Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fifty Plus (50+)
Reload this Page >

First Pair of Glasses at 80--Not Happy.

Search
Notices
Fifty Plus (50+) Share the victories, challenges, successes and special concerns of bicyclists 50 and older. Especially useful for those entering or reentering bicycling.

First Pair of Glasses at 80--Not Happy.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-15 | 04:58 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 6
From: New England

Bikes: Trek 1.1

First Pair of Glasses at 80--Not Happy.

Recently the MVD told me I could only drive during the day unless I got glasses.
Yesterday we went and ordered some. What a lot of bother! I had no idea glasses
were so complicated. Dr. suggested bi focals so I could glance down at the dashboard
when needed. Ordered some kind of divided lenses that allow for distance, mid range and closeup.
Also to prevent glare. Dr. said only wear them when driving. Which is what I intend.
As to cycling I have gotten along fine this past season with just sunglasses so we will see.
(I should not complain; my dear grandson has had to wear them since a young boy).
Sculptor7 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-15 | 06:04 PM
  #2  
DiabloScott's Avatar
It's MY mountain
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,175
Likes: 4,236
From: Mt.Diablo

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

I should not complain
This.
Next you'll be telling us you noticed your first gray hair the other day.
DiabloScott is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-15 | 06:06 PM
  #3  
10 Wheels's Avatar
Galveston County Texas
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 33,335
Likes: 1,286
From: In The Wind

Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum

Tri Focals.....yay..
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"

10 Wheels is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-15 | 06:41 PM
  #4  
lphilpot's Avatar
Saved by Grace
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 1
From: The slow guy in the back

Bikes: Only one at a time; currently a 2012 Specialized Tricross Sport

Yep. I'm there at (almost) 56 - Trifocals. I've had 'em for a couple of years in fact (had glasses since my mid/late 30s). I keep thinking progressives would be better, but after two pointless attempts a couple of years apart, I'm doubtful: Waaaaay too much that's generally out of focus and blurry, with only a tiny little (moving) spot that's sharp.
lphilpot is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-15 | 07:16 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
From: N.W.Ohio
wow . first pair of glasses. I guess it would be tough to get use to all that at once. I wore glasses since i was a kid, then the blended lenses a few years ago with the transition for sun. The worst time wearing glasses was when my son started wrestling around the age of 9 through high school, by glasses were aways messed up.
freedomrider1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-15 | 08:38 PM
  #6  
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
just another gosling
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 20,568
Likes: 2,677
From: Everett, WA

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Yeah, I got my first pair at 68. What a bummer, eh? I got the progressive lenses with the photochromic option and of course the anti-glare coating. $700 with the frames. I put those bifocal stick-ons (Hydrotac/Optx) in my non-prescription sunglasses so I can read my cycling instruments and auto dash. .
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-15 | 08:40 PM
  #7  
John E's Avatar
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,409
Likes: 1,875
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Family curse -- my father and my brother had severe myopia, needed corrective lenses in by age 6 or 7, and ended up with about a -13 diopter correction.

I was a little better off, getting glasses at age 9 and ending up with a -7 correction.

I wore single-vision glasses until two years ago, when I got a pair of "office" progressives, with the bottom 35% of the vision field for close work, the next 40% for midrange, and only the top 25% for distance. For driving and bicycling I still prefer my old single vision lenses.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply
Old 01-09-15 | 09:02 PM
  #8  
tarwheel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,896
Likes: 7
From: Raleigh, NC

Bikes: Waterford RST-22, Bob Jackson World Tour, Ritchey Breakaway Cross, Soma Saga, De Bernardi SL, Specialized Sequoia

Glasses make you look smarter and more distinguished, at least that's what I keep telling myself. Sort of like gray hair.
tarwheel is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 12:19 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 780
Originally Posted by lphilpot
Yep. I'm there at (almost) 56 - Trifocals. I've had 'em for a couple of years in fact (had glasses since my mid/late 30s). I keep thinking progressives would be better, but after two pointless attempts a couple of years apart, I'm doubtful: Waaaaay too much that's generally out of focus and blurry, with only a tiny little (moving) spot that's sharp.
I have recently found that to be so true. I am forcing myself to adapt, it is a slow go.
02Giant is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 12:55 AM
  #10  
Zinger's Avatar
Trek 500 Kid
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,563
Likes: 399
From: Spokane WA

Bikes: '83 Trek 970 road --- '86 Trek 500 road

Yeah you're lucky. I had to start in my 50s and I had 20-20 at one time. I assumed that I'd never be a "four-eyes". I'm up to +2s for general use and +3s for reading. I'm far sighted though and still can hunt w/o glasses. I use my +2s for driving but don't ride with them......yet. Sometimes I forget I have my glasses on when riding from the house so I stop and stash them by the road somewhere and pick them up on the way back home.

I also forget that I'm wearing my reading glasses sometimes when I start to drive away from the house and used to turn around, go back home, and change out. Now I just keep both extra glasses in the truck. I should probably get some upgraded bifocals (My work glasses needed upgrading before I retired) but I'd probably break them so I haven't yet. Been getting the cheapies at the drugstores or book shops.

What a hassle, lol. But I've had to wear safety glasses at work for decades so it's not that foreign to me.
Zinger is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 01:57 AM
  #11  
79pmooney's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,172
Likes: 5,301
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

[h=2]First Pair of Glasses at 80--Not Happy.[/h]My first glasses at 13. Happy! I could see. Better than I ever had. Now it's trifocals, bifocal sunglasses and computer glasses that are restful for my eyes but that I only see the computer screen well.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 07:40 AM
  #12  
avidone1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 1
From: still above ground

Bikes: 2016 Specialized crosstrail comp disc

those 'tri foculs' also called 'progressives' can be challenging to get used to. Give yourself some time. The more you wear them the more your eyes will 'learn' to find that sweet spot where they automatically go to the point on the lens that's correct for the distance you are viewing. Good luck
avidone1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 08:19 AM
  #13  
Wanderer's Avatar
aka Phil Jungels
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,234
Likes: 91
From: North Aurora, IL

Bikes: 08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp

Originally Posted by avidone1
those 'tri foculs' also called 'progressives' can be challenging to get used to. Give yourself some time. The more you wear them the more your eyes will 'learn' to find that sweet spot where they automatically go to the point on the lens that's correct for the distance you are viewing. Good luck
Tri focals are NOT PROGRESSIVES. Progressives have an ever changing focal point. Tri focals have 3.
Wanderer is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 08:45 AM
  #14  
JerrySTL's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,472
Likes: 11
From: Near St. Louis, Missouri

Bikes: Giant Defy Advanced, Breezer Doppler Team, Schwinn Twinn Tandem, Windsor Tourist, 1954 JC Higgens

If night driving is the problem, get the anti-glare coating.

I've been wearing glasses for 42 years now. I even have fancy Rudy Project prescription lenses bifocal sunglasses for riding. My eyesight is so bad that I have to use the inserts. I found out that lined bifocals are much better for my riding glasses than progressive lenses. For the most part I'm looking at the map/bike computer or down the road so it's an either/or situation.
JerrySTL is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 11:24 AM
  #15  
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Lacombe County Alberta

Bikes: Canondale MTB, Arvon Stacy custom steel road, Quattro Assi Team 2000 road.

Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
I put those bifocal stick-ons (Hydrotac/Optx) in my non-prescription sunglasses so I can read my cycling instruments and auto dash. .
Never knew there was such a thing.
I just ordered two sets for my two pair of Serengetis, driving and running/biking. I occasionally run with a music player but not in recent times as i can't read the screen to change playlists or albums and I dont carry my readers with me. Like you, I will also be able to read the screen on my bike comp.
Thanks for the post.
bexiesbruv is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 11:36 AM
  #16  
jmiked's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Texas

Bikes: Specialized Camber Elite 29er

Originally Posted by lphilpot
Yep. I'm there at (almost) 56 - Trifocals. I've had 'em for a couple of years in fact (had glasses since my mid/late 30s). I keep thinking progressives would be better, but after two pointless attempts a couple of years apart, I'm doubtful: Waaaaay too much that's generally out of focus and blurry, with only a tiny little (moving) spot that's sharp.
Agreed. I tried the progressive lenses for six months and went back and got regular trifocals (a free swap). Nowadays, at 71 years, I don't need glasses for cycling or driving, but do for reading (cataract surgery).
jmiked is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 11:43 AM
  #17  
BobbyG's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 2,388
From: Colorado Springs, CO

Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Specialized Rockhopper, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V

Trifocals for me at 50. I tried progressives when I needed help reading at 41. They were okay, but biking and driving they didn't yield as much peripheral distance vision as lenses with bi- and tri-focal insets. It is that top-to-bottom distance vision that really helps when approaching cross-streets. On my first pair of bi-focals (back in college in the early '80s before progressives were available) the reading portion was too high and I had a lot of mis-steps on stairs, etc. After college I found I didn't need them any longer and went 20 years before revisiting them. What I did was buy those stick on reading lenses and positioned them down low where I wanted them. Took it in to the optician and said, "here is where I want the cutoff". He said that is not where they usually put them. I said that's irrelevant. They did it my way and I was happy. When I needed separate help for midrange and reading I went to trifocals using my bifocals as to where to put the splits (down low).
BobbyG is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 11:59 AM
  #18  
el padre
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
From: South East Kansas

Bikes: Rans Stratus, ICE TRike, other assorted

Glasses since 5th grade, contacts from jr. in high school till 'several' years ago... ...now use progressive with good results. Just take your time and as they say 'get used to it'
Floyd is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 12:11 PM
  #19  
lphilpot's Avatar
Saved by Grace
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 1
From: The slow guy in the back

Bikes: Only one at a time; currently a 2012 Specialized Tricross Sport

Originally Posted by 02Giant
I have recently found that to be so true. I am forcing myself to adapt, it is a slow go.
Maybe I need to shop around some more but I spent more time trying to "find focus" than actually using my progressives, both times. When reading a phone book, if the name was sharp the number was blurry. That's how small the area of clear focus was. I ended up with headaches: Not from the poor vision, but from unconscious tightness in my neck muscles as a result of constantly "pointing my nose" at what I was attempting to see.

Plus, in the versions I tried, the focal length varied not only vertically across the lenses, but horizontally as well. If it had been vertical only with horizontal bands of consistent focus that would have worked (essentially like "continuous bi/trifocals"), but not both ways. I have no idea if those are available.

Oh well - What are a few more lines at this point?
lphilpot is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 01:55 PM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 6
From: New England

Bikes: Trek 1.1

The more I read about the complexities of glasses the more concerned I become that they will help at all. Have pretty good peripheral vision but they said that would be blurry unless I turned my head. I think I am going to feel like Jerry Seinfeld in that episode where he was using the thick glasses for what reason I can't remember. Also the contradiction between the Doctor's advice to only wear them when I am driving and what has been said here about "getting used to them" is a little scary. I can still just read the newspaper without glasses but prefer my trusty $2.00 pair of 1.50s. At night I think I am mostly concerned about glare from oncoming cars so the anti-glare feature sounds good. From what I can see the whole thing about who can drive and who can't seems a little crazy. I underrstand that people with one eye can drive (where's the depth perception?). Another crazy thing about the law here in Maine is that I can legally drive without glasses during the day now but the way I understand it when I get the glasses I will have to wear them all the time!
Sculptor7 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 08:29 PM
  #21  
cale's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,248
Likes: 4
From: Seattle

Bikes: Kuota Ksano. Litespeed T5 gravel - brilliant!

I suspect the biggest adjustment, S7, will be keeping track of them. Being a practiced four-eye, I can generally find mine hanging from my nose but as a newb, you'll probably have a harder time of it.
cale is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 09:07 PM
  #22  
BlazingPedals's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,561
Likes: 799
From: Middle of da Mitten

Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Bacchetta Quattro, Catrike Speed

Yes, don't complain. I've had glasses since 2nd grade. My diopter is about -5 (nearsighted.) I have progressives, but for bike riding I use contacts so that I can use any old wraparound sunglasses I want, and I take a pair of reading glasses along for food stops.

My swim goggles have optical inserts, too; otherwise I can't read the lap timer on the wall - and it's big.
BlazingPedals is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-15 | 10:24 PM
  #23  
Rich Gibson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Annandale, VA

Bikes: Fuji Rubaix 1.0

Originally Posted by BobbyG
..... What I did was buy those stick on reading lenses and positioned them down low where I wanted them. Took it in to the optician and said, "here is where I want the cutoff". He said that is not where they usually put them. I said that's irrelevant. They did it my way and I was happy. When I needed separate help for midrange and reading I went to trifocals using my bifocals as to where to put the splits (down low).
Good for you. The last few pairs of transitions I got I told the doctor where I wanted the reading area to go to. He doesn't get to decide unless you let him. Your money, your decision.

Rich
__________________
..life is like a roll of toilet paper. The closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes. ― Andy Rooney ...enjoy what's left!
Rich Gibson is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-15 | 07:43 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,940
Likes: 363
Heck, the fact you are riding, and for that fact, all of us, is fantastic. Getting glasses is probably the easiest thing I do for my health issues. They will become an everyday thing to you, Sculptor, if this is the worst you have to add, you will get off quite well. Keep on pedaling, everyone, keep on.

Bill
qcpmsame is offline  
Reply
Old 01-19-15 | 06:12 PM
  #25  
zonatandem's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,013
Likes: 24
From: Tucson, AZ

Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single

First pair of glasses???
Beats a seeing eye dog (got to feed him!) or a white cane!
zonatandem is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.