Size problem, geometry problem or both?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

05-03-18, 06:07 AM

#26

Road Fan

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Posts: 16,878

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)

Tagged: 0 Thread(s)

Quoted: 1857 Post(s)

Likes: 102

Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrick112

I bought a 2014 Cannondale supersix some years back for a great price. I am 5'8 with a 31 inch inseam, the bike is a 54 cm. 54 cm in other bikes fit me fine, but the Supersix never felt quite right and caused lower back pain. I had a bike fit, and the mechanic put a 60mm stem on there with like a 15% pitch. But the handling has been effected.

So I am going to sell the bike and buy something new. If I go for a supersix 52 cm will I be alright? Or is it likely that the geometry doesn't work for me too?

I'm 5'6" with a 81 cm PBH (different from inseam), which is right near 32 inches. BTW, my trousers are 29" or 30" as the tailor measures them. I usually have a 69 cm saddle height. Except for odd frames, I need a 54 cm c-c, and 52 or 53 can work.

First thing I'd suggest is to double check your PBH measurement. If yours is correct, you have really short legs, and you if you make a change, consider a 52 cm c-c which can accommodate your torso. You might need some help from a good fitter to adapt this thinking to modern frames.

To me the basic numbers are worth double-checking. The correct view of inseam has nothing to do with trousers.