Advice, do 4 fewer lbs make a difference?
#26
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,398
Likes: 1,865
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
As several others have noted, the wheelset is what really counts. During acceleration the weight of the tires and rims is twice as important as the weight of the frame, because of moment of inertia. Variations in tire rolling resistance can also be noticeable.
At some point, frame weight does matter, but I do not agonize over it. When I ride with a local club, I do fine on either the Bianchi (10 kg. = 22lb. total) or Capo #1 (about 1 kg. heavier), but I do seem to be somewhat slower on the UO-8, which weighs another couple of kg. and whose tire pressure I restrict to 80 PSI because of the smooth-walled rims. When my commute included a 12% climb, I definitely did notice the 4 kg. = 9 lb. difference between a Schwinn Varsity and a Peugeot UO-8, both of which I had converted to aluminum rims.
At some point, frame weight does matter, but I do not agonize over it. When I ride with a local club, I do fine on either the Bianchi (10 kg. = 22lb. total) or Capo #1 (about 1 kg. heavier), but I do seem to be somewhat slower on the UO-8, which weighs another couple of kg. and whose tire pressure I restrict to 80 PSI because of the smooth-walled rims. When my commute included a 12% climb, I definitely did notice the 4 kg. = 9 lb. difference between a Schwinn Varsity and a Peugeot UO-8, both of which I had converted to aluminum rims.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#27
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
From: S.E. Pennsylvania, USA
#28
Let's do a Century
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 883
From: North Carolina
Bikes: Cervelo R3 Disc, Pinarello Prince/Campy SR; Cervelo R3/Sram Red; Trek 5900/Duraace, Lynskey GR260 Ultegra
I'm not a weight weenie but I'll take my 16 lb bike over a 20-22 lb bike any day!! I've used both types on 100 mile rides in the mountains and for some reason I'm always a lot faster on the 16 lb bike........
#29
just keep riding
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,560
Likes: 44
From: Milledgeville, Georgia
Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
#30
Time for a change.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
To be honest- All my frames are aluminium- The MTB with short travel stiff front Suspension. The Tandem with Full Downhill spec front suspension and the Rolls of Suspension seat posts- The "Thud Buster"- The Giant OCR3 that I did have a problem on road buzz with till I changed the wheels- and the Boreas.
The Boreas has Ultegra wheels an 23mm tyres at 140psi and no road buzz. I put this down the frame having no flex in it and the Forks and seat post being C.F. But then the Giant has C.F.Forks and that was a problem- But there is C.F. parts that are made of C.F. to sell and then there are C.F.Parts designed to work. The boreas forks work.
https://www.boreas-bikes.dk/pages/ignis.html
Now as to that lightness- I have noticed that The Boreas not only feels better to ride- It gives a better ride-Accelerates faster and Downhill is very stable. I am not a speed merchant so do not hammer it in many places- but a 60 mile ride on the Boreas is done with ease- Different bike in a different class but the Giant leaves me Tired after the same ride.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
#31
Time for a change.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
It was estimated a few years ago that the average weight of a Rigid Mountain bike was 23lbs- To get down to a 20lbs bike would cost $200 per lb. Then you start really paying. And that was when a $1,500 bike was the top one.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
#32
bobkat
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Bismarck, ND
Bikes: Modified Burley Koosah, Trek Navigater folding, downtube folding
Yes, wallet lightness. I was looking at a couple of high end bents, two identical bikes from the same manufacturer, same top components, tires, wheelsets, etc. The only difference was that one was aluminum and one titanium. Price difference exactly $1000!
I'd have to have a lot of convincing for a grand a pound! Ha!
I'd have to have a lot of convincing for a grand a pound! Ha!
#33
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Avila Beach, CA
Bikes: Bianchi Eros (Celeste)
[QUOTE=Deanster04;5173902]215 + 23 = 238 lbs. 4lbs difference is a mere 1.6% difference. Lose the weight off your body and you will be ahead.
I'm not convinced that it's true. The leg muscles have to exert a force proportional to the 22.5 lbs weight of the bike to make it go forward. If the bike is 4 lbs lighter (18% less weight) I would expect the muscles to require 18% less effort to make it move, not 1.6%.
I'm not convinced that it's true. The leg muscles have to exert a force proportional to the 22.5 lbs weight of the bike to make it go forward. If the bike is 4 lbs lighter (18% less weight) I would expect the muscles to require 18% less effort to make it move, not 1.6%.
#34
just keep riding
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,560
Likes: 44
From: Milledgeville, Georgia
Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
[QUOTE=Aldo;5180197]
Are you not on the bike when you ride it? How do you do that?
215 + 23 = 238 lbs. 4lbs difference is a mere 1.6% difference. Lose the weight off your body and you will be ahead.
I'm not convinced that it's true. The leg muscles have to exert a force proportional to the 22.5 lbs weight of the bike to make it go forward. If the bike is 4 lbs lighter (18% less weight) I would expect the muscles to require 18% less effort to make it move, not 1.6%.
I'm not convinced that it's true. The leg muscles have to exert a force proportional to the 22.5 lbs weight of the bike to make it go forward. If the bike is 4 lbs lighter (18% less weight) I would expect the muscles to require 18% less effort to make it move, not 1.6%.
#35
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 1
From: On a Road in Central Bluegrass KY
Bikes: Not enough
Bottom line though, upgrading wheels to make up for frame weight increase doesn't make much sense. Just my 1PHP (1 philippine peso = $0.02 USD)
#36
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Bikes: litespeed, cannondale
I have often seen the fastest and strongest rider in the group was the person on the heaviest bike. Weight means something when you are accelerating or going up hills but otherwise, it is not that big a deal.
I have seen plenty of people who put down big bucks on really high end bikes to discover that the high end bike did not make them any faster. Shoot, I had a friend who got a pricier bike and I swear he slowed down (we used to discuss this when he was not around so other people noticed it too).
Now I have noticed geometry changes affect things. I went from a touring bike to a rigid short wheel base racing bike and it made a noticeable difference on cornering and seemingly acceleration. It might have just handled better which meant I was going through corners faster. But if you are on a bike whose handling you really like, you will probably see a performance advantage.
A friend of mine looked at a ultra high end bike that was leaning against a wall and sniffed saying "Without a rider, that is the fastest that bike is going today".
I have seen plenty of people who put down big bucks on really high end bikes to discover that the high end bike did not make them any faster. Shoot, I had a friend who got a pricier bike and I swear he slowed down (we used to discuss this when he was not around so other people noticed it too).
Now I have noticed geometry changes affect things. I went from a touring bike to a rigid short wheel base racing bike and it made a noticeable difference on cornering and seemingly acceleration. It might have just handled better which meant I was going through corners faster. But if you are on a bike whose handling you really like, you will probably see a performance advantage.
A friend of mine looked at a ultra high end bike that was leaning against a wall and sniffed saying "Without a rider, that is the fastest that bike is going today".
#37
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Avila Beach, CA
Bikes: Bianchi Eros (Celeste)
#38
Time for a change.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Try a madone, I have seen it written that ~6lbs body is 1 lb on a bike. I believe it. Don't mean you have to. But thats why I don't ever use a Camelbak. And have planned water stops on a long ride.
Bottom line though, upgrading wheels to make up for frame weight increase doesn't make much sense. Just my 1PHP (1 philippine peso = $0.02 USD)
Bottom line though, upgrading wheels to make up for frame weight increase doesn't make much sense. Just my 1PHP (1 philippine peso = $0.02 USD)
Now on the lighter bike- It is a bit unfair as the Boreas is a different geometry but it is a 15lbs bike. That thing goes up hills and the only thing that is stopping me from Trying the Steeper hills is a lack of confidenece in my ability. I weigh the same- Same toolkit, pump and water bottle but On the 10%'s I am faster than on the Giant. In fact-Except top speed- which I do not concern myself with- The light bike is 2mph average faster. The hills take less time to get up(But are still hard) and I can go further because I am not putting as much effort into riding to get the same effect.
Now as to whether a rider needs to spend $200 on a set of wheels or a lot more on a lighter bike is up to the quality of the rider. For many- a standard wheelset or cheaper bike is completly adequate and no amount of "Upgrades" would improve that rider on a bike. It is only when you have spent the money that you find out that the Upgrade was worth it or a waste of money. Only thing is- I am glad that I was able to spend the money to get a significent improvement in my riding.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.
Spike Milligan





