Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Fitting Your Bike
Reload this Page >

Another thread about crank length (as it applies to different events)

Search
Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Another thread about crank length (as it applies to different events)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-16 | 06:15 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Another thread about crank length (as it applies to different events)

My experience

I am 47, 6'-1" and 195lbs. I have raced on and off since I was 20 years old, including a season in Europe. I am a CAT 1 on the road and a CAT 2 on the track. For all my years of riding, I rode 175mm (on road bike, on TT bike, on cross bike, on mountain bike). I went back to doing the Pursuit and Kilo on the track in 2012 after 20 years off the track and used a set of 180mm Zipp Vuma Chrono cranks. I got bronze in the pursuit (3k in 3:42) and 4th in the Kilo (1:08.8).

Last year after hearing so much about the benefits of short cranks, and primarily influenced by the Martin study of peak power at 220/195/170/145/120, I went all-in and went 145mm on ALL my bikes. I have been on them for 13 months now.

My observations: my peak power is down 250W on average and 400W from my all time high. My standing starts in the pursuit and kilo are embarrassingly slow. I did have decent success in criteriums and mass start track races, winning a half dozen or so, but it wasn't from sprinting, it was from overall fitness. I did have a PR in the 3K pursuit at Carson Velodrome of 3:41.

I am struggling with wanting to stay on the 145mm given how I see the leverage and peak power down so much. I know they say that leg speed will make up for the lesser force, but while my cadence went up, my power for various time periods never measured to previous years despite being coached, training seriously, and feeling like I was as good of shape as ever. I am currently thinking about staying with 145mm on my Time Trial and Pursuit bike as they is no premium on the start and you are in aero position. Then go back to between 170mm and 175mm for criteriums, road races, and mass start track races. Finally, to go 180, or maybe even 190mm for the Kilo (where the standing start and leverage is most important) and match sprints.

Thoughts on that logic?

I am leaning towards getting a Power Cranks adjustable crank (from 145mm - 182.5mm) that you can put in dual mode (locking out that both arms rotate independently) and then I can do out on the road and take notes about power output.

Any other feedback?
KramesJamer is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Voodoo76
Masters Racing (All Disciplines)
18
03-06-18 06:55 AM
2ndLaw
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
35
10-10-17 10:59 AM
RMoudatir
General Cycling Discussion
32
10-23-16 05:45 PM
Bulldogsprinter
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
18
10-23-14 12:09 PM
Khris
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
6
04-05-10 10:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.