Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

Recommend a

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-07, 07:48 PM
  #26  
TCR Advanced SL
Thread Starter
 
Spinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ulah Proper N.C.
Posts: 1,043
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Looks like Cateye is the one to go with. Question two ----- wired or wireless, what say you all? Lp
Spinz is offline  
Old 12-11-07, 08:00 PM
  #27  
Senior Member ??
 
Beverly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Englewood,Ohio
Posts: 5,098

Bikes: 2007 Trek Madone 5.0 WSD - 2007 Trek 4300 WSD - 2008 Trek 520 - 2014 Catrike Trail

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spinz@50
Looks like Cateye is the one to go with. Question two ----- wired or wireless, what say you all? Lp
I've had both and I prefer the wireless. Unlike some, I don't like those wires wrapped around my cables

Some people say they've had problems with the wireless but I never had the first problem. Maybe it's because I didn't install it.
__________________
=============================================================

Enjoy the little things in life, for one day you may look back and realize they were the big things.
-- Antonio Smith
Beverly is offline  
Old 12-11-07, 08:26 PM
  #28  
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by maddmaxx
Wow, I have never seen this much agreement in 50+ about anything.
Can I change my answer?
BluesDawg is offline  
Old 12-11-07, 08:52 PM
  #29  
just keep riding
 
BluesDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560

Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 173 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Spinz@50
Looks like Cateye is the one to go with. Question two ----- wired or wireless, what say you all? Lp
I have both types (actually my son has the wireless unit).
I've already stated my preference for wired, but I'll restate the answer in terms of the original post:

"I do not need a top of the line widgit just a decent basic model."

Both types have the same functions.
Both types work well and are very reliable.
Wireless costs a little more initially and has two batteries to replace instead of one.
Wired has a wire. Installed correctly, the wire stays out of the way and looks good (to some, not to others).
Installed incorrectly, the wire can get into the spokes, pinched by the headset, pulled tight when the fork turns or look sloppy.
In very rare cases, there can be problems getting an uninterrupted line of signal from the wireless sending unit to the receiver.

To me, wireless fixes a nonexistent problem and costs more for the trouble. As a decent basic model, wired functions equally to the wireless. For others, the aesthetics of not having a wire is worth the extra cost.
BluesDawg is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 07:33 AM
  #30  
TCR Advanced SL
Thread Starter
 
Spinz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ulah Proper N.C.
Posts: 1,043
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks BD. Well said ------- Lp
Spinz is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 12:14 PM
  #31  
Riding Heaven's Highwayson the grand tour
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tehachapi Mtns, Calif.
Posts: 737

Bikes: '10 C'Dale Tandem RT2. '07 Trek Tandem T2000, '10 Epic Marathon MTB, '12 Rocky Mountain Element 950 MTB, '95 C'dale R900, "04 Giant DS 2 '07 Kona Jake the Snake, '95 Nishiki Backroads

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cateye Astrale.....Cadence is king for mature knees.

Bill J.
specbill is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 12:18 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Middle of the road, NJ
Posts: 3,137
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 293 Post(s)
Liked 106 Times in 69 Posts
After installing a few of each, wireless is the way to go. securing the extra wire, wraping it around the fork and cable, is just a PIA. Attach the sending unit, and handler bar mount, and your done.
leob1 is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 12:22 PM
  #33  
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Posts: 19,913

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BluesDawg
I have both types (actually my son has the wireless unit).
I've already stated my preference for wired, but I'll restate the answer in terms of the original post:

"I do not need a top of the line widgit just a decent basic model."

Both types have the same functions.
Both types work well and are very reliable.
Wireless costs a little more initially and has two batteries to replace instead of one.
Wired has a wire. Installed correctly, the wire stays out of the way and looks good (to some, not to others).
Installed incorrectly, the wire can get into the spokes, pinched by the headset, pulled tight when the fork turns or look sloppy.
In very rare cases, there can be problems getting an uninterrupted line of signal from the wireless sending unit to the receiver.

To me, wireless fixes a nonexistent problem and costs more for the trouble. As a decent basic model, wired functions equally to the wireless. For others, the aesthetics of not having a wire is worth the extra cost.
You have said it all. Like you I have both types And wired for reliability- and wireless for convenience.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 01:36 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spinz@50
Looks like Cateye is the one to go with. Question two ----- wired or wireless, what say you all? Lp
If you have not pulled the trigger, take a look at the Blackburn computers. The screen is a bit bigger and easier on the 50+ eyeballs. I like the wireless myself. I can not recommend the Ciclo computers, pain in the arse.
oilman_15106 is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 02:36 PM
  #35  
His Brain is Gone!
 
Tom Bombadil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paoli, Wisconsin
Posts: 9,979

Bikes: RANS Stratus, Bridgestone CB-1, Trek 7600, Sun EZ-Rider AX, Fuji Absolute 1.0, Cayne Rambler 3

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I have a low-end Cateye on my hybrid. When I went to get something for my bent, I found a Planet Bike 9.0 (wired) on sale from Nashbar for $20, list of $45. I like it a lot. Large, readable screen, and it allows you to set the exact circumference of your front wheel, to the mm, for an accurate reading.
__________________
"Too often I would hear men boast of the miles covered that day, rarely of what they had seen." Louis L'Amour

There are two types of road bikers: bikers who are faster than me, and me. Bruce Cameron - Denver Post
Tom Bombadil is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 06:41 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 776
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hmmmmm. You folks must have great eyesight. I tried a Cateye last year and quickly realized that the face was the same size as a postage stamp and was difficult for me to read.

Now I have a Sigma 1106 and think it is much better. Larger and easier to read. Maybe the Cateye you folks bought had a much larger screen than the one I bought.

Sigma 1106.
LastPlace is offline  
Old 12-12-07, 08:41 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
BlazingPedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Middle of da Mitten
Posts: 12,485

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1514 Post(s)
Liked 734 Times in 455 Posts
I've had wireless in the past. One of the drawbacks to wireless is that your top speed function becomes useless. Going under power lines can produce some strange readings; I would regularly hit 300+ mph on the same uphill every week. Not even wired computers are immune, though. I discovered the hard way that electric fence pulses will trigger the wheel sensor - and you will accumulate mileage at a very slow pace. It absolutely ruins your average speed for the ride.
BlazingPedals is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.