Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Framebuilders
Reload this Page >

Tube denting (equations?)

Search
Notices
Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

Tube denting (equations?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-09, 08:37 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11

Bikes: M: Pivot Mach 5.7 Carbon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tube denting (equations?)

Anybody know of any equations to determine relative denting resistance to dynamic impact between two different tubing materials? Particularly as it relates to equal-weight options (IE, a 150g 3040 steel tube of 24" vs a 150g 7075-t6 aluminum tube of 24"). Obviously there are a lot of things that go into this (hardness, work hardening, wall thickness, diameter, etc.), but the more detail the better!

I know this has been touched on in the past (see: https://www.bikeforums.net/archive/in.../t-290453.html ) but it stopped a bit short of the really juicy stuff

Cheers
jmblur is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 03:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,246
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I suggest you ask a more meaningful question. All of us engineers know that steel's density and Youngs modulus is 3 times greater than Aluminum, but what exactly is your issue, I doubt that you are designing a tube denting device. I guessing you are trying to build something from tubing, and are trying to decide between the two materials, but without really knowing....
merlin55 is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 05:45 PM
  #3  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times in 2,518 Posts
this actually is a difficult problem, at least it looks like it would require some thought. Generally speaking, the thicker tube is going to win.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 04-16-09, 09:35 PM
  #4  
Banned.
 
Nessism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061

Bikes: Homebuilt steel

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times in 337 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
this actually is a difficult problem, at least it looks like it would require some thought. Generally speaking, the thicker tube is going to win.
Higher strength matters too - steel tubes for bicycles range in strength greatly.
Nessism is offline  
Old 04-20-09, 08:26 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 11

Bikes: M: Pivot Mach 5.7 Carbon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlin55
I suggest you ask a more meaningful question. All of us engineers know that steel's density and Youngs modulus is 3 times greater than Aluminum, but what exactly is your issue, I doubt that you are designing a tube denting device. I guessing you are trying to build something from tubing, and are trying to decide between the two materials, but without really knowing....
I would argue this is a very meaningful question - how to chose between two materials (assuming isotropic, non-composite materials) when dent resistance is an important factor?

For example, given two steel tubes of equal ultimate tensile strength and equal density, which one wins - the harder material, or the one with more work hardening potential? Or, for example, given constraints of equal outer diameter and equal weight, which is more dent resistant - aluminum 7075-T5, 6061-T5, Reynolds 953, 6/4 Ti, or an AZ-91D magnesium alloy? Ignoring weldability etc.

I'm not necessarily trying to decide between two materials, i'm trying to come up with a way of looking at a sheet of materials and saying "These materials will probably be more dent resistant than what we use now and should be tested further, while these ones are likely less dent resistant and should not be tested".

And for the record, I am actually going to be building a "tube denting device" as part of this testing
jmblur is offline  
Old 05-17-09, 07:03 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,878

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times in 506 Posts
Originally Posted by jmblur
I would argue this is a very meaningful question - how to chose between two materials (assuming isotropic, non-composite materials) when dent resistance is an important factor?

For example, given two steel tubes of equal ultimate tensile strength and equal density, which one wins - the harder material, or the one with more work hardening potential? Or, for example, given constraints of equal outer diameter and equal weight, which is more dent resistant - aluminum 7075-T5, 6061-T5, Reynolds 953, 6/4 Ti, or an AZ-91D magnesium alloy? Ignoring weldability etc.

I'm not necessarily trying to decide between two materials, i'm trying to come up with a way of looking at a sheet of materials and saying "These materials will probably be more dent resistant than what we use now and should be tested further, while these ones are likely less dent resistant and should not be tested".

And for the record, I am actually going to be building a "tube denting device" as part of this testing

Given the same impact, I'd think the material that can stand more deflection and remain elastic (i.e. will spring back to original dimensions after the stress) will better resist denting, for two tubes with the same mechanical properties. That last phrase makes it complex, however. What are the significant properties and what is the shape? A tube will behave differently from a sheet. I'd also expect how the sheet is supported is rather significant.

'Luck!
Road Fan is offline  
Old 05-17-09, 11:37 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Seems to me like a problem where a denting machine could be devised and used in less time than talking about it here, except for the need to accumulate the different samples.
NoReg is offline  
Old 05-20-09, 02:22 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by jmblur
I would argue this is a very meaningful question - how to chose between two materials (assuming isotropic, non-composite materials) when dent resistance is an important factor?

For example, given two steel tubes of equal ultimate tensile strength and equal density, which one wins - the harder material, or the one with more work hardening potential? Or, for example, given constraints of equal outer diameter and equal weight, which is more dent resistant - aluminum 7075-T5, 6061-T5, Reynolds 953, 6/4 Ti, or an AZ-91D magnesium alloy? Ignoring weldability etc.

I'm not necessarily trying to decide between two materials, i'm trying to come up with a way of looking at a sheet of materials and saying "These materials will probably be more dent resistant than what we use now and should be tested further, while these ones are likely less dent resistant and should not be tested".

And for the record, I am actually going to be building a "tube denting device" as part of this testing
I think you want to compare yield strength.
DannoXYZ is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.