Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

Mounted lights on fork?

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Mounted lights on fork?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-08 | 07:15 PM
  #1  
striker_dj's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 90
Likes: 21
From: Arizona

Bikes: Giant Stance, Kona Unit X, Bridgestone MB-2, Miyata Triple-Cross, Specialized Sequoia, Specialized Hard Rock

Mounted lights on fork?

I moved my 2 headlights down to the fork today cause they get in the way up on the handlebars. I haven't had a chance to try em out in the dark yet. Does anyone else do this - or is there a reason I shouldn't keep them down there.



striker_dj is offline  
Reply
Old 04-13-08 | 01:44 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 1
From: wa
If they get turned into the spokes, it will mess up the light and most likely the spokes.
busted knuckles is offline  
Reply
Old 04-13-08 | 07:53 AM
  #3  
Behind Bars
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
I keep a knog bull frog blinky light on my fork. The only thing I've notice so far is that it collects any sand/dirt/grime falling from the fenders. In your case it may make the lens dirty and block some light. But it's easy to wipe down if it does get dirty.
ObjectAgnosia is offline  
Reply
Old 04-13-08 | 07:57 PM
  #4  
Novakane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 577
Likes: 3
From: Canada's Capital

Bikes: Sekine RM40 1980, Miyata 1000LT 1990, Raleigh Mixte Sprite 1980, Raleigh Grand Prix 1979

I've been wondering this myself, but have yet to try it.

I suspect you're going to have a dark spot right up the middle due to the rim itself being in the path of both lights. I'd have something up higher in addition to shine a beam in front of the wheel so you don't catch unseen holes/items in your path.
Novakane is offline  
Reply
Old 04-13-08 | 08:03 PM
  #5  
jsharr's Avatar
You Know!? For Kids!
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,166
Likes: 29
From: Just NW of Richardson Bike Mart

Bikes: '05 Trek 1200 / '90 Trek 8000 / '? Falcon Europa

Passed a guy the other night with fork mounted lights. He also had either a bar light to fill in, or a helmet mounted light. He was approacing an intersection to my left and I crossed before he got there, but I was cool to see the two lights down low. Really seemed to light up the road well.
__________________
Are you a registered member? Why not? Click here to register. It's free and only takes 27 seconds! Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.
Originally Posted by colorider
Phobias are for irrational fears. Fear of junk ripping badgers is perfectly rational. Those things are nasty.
jsharr is offline  
Reply
Old 04-13-08 | 08:30 PM
  #6  
znomit's Avatar
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,922
Likes: 978
From: New Zealand

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Trek Marlin 6, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

This works well with two lights. Yes you get two rim shadows but they are not significant.
Lots of long distance riders run them there as it saves room on the bars for comfy hand positions and handlebar bags. I used to use two cateye el530s, one on each side.
Drawbacks: You get somewhat better visibility to others if your lights are higher, and also you can see better over bumps with a bar mounted light.
znomit is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-08 | 10:55 AM
  #7  
supcom's Avatar
You need a new bike
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,433
Likes: 4
Mounting the lights low makes them more effective because the vertical separation between the lights and your eyes brings emphasizes the texture of the road and makes it easier to spot debris and potholes. This mounting is very popular among randonneurs who ride many hours at night.

The location will cause shadows from the tire that go off to each side, but using two lights will fill those shadows. Even so, it's a minor annoyance that you quickly get used to.

Just be sure that your mounting to the fork is secure.
supcom is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-08 | 04:48 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 912
Likes: 1
From: Mid-Atlantic

Bikes: A bunch

I think this arrangement is more interesting to look at than to see with. I have tried it with dual generator lights, and the arrangement can be a bit of a pain, especially if you want to turn on a secondary light while riding. I ended up moving my lights closer to the cockpit, on a modified bar outrigger for a computer. (Also, if you have cantilever brakes, there are considerations of interference with the lamp housing and the brake arms and straddle wires. If you have a front rack with braze-ons, you can buy hangers that let you place the lamp toward the forward edge of the rack underside, below the bag bottom and out of the way of the fork. This still doesn't get you around the switching inconvenience, but it looks good and works better than a fork mount, IMO.)

The idea of illuminating rough spots better by having the beam closer to the pavement does not result in enough benefit to outweigh the inconvenience of having the switches out of easy reach.
CHenry is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-08 | 05:46 PM
  #9  
cyqlist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts, USA

Bikes: Mobiky, PBW, Jim Redcay, old Chicago Schwinns

Originally Posted by CHenry
The idea of illuminating rough spots better by having the beam closer to the pavement does not result in enough benefit to outweigh the inconvenience of having the switches out of easy reach.
Switches do not necessarily have to be located on the lights. I currently have a remote handlebar switch for the lights on my 20" wheel folding touring bike (single headlight at fork crown level and taillight on rear fender), but the even better way is to use a hub generator setup with LED lights, which has such low drag and long life that it's just not worth the bother of ever switching them off.
cyqlist is offline  
Reply
Old 04-15-08 | 06:27 AM
  #10  
cab horn
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 28,353
Likes: 30
From: Toronto

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

You want the lights at car headlight level, that is if you're more interested in maximizing your visibility to cars.
operator is offline  
Reply
Old 04-15-08 | 07:34 AM
  #11  
supcom's Avatar
You need a new bike
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,433
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by CHenry
I think this arrangement is more interesting to look at than to see with. I have tried it with dual generator lights, and the arrangement can be a bit of a pain, especially if you want to turn on a secondary light while riding. I ended up moving my lights closer to the cockpit, on a modified bar outrigger for a computer. (Also, if you have cantilever brakes, there are considerations of interference with the lamp housing and the brake arms and straddle wires. If you have a front rack with braze-ons, you can buy hangers that let you place the lamp toward the forward edge of the rack underside, below the bag bottom and out of the way of the fork. This still doesn't get you around the switching inconvenience, but it looks good and works better than a fork mount, IMO.)

The idea of illuminating rough spots better by having the beam closer to the pavement does not result in enough benefit to outweigh the inconvenience of having the switches out of easy reach.
When using dual generator lights, having the secondary light mounted a little higher has merit so that you can more easily reach the switch. This is most important with halogen generator lights, such as the Schmidt E6 since you get more light from a single E6 climbing steep hills at speeds below 10-11 mph. I know some randonneurs who mount their primary light on the fork blade and the secondary at the fork crown for this reason.

I disagree with trading off light effectiveness for switch convenience. Most bike lights are marginal at best. The lights shown in the OPs post are much more effective when mounted in the position shown. I had similar lights for my first season of randonneuring and was very pleased with their performance when mounted on the fork blades.

With battery lights, there is little reason to turn one light on and off while riding unless there is a need to conserve batteries. However, in such case, a better strategy would be to carry a spare set of batteries so you can run both lights all the time.
supcom is offline  
Reply
Old 04-15-08 | 07:38 AM
  #12  
cyqlist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts, USA

Bikes: Mobiky, PBW, Jim Redcay, old Chicago Schwinns

Originally Posted by operator
You want the lights at car headlight level, that is if you're more interested in maximizing your visibility to cars.
And maximizing your chances of being recognized and respected as a vehicle on the road. That would be around fork crown level on most bikes. That's also why I prefer larger headlights. And one of the reasons I dislike helmet mounted lights, especially when they are the only front light.
cyqlist is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.