Search
Notices
Fitting Your Bike Are you confused about how you should fit a bike to your particular body dimensions? Have you been reading, found the terms Merxx or French Fit, and don’t know what you need? Every style of riding is different- in how you fit the bike to you, and the sizing of the bike itself. It’s more than just measuring your height, reach and inseam. With the help of Bike Fitting, you’ll be able to find the right fit for your frame size, style of riding, and your particular dimensions. Here ya’ go…..the location for everything fit related.

Crank size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-15 | 09:09 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Crank size

Hi all-

I had a 2010 Specialized Roubaix 58 comp triple up until recently. I loved it. I am 5'10 with a 34 inch inseam. I am a serious recreational cyclist-not a racer, but like to group ride. After trying a 58 2014 Roubaix comp, the frame felt a little too big. I really felt stretched no matter what adjustments were tried .I rode a 56 and felt more comfortable. I purchased this bike. I am not stretched, but still tweaking saddle position. Have a 120 adjustable stem which I am also playing with. Overall the bike feels pretty good. But I definitely don't have the same power in the big gear that i had with my old bike. The crank on the 56 is 172.5 . Heres the question: would getting a bigger crank-175?- give me the same power i had with the 2010?
desertjourneys is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-15 | 07:47 PM
  #2  
AnthonyG's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 420
From: Queanbeyan, Australia.
At your inseam, either 172.5mm cranks or 175mm cranks are spot on for you. I honestly don't think that you would feel much difference from the cranks alone. The 172.5mm cranks would be a tiny bit easier to spin at high cadence.

I had a quick look for specifications on the bike. Triple cranks often have a smaller large chainring than a double chainring by a few teeth.
One specification that I read specified a 50 tooth large chainring. If the new bike has a 53 tooth large chainring then you would have increased the gear ratio's in the big ring by a noticeable amount. Also I find that getting the saddle in just the right place effects how much power I feel I have.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Reply
Old 01-31-15 | 06:42 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Thanks for the feedback and info. After speaking with my local bike shop mechanic, he suggested that i get a 52 ring. It should come in next week. Still have a feeling that a 175 crank would make a difference.

Thanks again!
desertjourneys is offline  
Reply
Old 02-01-15 | 12:06 AM
  #4  
AnthonyG's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 420
From: Queanbeyan, Australia.
Originally Posted by desertjourneys
Thanks for the feedback and info. After speaking with my local bike shop mechanic, he suggested that i get a 52 ring. It should come in next week. Still have a feeling that a 175 crank would make a difference.

Thanks again!
I'd move your saddle around a little. I don't know how you've set it up now although if all things were equal, then compared to the 175mm cranks I would have the seat 2.5mm higher with 172.5mm cranks and probably a couple of mm further back.

Also, you might be right. You may fell better with 175mm cranks yet given the cost involved in this change I would try some cheaper adjustments first.

Anthony
AnthonyG is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-15 | 01:43 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 2
From: Anchorage

Bikes: Devinci Oslo

a change from 172.5 to 175 is a 1.5% force reduction.
Cheers,
David B.
md11mx is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-15 | 02:11 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast

Bikes: 8

Heres the question: would getting a bigger crank-175?- give me the same power i had with the 2010?
spend the big bucks on a power meter crank an it will give you numbers to play with. to what benefit? beats me.. IDK.
fietsbob is offline  
Reply
Old 02-24-15 | 04:13 AM
  #7  
jyl's Avatar
jyl
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,643
Likes: 68
From: Portland OR

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Originally Posted by md11mx
a change from 172.5 to 175 is a 1.5% force reduction.
Cheers,
David B.
Too simplistic.
jyl is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sito
Fitting Your Bike
7
08-10-16 11:50 AM
Medic Zero
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
3
04-21-14 10:03 PM
Campag4life
Road Cycling
10
10-05-12 09:54 PM
thenomad
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
13
06-07-10 09:49 PM
surewould
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
11
03-16-10 10:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.