Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

Advice, do 4 fewer lbs make a difference?

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

Advice, do 4 fewer lbs make a difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-07 | 08:43 AM
  #26  
John E's Avatar
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,398
Likes: 1,865
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

As several others have noted, the wheelset is what really counts. During acceleration the weight of the tires and rims is twice as important as the weight of the frame, because of moment of inertia. Variations in tire rolling resistance can also be noticeable.

At some point, frame weight does matter, but I do not agonize over it. When I ride with a local club, I do fine on either the Bianchi (10 kg. = 22lb. total) or Capo #1 (about 1 kg. heavier), but I do seem to be somewhat slower on the UO-8, which weighs another couple of kg. and whose tire pressure I restrict to 80 PSI because of the smooth-walled rims. When my commute included a 12% climb, I definitely did notice the 4 kg. = 9 lb. difference between a Schwinn Varsity and a Peugeot UO-8, both of which I had converted to aluminum rims.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply
Old 08-30-07 | 09:52 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
From: S.E. Pennsylvania, USA
Originally Posted by Deanster04
215 + 23 = 238 lbs. 4lbs difference is a mere 1.6% difference. Lose the weight off your body and you will be ahead.
This is true, and if you lose 4 lbs off the bike, now you're 8 lbs ahead.
BSLeVan is offline  
Reply
Old 08-30-07 | 09:54 AM
  #28  
jppe's Avatar
Let's do a Century
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 883
From: North Carolina

Bikes: Cervelo R3 Disc, Pinarello Prince/Campy SR; Cervelo R3/Sram Red; Trek 5900/Duraace, Lynskey GR260 Ultegra

Originally Posted by Aldo
...I liked the feeling I got when I was test riding the Kestrel up a steep hill and it felt almost effortles compared to my 22.5 lbs Bianchi.
Exactly!! I also agree that wheelsets make a huge, huge difference. I train on my 1800 gram wheelset with "heavier" tires but do most of my timed rides on a 1400 gram wheelset with lighter weight tires. I notice the same "less effort" type of feeling when changing to the lighter wheelsets but using the same frames.

I'm not a weight weenie but I'll take my 16 lb bike over a 20-22 lb bike any day!! I've used both types on 100 mile rides in the mountains and for some reason I'm always a lot faster on the 16 lb bike........
jppe is offline  
Reply
Old 08-30-07 | 10:32 AM
  #29  
BluesDawg's Avatar
just keep riding
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,560
Likes: 44
From: Milledgeville, Georgia

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Originally Posted by BSLeVan
This is true, and if you lose 4 lbs off the bike, now you're 8 lbs ahead.

The weight taken off the bike makes more of an impact because it also makes you wallet SO much lighter.
BluesDawg is offline  
Reply
Old 08-30-07 | 12:19 PM
  #30  
stapfam's Avatar
Time for a change.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Originally Posted by Aldo
Stepfam,

Thanks for the post, it supports the idea that a lighter bike does make a difference in a lot of ways. Is there a comfort/buzziness issue with the aluminum frame of your New Boreas? I did a Google search on New Boreas and came up with nothing...who makes it?

To be honest- All my frames are aluminium- The MTB with short travel stiff front Suspension. The Tandem with Full Downhill spec front suspension and the Rolls of Suspension seat posts- The "Thud Buster"- The Giant OCR3 that I did have a problem on road buzz with till I changed the wheels- and the Boreas.

The Boreas has Ultegra wheels an 23mm tyres at 140psi and no road buzz. I put this down the frame having no flex in it and the Forks and seat post being C.F. But then the Giant has C.F.Forks and that was a problem- But there is C.F. parts that are made of C.F. to sell and then there are C.F.Parts designed to work. The boreas forks work.


https://www.boreas-bikes.dk/pages/ignis.html


Now as to that lightness- I have noticed that The Boreas not only feels better to ride- It gives a better ride-Accelerates faster and Downhill is very stable. I am not a speed merchant so do not hammer it in many places- but a 60 mile ride on the Boreas is done with ease- Different bike in a different class but the Giant leaves me Tired after the same ride.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Reply
Old 08-30-07 | 12:23 PM
  #31  
stapfam's Avatar
Time for a change.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Originally Posted by BluesDawg
The weight taken off the bike makes more of an impact because it also makes you wallet SO much lighter.
Too true.

It was estimated a few years ago that the average weight of a Rigid Mountain bike was 23lbs- To get down to a 20lbs bike would cost $200 per lb. Then you start really paying. And that was when a $1,500 bike was the top one.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Reply
Old 08-30-07 | 07:34 PM
  #32  
bobkat
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
From: Bismarck, ND

Bikes: Modified Burley Koosah, Trek Navigater folding, downtube folding

Yes, wallet lightness. I was looking at a couple of high end bents, two identical bikes from the same manufacturer, same top components, tires, wheelsets, etc. The only difference was that one was aluminum and one titanium. Price difference exactly $1000!
I'd have to have a lot of convincing for a grand a pound! Ha!
bobkat is offline  
Reply
Old 08-30-07 | 08:37 PM
  #33  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Avila Beach, CA

Bikes: Bianchi Eros (Celeste)

[QUOTE=Deanster04;5173902]215 + 23 = 238 lbs. 4lbs difference is a mere 1.6% difference. Lose the weight off your body and you will be ahead.

I'm not convinced that it's true. The leg muscles have to exert a force proportional to the 22.5 lbs weight of the bike to make it go forward. If the bike is 4 lbs lighter (18% less weight) I would expect the muscles to require 18% less effort to make it move, not 1.6%.
Aldo is offline  
Reply
Old 08-30-07 | 09:50 PM
  #34  
BluesDawg's Avatar
just keep riding
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,560
Likes: 44
From: Milledgeville, Georgia

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

[QUOTE=Aldo;5180197]
Originally Posted by Deanster04
215 + 23 = 238 lbs. 4lbs difference is a mere 1.6% difference. Lose the weight off your body and you will be ahead.

I'm not convinced that it's true. The leg muscles have to exert a force proportional to the 22.5 lbs weight of the bike to make it go forward. If the bike is 4 lbs lighter (18% less weight) I would expect the muscles to require 18% less effort to make it move, not 1.6%.
Are you not on the bike when you ride it? How do you do that?
BluesDawg is offline  
Reply
Old 08-31-07 | 02:10 AM
  #35  
Red Baron's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 1
From: On a Road in Central Bluegrass KY

Bikes: Not enough

Originally Posted by Aldo
Yup, lots of hills, some group rides...I liked the feeling I got when I was test riding the Kestrel up a steep hill and it felt almost effortles compared to my 22.5 lbs Bianchi.
Try a madone, I have seen it written that ~6lbs body is 1 lb on a bike. I believe it. Don't mean you have to. But thats why I don't ever use a Camelbak. And have planned water stops on a long ride.

Bottom line though, upgrading wheels to make up for frame weight increase doesn't make much sense. Just my 1PHP (1 philippine peso = $0.02 USD)
Red Baron is offline  
Reply
Old 08-31-07 | 08:46 AM
  #36  
Pat
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL

Bikes: litespeed, cannondale

I have often seen the fastest and strongest rider in the group was the person on the heaviest bike. Weight means something when you are accelerating or going up hills but otherwise, it is not that big a deal.

I have seen plenty of people who put down big bucks on really high end bikes to discover that the high end bike did not make them any faster. Shoot, I had a friend who got a pricier bike and I swear he slowed down (we used to discuss this when he was not around so other people noticed it too).

Now I have noticed geometry changes affect things. I went from a touring bike to a rigid short wheel base racing bike and it made a noticeable difference on cornering and seemingly acceleration. It might have just handled better which meant I was going through corners faster. But if you are on a bike whose handling you really like, you will probably see a performance advantage.

A friend of mine looked at a ultra high end bike that was leaning against a wall and sniffed saying "Without a rider, that is the fastest that bike is going today".
Pat is offline  
Reply
Old 08-31-07 | 12:14 PM
  #37  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Avila Beach, CA

Bikes: Bianchi Eros (Celeste)

[QUOTE=BluesDawg;5180694]
Originally Posted by Aldo

Are you not on the bike when you ride it? How do you do that?
BlueDawg, I do that late at night when I have a fraction of the brain left to work with
Aldo is offline  
Reply
Old 08-31-07 | 01:15 PM
  #38  
stapfam's Avatar
Time for a change.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Originally Posted by Red Baron
Try a madone, I have seen it written that ~6lbs body is 1 lb on a bike. I believe it. Don't mean you have to. But thats why I don't ever use a Camelbak. And have planned water stops on a long ride.

Bottom line though, upgrading wheels to make up for frame weight increase doesn't make much sense. Just my 1PHP (1 philippine peso = $0.02 USD)
On the wheels- An upgrade on wheels is not only to a lighter wheel- It should also be to a better quality wheel. On the Giant OM wheels- I have a hill that I go down. It has a curve in the middle of it. On the OM wheels- I could feel the bike wanting to go to the outside of the curve from about 30mph.At 35Mph I was leaning more and Braking. Looked at the wheels and they were flexing sideways and I know the spokes were properly tensioned but that Deflexion of the wheel was noticable to my eye. Got a set af "Training wheels. Still 36 spokes-105 hubs and Mavic CXP33 rims AND hand built by an expert. First time down the hill and waiting for the wheels to flex. They didn't. Still cut the speed to less than 40 with the brakes and I was happy. Then on the Boreas and this has lighweight- fewer spoke Ultegras. It was not even caution to the wind- Just let the bike go- The curve was just a curve and the only time I got worried was when a Policecar pulled along side me and The passenger reminded me it was a 30mph limit.

Now on the lighter bike- It is a bit unfair as the Boreas is a different geometry but it is a 15lbs bike. That thing goes up hills and the only thing that is stopping me from Trying the Steeper hills is a lack of confidenece in my ability. I weigh the same- Same toolkit, pump and water bottle but On the 10%'s I am faster than on the Giant. In fact-Except top speed- which I do not concern myself with- The light bike is 2mph average faster. The hills take less time to get up(But are still hard) and I can go further because I am not putting as much effort into riding to get the same effect.

Now as to whether a rider needs to spend $200 on a set of wheels or a lot more on a lighter bike is up to the quality of the rider. For many- a standard wheelset or cheaper bike is completly adequate and no amount of "Upgrades" would improve that rider on a bike. It is only when you have spent the money that you find out that the Upgrade was worth it or a waste of money. Only thing is- I am glad that I was able to spend the money to get a significent improvement in my riding.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.