Scorchers on Brompton
#29
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,393
Likes: 10
From: Albany, WA
It's 3mm. I think that is quite adequate - you would have to have a bad bulge if it touched. The problem is not the frame - it is the mudguard stays. I had to optimise their length. The brake calipers could also be installed at a better angle - the angle such that the mudguard is pressed closer to the tyre.
#35
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,393
Likes: 10
From: Albany, WA
#40
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
The other EZ shift piece screws on under the pedal, and is a no-go fit, with the folding pedal.
I dont use the ones that came with my MD, if anyone state-side wants them ..
Post to AU when the distributor there is a walk-in, would be silly..
whats your tooth count on those 3 [2 cog ,1 CR]on that?
I dont use the ones that came with my MD, if anyone state-side wants them ..
Post to AU when the distributor there is a walk-in, would be silly..
whats your tooth count on those 3 [2 cog ,1 CR]on that?
#43
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,393
Likes: 10
From: Albany, WA
Not so much; it could be a little cushier, but since the Brompton has suspension in the back anyway, the effect of a cushier tyre is masked. It would be more forgiving than the Kojak wrt getting pinch flats which was the starting point of a week of trouble with the rear wheel.
I'm not convinced at all it is any major improvement and it is unlikely that I would buy another. The Primo Comet seems better for several reasons - it is narrower so would not pose any fitting problems, it is much more robust than the Kojak and is a fair bit lighter than the Scorcher, and is cheaper than both.
I'm not convinced at all it is any major improvement and it is unlikely that I would buy another. The Primo Comet seems better for several reasons - it is narrower so would not pose any fitting problems, it is much more robust than the Kojak and is a fair bit lighter than the Scorcher, and is cheaper than both.
#44
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 1
Bikes: Brompton, Dahon Vitesse D5
I like my Scorcher on the front. I agree, the Brompton suspension works excellently, there's no need for any extra cushioning at the back. The front, however, is happier with a little extra air.
#45
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
Looked [web] at some of the folks who built up a wheel around the Pan Tour Hub..
they designed an elastomer between the axle and the hub shell,
their 1/2 inch of travel would take the front buzz out ,
the motion angle is adjustable...
fore and aft keeps the brake pads over the rim ..
they designed an elastomer between the axle and the hub shell,
their 1/2 inch of travel would take the front buzz out ,
the motion angle is adjustable...
fore and aft keeps the brake pads over the rim ..
#46
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 912
Likes: 1
From: Washington, DC
So last week my Scorcher TRs finally wore thin enough that one developed a hole in its sidewall big enough for the tube to herniate out. :-) Time to replace. As I was waiting for new Scorchers to come in, I tried on my old Marathons again, and WOW that was bad.
Anyway: after hearing of Jur's success I gave my remaining usable old Scorcher to a friend with a Brompton, probably 5 years old I'd guess (he bought it used). And the verdict: absolutely no way could it possibly be mounted on the back wheel, because of -- what else -- the chainstay bridge. Either they make magic Bromptons in Australia or Brompton has changed its design recently in that regard.
Anyway: after hearing of Jur's success I gave my remaining usable old Scorcher to a friend with a Brompton, probably 5 years old I'd guess (he bought it used). And the verdict: absolutely no way could it possibly be mounted on the back wheel, because of -- what else -- the chainstay bridge. Either they make magic Bromptons in Australia or Brompton has changed its design recently in that regard.
#47
Part-time epistemologist
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,870
Likes: 3
From: Washington, DC
Bikes: Jamis Nova, Bike Friday triplet, Bike Friday NWT, STRIDA, Austro Daimler Vent Noir, Hollands Tourer
Interesting. Thanks for the news.
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
A narrative on bicycle driving.
#48
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
Kojaks go a bit skinnier and slick, for the need for speed..
in the back, for ride comfort, just change to the softer suspension elastomer.
the excessively tight fit may be Why the sidewall shredded.
in the back, for ride comfort, just change to the softer suspension elastomer.
So last week my Scorcher TRs finally wore thin enough
that one developed a hole in its sidewall big enough for the tube to herniate out. :-)
Time to replace.
that one developed a hole in its sidewall big enough for the tube to herniate out. :-)
Time to replace.
Last edited by fietsbob; 04-17-12 at 11:56 AM.
#50
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 1
From: Auld Blighty
Bikes: Early Cannondale tandem, '99 S&S Frezoni Audax, '65 Moulton Stowaway, '52 Claud Butler, TSR30, Brompton
My newest B (2 years old) has the bigger chainstay bridge clearance. My old B had mud/grit on the tyre skimming the bridge.






