which is the lightest steel fork ever made?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
which is the lightest steel fork ever made?
seriously, which is the lightest road bicycle steel fork ever made?
what is its weight? and with which type of steel alloyed?
what is its weight? and with which type of steel alloyed?
Likes For DiTBho:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,102
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4214 Post(s)
Liked 3,891 Times
in
2,322 Posts
For what size wheel/tire, what steerer/.headset standard and what brake?
These types of questions remind me of a friend, of a shop that I use to work at. who decided his tandem frame and parts by their weights as a primary determinate. Simple to say that he had an awful working tandem in real life use. Andy
These types of questions remind me of a friend, of a shop that I use to work at. who decided his tandem frame and parts by their weights as a primary determinate. Simple to say that he had an awful working tandem in real life use. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2201 Post(s)
Liked 426 Times
in
338 Posts
I made a wonderfully lightweight (for steel) fork one time using True Temper blades and steerer tube. Henry James crown. I can't remember the exact model number for these parts, but the blades were very skinny down by the dropouts. I bent the fork for about 50mm of offset, and still remember how it would chatter on slow stops. I learned a lesson on that one...
Likes For Nessism:
#4
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,406
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,705 Times
in
2,524 Posts
It seems like some company is still making lightweight steel steerers in 1". The lightweight 1 1/8" true temper steerers used to be lighter than any 1" steerer.
There have been a lot of weight weenied steel forks.
I couldn't find any info about 953 or XCR fork blades. I was wondering if they were lighter than anything else available now. 853 blades are lighter than 921 blades.
There have been a lot of weight weenied steel forks.
I couldn't find any info about 953 or XCR fork blades. I was wondering if they were lighter than anything else available now. 853 blades are lighter than 921 blades.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,397
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2496 Post(s)
Liked 2,975 Times
in
1,687 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4434 Post(s)
Liked 1,576 Times
in
1,038 Posts
I recalled this article:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/..._forktest.html
It was a test of contemporary road forks, comparing the weight and deflection of steel, aluminum and carbon forks with 1" threaded steerers. Of the three weighed steel forks in the test, the Tange Silhouette was markedly lighter at 590 grams - almost the weight of a Kestrel EMS carbon fork. Tange advertised this unicrown fork as being lighter than aluminum forks.
https://www.equusbicycle.com/bike/tan...ngecat1997.pdf
There could certainly be lighter steel forks, but I would bet the construction is going to have to be similar to the Silhouette. Given the fixed steerer size, going to thinner wall, oversized tubing may not necessarily yield a lighter fork as it does with frames.
It is interesting that the light steel fork was markedly more flexible than any of the crowned steel forks, which were more alike than any other forks in the test.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/rinard/..._forktest.html
It was a test of contemporary road forks, comparing the weight and deflection of steel, aluminum and carbon forks with 1" threaded steerers. Of the three weighed steel forks in the test, the Tange Silhouette was markedly lighter at 590 grams - almost the weight of a Kestrel EMS carbon fork. Tange advertised this unicrown fork as being lighter than aluminum forks.
https://www.equusbicycle.com/bike/tan...ngecat1997.pdf
There could certainly be lighter steel forks, but I would bet the construction is going to have to be similar to the Silhouette. Given the fixed steerer size, going to thinner wall, oversized tubing may not necessarily yield a lighter fork as it does with frames.
It is interesting that the light steel fork was markedly more flexible than any of the crowned steel forks, which were more alike than any other forks in the test.
Likes For Kontact:
#8
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,406
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,705 Times
in
2,524 Posts
That's interesting that Tange built a lightweight unicrown fork. I was guessing the lightest fork was either made by them, or TrueTemper. People are still building road forks by brazing the blades directly to the steerer. The blades are just regular ones that are meant to use with crowns.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4434 Post(s)
Liked 1,576 Times
in
1,038 Posts
That's interesting that Tange built a lightweight unicrown fork. I was guessing the lightest fork was either made by them, or TrueTemper. People are still building road forks by brazing the blades directly to the steerer. The blades are just regular ones that are meant to use with crowns.
#10
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,406
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,705 Times
in
2,524 Posts
They close them off somehow. Also, some people use spacers out from the steerer.
Likes For unterhausen:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,131
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1414 Post(s)
Liked 1,915 Times
in
1,101 Posts
interesting article and chart
Kinesis alloy fork sits in/around the middle … apparently that is good
#12
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,997
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,078 Posts
The steel fork I made for my wife's Davidson road bike in about '89 weighed 450g, just under 1.0 lb. That was for 700c wheels, small frame (short steerer). I know it isn't the lightest though, because then later I made a still-lighter fork for a smaller rider, probably 650c wheels (I forget). That one used 7/8" chainstays as forkblades. Don't remember the weight but it was lighter. Bob Freeman of Elliott Bay Bicycles in Seattle sold it, so he may know what the fork weighed -- but I doubt it. I expect we'll never know that number.
I don't know anything about how well the lighter one rode or how long it lasted, but Laurie says that 450g fork rode great ("best ever") -- and she had her share of top-notch lightweight bikes to compare it with. She won medals at Districts and raced at Nationals, and always paid attention to bike handling. She rode it for over 15 years before the bike was retired. I don't know her mileage but it was more than I was riding! She tended to ride hard; her friends were racers and ex-racers who still liked to hammer. Rider weight about 120 lb. The fork is still fine, can still be ridden, but it doesn't fit her anymore due to too short a steerer. She's over 70 now and can't bend down so low for the bars, so she likes a much taller steerer. But I'd say the fork proved itself reliable.
Mark B
I don't know anything about how well the lighter one rode or how long it lasted, but Laurie says that 450g fork rode great ("best ever") -- and she had her share of top-notch lightweight bikes to compare it with. She won medals at Districts and raced at Nationals, and always paid attention to bike handling. She rode it for over 15 years before the bike was retired. I don't know her mileage but it was more than I was riding! She tended to ride hard; her friends were racers and ex-racers who still liked to hammer. Rider weight about 120 lb. The fork is still fine, can still be ridden, but it doesn't fit her anymore due to too short a steerer. She's over 70 now and can't bend down so low for the bars, so she likes a much taller steerer. But I'd say the fork proved itself reliable.
Mark B
Likes For bulgie:
#13
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,406
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,705 Times
in
2,524 Posts
What blades did you use for that bike? Was the crown modified?
The Rene Herse crown for Toei Special blades is really light and makes me wonder why I would use something like the Pacenti Paris Brest crown, which is a brick
https://www.renehersecycles.com/shop...mm-fork-crown/
The Rene Herse crown for Toei Special blades is really light and makes me wonder why I would use something like the Pacenti Paris Brest crown, which is a brick
https://www.renehersecycles.com/shop...mm-fork-crown/
Last edited by unterhausen; 10-14-23 at 10:21 AM.
#14
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,997
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,078 Posts
I don't remember for sure but the blades were probably either Excel or Prestige, the extra-light (0.8 mm) model no longer available. Excel were 0.7 I believe or maybe even 0.6. I still have a pair and they're scary-light. Some "super-steel" though, stronger than Prestige.
Whatever they were, I spun them slowly in the lathe (held by the small end of course) and ground them down thinner with a Dynafile, just moving the dynafile and paying attention to how much pressure I was putting on it and how long I was dwelling on any region. With the goal of thinning the wall only in the middle, away from the (eventual) HAZ at both ends. Sort of like double-butted in the final result. Since I had no good way to measure the resulting wall thickness down there halfway down the blade, I just went with weight as a proxy for wall thickness, and stopped when I reached my predetermined goal for lightening. I don't remember what that was now, but I'm sure I stopped well short of taking half the wall off. More likely I took off a quarter or less.
Sound risky? yes of course, and too time-consuming, so I would never do this for a paying customer. Laurie was into it though, I wasn't foisting this on her unawares. She said "hell yeah" when I proposed making the lightest fork I could. My justification for it was basically "why should she have to use the same blades I used for my own fork, when I weigh literally twice what she does? I'm 95% sure the resulting fork was more reliable for her, than my fork is for me.
The crown is a Saba, investment cast, very tiny. Then I lightened it by thinning it down from every direction, even milling a pocket down inside the blade socket. I don't know how much got turned into chips, probably not a huge amount since the crown is so minimalist already.
Builders who used them in the '80s include Glenn Erickson and Dave Moulton. Ooh here they are for sale cheap on ebay: https://www.ebay.com/itm/254458998579
Oh yeah I also thinned and lightened the dropouts, and used an un-butted steerer. Nothing else wacky about the steerer though, I didn't thin it or drill holes in it like on Merckx's hour-record bike...
Mark B
Whatever they were, I spun them slowly in the lathe (held by the small end of course) and ground them down thinner with a Dynafile, just moving the dynafile and paying attention to how much pressure I was putting on it and how long I was dwelling on any region. With the goal of thinning the wall only in the middle, away from the (eventual) HAZ at both ends. Sort of like double-butted in the final result. Since I had no good way to measure the resulting wall thickness down there halfway down the blade, I just went with weight as a proxy for wall thickness, and stopped when I reached my predetermined goal for lightening. I don't remember what that was now, but I'm sure I stopped well short of taking half the wall off. More likely I took off a quarter or less.
Sound risky? yes of course, and too time-consuming, so I would never do this for a paying customer. Laurie was into it though, I wasn't foisting this on her unawares. She said "hell yeah" when I proposed making the lightest fork I could. My justification for it was basically "why should she have to use the same blades I used for my own fork, when I weigh literally twice what she does? I'm 95% sure the resulting fork was more reliable for her, than my fork is for me.
The crown is a Saba, investment cast, very tiny. Then I lightened it by thinning it down from every direction, even milling a pocket down inside the blade socket. I don't know how much got turned into chips, probably not a huge amount since the crown is so minimalist already.
Builders who used them in the '80s include Glenn Erickson and Dave Moulton. Ooh here they are for sale cheap on ebay: https://www.ebay.com/itm/254458998579
Oh yeah I also thinned and lightened the dropouts, and used an un-butted steerer. Nothing else wacky about the steerer though, I didn't thin it or drill holes in it like on Merckx's hour-record bike...
Mark B
Likes For bulgie:
#15
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,406
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,705 Times
in
2,524 Posts
Merckx probably wishes he thought of sanding down the fork blades on his bike.
Likes For unterhausen:
#16
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,997
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,078 Posts
And round track blades are much easier to sand down. Much less hand-eye coordination needed. For oval, there's a tendency to grind too much off the major axis (front and back of the blade) and less off the sides, if you just hold the dynafile steady. So you have to vary the pressure on the dynafile in time with the rotation, to make yourself grind more off the sides, to keep it even. And know you're not going to be perfect at it, so account for the fact that there will be thicker and thinner places, where you didn't grind it exactly evenly. So leave a little more safety margin than you might have to in a perfect world.
It helps to grind at a 45° angle to the rotation axis (or any angle really, other than 90°). Switch sides now and then, from 45° left to 45° right, so the scratches cross each other -- then you can see when the first set of scratches just starts to disappear.
But why am I describing this crazy procedure that no one is ever going to do (if they're smart)?
Likes For bulgie:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,499
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 1,638 Times
in
1,052 Posts
A new light weight SLX steel fork for 700c?
Yep, they are out there, but its gonna be quite a sting in the wallet for sure...
Yep, they are out there, but its gonna be quite a sting in the wallet for sure...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#18
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,997
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,078 Posts
In the past (like when I was a builder, last millennium) SLX main triangle tubes were very similar to SL, but slightly heavier. Blades were the same -- no different blade for SLX, same as SL
Am I behind on the newer offerings?
Likes For bulgie:
#19
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,406
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,705 Times
in
2,524 Posts
Only thing new I see from Columbus is disc blades, i.e., heavier.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,499
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 1,638 Times
in
1,052 Posts
For road bikes I think we need to take lessons from the Track Bike builders. They have probably shaved the weight down on forks to the barest minimum...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#21
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,997
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,078 Posts
Two reasons why track forks were heavy:
- There's almost no advantage to light weight on a track bike. With no hills, weight almost goes away as a factor in a race. You don't accelerate enough for the slower acceleration to be a factor, even in Match Sprint.
- Most trackies wanted max stiffness. I was skeptical of the value of that, so I made my own track bike with light tubing, and even I had to admit, it was too flexible for me. I sold it to a skinny guy with no sprinting ability to speak of, and he loved it! Most people want 'em stiff though, even if it means heavier.
Round track blades came in 22 mm and 24 mm, but the 22 mm ones generally weren't any lighter because they were thicker wall. Maybe Columbus Record had lighter blades, anyone know? Named after the tubeset made for Merckx's hour record bike. He didn't really need light-weight for an hour of steady output with only one acceleration at the beginning, but he didn't need stiffness either, so why not? They went nuts on the lightening, like leaving the hub dustcaps off so you could see the ball bearings. Major drillium all over including huge holes drilled in the handlebars. Nuts! If it made him faster, it would only have been the psyche factor, aka placebo.
Likes For bulgie:
#22
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,406
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,705 Times
in
2,524 Posts
They drilled holes in the steerer on Merckx's hour record bike. I never really understood it, he's probably lucky it made it to the end of the hour. It's funny that the tiniest bit of aero would have helped more than all that drilling. But we didn't believe in aero back then.
Likes For unterhausen:
#23
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,800
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3594 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,937 Posts
According to my Columbus catalog, PL fork blades were 1.0mm thick, PS were 1.05mm, and Record were 0.9mm
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Ib...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Ib...ew?usp=sharing
#24
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,997
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,078 Posts
According to my Columbus catalog, PL fork blades were 1.0mm thick, PS were 1.05mm, and Record were 0.9mm
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Ib...ew?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Ib...ew?usp=sharing
#25
Junior Member
Thread Starter