Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Need bike accessory for carrying items on bike

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Need bike accessory for carrying items on bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-16, 12:44 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago North Shore
Posts: 2,352

Bikes: frankenbike based on MKM frame

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 728 Post(s)
Liked 625 Times in 384 Posts
I have a 30.5" inseam, and I've been riding a 54 cm (21+") frame for ages. I'm 5' 7", though, so my torso is longer than yours.

I owned a 58 and then a 50. The 58 was fine, except in an emergency situation, so I sold it. (The shop had told me I needed a 54, but they were out of stock, and I didn't want to wait.) The 50 was fine for a while (long top tube), but eventually I felt cramped, so I got a low slung 54, which has been fine for 36+ years.

The Nashbar 19" bike gives you just about exactly 1" of clearance in its standover height, which is a good rule of thumb to follow, IMO. The 17" gives you more than 2", which seems too high to me.

Either of the larger frames may allow you to attach your basket; it may be easier with the 19.
philbob57 is offline  
Old 07-20-16, 05:01 PM
  #27  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by philbob57
I have a 30.5" inseam, and I've been riding a 54 cm (21+") frame for ages. I'm 5' 7", though, so my torso is longer than yours.

I owned a 58 and then a 50. The 58 was fine, except in an emergency situation, so I sold it. (The shop had told me I needed a 54, but they were out of stock, and I didn't want to wait.) The 50 was fine for a while (long top tube), but eventually I felt cramped, so I got a low slung 54, which has been fine for 36+ years.

The Nashbar 19" bike gives you just about exactly 1" of clearance in its standover height, which is a good rule of thumb to follow, IMO. The 17" gives you more than 2", which seems too high to me.

Either of the larger frames may allow you to attach your basket; it may be easier with the 19.
Thanks for the insight. I'm very tempted by the 19". If I knew if it were a tad too big that I could make adjustments to get it to fit I'd go for it. I think I'm afraid the 19 might be too big or 17 too small.

It sounds like you got the perfect size finally. I may be in between a 53 and 54cm? Do you know how that translates size-wise with the Nashbar bikes?

diddlydood is offline  
Old 07-20-16, 06:10 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by diddlydood
I'm 5'5 1/2" w/30.5 inseam. Anyone know if a 19" in Nashbar would be too big or could I make that fit me? I'd just prefer to go a little bigger and adjust than smaller and adjust.
The Nashbar Flatbar bike has a sloping top tube so going by standover height can be misleading. The 'old' 1" clearance at standover really only applies for a level top tube frame and even then it just gets you in the ballpark. I have a 32" inseam and own a 19" Specialized MTB and it is simply too big for me. I can straddle it due to the sloping top tube but the reach to the bars is too long even with a fairly short stem. My newer 17.5" MTB is perfect.

So for you, I'd say go with the 17". My wife is 5'6" with a 32" inseam and rides a 17" Specialized Sirrus (very similar bike to the Nashbar). If anything, with your long torso you may need a longer stem but that is a simple and cheap swap.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 07-20-16, 06:13 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by diddlydood
I may be in between a 53 and 54cm? Do you know how that translates size-wise with the Nashbar bikes?

Road bike (as in drop bar bike) sizing is different than flat bar bike sizing. The drop handlebars add additional reach and the frame geometry is different enough that you can't compare sizing between the two. For instance, I ride a 53cm road bike (measured from crank center to level top tube center) which translates to an almost 21" frame. No way I can ride a 21" flat bar bike. As noted, even a 19" MTB is too big for me.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 07-22-16, 09:56 AM
  #30  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
Road bike (as in drop bar bike) sizing is different than flat bar bike sizing. The drop handlebars add additional reach and the frame geometry is different enough that you can't compare sizing between the two. For instance, I ride a 53cm road bike (measured from crank center to level top tube center) which translates to an almost 21" frame. No way I can ride a 21" flat bar bike. As noted, even a 19" MTB is too big for me.
Thanks for the comparisons. It helps.

I did a chat with Nashbar regarding the Flat Bar rd bike with bar across. I asked them with my inseam and height, which size would they recommend.

Reps response:

At your size I would recommend the 19" frame. Bike is more like a hybrid and generally you would want to size up from what you would in a road bike.

I then asked him what is the smallest person he would put on the 19".

Rep's response:

I really would not recommend it for someone under 5'5".

I bet I could go either way and fit both. Maybe with shoes, that would put me a little taller and the 19" might be fine and good? I wish I wasn't in the middle of sizes. Dang it. Sure would make things so much easier. lol
diddlydood is offline  
Old 07-22-16, 11:38 AM
  #31  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 38
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RonH
The specs on the manufacturers page says there is one water bottle mount.
The phone you can mount to the stem. If its a smartphone you can use one of these.




Don't wear earbuds. You want to hear what's behind you and around you whether you're on the road or a bike trail.
Thanks. That looks perfect and the reviews are great.
diddlydood is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rosefarts
General Cycling Discussion
24
07-30-18 09:20 AM
diddlydood
General Cycling Discussion
10
08-03-16 07:00 AM
halcyon100
Road Cycling
18
01-22-14 12:00 AM
asuna
General Cycling Discussion
12
11-29-13 04:32 PM
techman
Living Car Free
22
05-15-10 07:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.