Folding Bikes
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Folding Bikes
Hey guys. I am still in a search of a bike to get as I don't want to get something then not like it. I recently was looking at some folding bikes. What are your opinions on them, etc. I am thinking about getting this one.
https://www.dahon.com/us/ciaop8.htm
https://www.dahon.com/us/ciaop8.htm
#2
Hey, TranDz. Check out the folding bike forum for more information. I have a Dahon and I love it.
#3
Moving this to Folding Bikes -forum.
--J, a Forum Mod
--J, a Forum Mod
__________________
To err is human. To moo is bovine.
Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?
Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
Community guidelines
To err is human. To moo is bovine.
Who is this General Failure anyway, and why is he reading my drive?
Become a Registered Member in Bike Forums
Community guidelines
#5
Eschew Obfuscation
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,845
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Bikes: 2005 Fuji Professional, 2002 Lemond Zurich, Folders - Strida, Merc, Dahon, Downtube, Recumbent folder
Better yet, do a search on this forum first. There have been tons of questions like yours recently. Lots of good info there.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 1
"What are your opinions on them"
Folding bikes are not as good mechanically as the best full size bikes, which is why they are not used in competition. The smaller wheels make for a rougher ride, and fall more easily into holes. They are often less stable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folding_bike
That said, my guess is you will get a lot more use from a folding bike due to its superior practicality.
Folding bikes are not as good mechanically as the best full size bikes, which is why they are not used in competition. The smaller wheels make for a rougher ride, and fall more easily into holes. They are often less stable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folding_bike
That said, my guess is you will get a lot more use from a folding bike due to its superior practicality.
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Thanks. Didn't see a folding bike forum sorry as I book marked the commuting forums and never ventured out haha.
I want to use the bike mainly to go to and from school, and around town during the summer or w.e
I want to use the bike mainly to go to and from school, and around town during the summer or w.e
#8
geo8rge is correct about the folding bike's superior practicality. These bikes are sometimes the only option available to any cyclist since regular larger wheeled bikes may not be stored inside some places. These bikes are the only ones I use now. Dahon is an excellent brand to start out with to learn about and see if the folder is the bike for you.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 1
You just can't go wrong with the Dahon. You've made the first and most important step by gettin' over that fact that they appear odd and dinky,I guess you rode one and know better now,it will get better yet. I have a Helious. I chose it because it was light,not so much for light on the road but seemed easier for the wife to heft when she'd want to use it.I use it more than she though. They're so adjustable,so much NOT an inferior ride. Yours is one of the high-end models,that's good go for it. The cheap ones are fine,I test rode a cheaper one at first before ordering mine. LBS's had none and seemed uninterested in offering to order it.
#10
Part-time epistemologist
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,870
Likes: 3
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Jamis Nova, Bike Friday triplet, Bike Friday NWT, STRIDA, Austro Daimler Vent Noir, Hollands Tourer
Originally Posted by TranDz
Thanks. Didn't see a folding bike forum sorry as I book marked the commuting forums and never ventured out haha.
I want to use the bike mainly to go to and from school, and around town during the summer or w.e
I want to use the bike mainly to go to and from school, and around town during the summer or w.e
#11
Originally Posted by old and new
You just can't go wrong with the Dahon.
• Ciao P8 has a fixed handlebar height, so no adjustment there.
• Ciao P8 weighs 32 (!!) lbs, largely irrelevant for performance but would be horrible to carry around
• Wheel quality on Dahons are substandard / bad quality control
The only pluses I can see for the Ciao over some other models is the low step and the internal hub, which is a good choice for commuting (presumably the OP's purpose)
If you're going to spend over $700, I'd highly recommend you get a Swift, which is very light (22 lbs), fully upgradeable, fast fold, designed for urban use.
If you want to spend less, look into Downtubes. They don't look as good as the Dahons and I have a few doubts about component quality, but afaik they're much easier to fix and upgrade than the low-end Dahons.
Originally Posted by geo8rge
Folding bikes are not as good mechanically as the best full size bikes, which is why they are not used in competition....
Folding bikes aren't used in most competitions (e.g. USAC, UCI) because the regulations are very strict about numerous aspects of a bike -- wheel size, weight, design, saddle height, handlebar height and so forth.
And if I am not mistaken, you can use 20" wheels in some Tri and long distance events (e.g. RAAM), so some people use Bike Fridays / Air Fridays.
That said, I would agree that sometimes there is a price premium to get the same mechanical quality on a folding bike as most road bikes.
#12
Car free since 1995
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 10
From: NYC
Bikes: M5 Carbon High Racer, Trek Emonda SL6
I disagree with Geo8rge. Folding bikes aren't used in competition because they are not allowed in competition. If cycling associations allowed recumbants and odd shaped bikes, races would be much faster.
Some folders are at least as fast as road bikes, and at least one upright speed record was set on one.
In fact, road bikes are one of the less efficient bike designs out there, but they are the standard, and cycling associations don't permit anything that weighs too little or looks too weird to ensure that it's all about the rider and not about the bike.
Some folders are at least as fast as road bikes, and at least one upright speed record was set on one.
In fact, road bikes are one of the less efficient bike designs out there, but they are the standard, and cycling associations don't permit anything that weighs too little or looks too weird to ensure that it's all about the rider and not about the bike.
#13
Banned
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,294
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pm124
I disagree with Geo8rge. Folding bikes aren't used in competition because they are not allowed in competition. If cycling associations allowed recumbants and odd shaped bikes, races would be much faster.
Some folders are at least as fast as road bikes, and at least one upright speed record was set on one.
In fact, road bikes are one of the less efficient bike designs out there, but they are the standard, and cycling associations don't permit anything that weighs too little or looks too weird to ensure that it's all about the rider and not about the bike.
Some folders are at least as fast as road bikes, and at least one upright speed record was set on one.
In fact, road bikes are one of the less efficient bike designs out there, but they are the standard, and cycling associations don't permit anything that weighs too little or looks too weird to ensure that it's all about the rider and not about the bike.
#15
Car free since 1995
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 10
From: NYC
Bikes: M5 Carbon High Racer, Trek Emonda SL6
Originally Posted by TranDz
I got another question.. Will a folding bike be reliable as a normal road bike. Especially in the snowand rain etc
#16
Car free since 1995
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 10
From: NYC
Bikes: M5 Carbon High Racer, Trek Emonda SL6
Also, that leaves the Downtube out unless you replace all the moving parts and steel bits. The only reason I use mine as a rain bike is that I'm trying to motivate myself to rebuild the hubs. I've already replaced everything else on the bike with sealed components.
#18
Car free since 1995
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 10
From: NYC
Bikes: M5 Carbon High Racer, Trek Emonda SL6
I just took a look at the specs. It would hold up better than most bikes, I'd think. Not only does it have extensive rust protection, but the chain is enclosed. Everything is sealed. That and a $10 rain suit, and you'll be set to go.
If you can get your hands on a 2006 Mu XL and don't need the step through frame, you will probably have a better ride and lighter bike with the Thudbuster seat post.
If you can get your hands on a 2006 Mu XL and don't need the step through frame, you will probably have a better ride and lighter bike with the Thudbuster seat post.







