from being attached to the rider. I can imagine such laws in Germany however.
Laws aside, many people ride with lights on the back of their helmet or jersey and these are perfectly visible. The bike itself moves as one pedals and so there is little practical difference. Modern LED lights are visible to the point where motorist complain that they are too bright. I don't see visiblity of the lights as a problem.
I've never heard of US state or local laws which restrict rear lights only to the bike or prohibit rear facing lights from being attached to the rider. I can imagine such laws in Germany however.
Laws aside, many people ride with lights on the back of their helmet or jersey and these are perfectly visible. The bike itself moves as one pedals and so there is little practical difference. Modern LED lights are visible to the point where motorist complain that they are too bright. I don't see visiblity of the lights as a problem.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: QC Canada
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom built LHT & Troll
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 846 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
106 Posts
I was personally surprised to discover that reflectors (white front, red rear, yellow pedals, white spokes) and mandatory in several jurisdictions, in addition to active lights. The reason being that active lights may stop working, or that you didn't plan to ride at night.
#6
Unavilable due to riding
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Cinci, Ohio
Posts: 418
Bikes: Nishiki Olympic
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
( unless i read it wrong) in ohio, its a red light. Doesnt state where on the back.
Last edited by Jean3n16; 09-29-16 at 01:14 PM.
#7
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
I know you can't have blue or blue flashing in some places. That's reserved for law enforcement.
#8
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I think it's safest to have one on the bike, but I would never ride with just one rear light. The one I mount on my helmet is very wide angle (180 degrees plus) and pretty bright - I'm using the Blitzu Cyborg 168T. At < $20 it's an amazing value. I think it's probably THE light to get if you only have one light and don't want to spend > $50. This coming from someone who has about 20 rear lights up to a DesignShine one. I think it's probably as effective as anything less than a DesignShine or a Dinotte.
I think most of the laws say that "the bike must be fitted with" a rear light - this could easily be interpreted to mean that it must be mounted on the bike, not on the person. Just to be safe I'd put one on there, just like even though I never use it, I have a bell on my handlebars, for when I ride through a town that has a mandatory bell law.
I think most of the laws say that "the bike must be fitted with" a rear light - this could easily be interpreted to mean that it must be mounted on the bike, not on the person. Just to be safe I'd put one on there, just like even though I never use it, I have a bell on my handlebars, for when I ride through a town that has a mandatory bell law.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#9
What happened?
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Around here somewhere
Posts: 7,927
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1835 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
255 Posts
Guys
Is it law and regulation that my rear light MUST be placed, for example on the post below my seat? - Or could i have a rear red rear light placed anywhere on my bike, person/ clothing / helmet? - as long as its red and facing in the rear direction?
Is there anywhere particular i can find out the actual regulation for the UK, USA and other countries in Europe?
Many thanks
Is it law and regulation that my rear light MUST be placed, for example on the post below my seat? - Or could i have a rear red rear light placed anywhere on my bike, person/ clothing / helmet? - as long as its red and facing in the rear direction?
Is there anywhere particular i can find out the actual regulation for the UK, USA and other countries in Europe?
Many thanks
Any really swell deluxe antique bike probably has one on the rear rack or fender.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times
in
38 Posts
As a few other posters have said, I would not wear my primary rear light on any clothing because it's way to easy for it to end up facing the wrong direction and not visible (regardless of what the law says). I prefer to mount mine to the back of my rack if possible, seatpost would be fine if your bike doesn't have a rear rack.
Actual laws vary so much you'd have to check the specific laws for where you live.
Actual laws vary so much you'd have to check the specific laws for where you live.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,278
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4260 Post(s)
Liked 1,363 Times
in
945 Posts
Laws aside, many people ride with lights on the back of their helmet or jersey and these are perfectly visible. The bike itself moves as one pedals and so there is little practical difference. Modern LED lights are visible to the point where motorist complain that they are too bright. I don't see visiblity of the lights as a problem.
Yes, bicycles move but that isn't actually much of a problem with lights that are set up properly. Nothing is perfect but what you are describing is often worse.
The issue is that mounting lights on places like seat bags often causes the lights to persistently be pointed downwards making them mostly worthless. Jersey mounted lights often have the same problem (though, those can be pointed uselessly upward).
And lots of people have no idea that their lights are set up badly.
Most people use lights that no motorist would complain about (that's mostly a made-up concern).
If the light is mounted on the bike, it's easy to check that it's set up reasonably and reliably. Lights in other places might be useful as a secondary but they are often less effective than a light mounted on the bike.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
You need to look up your state laws (assuming you're in the United States) and any local ordinances regarding bicycle lighting. For example, many states require a forward facing white and rear facing red light on bicycles at night, while my state only requires a forward facing white and rear red reflector. It does say that "Every bicycle when in use at nighttime shall be equipped with a lamp on the front ... and with a red reflector on the rear," so it kind of sounds like they're requiring the light to be mounted on the bike itself. However, I don't think any cop would be too nitpicky if you had a bright light on your helmet.
#14
Banned
I have a safety vest with a patch of velcro sewn on it, and a patch of sticky back velcro on the back of a red Blinky..
I attach to the vest.. Try That?
Also have Bought German Made Bike Lights, Blinking Bike lights is Verboten there so they don't blink.
There probably are but I'm not going to do your research for You. try searching the internet?
./.
I attach to the vest.. Try That?
Also have Bought German Made Bike Lights, Blinking Bike lights is Verboten there so they don't blink.
Is there anywhere particular I can find out the actual regulation for the UK, USA and other countries in Europe?
./.
Last edited by fietsbob; 09-30-16 at 01:23 PM.
#15
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,503
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7349 Post(s)
Liked 2,474 Times
in
1,437 Posts
Another factor is enforcement. If you are not likely to be cited by law enforcement, do what makes sense, regardless of the law. If the law requires a light to be attached to the bike but the thing that works best for you is a jacket festooned with several ribbons, each with several LEDs, then use that if you can get away with it.
Bike laws have hardly been enforced in this part of the country until recently. I've even heard of citations for not having a bell. That never would have happened before.
Bike laws have hardly been enforced in this part of the country until recently. I've even heard of citations for not having a bell. That never would have happened before.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I've never seen any law or statute in a US jurisdiction with a specific location for the rear light, only that it is visible from a certain distance. It is possible still, but I'd say unlikely.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5791 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
The laws vary by state, but in most they refer to light as mandatory bicycle equipment. In other words they speak to the bicycle itself. I don't believe most are fussy about placement, and simply refer to visibility at a minimum distance.
That said, I doubt that anyone will ever get cited for having a light on their body rather than the bike.
I've violated NY's law for decades by using an amber strobe in lieu of red. I started doing this because flashing amber is the lighting for stationary hazards and slow moving heavy vehicles. IMO this better fits a bicycle in moving traffic, and I'd prefer underestimate my speed and slow down to avoid hitting me, than overestimated my speed and found himself driving up my rear end.
In 40+ years I was stopped ONCE, by a cop who questioned me about the amber vs. red. I explained my thinking, and he responded, that it was OK, he was mainly curious and added that it wouldn't make sense to worry about my light's color when 9 out of ten bicyclists had no light at all.
Currently I use a blue police strobe, left over from when I sold them, and that draws a bit more police attention, and no citations, only reminders not to fool myself because police are routinely killed in traffic despite their blue strobes.
So, to the OP, research the local laws so you know, then do what will best protect you.
BTW - some states still haven't adjusted the laws to reality and specify steady red, meaning that the highly visible strobes and flashers most cyclists use, don't conform anyway.
That said, I doubt that anyone will ever get cited for having a light on their body rather than the bike.
I've violated NY's law for decades by using an amber strobe in lieu of red. I started doing this because flashing amber is the lighting for stationary hazards and slow moving heavy vehicles. IMO this better fits a bicycle in moving traffic, and I'd prefer underestimate my speed and slow down to avoid hitting me, than overestimated my speed and found himself driving up my rear end.
In 40+ years I was stopped ONCE, by a cop who questioned me about the amber vs. red. I explained my thinking, and he responded, that it was OK, he was mainly curious and added that it wouldn't make sense to worry about my light's color when 9 out of ten bicyclists had no light at all.
Currently I use a blue police strobe, left over from when I sold them, and that draws a bit more police attention, and no citations, only reminders not to fool myself because police are routinely killed in traffic despite their blue strobes.
So, to the OP, research the local laws so you know, then do what will best protect you.
BTW - some states still haven't adjusted the laws to reality and specify steady red, meaning that the highly visible strobes and flashers most cyclists use, don't conform anyway.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#18
Señior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
That sounds to me like the blinkie would hang down so much that it would be pointing at the ground. Unless your safety vest is a lot more rigid than mine are.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
All that it says in Indiana is this:
9‐21‐11‐9 Lamps and reflectors
Sec. 9 A bicycle operated on a highway from one‐half (1/2) hour after sunset until one‐half (1/2) hour before sunrise
must be equipped with the following:
(1) A lamp on the front exhibiting a white light visible from a distance of at least five hundred (500) feet to the
front.
(2) A lamp on the rear exhibiting a red light visible from a distance of five hundred (500) feet to the rear or a red
reflector visible from a distance of five hundred (500) feet to the rear.
Nothing about where the lights must be positionally other than white on front and red on rear.
9‐21‐11‐9 Lamps and reflectors
Sec. 9 A bicycle operated on a highway from one‐half (1/2) hour after sunset until one‐half (1/2) hour before sunrise
must be equipped with the following:
(1) A lamp on the front exhibiting a white light visible from a distance of at least five hundred (500) feet to the
front.
(2) A lamp on the rear exhibiting a red light visible from a distance of five hundred (500) feet to the rear or a red
reflector visible from a distance of five hundred (500) feet to the rear.
Nothing about where the lights must be positionally other than white on front and red on rear.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the replies guys, appreciated
Do you think, it would be ok, in general, to fix my rear red light to the handle bars, or even 2 rear red lights, one on each end of my handle bar (and so they are still facing to the rear)? - or is it basically mandatory that it needs to be at the rear of my bike, below saddle for example?
Thanks agsin
Do you think, it would be ok, in general, to fix my rear red light to the handle bars, or even 2 rear red lights, one on each end of my handle bar (and so they are still facing to the rear)? - or is it basically mandatory that it needs to be at the rear of my bike, below saddle for example?
Thanks agsin
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
Thanks for the replies guys, appreciated
Do you think, it would be ok, in general, to fix my rear red light to the handle bars, or even 2 rear red lights, one on each end of my handle bar (and so they are still facing to the rear)? - or is it basically mandatory that it needs to be at the rear of my bike, below saddle for example?
Thanks agsin
Do you think, it would be ok, in general, to fix my rear red light to the handle bars, or even 2 rear red lights, one on each end of my handle bar (and so they are still facing to the rear)? - or is it basically mandatory that it needs to be at the rear of my bike, below saddle for example?
Thanks agsin
I wouldn't do that because the light would be striking your eyes as you ride which would be a huge disturbance to your eye's ability to see at night and the flashing would drive you crazy, plus take up valuable space on the bars for your hands, forward facing lights, and computer, plus parts of your body will hinder the light from being seen from the rear.
It's not mandatory, that I know of, that the rear lights be on the rear, but it is the best place to put them.
#22
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,365
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,219 Times
in
2,366 Posts
12-702-Headlight and taillight required at night
Every bicycle in use at the times described in 12-201 shall be equipped
with a headlight on the front emitting a white light visible from a
distance of at least 500 feet to the front, and a taillight on the rear
emitting a red light visible from a distance of at least 1000 feet to
the rear.
S 12-703-Rear reflector required at all times
Every bicycle shall be equipped with a red reflector of a type
approved by the department which shall be visible for 600 feet to the
rear when directly in front of lawful lower beams of headlights on a
motor vehicle.
Every bicycle in use at the times described in 12-201 shall be equipped
with a headlight on the front emitting a white light visible from a
distance of at least 500 feet to the front, and a taillight on the rear
emitting a red light visible from a distance of at least 1000 feet to
the rear.
S 12-703-Rear reflector required at all times
Every bicycle shall be equipped with a red reflector of a type
approved by the department which shall be visible for 600 feet to the
rear when directly in front of lawful lower beams of headlights on a
motor vehicle.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,725
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5791 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
Thanks for the replies guys, appreciated
Do you think, it would be ok, in general, to fix my rear red light to the handle bars, or even 2 rear red lights, one on each end of my handle bar (and so they are still facing to the rear)? - or is it basically mandatory that it needs to be at the rear of my bike, below saddle for example?
Thanks agsin
Do you think, it would be ok, in general, to fix my rear red light to the handle bars, or even 2 rear red lights, one on each end of my handle bar (and so they are still facing to the rear)? - or is it basically mandatory that it needs to be at the rear of my bike, below saddle for example?
Thanks agsin
Forget the law because nobody is going to enforce it to the letter, except if you have no light at all.
Mount the lights wherever you want to, but consider good visibility to the rear and sides more important than anything else.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NE Indiana
Posts: 8,687
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1126 Post(s)
Liked 253 Times
in
204 Posts
The laws vary but not by much. They all follow the US Uniform Vehicle Code fairly closely.
Some states haven't caught up with the light requirement yet and only require the rear reflector. I haven't seen anything about where they need to be mounted, however. Just that they need to be visible for a specific distance.
Some states haven't caught up with the light requirement yet and only require the rear reflector. I haven't seen anything about where they need to be mounted, however. Just that they need to be visible for a specific distance.
The part that i think is weird in our code is they require a bell or some other device that can be heard for 100 feet but not a whistle or a siren...bells are so stupid, they can't be heard a 100 feet in traffic, and it takes one hand off a brake that could help you to stop sooner which would be better than dinging a bell. I have yet to run into any road bike type of person with a bell, I see them on some kids bikes and I see them on Electra's but that's it that I've found, bells don't even come on a road bike from the LBS and they don't push the sale of them either.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
I've got a bell on my hybrid, and I mainly use it for a road bike. I never thought I'd need a bell until I started riding early in the morning and kept coming up behind some of the morning walkers who couldn't hear me approaching until I was close. A bell seems to get the point across better than yelling "on your left!" and my voice isn't that loud anyway. I think the bell can be heard better than my voice. It's also come in handy on rail trails.