Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

help in calculating grade

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

help in calculating grade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-10 | 02:43 PM
  #1  
geofitz13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MA

Bikes: Specialized Allez Elite

help in calculating grade

Not neccessarily a 50+ topic, but I could use some help.
Trying to calculate the grade of a hill I go up.
According to Gmaps pedometer, the hill is .7809 mile, and elevation is 731 feet. Converted the miles to feet and came up with 4123 feet, and calculated a 17% grade. Could this be right? I knew it was a steep hill, but, egad....
geofitz13 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-10 | 03:06 PM
  #2  
DougG's Avatar
Road Runner
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 46
From: Rochester Hills, MI

Bikes: 2017 Felt VR5, 2013 Specialized Crosstrail, 2020 Specialized Vado 4.0

I think that the basic mistake you're making is that the bottom of the hill is probably not at sea level (0 ft.). You have to subtract the elevation at the bottom of the hill from the elevation at the top (call this value the "rise").

There's also a slight inaccuracy that you'll get by using the distance along the road from the bottom to the top (.7809 miles) as the value to divide the rise by. Strictly speaking, the grade is "rise over run" where the "run" is the horizontal distance from the bottom to the top. If you remember the terminology of a right-angle triangle, the rise is the length of the vertical part of the triangle, the run is the horizontal bottom leg, and the distance you actually ride along to get up to the top is the hypotenuse. For a typical grade of a few percent, however, the hypotenuse is not much longer than the "run", so it's OK to use that as an approximation.
DougG is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-10 | 03:08 PM
  #3  
maddmaxx's Avatar
Boomer
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,214
Likes: 1,458

Bikes: Diamondback Clarity II frame homebuilt.

Typically, anything between 90 and 100 is an A grade, between 80 and 89 is a B grade...........................................


Oh, the hill. Looks like your calculations are just about right.......Compared to the exact calculations of the previous post, the difference will be tenths of a percent.

Last edited by maddmaxx; 03-18-10 at 03:14 PM.
maddmaxx is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-10 | 03:37 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Bikes: 1976 Apollo Mk IV, mid-'80s Miyata touring bike, mid-'80s Miyata mtn bike, 2007 Trek 6500 mtn bike, 2008 Trek Madone 5.2

Here's how I determine the grade of a hill, from the gentlest to the steepest:

-breathing easy, can still accelerate
-breathing harder, would rather not talk, can accelerate with difficulty
-can feel my heart beating, feeling my legs, can only accelerate by standing
-muscle burn is setting in
-should probably stand if I'm going to make it
-drop into my small chainring on a triple
-and finally: holy cr@p, please, please, please, make the pain stop.
Cone Wrench is offline  
Reply
Old 03-18-10 | 08:55 PM
  #5  
Banned.
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 2
From: Southern california

Bikes: Lapierre CF Sensium 400. Jamis Ventura Sport. Trek 800. Giant Cypress.

Originally Posted by geofitz13
Not neccessarily a 50+ topic, but I could use some help.
Trying to calculate the grade of a hill I go up.
According to Gmaps pedometer, the hill is .7809 mile, and elevation is 731 feet. Converted the miles to feet and came up with 4123 feet, and calculated a 17% grade. Could this be right? I knew it was a steep hill, but, egad....
Do you ride up this hill all the time and how hard is it for you to climb? I find an 8 percent climb hard enough. 10 percent makes me want to cry and anything more would take a triple at least. What is the elevation at the bottom of the hill and what is it at the top?
Robert Foster is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-10 | 10:10 AM
  #6  
stapfam's Avatar
Time for a change.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

I look on the garmin when I get home or for the road signs. Both of them are wrong for them at this time of the year as this must be a 25%. Seems to flatten out after a couple of months of training though

Garmin shows it as 18%- although the camera doesn't- but it is only 200yards long.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Route outt.jpg (104.8 KB, 11 views)
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-10 | 04:36 PM
  #7  
geofitz13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MA

Bikes: Specialized Allez Elite

Originally Posted by DougG
I think that the basic mistake you're making is that the bottom of the hill is probably not at sea level (0 ft.). You have to subtract the elevation at the bottom of the hill from the elevation at the top (call this value the "rise").

There's also a slight inaccuracy that you'll get by using the distance along the road from the bottom to the top (.7809 miles) as the value to divide the rise by. Strictly speaking, the grade is "rise over run" where the "run" is the horizontal distance from the bottom to the top. If you remember the terminology of a right-angle triangle, the rise is the length of the vertical part of the triangle, the run is the horizontal bottom leg, and the distance you actually ride along to get up to the top is the hypotenuse. For a typical grade of a few percent, however, the hypotenuse is not much longer than the "run", so it's OK to use that as an approximation.
You hit the nail on the head. I did not take into account that the elevation at the bottom of the hill was not sea level. But you folks did confirm that I am at least doing the math right. So, when I went back and got the real evevation change, it turned out to be a 5% grade. Now...I really stink at climbing, and find this one to be pretty difficult. The entire hill is a little over a mile, with a couple small breaks in climbing, but is mostly a steady climb. I can do it, but I am not particularly happy about it. I really wanted to get an idea of what the grade was on this climb, just outta curiosity.
Is a 5% grade considered somewhat difficult, or am I just a weenie?
geofitz13 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-10 | 04:51 PM
  #8  
cruzMOKS's Avatar
just over the next hill
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City MO

Bikes: Bianchi Volpe 2006 Fuji Tahoe

Being a weenie is relative. I know 5% for a mile would be very hard for me. (You are probably in the top tier% of your age bracket.) It seems a hill like this that is not too steep would be a good training hill to gain strength.
__________________
Enjoy the ride.
Bianchi Volpe 2006; Fuji Tahoe 1990
cruzMOKS is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-10 | 04:51 PM
  #9  
DnvrFox's Avatar
Banned.
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,915
Likes: 12
IMHO, 5% is a significant grade - but then, I am a definite weenie!
DnvrFox is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-10 | 06:01 PM
  #10  
cyclinfool's Avatar
gone ride'n
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,050
Likes: 2
From: Upstate NY

Bikes: Simoncini, Gary Fisher, Specialized Tarmac

Originally Posted by DnvrFox
IMHO, 5% is a significant grade - but then, I am a definite weenie!
Being an experienced educator I would have thought you had more sage advice on determining grades.
cyclinfool is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-10 | 06:14 PM
  #11  
DnvrFox's Avatar
Banned.
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 20,915
Likes: 12
Originally Posted by cyclinfool
Being an experienced educator I would have thought you had more sage advice on determining grades.
5% of my students always got grades.
DnvrFox is offline  
Reply
Old 03-19-10 | 10:21 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
The other thing that makes hill grade percentage calculations all wrong is that a hill may be .5 mile long at a calculated 6% but if say it has a 10 or 12%
section within that number it is a lot tougher climb. I always wondered why I had so much trouble with a short hill in our area until I discovered the middle part of it is 14%! even though the whole thing is less than 10% when you do the math. The road would be illegal to build today according to our township manager.
oilman_15106 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-20-10 | 01:30 AM
  #13  
stapfam's Avatar
Time for a change.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 19,913
Likes: 7
From: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England

Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.

Originally Posted by cruzMOKS
Being a weenie is relative. I know 5% for a mile would be very hard for me. (You are probably in the top tier% of your age bracket.) It seems a hill like this that is not too steep would be a good training hill to gain strength.
Plenty of 10 to 12% slopes for 1 mile round here and they are easy once I am up to fitness. Even the 16% for .7 miles is achievable with training. But the one that gets me has an average of 5% for 2 miles. Lots of it are just a rise in the road and a few short bits at 10%- but that slight rise is one I only do if I have to. Mainly because it is right on the coast and always seems to have a headwind- but I don't even like it in reverse.

Couple of pics attached and it is nothing. One from the top looking back and it starts from the white cliffs in the background and the other taken about halfway up.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
RRHeadtogap.jpg (13.1 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg
RRBHeadrd.jpg (25.5 KB, 8 views)
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlamsteadHill
General Cycling Discussion
14
08-20-17 04:43 AM
bikecommuter13
Commuting
57
12-14-16 01:47 PM
bigdaddy10028
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
48
08-03-10 10:37 PM
Jeremy_WNY
Road Cycling
22
04-04-10 11:01 PM
JMallez
General Cycling Discussion
14
04-03-10 06:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.