![]() |
Originally Posted by Raxel
(Post 20781479)
I am with the group 2, and actually think Peter and his believer were totally clueless.
(...) So here's my 2c -IF peter outsourced the frame to Chinese titanium builders (which I think he should have) the frameset and fork would cost AT LEAST $2,000. Then the retail price of the full bike would be $4,000-$5,000 range. -The only way to (somehow) meet the claimed price is to use cheaper material (cro-mo or aluminium) and mass produce in existing big factories - in short, let Dahon or Pacific make the bike. I am not sure whether a) Peter didn't know this b) knew everything but lied to people to get money. |
Latest Update
Latest update is that the first bikes are out the door to backers...
|
Brunhilde steps forth, takes a deep breath and begins her final song. The first handful of bike have apparently shipped! What a saga it has been. Looking forward to the first user reviews and, in due course, my first ride.
|
Originally Posted by berlinonaut
(Post 20786251)
How would ETRO 507 wheels be not standard components? ETRO 507 IS a standard... Just because you probably do not get them in the supermarket around the corner? Then there is a problem: If you consider everything that is not identical to all the other bikes around to be "non standard" (and thus a downside) but on the other hand want a bike that massively differs from all the other bikes around in terms that it should i.e. be lighter and have bigger wheels and still fold very compact but at the same time is identical to all the other bikes around you end up in a catch 22....
But if you look at the amount of road bikes using ETRTO 507 wheels, then its not (there is ETRTO 520 for junior or woman road bikes). And ETRTO 507 40mm wide or less tires aren't standard at all. Having several bikes with ETRTO 406 wheels and having used an ETRTO 520 wheeled bike, I am absolutely not convinced of the benefit of using ETRTO 507 wheels. The only thing I am sure is that it drastically reduces the choice of tires (and tires a crucial for the bike performances, the same problem exists for the Brompton, no high end high performances folding tires unless the Schwalbe One presented on the 2019 CHPT3 become available as spare parts), it makes the bike bigger (an Helix with ETRTO 406 wheels would be smaller) and it increases the weight (an Helix with ETRTO 406 wheels would weight less). In your list of Brompton improvements, you forgot that the wheelbase of the Brompton was increased what changed the behavior of the bike. |
Originally Posted by Jipe
(Post 20786577)
If you consider any ETRTO size to be standard, then yes ETRTO 507 is a standard component..
Originally Posted by Jipe
(Post 20786577)
The only thing I am sure is that it drastically reduces the choice of tires (and tires a crucial for the bike performances, the same problem exists for the Brompton, no high end high performances folding tires unless the Schwalbe One presented on the 2019 CHPT3 become available as spare parts),
Originally Posted by Jipe
(Post 20786577)
it makes the bike bigger (an Helix with ETRTO 406 wheels would be smaller) and it increases the weight (an Helix with ETRTO 406 wheels would weight less).
Originally Posted by Jipe
(Post 20786577)
In your list of Brompton improvements, you forgot that the wheelbase of the Brompton was increased what changed the behavior of the bike.
|
Brompton detour
I was given a ' look out for' on used Mk 2 bikes, which butt fillet brazed the hinges on the frame and bar mast tubes..
the underside of the main frame tube hinge ... is the place to check.. for any separations .. over time .. I had a saddle adapter pin , pointed back on my Mk2 for a bit more space, don't need it on the newer bike.. ..... |
Berlinonaut, let it go. None of us, at present, know whether this bike is any good or not, nor whether it will sell in the numbers to keep the company in business. You also have to remember that many, including myself, have no need of another folding bike, the one (s) we have are more than adequate.
So, the Helix is a brave attempt. I trust it will do well. There is one thing I would say, however, is that if is a success, I stongly doubt production will remain in Canada, nor that the company will remain independent. |
The fact that a size is defined as a standard, doesn't mean that there are components available.
If you have a bike with ETRTO 507 wheels and have a wide choice of tires, it means that that bike was well designed to accept the usual ETRTO 507 50mm or wider tires. The problem with Helix is that Helix doesn't accept (to be confirmed when there will be some Helix delivered) up to 40mm wide tires and that there are very few models available (seems only one remaining). Yes, I own a Brompton and doesn't like the heavy, cheap Schwalbe Marathon, Marathon Racer, Marathon Plus tires nor the fragile, slow Kojak. What is missing is high performances lightweight folding tires like the Marathon Supreme, Marathon Mondial, Pro-one or Continental Grand Prix. ETRTO 507 wheels on a folder isn't a unique selling proposition, there are for instance Tern folding with ETRTO 507 wheels. Now, who would like to have a unique selling proposition that doens't bring any benefit or is a drawback ? And actually, this is exactly what ETRTO 507 wheels is: no benefit, only drawbacks ! For the increase of wheel base of the Brompton, your comments means that you never rode a small wheelbase and a large wheelbase Brompton, if you did, you would know the benefit of the increased wheelbase. |
Originally Posted by LannyPots
(Post 20786527)
Latest update is that the first bikes are out the door to backers...
Dang....we'll have test ride reports here soon! I noticed one change to the website.... The weights have increased by about a pound & a half. My 10 speed is now 24.4 lbs. I can live with this. |
We need actual pics of actual bikes. I'll plotz!
|
Originally Posted by Jipe
(Post 20786689)
For the increase of wheel base of the Brompton, your comments means that you never rode a small wheelbase and a large wheelbase Brompton, if you did, you would know the benefit of the increased wheelbase.
|
Originally Posted by Jipe
(Post 20786689)
The problem with Helix is that Helix doesn't accept (to be confirmed when there will be some Helix delivered) up to 40mm wide tires and that there are very few models available (seems only one remaining).
Originally Posted by Jipe
(Post 20786689)
Yes, I own a Brompton and doesn't like the heavy, cheap Schwalbe Marathon, Marathon Racer, Marathon Plus tires nor the fragile, slow Kojak. What is missing is high performances lightweight folding tires like the Marathon Supreme, Marathon Mondial, Pro-one or Continental Grand Prix.
Originally Posted by Jipe
(Post 20786689)
And actually, this is exactly what ETRTO 507 wheels is: no benefit, only drawbacks !
|
One of the potential problems of size for big people of the Helix is B) Effective top tube length: 590 mm Hopefully, this has changed since the Kickstarter campaign)
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...5299a20879.png If you compare with the Brompton (M: 670, S: 700, P: 715), you see that it is much smaller and could be too short for big people, same problem than on the excellent Tyrell bikes that only fit for small people 9normal, it was made for the Japanese market). The reason of this is a one piece frame made short to reduce the folded size, If you look how other folders (Birdy, Ori) solved this, they use a forward tilted stem. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...23c9a1c8b8.jpg For the Brompton tires, yes I know the Josef Kuosac Strozzapreti. , it is very fragile. But there will be Schwalbe One on the 2019 CHPT3 maybe Brompton will sell them as spare parts ? |
Originally Posted by LannyPots
(Post 20786527)
Latest update is that the first bikes are out the door to backers...
|
Well, there goes my $20, bet lost. Congratulations to all the backers. I hope it is everything you dreamed it would be and more.
|
Originally Posted by Jipe
(Post 20786812)
One of the potential problems of size for big people of the Helix is B) Effective top tube length: 590 mm Hopefully, this has changed since the Kickstarter campaign)
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...5299a20879.png If you compare with the Brompton (M: 670, S: 700, P: 715), you see that it is much smaller and could be too short for big people, same problem than on the excellent Tyrell bikes that only fit for small people 9normal, it was made for the Japanese market). The reason of this is a one piece frame made short to reduce the folded size, If you look how other folders (Birdy, Ori) solved this, they use a forward tilted stem. the Helix) achieve the same thing as tilted stem? See "Rider Compartment"..... https://www.bikecad.ca/taxonomy/term/25?page=2 And a longer stem could be substituted. |
Ooooo,...please, start a new Helix thread when you all receive your bikes!!! Congratulations!!! :beer:
|
Damn! Finally :beer:
I suspect that the first shipment to backers was not more than a handful of bikes, but hopefully now they are past that hurdle they can ramp up and get bikes to many more of us. Wish I'd bought out a backer, because I'm going to be waiting a long time for my bike, while people like GibsonSean will get theirs much sooner. At least I can see pics and read reviews :/ Actually, I had a dream I received my Helix last night, but it was in tiny pieces and had a manual showing how to assemble, but it was too small to read. I also dreamt that I left my other bike on a station platform and it was stolen (I always have weird dreams about my bikes getting nicked, if a bicycle appears in my dream, it WILL be stolen by the end of the dream). |
And so it begins... I hope the reviews are good, but a small part of me hopes that the reviews are mixed so that we can enjoy some more drama.
|
Perhaps we should have a new thread for the new saga of Heilx in the wild?
|
Seems a bit premature at the moment.
|
Originally Posted by Gibsonsean
(Post 20787463)
Perhaps we should have a new thread for the new saga of Heilx in the wild?
|
Originally Posted by Lalato
(Post 20787819)
Please encourage one of your fellow backers who are receiving their bikes over the next week or so to post about it here. Or to funnel their thoughts (and pics) to you so you can post it for them.
|
I just SCANNED through my email with weekly update from this thread. Did not read it all.
A few comments as a backer that is somewhat active in the Helix supporter forum. Here are my opinions - just that - opinions: 1. Peter's clarity of vision is what gave me assurance that this project will be completed so I invested in multiples. 2. Peter is setting a new paradigm for bike manufacturing and value proposition. He is a visionary. But a visionary that actually could execute. The complexity of the project is far far beyond what I (any probably anyone else including Peter and team) ever imagined. But it worked. You have to be privy to the supporter forum to grasp a bit of the complexity. 3. I believe that the Helix will put a lot of pressure on other high end manufacturers such as the Brompton mentioned in these threads. It really is a fresh paradigm. 4. His perfectionism did delay the bike, but was welcome by some including myself. I am unlikely to repurchase it in the future if the first iteration worked poorly. 5. Now that the first ones are shipping, clearly the vision is coming into being so all the naysayers, reasoned though some may be, are happily (presumably) proven wrong. This is good for all - supporters and naysayers as it elevates the industry. (Looking forward to his electric drive when it comes to fruition.) 6. Durability should be excellent - it is actually overbuilt and the later bikes will eventually be a bit lighter. Peter sent just one sample (instead of multiples as of parts as is customary) of each part to be stress tested to industry standards far beyond the norm. 7. The decision to keep the Helix 'forum' private to supporters is probably a wise one - there're already an incredible amount of chatter there. If it was open to public, the static could have been completely unmanageable. Support has it privileges....:beer: 8. I think this is already one of the better success story of Kickstarter and in time, may prove to be one of the best successes of Kickstarter. It is not often that one has the opportunity to redefine what is possible in a long/well established industry. Looking forward to the documentary some day....:) 9. I did wonder publicly if Peter's forum short snippets revealed a lot to his competitors who may seek to emulate his approach - perhaps, but apparently one of his secret is finding people who are top in their field to be on the team. Great people are hard to find. 10. There's a certainly humility and strength of character about Peter (and his wife I'm sure) as I read his updates. He has been wonderfully unruffled by some strong words sent his direction. The above just the top of my head. I don't really follow this forum much anymore since I ordered the Helices (:tandem:) as I found my lifetime bikes so if you send me queries, I may not see them. . |
Bikes sent
The official picture shows the three founders standing by five folded bikes, to be sent to the USA and two more remote places. The USA orders are likely to be there soon. (But I have to wait till July...)
the folded bikes look good. Now waiting to hear about the riding experience and durability. (They say they subjected the test bike to twice the required degree of stress.) Avner. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.