Flexible vs Stiff
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Flexible vs Stiff
What is the meaning of flexible and stiff on bicycle frame? I heard steel frame is flexible. Can it bends and retains to normal structure? What about aluminum and carbon fiber? These don't bend at all?
#2
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Everything bends if enough force is exerted. Aluminium doesn't have a fatigue limit, which means that if you repeatedly flex it, even a little, it will eventually fail. Steel, on the other hand, has a distinct limit beneath which it can be flexed indefinitely without failure. So alu frames are typically "stiffer" than steel frames so they flex very little.
People talk of "stiff" and "flexy" or "compliant" frames very loosely, it isn't always clear what they think they mean. Usually they are referring to the ride quality of a specific bike, but that is influenced by a lot of things other than frame material. Forks, geometry, wheel, tyres, all play a role.
You'd be better off asking your question in the frame builders sub-forum, there are lots of posters there who have real metallurgical and other expertise.
People talk of "stiff" and "flexy" or "compliant" frames very loosely, it isn't always clear what they think they mean. Usually they are referring to the ride quality of a specific bike, but that is influenced by a lot of things other than frame material. Forks, geometry, wheel, tyres, all play a role.
You'd be better off asking your question in the frame builders sub-forum, there are lots of posters there who have real metallurgical and other expertise.
#3
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 398
Bikes: Swobo Sanchez 3x1
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
its about ride quality. an all aluminum bike frame (given no suspension) will be a much harsher ride, you'll feel all the bumps. steel absorbs much more shock and is much more "comfy".
carbon fiber has what's called "dampening" qualities. its stiffer than steel but can still be a very smooth ride. at least i think thats the jist of it, i don't have a full carbon bike.
carbon fiber has what's called "dampening" qualities. its stiffer than steel but can still be a very smooth ride. at least i think thats the jist of it, i don't have a full carbon bike.
#4
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
its about ride quality. an all aluminum bike frame (given no suspension) will be a much harsher ride, you'll feel all the bumps. steel absorbs much more shock and is much more "comfy".
carbon fiber has what's called "dampening" qualities. its stiffer than steel but can still be a very smooth ride. at least i think thats the jist of it, i don't have a full carbon bike.
carbon fiber has what's called "dampening" qualities. its stiffer than steel but can still be a very smooth ride. at least i think thats the jist of it, i don't have a full carbon bike.
#5
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
This is misleading, at best. How "stiff" steel is relative to other materials depends on the tubing used, among other things. Some steel bikes feel very stiff indeed, some aluminium bikes ride beautifully. The idea that frame material, in and of itself, determines ride quality is a myth.
But what tire size and pressure you use trumps either in ride quality.
#6
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,515
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,398 Times
in
2,057 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
What is your current riding experience? A little bit of this type of information may help to explain the meaning.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
This is misleading, at best. How "stiff" steel is relative to other materials depends on the tubing used, among other things. Some steel bikes feel very stiff indeed, some aluminium bikes ride beautifully. The idea that frame material, in and of itself, determines ride quality is a myth.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#9
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,787
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
Carbon fiber, especially in its modern monocoque type construction, offers the advantage that reinforcement can be added explicitly to the areas expected to benefit from it, and reduced in other areas to minimize weight. Other frame materials are less accommodating in this manner, although modern hydroforming methods may be changing this.
#10
Banned
[rather than Opine] Science! It is something you can set up a facility to test.
Like : Measure the Deflection distance under a measurable force .
dont forget that the wall thickness of a smaller diameter tube can be increased to make it stiffer .. (smaller ID)
though a Larger diameter tube can be using thinner wall , so to have lower weight data to help sales
They Do.
Like : Measure the Deflection distance under a measurable force .
dont forget that the wall thickness of a smaller diameter tube can be increased to make it stiffer .. (smaller ID)
though a Larger diameter tube can be using thinner wall , so to have lower weight data to help sales
They Do.
Last edited by fietsbob; 03-13-16 at 10:58 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#12
FLIR Kitten to 0.05C
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 5,331
Bikes: Roadie: Seven Axiom Race Ti w/Chorus 11s. CX/Adventure: Carver Gravel Grinder w/ Di2
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2349 Post(s)
Liked 406 Times
in
254 Posts
[rather than Opine] Science! It is something you can set up a facility to test.
Like : Measure the Deflection distance under a measurable force .
dont forget that the wall thickness of a smaller diameter tube can be increased to make it stiffer .. (smaller ID)
though a Larger diameter tube can be using thinner wall , so to have lower weight data to help sales
They Do.
Like : Measure the Deflection distance under a measurable force .
dont forget that the wall thickness of a smaller diameter tube can be increased to make it stiffer .. (smaller ID)
though a Larger diameter tube can be using thinner wall , so to have lower weight data to help sales
They Do.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
[rather than Opine] Science! It is something you can set up a facility to test.
Like : Measure the Deflection distance under a measurable force .
dont forget that the wall thickness of a smaller diameter tube can be increased to make it stiffer .. (smaller ID)
though a Larger diameter tube can be using thinner wall , so to have lower weight data to help sales
They Do.
Like : Measure the Deflection distance under a measurable force .
dont forget that the wall thickness of a smaller diameter tube can be increased to make it stiffer .. (smaller ID)
though a Larger diameter tube can be using thinner wall , so to have lower weight data to help sales
They Do.
There is a theoretical optimum relationship between tube diameter and wall thickness. In general a tube resists bending as the diameter increases but you eventually reach a point at which a thin walled tube becomes too susceptible to physical damage (beer canning).
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#14
Banned
Frank Berto was Into making test fixtures, and wrote for the magazine
.. Scanned material - Frank Berto
Klein of course wanted to demonstrate his 'My Frames are stiffer' selling point.
In aluminum and steel there are different characteristics in each alloy mix ..
.. Scanned material - Frank Berto
Klein of course wanted to demonstrate his 'My Frames are stiffer' selling point.
In aluminum and steel there are different characteristics in each alloy mix ..
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
The next question is: How much does it matter?
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#16
Senior Member
Hence why vintage steel frames with narrow tubes are sometimes flexier than modern steel frames with wider tubes, even though the material's stiffness is the same, and even though the newer frame's tubes might be made from less material (and thus lighter). Diameter has such a big effect.
#17
Banned
Double butting thins the middle .
Not Sprinting to the finish, I dont obsess over stiffness
though my 2 side by side .75 .049 wall top tube touring bike didnt 'plane'
like the 1.125" single tube Specialized expedition , flexing and spring back with every pedal stroke .
Not Sprinting to the finish, I dont obsess over stiffness
though my 2 side by side .75 .049 wall top tube touring bike didnt 'plane'
like the 1.125" single tube Specialized expedition , flexing and spring back with every pedal stroke .
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
Also keep in mind that one may not want different amounts of flex in different parts of the frame.
So, if you look at the Specialized Roubaix, it is specifically designed to have a stiff center triangle (bottom bracket to seat to head tube) for performance and accurate shifting, while having moderate flex in the chainstays/seatstays, and fork for comfort.
So, if you look at the Specialized Roubaix, it is specifically designed to have a stiff center triangle (bottom bracket to seat to head tube) for performance and accurate shifting, while having moderate flex in the chainstays/seatstays, and fork for comfort.
#19
Senior Member
Standard old guy response to an old, old discussion in cycling:
I've been riding and racing bikes for decades. The longer I ride, the more confused I am about the physics of stiffness. Frankly, bike stiffness, especially when measured in extremely fine gradients like bike magazines do, has started to smell of snake oil to me. Despite all the pseudo-science applied to this topic I've never seen any hard evidence published anywhere that watts are "lost" with a flexy frame.
It seems intuitive: any pedaling force flexing the frame is not being used to drive the rear wheel.... but is that really true? Can someone explain how exactly is energy "lost" through lateral deflection? Any energy expended is likely returned as the frame flexes back, what happens to that energy? Does that returned energy help on the next pedal stroke somehow or is it just "gone"? Are any of these effects measurable? How would one even measure it?
One thing I'm clear about: a stiff fork and stiff head tube is really important for good handling. To me, that's not up for debate.
I've been riding and racing bikes for decades. The longer I ride, the more confused I am about the physics of stiffness. Frankly, bike stiffness, especially when measured in extremely fine gradients like bike magazines do, has started to smell of snake oil to me. Despite all the pseudo-science applied to this topic I've never seen any hard evidence published anywhere that watts are "lost" with a flexy frame.
It seems intuitive: any pedaling force flexing the frame is not being used to drive the rear wheel.... but is that really true? Can someone explain how exactly is energy "lost" through lateral deflection? Any energy expended is likely returned as the frame flexes back, what happens to that energy? Does that returned energy help on the next pedal stroke somehow or is it just "gone"? Are any of these effects measurable? How would one even measure it?
One thing I'm clear about: a stiff fork and stiff head tube is really important for good handling. To me, that's not up for debate.
#20
Senior Member
There are endless possibilities, I was just digging around and I came up with old batches of photographs ... In the old days, the Frame was Steel and the Fairing was glass or carbon fiber...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/116299...57639939606343
Now, everyone wants to buy carbon, but we still haven't considered that carbon and glass (fiberglass) are both "Composites" . and are made with another element (compound) "Epoxy"...
Example of a Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle, the Frame and Fairing were cast in one piece... which is an oddity, but then , most Monocoques are oddities...
Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle by AviationMetalSmith, on Flickr
The Designer wanted more FLEX in the Seat area, but since this is a Prototype, and I weigh a lot more than her, I changed the design a little.... The Frame Tube, Or Frame Rail, is a Box Beam, 4 inches wide by 6 inches deep...
Now, I wish to build more Prototypes, with Glass Fiber as the main component, but with the same Epoxy, and a little-itty-bit of Carbon Fiber, which carries six times more weight, on a tensile strength - to - weight basis...
Keep in mind, in Compression, Carbon is NO stronger than Fiberglass... ALL of Carbons advantage is in the TENSILE strength test...
Anyway, this photo shows a "stiff" frame, with a partial Fairing, which is also unique that it's a Cargo Fairing... No one else has built a cross-breed between a Velomobile and a Cargo Bike, this is it, it's unique,
Dubbed the Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle
.
And this picture shows a semi-recumbent, the seat tube is huge to offset the Cantilever- Leverage, a normal seat post would bend if it was at that angle...
Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle by AviationMetalSmith, on Flickr
That bike was sold off for twelve hundred dollars in 1999 , and since then , I've been riding a few other Prototypes, but trying to keep it low-key...
I hope a newer generation of Engineering Student can learn from what we done, and build something evolutionarily better ...
You could probably change this Frame Design , so the Frame Rail is 3 inches wide, by 5 inches deep, and made of Carbon, put Carbon Monocoque Panniers on the rear, leave a Cargo Platform in front, but without the Fairing,
add a Coroplast™ Fairing later and enter it in a Velomobile Race... But don't take it too seriously , it is a Cargo Bike/Velomobile, the proverbial "jackass designed by a committee ".
Good Luck.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/116299...57639939606343
Now, everyone wants to buy carbon, but we still haven't considered that carbon and glass (fiberglass) are both "Composites" . and are made with another element (compound) "Epoxy"...
Example of a Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle, the Frame and Fairing were cast in one piece... which is an oddity, but then , most Monocoques are oddities...
Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle by AviationMetalSmith, on Flickr
The Designer wanted more FLEX in the Seat area, but since this is a Prototype, and I weigh a lot more than her, I changed the design a little.... The Frame Tube, Or Frame Rail, is a Box Beam, 4 inches wide by 6 inches deep...
Now, I wish to build more Prototypes, with Glass Fiber as the main component, but with the same Epoxy, and a little-itty-bit of Carbon Fiber, which carries six times more weight, on a tensile strength - to - weight basis...
Keep in mind, in Compression, Carbon is NO stronger than Fiberglass... ALL of Carbons advantage is in the TENSILE strength test...
Anyway, this photo shows a "stiff" frame, with a partial Fairing, which is also unique that it's a Cargo Fairing... No one else has built a cross-breed between a Velomobile and a Cargo Bike, this is it, it's unique,
Dubbed the Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle
.
And this picture shows a semi-recumbent, the seat tube is huge to offset the Cantilever- Leverage, a normal seat post would bend if it was at that angle...
Fiberglass Ladies Bicycle by AviationMetalSmith, on Flickr
That bike was sold off for twelve hundred dollars in 1999 , and since then , I've been riding a few other Prototypes, but trying to keep it low-key...
I hope a newer generation of Engineering Student can learn from what we done, and build something evolutionarily better ...
You could probably change this Frame Design , so the Frame Rail is 3 inches wide, by 5 inches deep, and made of Carbon, put Carbon Monocoque Panniers on the rear, leave a Cargo Platform in front, but without the Fairing,
add a Coroplast™ Fairing later and enter it in a Velomobile Race... But don't take it too seriously , it is a Cargo Bike/Velomobile, the proverbial "jackass designed by a committee ".
Good Luck.
#22
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
So many variables would make it difficult to objectively evaluate frame stiffness/flexibility:
- Materials
- Joining
- Geometry, along with trail and fork design
- Wheelbase
- Give or play in the bottom bracket, crankset and steering doodads
- Wheels
- Tires
- And, subjectively, rider weight and strength
#23
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 398
Bikes: Swobo Sanchez 3x1
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 137 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This is misleading, at best. How "stiff" steel is relative to other materials depends on the tubing used, among other things. Some steel bikes feel very stiff indeed, some aluminium bikes ride beautifully. The idea that frame material, in and of itself, determines ride quality is a myth.
i guess what i was touching on more is that generally these days you see a lot of cheap aluminum bikes which are often not very comfortable to ride. whereas with steel its a pretty sure bet you wont have the same problem.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 1,667
Bikes: Trek Emonda SL6 .... Miyata One Thousand
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 29 Times
in
22 Posts
my son has a Specialized hard rock aluminium .... I was aghast when he stood alongside it, held the handlebars with one hand and the seat post with his other hand and pressed his foot against the crank with slight pressure.... the bike bends considerably (sideways).
#25
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
612 Posts
They all do that.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html