![]() |
mechBgon
If you had to pick one, would it be the radbot or the danger zone? |
Originally Posted by 2manybikes
(Post 13528034)
mechBgon
If you had to pick one, would it be the radbot or the danger zone? |
Originally Posted by mechBgon
(Post 13527874)
From directions where it's not blocked, it should be worth having onboard. But it doesn't have *quite* enough power to penetrate solid metal :thumb: so you wouldn't want to be relying on it by itself to cover your backside from all angles.
|
Originally Posted by mechBgon
(Post 13528085)
The Danger Zone wins by default, you know my bad experience with the Radbots I had. The DZ also allows battery changes without tools, has some extra-crazy strobe tricks, and I'm pretty sure it has a longer runtime (although still short).
|
Originally Posted by no1mad
(Post 13528088)
I just had another thought on mounting- use a Gino mount. This thingy can be used wherever a M5 bolt can go, so it it could be used at the seat stay or the drop out. But I don't know what size clamps that the PDW and PBSF lights use...
BTW if you're considering the Gino mount, you could just drill a hole in a square piece of scrap metal, bolt that to your eyelet, and bolt the light receptacle straight to it. I know you're not made of money, and those Gino mounts are pricey. |
Originally Posted by mechBgon
(Post 13528085)
The Danger Zone wins by default, you know my bad experience with the Radbots I had. The DZ also allows battery changes without tools, has some extra-crazy strobe tricks, and I'm pretty sure it has a longer runtime (although still short).
I have a Radbot 1000, and I was disappointed when I did the math -- on steady mode it claims a 15hr runtime, and even using 1200mah primaries, it only puts about 1/5W into a 1W LED. |
Originally Posted by CaptainCool
(Post 13528285)
Longer battery life isn't a good thing when you want a bright light.
I have a Radbot 1000, and I was disappointed when I did the math -- on steady mode it claims a 15hr runtime, and even using 1200mah primaries, it only puts about 1/5W into a 1W LED. So if you run the Radbots in steady-on with NiMH cells, the cells need to be swapped out every 2 hours to stay at or above 75% of max output with NiMH. In flash mode, a 3 hour changeout will stay at or above 80% of maximum. Another steady-burn monster is the DealExtreme SKU 20333, a flashlight with a red emitter: http://www.dealextreme.com/p/ultrafi...2-cr123a-20333 I have one of these and it's REALLY intense if aimed right :eek: Might be a good "early warning system" for people who ride in dense fog, although flashing would still be better yet. |
Originally Posted by no1mad
(Post 13528093)
Yep. Just checked the PDW site- 50 hrs on the DZ and 30 for the Radbot 1000.
|
Originally Posted by no1mad
(Post 13528088)
I just had another thought on mounting- use a Gino mount. This thingy can be used wherever a M5 bolt can go, so it it could be used at the seat stay or the drop out. But I don't know what size clamps that the PDW and PBSF lights use...
|
Originally Posted by mechBgon
(Post 13528085)
The Danger Zone wins by default, you know my bad experience with the Radbots I had. The DZ also allows battery changes without tools, has some extra-crazy strobe tricks, and I'm pretty sure it has a longer runtime (although still short).
|
I guess if you want the convenience of using a light with cells integrated in the body then PDW has at least two good tail lights.
But after using lights with higher power battery packs - I don't see big benefits. A MS tail light can be had around $30 and connected to a 4xAA $2 battery carrier from Radio Shack and still out perform these lights while lasting much longer as well. Of course one could argue the hassle of strapping on the battery carrier and taping or soldering two wires......... In any event I'll take four......... |
Where I ride, anything you leave attached to the bike without being locked is subject to being quickly stolen. I need a taillight that puts out a lot of attention-getting light and is still quickly and easily removable and pocketable. Your bike would be stripped within 15 minutes if you parked it in San Francisco. And they wouldn't do it neatly.
|
Originally Posted by michaelnel
(Post 13528742)
Where I ride, anything you leave attached to the bike without being locked is subject to being quickly stolen. I need a taillight that puts out a lot of attention-getting light and is still quickly and easily removable and pocketable. Your bike would be stripped within 15 minutes if you parked it in San Francisco. And they wouldn't do it neatly.
|
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium
(Post 13528600)
I guess if you want the convenience of using a light with cells integrated in the body then PDW has at least two good tail lights.
But after using lights with higher power battery packs - I don't see big benefits. A MS tail light can be had around $30 and connected to a 4xAA $2 battery carrier from Radio Shack and still out perform these lights while lasting much longer as well. Of course one could argue the hassle of strapping on the battery carrier and taping or soldering two wires......... In any event I'll take four......... |
I've been commuting with a RAdbot 1000 since July, and it's been terrific. I like the button. Makes it easy to switch modes and turn on/off. Does the DZ have a similar button?
|
Originally Posted by mechBgon
(Post 13528301)
On that note, BrianMc did some measurements with the Radbot 1000 and his assessment is found here: http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/...ar-light/page2
I speculate the 1W blinkies on the market only deliver 1W in flashing mode, if even then. If you want a high-brightness steady-burn light, the Hotshot might be your ticket to ride. I haven't checked burn time in steady mode, but if it's of particular interest I could do a runtime test. Are there any tests or measurements that compare the visibility of taillights with car tail/brake lights? I don't need crazy -- I've seen bike taillights that were way too bright and I don't want to go there. |
Originally Posted by itsthewoo
(Post 11787810)
If mounted horizontally, does it increase the angle of view?
|
Originally Posted by michaelnel
(Post 13528742)
Where I ride, anything you leave attached to the bike without being locked is subject to being quickly stolen. I need a taillight that puts out a lot of attention-getting light and is still quickly and easily removable and pocketable. Your bike would be stripped within 15 minutes if you parked it in San Francisco. And they wouldn't do it neatly.
Originally Posted by michaelnel
(Post 13528523)
I think the only way a DZ is going to get 50 hours of runtime is if it is running in the OFF mode. I ran mine on a pair of freshly charged 800mAh NiMH cells and it finally shut itself down at about 20 hours. It was pretty feeble during the last 5 hours or so.
Originally Posted by no1mad
(Post 13528093)
Yep. Just checked the PDW site- 50 hrs on the DZ and 30 for the Radbot 1000.
|
http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...able-taillight
This light leaves all the cheap lights like Superfalsh/SF Turbo/Danger Zone/Radbot/All Cateyes etc. in the dust. IMHO, there is no compelling reason to buy them at all. I am amazed how a light this small can be so powerful. For the price, one can get two just for the redundancy. Dinotte 300R is 50% brighter but 600% more expensive so there is no reason to buy it either... |
Originally Posted by jsdavis
(Post 13535419)
DZ will not last more than 12 or 15 hours with any useful amount of output. Not with NiMH at least. Alkalines might be different, but will be more costly in the long run.
|
Originally Posted by rfomenko
(Post 13535555)
.. there is no compelling reason to buy them at all...
Most of the other taillights will continue operating in rain, which is apparently not always the case with the Hotshot, based on comments in that thread. Finally, although the beam of the Hotshot is very bright, it is a very narrow beam for a taillight, with no spill whatsoever. You'll be visible only from directly behind with the Hotshot. Those are three compelling reasons to consider lights others than the Hotshot. |
Originally Posted by seeker333
(Post 13535644)
Nearly all other taillights are powered by replaceable AAA or AA cells. The Hotshot is powered by a non-user-replaceable Li cell. One has to wonder how long this cell will last, because in a light that sells for $33 shipped, it is likely this is a cheap cell. I have had cheap Li cells last for days or years.
Most of the other taillights will continue operating in rain, which is apparently not always the case with the Hotshot, based on comments in that thread. Finally, although the beam of the Hotshot is very bright, it is a very narrow beam for a taillight, with no spill whatsoever. You'll be visible only from directly behind with the Hotshot. Those are three compelling reasons to consider lights others than the Hotshot. Operating in the rain: you'll find many more links of people complaining of Superflash & the like letting the water in. Come to think about it, they are more likely to do so because of the replaceable batteries so let me disagree with you on this point. As far as the narrow beam goes, it seems to have a wider one than Superflash & Radbot both of which I also own & use. I mostly use Hotshot for daytime riding when the other cheap lights are just not bright enough & it has performed splendidly. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:59 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.