"Tactical" flashlight buyers
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
"Tactical" flashlight buyers
Any military people find the "tactical" nature of these flashlights useful? Or is this "tactical" designation, with seizure-inducing strobes and beveled lens caps really just for show? (I know as a nonmilitary bike person myself, the tactical features aren't useful at all and I'd prefer they be completely omitted.)
#3
Infamous Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 24,360
Likes: 7
From: Ohio
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
I guess maybe if I was like down behind enemy lines and needed to signal the rescue chopper and it was dark and I didn't have a radio or an infrared and it was a Tuesday and a new moon and a leap year...
#4
__________________
1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold
1 bronze, 0 silver, 1 gold
#5
747 Freight Pilot
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, USA
Bikes: Rivendell, Bike-Friday Pocket-Rocket and one home made fixed gear
Surefire, a leading US manufacturer of tactical flashlights holds training sessions for their use. I have never met anyone who has actually attended.
#6
Tactical-style flashlights on bikes seem silly to me- they're big and heavy, with bulky attachment systems, and often lack in run-time compared to dedicated bike lights.
I will say, though, that the strobe function is a highly effective way of getting the attention of drivers. Perhaps the strike bezel would be a good "plan B" if the strobe fails to keep them away from you on the road...
I will say, though, that the strobe function is a highly effective way of getting the attention of drivers. Perhaps the strike bezel would be a good "plan B" if the strobe fails to keep them away from you on the road...
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
Tactical-style flashlights on bikes seem silly to me- they're big and heavy, with bulky attachment systems, and often lack in run-time compared to dedicated bike lights.
I will say, though, that the strobe function is a highly effective way of getting the attention of drivers. Perhaps the strike bezel would be a good "plan B" if the strobe fails to keep them away from you on the road...
I will say, though, that the strobe function is a highly effective way of getting the attention of drivers. Perhaps the strike bezel would be a good "plan B" if the strobe fails to keep them away from you on the road...
Show me a bike-specific light that will put out 200 lumens for 1 hour that costs less than $85 - you'll be lucky if you can get anything <$100 for 200 lumens. You can alternatively buy a Terralux $28 flashlight that will deliver the goods, and mount stably with a $5 lockblock.
I guess the Magicshine is a bike-specific solution, but it doesn't really count since it's not made by a well known bike-specific manufacturer (like Blackburn, NiteRider, etc.)
IMO, these major bike light manufacturers really need to get with the program - they've been WAY behind the lighting curve for years now. It's really sad when a $28 tactical flashlight outperforms nearly 100% of their products that cost 3x as much.
#9
I'm using a few of them, but I've been out of the military since long before marketing people started giving the "tactical" designation to everything. I think this is a pretty shrewd appeal to people who play a lot of Splinter Cell and can envision themselves having a sudden need for a tactical lint brush while suspended upside-down from a tactical wire rope at 3am in a foreign embassy.
The only tactics I'm aware of that apply to these flashlights are:
1. lighting things up (standard mode,)
2. getting attention (the flashy mode.)
I suppose bashing the enemy's skull in is a tactic, but you can do that with lots of other tactical things...
The only tactics I'm aware of that apply to these flashlights are:
1. lighting things up (standard mode,)
2. getting attention (the flashy mode.)
I suppose bashing the enemy's skull in is a tactic, but you can do that with lots of other tactical things...
#10
Infamous Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 24,360
Likes: 7
From: Ohio
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
If I recall, the last time anybody produced numbers, the majority of bike commuters have commutes that are less than one hour and the vast majority of cyclists never ride in the dark (or the rain, or the snow or the cold). I figure for most commuters and rec riders, an hour is about all they need and changing a battery in a flashlight isn't rocket science if they need more sometimes.
#11
Immoderator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,630
Likes: 5
From: POS Tennessee
Bikes: Gary Fisher Simple City 8, Litespeed Obed
I saw the Surefire ones at Loews the other day-Does anyone have an explanation as to why those things are $85 apiece that isn't an insult to the intellect?
__________________
Originally Posted by Bikeforums
Your rights end where another poster's feelings begin.
#12
Infamous Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 24,360
Likes: 7
From: Ohio
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
Point to ONE bike manufacturer which can come up with something that would deliver 1+hr of useable lighting (not just a "to-be-seen" light) for <$100?
You can use a $20 P7 flashlight with 200+ lumens on medium for 2+ hrs easily. Nothing the major manufacturers make comes close for price.
#14
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
I also don't see the average cyclist or commuter need a 200 lumen light. I got a Cygolite Luxeon light (150 lumens, maybe), that is more than enough for anything, save maybe off-roading in the dark. The main thing you need for commuting is "be seen" visibility. That includes the tail-light, reflectors, reflective clothing, etc.
Most of these flashlight costs you're quoting don't include the battery cost. Last I checked, 4 AA's + Charger is still around $20 or more. Add that cost to any flashlight if you don't have the batteries bought already.
Most of these flashlight costs you're quoting don't include the battery cost. Last I checked, 4 AA's + Charger is still around $20 or more. Add that cost to any flashlight if you don't have the batteries bought already.
#15
Banned.
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 604
Likes: 16
#16
I find the tactical forward-clickie switches very useful in real life. Half the time I pick up a flashlight, I only need a quick burst of light to look at something, so a tactical light is perfect. Push for momentary illumination, release to turn off. I don't know why they even bother making reverse-clickies 
US labor, Acme threading, and probably you can actually get parts for it 5 years from now. That's my best guess.
I have a Seca 700 (as in, 700 lumens). In total darkness, I can ride at a slow cruise (15mph) on the 175-lumen setting... the light's distributed really well, and that helps. But even at 700 lumens, well-distributed and all, it's still not overkill for high speeds and/or situations where there are strong lights to compete with (two oncoming lanes of car headlights, for example). It'll be a long time before I call "overkill" on a production light system.

I saw the Surefire ones at Loews the other day-Does anyone have an explanation as to why those things are $85 apiece that isn't an insult to the intellect?
I also don't see the average cyclist or commuter need a 200 lumen light.
Last edited by mechBgon; 10-28-09 at 08:40 PM.
#17
Any military people find the "tactical" nature of these flashlights useful? Or is this "tactical" designation, with seizure-inducing strobes and beveled lens caps really just for show? (I know as a nonmilitary bike person myself, the tactical features aren't useful at all and I'd prefer they be completely omitted.)
My Dinotte is a wonderful light, but it just gets used less because the flashlights are easier to use, and they do the job as well or better.
#18
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
I also don't see the average cyclist or commuter need a 200 lumen light. I got a Cygolite Luxeon light (150 lumens, maybe), that is more than enough for anything, save maybe off-roading in the dark. The main thing you need for commuting is "be seen" visibility. That includes the tail-light, reflectors, reflective clothing, etc.
Most of these flashlight costs you're quoting don't include the battery cost. Last I checked, 4 AA's + Charger is still around $20 or more. Add that cost to any flashlight if you don't have the batteries bought already.
Most of these flashlight costs you're quoting don't include the battery cost. Last I checked, 4 AA's + Charger is still around $20 or more. Add that cost to any flashlight if you don't have the batteries bought already.
If you run the P7s on "medium", it will STILL be brigher than your Cygolite 150lumen and run for hours. And it will still cost lower than your Cygolite. I also am not sure you can use the Cygolite charger on other lights - hopefully you can, or else you've just taken another loss there.
The Cygolite actually is actually a reasonable deal for a bike-specific manufacturer at <$100 for 150 lumens, but still, it's almost an afterthought compared to the examples I've given above that cost exactly the same, if not less.
The Dinotte is probably the most "useable" bike-specific light IMO, at it's $150 for 2 hr runtime at 200 lumens - still a far cry from dual P7s running on medium.
#19
Unlike most of you, I use my light in blinky mode (to be seen) since I live in a large city with enough street light to see the road.
For your reference, I have this MTE P7 sku13060 8-mode flashlight. I always have it on the 3rd mode (which I call the epileptic seizure mode). I think it blinks somewhere around 5 - 10x per second. I never really counted because I get a headache from looking at it. Sometimes I have to turn the light off for a few minutes because I'd get dizzy if I'm riding too long with it on.
#20
Banned
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,082
Likes: 1
Any military people find the "tactical" nature of these flashlights useful? Or is this "tactical" designation, with seizure-inducing strobes and beveled lens caps really just for show? (I know as a nonmilitary bike person myself, the tactical features aren't useful at all and I'd prefer they be completely omitted.)
#21
Infamous Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 24,360
Likes: 7
From: Ohio
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
I want to see Bambo the Deer, Rocky the suicide raccoon, Pete the bottomless pothole and all the rest of the goonies out there in the deep darkness that are waiting to ruin my day.
#22
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
I'm sure when I bought the Cygolite 3-4 years ago, it was rather advanced. The bike lights were just starting to go off of Halogen and onto the LEDs. I've commuted with it, ridden the dark paths, dodging deer and racoons and ice at 15-18mph. Like I said, it does the job very nicely. I think I got it for around $80 - now I see it on the internet for around $60-65.
You're right that the batteries and charger aren't useful for anything else. I'm just sort of pointing out that the Cygolite isn't that much more expensive than a Lowe's task force light when you take into account battery and charger.
You're right that the batteries and charger aren't useful for anything else. I'm just sort of pointing out that the Cygolite isn't that much more expensive than a Lowe's task force light when you take into account battery and charger.
#23
Perma-clyde
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Bikes: '05 Stumpy FSR 120, REK TEK Blitzkreig (Commuter)
It would be nice if the difference between 'tactical' and MIL-Spec were made more clear.
Just because something is described as 'tactical' does not mean that it has been designed or built to meet some pre-defined standards related to function, ruggedness, quality and reliability. Anyone who has ever asked flashlight questions that started 'is this really...' or 'what's the best...' will recognise that there is considerable variability in the performance of these lights.
That said, if any light really WERE designed, built and validated to MIL spec standards, you could be assured that a price tag of $100 would be a bargain, simply because it would likely cost as much to produce each one.
As for the utility of features like 'tactical strobe' and the 'assault crown', I'd chalk it up to the individual user. A legal, metal rod that you can carry with you at night, curl your fist around, and topped with a nasty striking tool seizure - inducing strobe might be might just be enough to disorient an attacker in the dark, throw them off balance and get that momentary advantage to get the hell out of there. That's why my wife rides with one.
Just because something is described as 'tactical' does not mean that it has been designed or built to meet some pre-defined standards related to function, ruggedness, quality and reliability. Anyone who has ever asked flashlight questions that started 'is this really...' or 'what's the best...' will recognise that there is considerable variability in the performance of these lights.
That said, if any light really WERE designed, built and validated to MIL spec standards, you could be assured that a price tag of $100 would be a bargain, simply because it would likely cost as much to produce each one.
As for the utility of features like 'tactical strobe' and the 'assault crown', I'd chalk it up to the individual user. A legal, metal rod that you can carry with you at night, curl your fist around, and topped with a nasty striking tool seizure - inducing strobe might be might just be enough to disorient an attacker in the dark, throw them off balance and get that momentary advantage to get the hell out of there. That's why my wife rides with one.
#24
Seņior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)
Alox: +1
Some of the "tactical" flashlights that I've seen aren't even up to the level of crappy civilian stuff. The word "tactical" has no legal meaning; I could sell a tactical ball of mud if I wanted to.
Some of the "tactical" flashlights that I've seen aren't even up to the level of crappy civilian stuff. The word "tactical" has no legal meaning; I could sell a tactical ball of mud if I wanted to.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
#25
Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Point is valid - but even so -
Point to ONE bike manufacturer which can come up with something that would deliver 1+hr of useable lighting (not just a "to-be-seen" light) for <$100?
You can use a $20 P7 flashlight with 200+ lumens on medium for 2+ hrs easily. Nothing the major manufacturers make comes close for price.
Point to ONE bike manufacturer which can come up with something that would deliver 1+hr of useable lighting (not just a "to-be-seen" light) for <$100?
You can use a $20 P7 flashlight with 200+ lumens on medium for 2+ hrs easily. Nothing the major manufacturers make comes close for price.
Mind you, I also love my Romisen that is my backup. I wouldn't be without either now and to think I used to commute with 2x blackburn quads. I'm so happy one of my quads flew off and was totally trashed during a rough ride; that was the push I needed to get some better lightning. I'm tempted by the Magicshine but not sure about the long term quality.







