Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Framebuilders Thinking about a custom frame? Lugged vs Fillet Brazed. Different Frame materials? Newvex or Pacenti Lugs? why get a custom Road, Mountain, or Track Frame? Got a question about framebuilding? Lets discuss framebuilding at it's finest.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-18-10, 03:16 PM   #1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: England, currently dividing my time between university in Guildford and home just outside Reading
Bikes: Too many to list here!
Posts: 1,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Touring frame geometry

Is a 68 degree headtube angle and a 68 degree seat tube angle (measured from horizontal) about the right geometry for a loaded-touring bike? If not, what would be?
Airburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-10, 07:50 PM   #2
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,115
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That's far from modern typical, which is often 72/72 is probably closer to normal. That said, if you are willing to engineer the fork and stearing, you can go as low as 68 on the head tube and gain longer wheel base and tailor stearing and load handling. The seat tube I tend to build from fundamentals of my postion, and the seat post and saddle conbination that makes sense for my kind of riding. That is normally in the 71-72 range for me.
NoReg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-10, 08:13 PM   #3
Decrepit Member
Scooper's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22
Posts: 10,465
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 452 Post(s)
Waterford 1900 Touring Geometry

Waterford T-14 Touring Geometry

Waterford ST-22 Sport Touring Geometry

68 seems a bit extreme to me.
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.
Scooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-10, 10:15 AM   #4
fietsbob's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
Posts: 27,791
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2789 Post(s)
Old 80's stump jumpers make decent loaded tourers, they have slack angles,
71/ 68 perhaps 'Repack' bombers was the model, Tom Richey's bikes were the ones Synyard copied.

thing you gain when the seat angle-setback is a lower angle is weight bias, less weight in your arms.

look back at old TdF race bikes they were pretty low angle long chainstay designs, most roads were un paved then.

If the wheel choice is 622 - 35 and rate of travel is your travel priority , adopt a race bike 73 /72 main triangle.

of course Size of frame is another thing, angles is part of getting fit better.

Last edited by fietsbob; 07-28-10 at 10:19 AM.
fietsbob is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 PM.

  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.