gravel bike gearing
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,913
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Liked 4,241 Times
in
2,357 Posts
gravel bike gearing
I live in IA and I've been thinking of building up a gravel grinder for a while. I'm building up a 93 bridgestone xo-2 as a gravel grinder. I'm going with 8 speed gearing, 8 spd brifters, and a triple crank mainly because that's what I have in my parts bin.
I'm currently have an older ritchey mtb crank with 44-32-22 rings and I'm thinking of running a 12-23 8 spd in the rear. It's a nice crank but I'm a little concerned that the rings are a bit too small.
I have a different triple I could run with a 46-36-26 and a 12-28 on the rear. Not a huge difference between the 2 triples on the top and bottom but the middle ring is where I'll spend a fair amount of time and I'm thinking I'll be happier in a 36 than a 32.
I'm curious what kind of gearing people are running.
I'm currently have an older ritchey mtb crank with 44-32-22 rings and I'm thinking of running a 12-23 8 spd in the rear. It's a nice crank but I'm a little concerned that the rings are a bit too small.
I have a different triple I could run with a 46-36-26 and a 12-28 on the rear. Not a huge difference between the 2 triples on the top and bottom but the middle ring is where I'll spend a fair amount of time and I'm thinking I'll be happier in a 36 than a 32.
I'm curious what kind of gearing people are running.
#2
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
The compact triple and tight spacing on the 12-23 makes for some nice shifting and offers the same low gearing and nearly the same top gear... I ran a 22/32/44 with an 11-27 road block which was good for pretty much any terrain and really good for speed.
#3
Senior Member
I've got a Deore 44-32-22 crankset with an HG50 11-32 cassette. It's all my long cage RD can handle but the gearing is outstanding on gravel roads over sawtooth hills and dirt singletrack. Some people tell me I should go with a bigger chainring like a 48 or 52 but according to Sheldon Brown, the 44 x 11 gear on my 700c bike should give me over 32 mph at 100 rpm. I just don't see wanting to go over 30 mph on a gravel downhill, so I'm good with what I've got. On a road bike it'd be different, but on gravel 30 mph is plenty for me. On the gravel rides I've done so far, I average 12-14 mph with top speeds in the low 20s on rolling to sawtooth hills. No long, straight downhills around here. When the time comes to change cassettes, I'll probably go 11-28.
#4
Trek 500 Kid
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 2,562
Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road
Liked 383 Times
in
308 Posts
Question:
Are Triples pretty much a necessity for gravel grinding?
Reason I ask is because I've been thinking about cold setting my stays on my '86 Trek 500 someday and going to a cassette setup (for better axle support) and making a gravel grinder out of it. If I did decide to go that way I'd rather keep my current modified drivetrain with a short cage derailleur and a 46/36 x 14-28 (That's my freewheel now and I'd build my own cassette with the same range).
That's only 34.4 gear inches at the low end. I could put on the 34 tooth ring for 32.5 gear inches but is that even a low enough bottom end for relatively flat land or only moderately hilly gravel grinding?
Are Triples pretty much a necessity for gravel grinding?
Reason I ask is because I've been thinking about cold setting my stays on my '86 Trek 500 someday and going to a cassette setup (for better axle support) and making a gravel grinder out of it. If I did decide to go that way I'd rather keep my current modified drivetrain with a short cage derailleur and a 46/36 x 14-28 (That's my freewheel now and I'd build my own cassette with the same range).
That's only 34.4 gear inches at the low end. I could put on the 34 tooth ring for 32.5 gear inches but is that even a low enough bottom end for relatively flat land or only moderately hilly gravel grinding?
Last edited by Zinger; 06-27-14 at 02:37 AM.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Des Moines, Ia
Posts: 158
Bikes: Trek Domane 5.2, Trek 520, Surly Straggler, Trek Roscoe 8, Fisher HK2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am riding a Surly Straggler with 46-36 and a 11-32. It seems to do fine on crushed rock bike paths and rolling gravel roads. It really depends on the roads and the condition of the gravel. Bottom line -triples are not a necessity but helpful at certain times
Mike
Mike
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,913
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Liked 4,241 Times
in
2,357 Posts
I'd have to buy the 12-23 8 speed cassette. That said, I'm tempted by this set up. Assuming the low gear works for the application, a tighter range in the rear is a plus. A 23 running on a 22 is a pretty low gear with 26 inch rear wheels gives me a 24 inch low gear which isn't bad.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,913
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Liked 4,241 Times
in
2,357 Posts
I've got a Deore 44-32-22 crankset with an HG50 11-32 cassette. It's all my long cage RD can handle but the gearing is outstanding on gravel roads over sawtooth hills and dirt singletrack. Some people tell me I should go with a bigger chainring like a 48 or 52 but according to Sheldon Brown, the 44 x 11 gear on my 700c bike should give me over 32 mph at 100 rpm. I just don't see wanting to go over 30 mph on a gravel downhill, so I'm good with what I've got. On a road bike it'd be different, but on gravel 30 mph is plenty for me. On the gravel rides I've done so far, I average 12-14 mph with top speeds in the low 20s on rolling to sawtooth hills. No long, straight downhills around here. When the time comes to change cassettes, I'll probably go 11-28.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,913
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Liked 4,241 Times
in
2,357 Posts
Question:
Are Triples pretty much a necessity for gravel grinding?
Reason I ask is because I've been thinking about cold setting my stays on my '86 Trek 500 someday and going to a cassette setup (for better axle support) and making a gravel grinder out of it. If I did decide to go that way I'd rather keep my current modified drivetrain with a short cage derailleur and a 46/36 x 14-28 (That's my freewheel now and I'd build my own cassette with the same range).
That's only 34.4 gear inches at the low end. I could put on the 34 tooth ring for 32.5 gear inches but is that even a low enough bottom end for relatively flat land or only moderately hilly gravel grinding?
Are Triples pretty much a necessity for gravel grinding?
Reason I ask is because I've been thinking about cold setting my stays on my '86 Trek 500 someday and going to a cassette setup (for better axle support) and making a gravel grinder out of it. If I did decide to go that way I'd rather keep my current modified drivetrain with a short cage derailleur and a 46/36 x 14-28 (That's my freewheel now and I'd build my own cassette with the same range).
That's only 34.4 gear inches at the low end. I could put on the 34 tooth ring for 32.5 gear inches but is that even a low enough bottom end for relatively flat land or only moderately hilly gravel grinding?
#9
Senior Member
Question:
Are Triples pretty much a necessity for gravel grinding?
Reason I ask is because I've been thinking about cold setting my stays on my '86 Trek 500 someday and going to a cassette setup and making a gravel grinder out of it. If I did decide to go that way I'd rather keep my current modified drivetrain with a short cage derailleur and a 46/36 x 14-28.
That's only 34.4 gear inches at the low end. I could put on the 34 tooth ring for 32.5 gear inches but is that even a low enough bottom end for relatively flat land or only moderately hilly gravel grinding?
Are Triples pretty much a necessity for gravel grinding?
Reason I ask is because I've been thinking about cold setting my stays on my '86 Trek 500 someday and going to a cassette setup and making a gravel grinder out of it. If I did decide to go that way I'd rather keep my current modified drivetrain with a short cage derailleur and a 46/36 x 14-28.
That's only 34.4 gear inches at the low end. I could put on the 34 tooth ring for 32.5 gear inches but is that even a low enough bottom end for relatively flat land or only moderately hilly gravel grinding?
On the flip side, I have recently gone to a compact double 10x2 on my newer road bike and can see how with the proper selection of gearing, a similar setup could work just fine for gravel grinding.
As to whether or not you have low enough gearing, it depends on how steep the hills are and how strong a rider you are. There are some of the younger guys half my age and 40 pounds lighter who fly by me pushing gears way higher than what I'm spinning.
To make a long story short (I know . . . too late) triples aren't a necessity but wide range gearing with some low range is. I know there are a few guys who will ride gravel on single-speeds or fixies, but there is just something wrong with them
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Last edited by GravelMN; 06-27-14 at 06:23 AM.
#10
The Improbable Bulk
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wilkes-Barre, PA
Posts: 8,379
Bikes: Many
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
I'm no speed demon by any means, but riding gravel I rarely get out of my 32 tooth middle ring, so I am actually considering going to a 1x8...
__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA
People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
#12
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,944
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Liked 1,450 Times
in
905 Posts
Two questions: 1) Can you get the low gear you want with a double, which probably implies an inner chaining with at least 34 teeth?
2) Given the low and high gears you want, how many different gear ratios do you want to fill out the range? I like about a 6 or 7 percent ratio progression, which generally requires a lot of gears.
2) Given the low and high gears you want, how many different gear ratios do you want to fill out the range? I like about a 6 or 7 percent ratio progression, which generally requires a lot of gears.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#14
Old. Slow. Happy.
My current all-roads rig is equipped with 34/50 chainrings and an 11-32 cassette. The 50t chainring is overkill for dirt/gravel, but otherwise the gearing works well for mixed-terrain riding.
#15
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,826
Liked 4,004 Times
in
2,728 Posts
I live in the mountains and my gravel bike has a 42/11 high gear. I think it's fine. I find myself spinning a little more than is comfortable sometimes, but that is good for me and I've been trying to up my cadence a little.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Port Dover Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,550
Bikes: 1965 Dilecta Le Blanc, 1956 Royal Nord, 1972 Raleigh Sports, 1972 CCM Turismo,1976 SuperCycle Excalibur, 2014 Salsa Vaya, 2017 Felt DD70, 2019 Giant Lafree and others
Liked 627 Times
in
235 Posts
The new Salsa Vaya Road/Touring/Gravel I recently purchased has Shimano Sora components. It came with a 30/42/52t crankset and an 11-32 9speed cassette.
I suspect the wide range of gears on this bike has a lot to do with it's intended multiple functions. The geometry is set-up to perform adequately loaded or un-loaded.
With its 700 40c tires it feels sweet on gravel and so far I'm very happy with the gearing.
I suspect the wide range of gears on this bike has a lot to do with it's intended multiple functions. The geometry is set-up to perform adequately loaded or un-loaded.
With its 700 40c tires it feels sweet on gravel and so far I'm very happy with the gearing.
__________________
We are what we reflect. We are the changes that we bring to this world. Ride often. -Geo.-
We are what we reflect. We are the changes that we bring to this world. Ride often. -Geo.-
#17
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
The rolling resistance on those 2.3's is also very low so it is no trouble to spin it out on the road.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,913
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Liked 4,241 Times
in
2,357 Posts
Yeah I'd prefer a compact but I don't have one lying around. I do have a 44-32-22 triple in my parts bin as well as shimano brifters for a triple so that's why I was asking. In any case, I suspect I'd need a lower low than you do for those hills!
#21
Senior Member
Many people use CX bikes to race gravel, not that you said you'd be racing. I have a Cannondale SuperX with 46/36 and 11-26 gearing. It's fine for gravel and fine for climbing pavement, but under geared for big, paved downhills out west where it lives. The new ones have disc brakes, which I wish I had. I have used a road bike with fenders on gravel, and that was a big mistake - gravel would get caught between the wheel and the rim. Not good.
#22
Trek 500 Kid
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 2,562
Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road
Liked 383 Times
in
308 Posts
Two questions: 1) Can you get the low gear you want with a double, which probably implies an inner chaining with at least 34 teeth?
2) Given the low and high gears you want, how many different gear ratios do you want to fill out the range? I like about a 6 or 7 percent ratio progression, which generally requires a lot of gears.
2) Given the low and high gears you want, how many different gear ratios do you want to fill out the range? I like about a 6 or 7 percent ratio progression, which generally requires a lot of gears.
It all depends on your terrain, road conditions, and personal strengths. I'm a 50 year old Clyde who is a recreational/fitness rider so I'm not as worried about speed as I am about having low bail-out gears when things get steep and soft. The bike I started with came with a 9x3 so it was easy to just swap to the wider cassette and smaller chainrings/crankset. I intentionally maxed out my long-cage LX RD to have the most range possible.
On the flip side, I have recently gone to a compact double 10x2 on my newer road bike and can see how with the proper selection of gearing, a similar setup could work just fine for gravel grinding.
As to whether or not you have low enough gearing, it depends on how steep the hills are and how strong a rider you are. There are some of the younger guys half my age and 40 pounds lighter who fly by me pushing gears way higher than what I'm spinning.
To make a long story short (I know . . . too late) triples aren't a necessity but wide range gearing with some low range is. I know there are a few guys who will ride gravel on single-speeds or fixies, but there is just something wrong with them![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
On the flip side, I have recently gone to a compact double 10x2 on my newer road bike and can see how with the proper selection of gearing, a similar setup could work just fine for gravel grinding.
As to whether or not you have low enough gearing, it depends on how steep the hills are and how strong a rider you are. There are some of the younger guys half my age and 40 pounds lighter who fly by me pushing gears way higher than what I'm spinning.
To make a long story short (I know . . . too late) triples aren't a necessity but wide range gearing with some low range is. I know there are a few guys who will ride gravel on single-speeds or fixies, but there is just something wrong with them
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
If I go this way and if I do find I need a lower range I'd just have to swap the derailleur out for a long or medium cage and go with a wider range cassette. I actually came up with this setup for some optimum mid range road gearing on my distance bike with just a little bit more bailout for hills than what I used to have and am pretty happy with my current mid range.....which is why I didn't want to change it.
I personally don't even use more than that on the road anymore on this bike. I sort of modified it to take advantage of some better mid ranges that I'm most comfortable with by sacrificing my top end. So 46-14 & 88 gear inches is as fast as this one gets. Even before that I'd been topping out at 95 gear inches with a 50-14 anyway (and rarely used that)........Which is about what my other dedicated road bike will have in the way of a top end.
![50+](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/old.gif)
It'll be another excuse for getting dropped should some cat 6 thing ever come up anymore.
![Smilie](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#23
just keep riding
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Milledgeville, Georgia
Posts: 13,560
Bikes: 2018 Black Mountain Cycles MCD,2017 Advocate Cycles Seldom Seen Drop Bar, 2017 Niner Jet 9 Alloy, 2015 Zukas custom road, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB, 1980ish Fuji S-12S
Liked 33 Times
in
22 Posts
I have two gravel rigs with different gearing reflecting their different roles.
The steel monstercrosser has a 30-39-50 triple and a 12-36 10 speed cassette. With fat tires (currently 29x1.8 Renegades), sturdy frame and wheels, extra low gearing and potential for carrying heavier loads, this is the bike I would choose for long rides in hilly areas, for more casual rides where comfort and ease are desired and in the future for overnight trips hauling camping, fishing and maybe cooking gear.
The carbon Crux has a 34-50 double and a 12-32 10 speed cassette. With a very lightweight build and more aggressive geometry, this bike is more for fast rides with minimal loads.
There is a lot of overlap of the roles of the two bikes. They have equivalent high gears which I find very useful for maintaining speed when mild rollers follow big downhills. I would find the wider range of the OP's second gearing option more suitable for the terrain here which ranges mostly from mildly rolling to frequent short and steep hills.
The steel monstercrosser has a 30-39-50 triple and a 12-36 10 speed cassette. With fat tires (currently 29x1.8 Renegades), sturdy frame and wheels, extra low gearing and potential for carrying heavier loads, this is the bike I would choose for long rides in hilly areas, for more casual rides where comfort and ease are desired and in the future for overnight trips hauling camping, fishing and maybe cooking gear.
The carbon Crux has a 34-50 double and a 12-32 10 speed cassette. With a very lightweight build and more aggressive geometry, this bike is more for fast rides with minimal loads.
There is a lot of overlap of the roles of the two bikes. They have equivalent high gears which I find very useful for maintaining speed when mild rollers follow big downhills. I would find the wider range of the OP's second gearing option more suitable for the terrain here which ranges mostly from mildly rolling to frequent short and steep hills.
#24
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Liked 293 Times
in
161 Posts
I'm using triples on all three of my Cyclocross bikes. The 36t middle chainring on a triple is ideal. A 22t granny ring is not needed except for loaded touring bikes, IMO.
My vintage Simoncini has a 48, 36 & 26 triple crankset with a 13-24 seven speed freewheel. It's really perfect with tight spacing between the cogs and the ability to pedal at speeds up to 30 mph. Climbing the 15% rural roads in southwestern Wisconsin is very do-able.
![](https://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll210/wildcat-bucket/ItalCXDrivetraindetailphoto_zpse1d95ae4.jpg)
My Monstercross has a 48, 36 & 22 with a 12-27 nine speed cassette. It also has a great range with tight cog spacing. The 22 granny gear is overkill, but the bike is set-up for loaded touring.
![](https://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll210/wildcat-bucket/CX700003.jpg)
My carbon fiber Cyclocross bike has a 50, 39 & 26 crankset with a 12-30 ten speed cassette. This bike can be used while on faster group rides and has a very wide range. I have installed an 11-32 cassette on this bike, but I didn't like the gaps in the 11, 12, 13, 15, 17... spacing. I do like having ...13, 14, 15, 17... cogs on all my bikes.
My vintage Simoncini has a 48, 36 & 26 triple crankset with a 13-24 seven speed freewheel. It's really perfect with tight spacing between the cogs and the ability to pedal at speeds up to 30 mph. Climbing the 15% rural roads in southwestern Wisconsin is very do-able.
![](https://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll210/wildcat-bucket/ItalCXDrivetraindetailphoto_zpse1d95ae4.jpg)
My Monstercross has a 48, 36 & 22 with a 12-27 nine speed cassette. It also has a great range with tight cog spacing. The 22 granny gear is overkill, but the bike is set-up for loaded touring.
![](https://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll210/wildcat-bucket/CX700003.jpg)
My carbon fiber Cyclocross bike has a 50, 39 & 26 crankset with a 12-30 ten speed cassette. This bike can be used while on faster group rides and has a very wide range. I have installed an 11-32 cassette on this bike, but I didn't like the gaps in the 11, 12, 13, 15, 17... spacing. I do like having ...13, 14, 15, 17... cogs on all my bikes.
![](https://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll210/wildcat-bucket/IMG_09611.jpg)
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.
Last edited by Barrettscv; 06-28-14 at 07:09 AM.
#25
Senior Member
My "gravel" bike runs on 42x622 marathons with 36 t chainring and 12-36 t cassette.
live on gravel, 5-8 km to some sort of pavement, this combination of gearing and tire
has worked well for me.
live on gravel, 5-8 km to some sort of pavement, this combination of gearing and tire
has worked well for me.