If I have a good pair of polarized sunglasses that look good and feel comfortable when I ride, is there a need to buy glasses labeled as cycling sunglasses? Do cycling sunglasses offer anything a good pair of regular sunglasses for not? Most of the cycling sunglasses I have seen look cheap and few are polarized. Using a pair of Bolle now

When you get right down to it, there's no real reason to buy any clothing or accessory like sunglasses that's specifically labeled for cycling. The litmus should be whether a specific product performs the desired function. If it does, buy it.

It's hard to get away from certain cycling specific items, such as bibs, standard cycling shorts, etc. But you don't have to wear jerseys when riding, don't have to buy a particular brand, etc. When you can save money, save it and use that money for things where the right product is more important.

the curved shape fits under bike hats worn under you helmet better, but it can be safety glasses too,

the corners of regular glasses can get the glasses pressed down on your nose.. by hats

I like this answer. In fact since I've started I have been checking out TJMaxx and have found cycling shorts and some nice moisture wicking tops for next to nothing on the clearance rack.

Other "sports glasses" or even safety glasses can work fine- they need to block the wind, provide protection from flying objects, and have UV protection (unless they are clear for night riding). If you want cycling specific shades, then get them. I wear a pair of Maui Jim sunglasses when I ride. They have my prescription in them, are polarized and have full UV protection, keep the wind and foreign objects out of my eyes, and I think they look good too. But, they are not cycling specific. Otherwise, I couldn't use them for kayaking and other activities...

Tops are by far the easiest way for both men and women to save money. I do have some cycling jerseys, but rarely wear them. Most all of my riding is in Russell athletic shirts I got from Target years ago. Shorts can be tricky because sizing and fit can vary between brands and you'll notice the lack of a comfortable fit in your shorts.

For a little perspective: once the vast majority of the roads raced on were paced, a lot of racing cyclists didn't wear glasses at all until rather recently. Look at the pre-helmet photos. After goggles were no longer needed for dirt roads, racers rode with no eye covering.

Yes, poor on the UV. Tiring, But the bike can be ridden just fine. I did all my racing with wire rim glass glasses, ala Laurent Fignon though I was before his time. (Glass is a pretty good UV block, unlike the untreated plastic lenses.) And now I wear prescription glasses and sunglasses, but not cycling specific. In fact, I wear glasses that have nearly rectangular and high outside corners so my helmet mirror is in a very good place, out of the way but completely in focus. (And I wear my helmet straps outside my helmet. Those glasses cost me enough that I don't want them being tossed off every time my helmet gets jarred. (Or I forget and just pull my helmet off.)

Ben

Functionally you are good to go, for posing at Starbucks not so much........

-Bandera

True story, although I did find a pair in my size for 20.00.

Polarized lenses can make some computer displays difficult to read.

I have cycling sunglasses, but only because the ones I had before would slip off my face when I sweated. Funny how those 90+ F riding days seem so long ago.

If my old sunglasses stayed securely on my face regardless of sweat, I'd be wearing those instead.

The top of my cycling glasses is higher than my normal glasses. That allows me to see better when riding in the drop or drop-like. With the other glasses, I have to bend my neck a bit more and that's something I can't do very long.

Cycling glasses are nice and offer some added benefits here and there but you can wear or not wear any glasses you'd like.

Are cycling glasses necessary? No, but as others have said they are nice. They're shaped in a way that prevents wind in the eyes and they stay snug to your head so they don't fall off.

Where do you put your stuff if you don't have a cycling jersey on?

In the mailbox hanging from the saddle.

Excellent answer! I used to not wear glasses at all. Then I started with regular prescription glasses for better vision. I found myself squinting in bright sunlight that gets tiring on long rides. Then there's the wind on steep descents that makes my eyes tear up do I can't see. While regular sunglasses help with sun glare, they aren't that good for blocking out wind.

If you ride slow and short, you may not need them. With increased speeds and distance, the more important they become.

No, cycling sunglasses are not necessary.

I've been cycling seriously for 25 years and have covered a lot of distance and have rarely worn sunglasses of any sort.

Sometimes I think they might be nice, but my prescription means that if I got some, they would be hugely expensive. So I don't bother.

IMO, if the glasses are designed well for the lighting conditions, the wind/environmental conditions and they're comfortable for the intended use, then they're perfect.

Have had the Oakley "M" frame wrap-arounds for years, with the polarized lenses. Keeps nearly all the blowing dust and air away from the eyes, has fairly good seal at the eyebrows (to keep the light out), and the polarized lenses are wonderful. Wouldn't want any other type of sunglasses for outdoors use where wind/dust is involved, actually, short of going to full goggles or mountaineer-style.

Can't imagine what having a "cycling" label on them would change, assuming those factors get met.

I think the key question is whether whatever glasses you want to wear are impact resistant/safety. ie.. glass lensed glasses probably aren't a great idea.

I've never owned a pair of "cycling" sunglasses in my life. I like ANSI certified safety glasses and have a few different pair in different tints. All are polycarbonate lenses with UVA/B protection. I've got clear, yellow, dark amber and dark smoke for various conditions. No Oakley or Tifosi here. I've got Remington, Dewalt, and Stanley.

Made in China shorts are usually undersize. I buy them one size larger than I do in regular clothing.

I use "Remington" shooting glasses:
(https://www.amazon.com/Remington-Shoo...0_SR160%2C160_

They are cheap and fit well.

Joe

x2 on the DeWalt safety glasses. My home workshop glasses be why I decided to try them for bike riding. Work great and I haven't yet been snubbed by the Starbucks crowd neither.

The Oakley's meant for cycling have a straight stem, whatever that means. So their cycling ones are actually different - it is not just a label. If I recall when I was shopping for glasses my Oakleys or maybe it was the other pair I was looking at were available with the straight stem for cycling but I wasn't into bike yet at that point and I just went with the normal version. I got the Racing Jacket and love em. Aside from the super cheap bin of terrible looking frames at the eye doctor, the Oakleys were really no more expensive than most of the other frames (most of them being >$200 and much more than the Oakleys actually). So the tables are turned when we are talking prescription glasses. And my health insurance paid a good chunk of them since they are prescription, and my tax free health savings account paid the rest.

To the OP... "necessary" is probably a poor choice of words. Probably 90% of cyclists don't wear cycling sunglasses so how could they be necessary?

Most cyclists around here wear protective glasses. The casual riders I meet daily on the MUPs, not so much.