Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

"Ride with GPS" + OSMAND = Wow!

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

"Ride with GPS" + OSMAND = Wow!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-12, 06:04 AM
  #1  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Bend, IN (U.S.A.)
Posts: 476

Bikes: Priority Continuum Onyx; Hunter CX

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
"Ride with GPS" + OSMAND = Wow!

This thread is redundant because I know I've seen people mention this combination in previous posts, but I had such a good experience this weekend I felt compelled to post.

I decided on very short notice to ride from South Bend, IN to Kalamazoo, MI this past weekend.

Having played around a little bit with OSMAND, an Android navigation app, I decided to couple it with Ride with GPS and fully trust the combination to get me there.

1) From the website, I simply specified my start and end points, and without any modifications of the route I exported it as a GPX file.

2) I dropped that GPX file into the correct folder on my phone.

3) I turned on the satellite-based GPS functionality of my phone.

4) I put my phone on airplane mode (i.e. no internet, network or bluetooth communication); notably, it can still receive GPS information in that mode.

5) I launched OSMAND on the phone, had it display the GPX track from Ride with GPS, and followed that the whole way to my destination.

Having tried similar things in the past I found that it never quite worked -- there was always some bug (or ignorance on my part) that kept it from being a viable navigation tool.

But this time... all I can say is WOW! Again, I'm sure many of you already know this, and have for a while, but I was truly blown away by how well this worked. It appears that the technology is finally there, and easy enough that even I could make it work.

The 75-mile ride took me about six hours, and although I didn't keep the screen on the entire time, I did check it frequently, and I had plenty of battery power left at the end. Each time I pulled out my phone to check my position it immediately showed me right where I was, and the next few turns were easy to discern.

Most notably, the route it took me on was great! Getting out of South Bend was the worst part, but after that I was on very low-traffic roads and bike paths almost the entire time. Much of the route included dirt and gravel roads, which may be a turnoff for some, but were perfect for me. (See below for a snapshot taken along the way.)

Near Kalamazoo I found myself on a fairly long series of bike paths that I didn't even know existed, and IMHO that was one of the best aspects of Ride with GPS: new bike paths are popping up all around the country, but they can be easy to miss for out-of-town visitors. At least in this example, Ride with GPS did an awesome job of knowing what was available and making good use of it for my trip.

Again, I don't mean for this post to sound like I think I've discovered anything new... I just wanted to share a good experience.

Derailed is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 07:19 AM
  #2  
Motorcycle RoadRacer
 
cehowardGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,826
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Great read, great picture, great ride, great experience.. IMO, can't get any better than that!!
cehowardGS is offline  
Old 05-07-12, 09:50 AM
  #3  
Fat Guy Rolling
 
dcrowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Louisville Kentucky
Posts: 2,434

Bikes: Bacchetta Agio, 80s Raleigh Record single-speed, Surly Big Dummy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Derailed
I decided on very short notice to ride from South Bend, IN to Kalamazoo, MI this past weekend.
Cool! I used to live in Niles. Can you share your gpx file?
dcrowell is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 08:26 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
joewein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 642

Bikes: Elephant Bikes National Forest Explorer, Bike Friday Pocket Rocket

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times in 82 Posts
Google Maps also works very well for me in this way. You can convert a GPX to a KML, import it into he My Places section on a PC and then use the Layers feature on Android Google Maps to superimpose the route as a red line on your map view.
joewein is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 09:20 AM
  #5  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Bend, IN (U.S.A.)
Posts: 476

Bikes: Priority Continuum Onyx; Hunter CX

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by dcrowell
Cool! I used to live in Niles. Can you share your gpx file?
My pleasure. I believe the following URL will take you to the route in Ride with GPS, and from there you can either just view it or export in in whatever format you wish: ridewithgps.com.
Derailed is offline  
Old 05-08-12, 09:22 AM
  #6  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Bend, IN (U.S.A.)
Posts: 476

Bikes: Priority Continuum Onyx; Hunter CX

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by joewein
Google Maps also works very well for me in this way. You can convert a GPX to a KML, import it into he My Places section on a PC and then use the Layers feature on Android Google Maps to superimpose the route as a red line on your map view.
Doesn't Google Maps require network access to download map tiles as you go, or can they all be downloaded from the outset?
Derailed is offline  
Old 05-14-12, 01:50 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
joewein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 642

Bikes: Elephant Bikes National Forest Explorer, Bike Friday Pocket Rocket

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times in 82 Posts
Google Maps can pre-cache the map data if you once scroll through the map before you go offline (for example at home on WiFi). It downloads the data to the SD card storage. However, I haven't tested the KML track in airplane mode or without nearby cellphone towers, only basic map access. Most of my bike rides are within mobile network coverage areas.
joewein is offline  
Old 08-22-18, 08:07 PM
  #8  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What is difference between osmand and ridewithgps?

What is the difference between ridewithgps and osmand? My basic requirements: be able to download a GPX file, have turn by turn directions, minimize battery usage, run offline, and in a pinch, create a new route.
ethanstrominger is offline  
Old 08-23-18, 06:55 AM
  #9  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times in 2,518 Posts
this is an old thread, never heard of osmand before.

Just a note, google maps now has an offline mode, so you can put your phone in airplane mode and the program doesn't constantly hammer your battery reloading the maps. Why it doesn't do something like that by default when you use it to navigate is beyond me.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 08-23-18, 06:43 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,883

Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3240 Post(s)
Liked 2,086 Times in 1,181 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
this is an old thread, never heard of osmand before.

Just a note, google maps now has an offline mode, so you can put your phone in airplane mode and the program doesn't constantly hammer your battery reloading the maps. Why it doesn't do something like that by default when you use it to navigate is beyond me.
Presumably it’s downloading and caching some local maps ?, and doing so automatically ?, which makes me wonder how big a region, does it keep data like restaurants, etc.... when does it dump the cache ?, how much memory used ?.
Steve B. is offline  
Old 08-23-18, 10:15 PM
  #11  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times in 2,518 Posts
I am pretty sure that google maps caches what it needs to navigate you to your destination from your start point. I'm sure there are limitations on what it can do off-route. I knew someone that dnf'ed a long ride and rode back to the finish using this technique with google maps. It was about a 70 mile ride.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 08-26-18, 07:13 AM
  #12  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I went ahead and tried osmand maps. The display of the maps looks much better than ridewithgps. Osmand is more oriented towards maps and following already created GPS tracks which is the key feature to me. I could not figure out how to create new routes on my PC, but it says you can do it on your smart phone or Android device. If I create a new route, I will probably do it on ridewithgps, then follow it on osmand.
ethanstrominger is offline  
Old 08-26-18, 07:28 AM
  #13  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For differences between osmand maps and google maps, see H T T P : / / osmand.net/blog?id=osmand_google_comparison. Two key differences: osmand maps uses open street map and osmand maps let you download a whole country (for US, you have to download a state) while Google maps only offer the 50km x 50km areas for download.
ethanstrominger is offline  
Old 08-26-18, 10:56 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
I've done the same thing, Ride with GPS and Osmand, and the one great thing about it is that it works. You can set up the complicated route on Ride with GPS, even starting with a GPX file that you got from somewhere, get it into the Osmand app, and it does a nice job of navigating it.

The reason I don't use it much is that the whole process is kind of convoluted, and the Osmand user interface is pretty ridiculous. If I don't need the route with way-points, I just use something simpler. Even Google Maps if nothing else.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 08-27-18, 01:58 PM
  #15  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 289
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Why is this better than using the "Ride This" feature in the Ride With GPS app? It seems like a lot of extra set-up work, but it may be worthwhile if there is an advantage.
njlonghorn is offline  
Old 08-27-18, 02:29 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by njlonghorn
Why is this better than using the "Ride This" feature in the Ride With GPS app? It seems like a lot of extra set-up work, but it may be worthwhile if there is an advantage.
Ride with GPS app navigation with turn by turn guidance etc requires "Basic" ($50 per year) or "Premium" ($80 per year). https://ridewithgps.com/help/compare-plans. We're cheap and don't want to pay anything.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 08-28-18, 06:48 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 210
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
Ride with GPS app navigation with turn by turn guidance etc requires "Basic" ($50 per year) or "Premium" ($80 per year). https://ridewithgps.com/help/compare-plans. We're cheap and don't want to pay anything.
Some minor points worth noting: the RideWithGPS app provides street names, the Osmand app does not. However, Osmand provides good return to route guidance, whereas RWGPS does not. Also, you need to create the route using RideWithGPS to have street name information. Yes, there is a cost for the Basic Plan that is needed in order to use the companion RWGPS app. However, few people know that the Track Navigator app performs nearly as well as the RWGPS app, yet it's free (donations accepted). Also, to have the richness of RWGPS street name turn by turn nav (or Track Navigator) combined with all features of Osmand, use them both at once. For tricky rides with many turns, this is what I do. Setting imperial distance on one app and metric on the other helps resolve any ambiguity if you primarily listen to audio cues.
sierrabob is offline  
Old 08-30-18, 11:19 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
FWIW, I find Dynamic.Watch to be a better routing tool than RWGPS (of which I am a premium member). Besides that, you can use it to route on a mobile device with full capability.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 08-30-18, 08:14 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
01 CAt Man Do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 1,141

Bikes: Mountain bike & Hybrid tour bike

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 183 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Just last night I discovered that RWGPS has changed some of their formats. Seems they want more of your money although they still offer a free version. Been using the free version for years along with my Locus Pro navigation app. Spent hours last night trying to figure out how now to download a planned route which I used to be able to do without any problems.

After giving up I discovered that the lastest version of Locus Pro has a function that lets you plan a route right from the app. It was kind of hidden so I never saw it before. Took me another couple hours to figure out the best way to use that. The Locus app has lots of settings and functions so it's not really easy to work with. Not to mention that if you don't use it very often ( which I don't ), it's real easy to forget some of the most basic functions and how to change them when needed. Since I had the time I found out how to use and download the off-line maps. Since you need an off line router to give turn by turn instructions for off line maps the Locus app has a direct link to the Brouter app., which I downloaded

After doing all that I went back to RWGPS and finally found the instruction on how to download a planned route to my PC. Not sure if the free RWGPS app will give me audible turn by turn when I download the route to my phone. I guess I'll find out when I next do a local ride. If it doesn't no worries because I can opt to use Brouter which supposedly will give me turn by turn.

Last edited by 01 CAt Man Do; 08-30-18 at 08:23 PM.
01 CAt Man Do is offline  
Old 08-30-18, 10:20 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by 01 CAt Man Do
Just last night I discovered that RWGPS has changed some of their formats. Seems they want more of your money although they still offer a free version. Been using the free version for years along with my Locus Pro navigation app. Spent hours last night trying to figure out how now to download a planned route which I used to be able to do without any problems.

After giving up I discovered that the lastest version of Locus Pro has a function that lets you plan a route right from the app. It was kind of hidden so I never saw it before. Took me another couple hours to figure out the best way to use that. The Locus app has lots of settings and functions so it's not really easy to work with. Not to mention that if you don't use it very often ( which I don't ), it's real easy to forget some of the most basic functions and how to change them when needed. Since I had the time I found out how to use and download the off-line maps. Since you need an off line router to give turn by turn instructions for off line maps the Locus app has a direct link to the Brouter app., which I downloaded

After doing all that I went back to RWGPS and finally found the instruction on how to download a planned route to my PC. Not sure if the free RWGPS app will give me audible turn by turn when I download the route to my phone. I guess I'll find out when I next do a local ride. If it doesn't no worries because I can opt to use Brouter which supposedly will give me turn by turn.
Have you looked at Komoot? Also really good. Great phone apps too.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 08-30-18, 11:23 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
01 CAt Man Do's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Columbia, Maryland
Posts: 1,141

Bikes: Mountain bike & Hybrid tour bike

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 183 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnJ80


Have you looked at Komoot? Also really good. Great phone apps too.
Very, very interesting.

John, it seems I can always count on you for good info. I just did a quick perusal of the Komoot app and website and it seems to have everything. With Komoot you can go to their website and a draw out a route just like with RWGPS. Can even use OSM cycle which is a "must have" for me. While it's not entirely free it's a much better deal than RWGPS. With Komoot you can use the app online or off line. Where things get dicy with Komoot is when you want to go off line. Then you have to download the area(s) you need just like with Locus but the listed areas seem smaller with Komoot. Not a real problem if you are going with the most expensive plan because that gives you unlimited downloads ( afaik ). Still, all things considered, the "one time price" of €29.99 beats RWGPS hands down.

Right now the Locus app is working for me but that Komoot app and website has me licking my chops. Currently I'm not doing many rides that require navigation but that may change. Got to get me a better phone so I know I have the storage space to download some off line maps.
01 CAt Man Do is offline  
Old 08-31-18, 09:10 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by 01 CAt Man Do
Very, very interesting.

John, it seems I can always count on you for good info. I just did a quick perusal of the Komoot app and website and it seems to have everything. With Komoot you can go to their website and a draw out a route just like with RWGPS. Can even use OSM cycle which is a "must have" for me. While it's not entirely free it's a much better deal than RWGPS. With Komoot you can use the app online or off line. Where things get dicy with Komoot is when you want to go off line. Then you have to download the area(s) you need just like with Locus but the listed areas seem smaller with Komoot. Not a real problem if you are going with the most expensive plan because that gives you unlimited downloads ( afaik ). Still, all things considered, the "one time price" of €29.99 beats RWGPS hands down.

Right now the Locus app is working for me but that Komoot app and website has me licking my chops. Currently I'm not doing many rides that require navigation but that may change. Got to get me a better phone so I know I have the storage space to download some off line maps.
Hi Cat - glad to help.

I’ve spent a bunch of time this summer figuring out bike navigation. We had planned a bucket list tour this year and that was part of it but that led me to buy a Hammerhead Karoo bike computer. While the thing has it’s problems, it is Android based and it is possible to sideload Android apps. It has a fabulous display and I had a need for better navigation and their nav, as of a few months ago when I needed it, was substandard (it’s better now). At any rate, I was able to sideload both Osmand and Komoot as well as Lotus.
Here’s the thing - Osmand has the best maps and you can download large geographic regions off line (think state, or EU country sized maps) plus you can add overlays that give you great topo understanding of the terrain. Osmand can do it’s own routing and will accept a gpx file as a route, but it cannot do turn by turn directiosn with street names unless you routed your tour on Osmand and on the exact platform you will be using. There is not a capability I’ve found to move native Osmand routes from device to device. So you can’t, say, do a route on your computer and then download it to your bike computer or phone and have it give you the street names in TbT directions. It will tell you to turn left or right but it won’t know the name of hte street. Osmand can operate off the grid better than any of the others because of it’s ability to download large sections of maps.

Komoot, on the other hand, can take an imported gpx file and turn it into TbT directions with street name cues. That’s a big advantage if you need to be on roads at all. Komoot maps cannot be regional maps and they are huge. You can download the map for the route you are going to ride and, if I recall, even some geographical areas but not to the extent that Osmand can. Komoot has a much cleaner interface, has the ability to get decent ride metrics, and also to see where you are on the altitude profile while you are riding - all really good.

Both Komoot and Osmand do turn by turn audio cues which is also a decent benefit.

The other piece I just came on recently is Dynamic.Watch as a route generator. This has all of the capabilities of RWGPS plus, and importantly for me, it replicates all of that on the mobile platforms. RWGPS has trouble routing and using the touch interface on mobile devices for generating routes using their web applications. Dynamic.Watch does not. DW can export all the file types you need, has a Garmin Connect IQ app that moves routes to and from the bike computer if you use a Garmin, can be imported into both Komoot and Garmin. If you have a dropbox or some cloud file service set up you can move files through that to any of the navigation apps. You can get premium capabililities for a one time lifetime fee of something like $30 or so and does not have the recurring annual charge that RWGPS.

So what I do is this: I build my routes on one of those two services (formerly RWGPS now I use DW), move it to the riding software platform that I want for this application. If I’m primarily needed high quality maps nad TbT is less important, then it’s Osmand. If TbT is more important and I want more vertical profile info, then it’s Osmand. If I have my Garmin unit, then I just pull it down on that unit directly when in WiFi. Sometimes on my Karoo I even run both Osmand and Komoot simultaneously - it takes marginally more battery power and I get different but important information from both. For example, when we did a ride in the EU over a wilderness trail that has a lot of topo issues but periodically came into more settled areas with car traffic, I used Osmand. When I ride a road bike route around home or exploring, I tend to use Komoot. If I’m on the road with someone else and I’m navigating, I use Komoot because I can tell them what street to turn on next.

So that’s pretty much what I learned the last few months and it served me pretty well. Check out Dynamic.Watch - I think you might find that pretty handy.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 09-05-18, 08:37 AM
  #23  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times in 2,518 Posts
rwgps' heavy-handed switch to a crippled free version and moving the two minor features I use to the highest price tier has me looking for alternatives. I mostly do route planning on rwgps and there are multitudes of flaws in that aspect of the site. I probably spend 2-3x the time fixing the problems they introduce into a route as I do preparing it. My understanding is they blame google for the problems, but they need to come up with fixes that don't involve laborious checking.

I have often though of upgrading, but I avoid that for buggy programs.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 09-05-18, 09:24 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,673

Bikes: N+1=5

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 875 Post(s)
Liked 244 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
rwgps' heavy-handed switch to a crippled free version and moving the two minor features I use to the highest price tier has me looking for alternatives. I mostly do route planning on rwgps and there are multitudes of flaws in that aspect of the site. I probably spend 2-3x the time fixing the problems they introduce into a route as I do preparing it. My understanding is they blame google for the problems, but they need to come up with fixes that don't involve laborious checking.

I have often though of upgrading, but I avoid that for buggy programs.
Look at https://dynamic.watch

I think it is a better routing interface plus it is available on mobile touch based platforms that RWGPS is not. Also can link to RWGPS to make importing your routes easy. One time premium upgdrade fee of $29 for lifetime. Easy to export or share routes with Komoot or Osmand or other app.

J.
JohnJ80 is offline  
Old 09-05-18, 10:04 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
rwgps' heavy-handed switch to a crippled free version and moving the two minor features I use to the highest price tier has me looking for alternatives. I mostly do route planning on rwgps and there are multitudes of flaws in that aspect of the site. I probably spend 2-3x the time fixing the problems they introduce into a route as I do preparing it. My understanding is they blame google for the problems, but they need to come up with fixes that don't involve laborious checking.

I have often though of upgrading, but I avoid that for buggy programs.
A while back, maybe a year or two, I opined that the easy to use Mapfactor Navigator app could import RWGPS routes but it burned me because I couldn't find it and retracted. Now I think it may be an option hidden by "GPS record", which of course you'd miss since you want to "import", not "record". I don't know about the flaws on the RWGPS site, but I'll check the Navigator app and report back if that actually does work after all.

Edited: it CAN work with Mapfactor Navigator! click on the file downloaded on the phone, and it imports into Navigator app under "My Routes" (when it works. if it doesn't work, it's under "record/replay" and will show the track but won't navigate) From there I can "load" and then "navigate". The advantage being that Navigator is easy to use (compared to Osmand) and isn't as big a memory hog.

Last edited by wphamilton; 09-05-18 at 07:26 PM.
wphamilton is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.