Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
Reload this Page >

Cateye Micro Wireless speed incorrect

Search
Notices
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets HRM, GPS, MP3, HID. Whether it's got an acronym or not, here's where you'll find discussions on all sorts of tools, toys and gadgets.

Cateye Micro Wireless speed incorrect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-14 | 05:35 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Old Peddler
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 3
From: Houston Texas area

Bikes: Trek Marlin 8

Cateye Micro Wireless speed incorrect

I installed a New Cateye CC-MC200W
Micro Wireless on my New Rockhopper 29. I set the wheel diameter at 2288 as per the instructions.
I've checked it against 2 seperate GPS units and it consistently read 2 mph slower,
Any ideas? Could I adjust the numbers up or down a little to correct?

thank you
Dave
Daniel 62 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 06:22 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 193
Likes: 20
From: Halifax, NS

Bikes: 2005 Peugeot Evasion 2019 Trek Verve

Did you measure your circumference or take it from the chart.
WarrenR is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 07:01 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Old Peddler
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 54
Likes: 3
From: Houston Texas area

Bikes: Trek Marlin 8

Originally Posted by WarrenR
Did you measure your circumference or take it from the chart.

I took the number from the Cateye instructions

thanks
Dave
Daniel 62 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 07:24 AM
  #4  
RoadTire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota

Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb

You probably have a "custom wheel size" option, us that instead of the presets. Make a change, ride, check, change, ride, check .... until it's averaging the same as the GPS. You will always get some variation, but it will be both > and <.

I do this on my road bikes, using my phone cycling app, and most of the time the same rides come in within 1 %, other times they are 5% or so. Depends on the GPS signals at the time.
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.

Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.

Last edited by RoadTire; 11-02-14 at 07:38 AM.
RoadTire is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 07:36 AM
  #5  
Looigi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Likes: 14
Or: Measure the actual circumference of the tire using the roll-out method. Stand the bike up on a smooth surface. Position the wheel with the sensor with the valve stem at the bottom. Mark the floor directly below the valve stem, roll the bike forward one wheel rotation and mark the floor when the valve is again at the bottom. Measure the distance between the marks to get the tire circumference. Weighting the bike as it would be while riding will improve the accuracy and yield a slightly lower number, roughly 1% lower.
Looigi is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 07:38 AM
  #6  
RoadTire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota

Bikes: '09 Trek 2.1 * '75 Sekine * 2010 Raleigh Talus 8.0 * '90 Giant Mtb * Raleigh M20 * Fuji Nevada mtb

Looigi is correct - that works too.

Alternate methods, obsessions, and general attitude are described in this thread. Pretty entertaining:


confused about calibrating bike speedometer
__________________
FB4K - Every October we wrench on donated bikes. Every December, a few thousand kids get bikes for Christmas. For many, it is their first bike, ever. Every bike, new and used, was donated, built, cleaned and repaired. Check us out on FaceBook: FB4K.

Disclaimer: 99% of what I know about cycling I learned on BF. That would make, ummm, 1% experience. And a lot of posts.
RoadTire is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-14 | 10:17 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 193
Likes: 20
From: Halifax, NS

Bikes: 2005 Peugeot Evasion 2019 Trek Verve

This

Originally Posted by Looigi
Or: Measure the actual circumference of the tire using the roll-out method. Stand the bike up on a smooth surface. Position the wheel with the sensor with the valve stem at the bottom. Mark the floor directly below the valve stem, roll the bike forward one wheel rotation and mark the floor when the valve is again at the bottom. Measure the distance between the marks to get the tire circumference. Weighting the bike as it would be while riding will improve the accuracy and yield a slightly lower number, roughly 1% lower.
WarrenR is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tellmethetruth
General Cycling Discussion
12
03-12-19 02:18 PM
dvai
Road Cycling
32
06-01-17 07:40 PM
redryder74
Training & Nutrition
9
02-18-14 07:06 AM
cs1
Hybrid Bicycles
19
10-17-12 08:41 PM
himespau
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
5
05-13-12 06:23 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.