![]() |
Calibrate Polar HRM/Cycle Computer
Just got a Polar CS 200 HRM for Christmas and I love it. But...I have noticed that there may be something wrong with the calibration for the cycle computer. It seems to be about 1/10 of a mile off for each mile. I have a route leaving from my house that I have measured many times with both of my cars and my old $10 walmart/schwinn cycle computer. The first ride I took with it is a 10 mile out and 10 mile back and it came up short on the mileage. I have 700 x 23 tires and I entered the correct code...just wondering if anyone else has come up against this with Polar. Thanks.
|
Three ways, each with greater accuracy than the preceeding one.
Sheldon Brown's site (may he rest in peace) knows all, tells all:
Deriving tire diameter from ISO/ETRTO numbers Roll-out Test for Super Accuracy Using a measured course to fine-tune your setting I've used the measued course method, determining the distance beginning of intersection to beginning of intersection, from Google Maps. When my 3 mile commute goes off by 0.02 miles, I know its time to pump up the tires. I suggest going directly to the measured course method, the longer and straighter, the better. |
Thanks, looking on Sheldon's site, I did have another number for my wheels than he had in his charts. I set it and can't wait to try it this weekend.
|
Just tried it out and it seems to be right on. There has to be something wrong with my mph though ;) I know I was riding. Thanks again.
|
arent they great? Im using a cs600X and all I got to say is wow.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.