The Truth?
#51
Senior Member

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,548
Likes: 797
From: Middle of da Mitten
Bikes: Trek 7500, RANS V-Rex, Optima Baron, Velokraft NoCom, M-5 Carbon Highracer, Catrike Speed
https://www.strava.com/activities/680984391
Does it actually show a graph of the instantaneous speed anywhere? I am just going off the stats at the top of the ride page. Genuinely curious, I was trying to figure out where it recorded that to figure out why I always have some oddball high speed.
Does it actually show a graph of the instantaneous speed anywhere? I am just going off the stats at the top of the ride page. Genuinely curious, I was trying to figure out where it recorded that to figure out why I always have some oddball high speed.
#52
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 86
From: Metro Detroit/AA
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
#53
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 86
From: Metro Detroit/AA
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
On the Analysis page. Is there like a tiny little steep incline in the trail for no reason? Coming up from under the highway, maybe? Because you're going along ~17mph, then suddenly 7.2mph, then accelerating to a peak of 31.8mph, then right back to 17mph. Even on the graph, the "hill" looks like a pimple. The climb (if it is such a thing) looks like it's about 400ft long.
Glad to have that sorted out!
#54
Thread Killer

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,140
Likes: 2,162
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
However, at mile 5.3, it does look like you've got a solid section of data down a similar incline that put you at 29.1mph, so quite close to the 31.8mph, suggesting to me that you could very well have peaked at 31.8mph at some other point.
So much for the guarantee you were "nowhere close to that"...

Just for reference, here's a grab of a ride I did downtown Detroit, where it's pancake flat as you probably know, and you can clearly see that the indicated 31.8mph max is clearly not a blip or GPS wackiness; the speed ramps up, and is sustained in the 30mph range for around .2mi, and is followed by another short sprint showing a similar, continuous ramp-up to +30mph:

https://www.strava.com/activities/358355859/overview
#55
Banned.
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 10
From: downtown Bulverde, Texas
Bikes: '74 Raleigh International utility; '98 Moser Forma road; '92 Viner Pro CX upright
I'm back...didn't time it, but I was kicking butt. Had to deal with work as soon as I got off the bike. Happy with my performance for 4 days off
Especially on common routes, you know what gears you're using compared to times past, and you have a general feel for what kind of watts you're putting out, even if it's only qualitative.
Fred was there - he stopped on a bridge in front of me and turned sideways (because there was a siren on the overpass). I of course stopped as I was ringing my bell 8 times, and said, dude, you're not supposed to stop on a bridge.
Especially on common routes, you know what gears you're using compared to times past, and you have a general feel for what kind of watts you're putting out, even if it's only qualitative.
Fred was there - he stopped on a bridge in front of me and turned sideways (because there was a siren on the overpass). I of course stopped as I was ringing my bell 8 times, and said, dude, you're not supposed to stop on a bridge.
Last edited by bulldog1935; 08-19-16 at 10:23 AM.
#56
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 86
From: Metro Detroit/AA
Bikes: 2016 Novara Mazama
However, at mile 5.3, it does look like you've got a solid section of data down a similar incline that put you at 29.1mph, so quite close to the 31.8mph, suggesting to me that you could very well have peaked at 31.8mph at some other point.
So much for the guarantee you were "nowhere close to that"...
So much for the guarantee you were "nowhere close to that"...


But yeah, that one I'd be more likely to believe, its a slight downhill that I like to do my best impression of pounding out. Interesting how much smoother yours is, though, do you have the actual Strava app? I'm wondering if a lot of my jaggedness is because I have a third party app that uploads my data to Strava in GPX form.
Really, I just like it for YTD mileages and general trends in improvements as the season progresses. I know I'm not winning any KOMs. It was cool to log the actual route of my tour, too.
#57
Don't make me sing!
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 2
From: Western PA
Bikes: 2013 Specialized Crosstrail Elite, 1986 Centurion Elite RS, Diamondback hardtail MTB, '70s Fuji Special Road Racer, 2012 Raleigh Revenio 2.0, 1992 Trek 1000
Here's our regular burger run. We stop at about the 7.5 mile mark at a little diner, then meander home. That 45.2 mph is probably right on the money. It's a pretty steep downhill.
https://www.strava.com/activities/667056192
https://www.strava.com/activities/667056192
#59
Thread Killer

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,140
Likes: 2,162
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Well, I guess if others are going to tell me I'm doing better than I want to admit, maybe I'll post it more 
But yeah, that one I'd be more likely to believe, its a slight downhill that I like to do my best impression of pounding out. Interesting how much smoother yours is, though, do you have the actual Strava app? I'm wondering if a lot of my jaggedness is because I have a third party app that uploads my data to Strava in GPX form.
Really, I just like it for YTD mileages and general trends in improvements as the season progresses. I know I'm not winning any KOMs. It was cool to log the actual route of my tour, too.

But yeah, that one I'd be more likely to believe, its a slight downhill that I like to do my best impression of pounding out. Interesting how much smoother yours is, though, do you have the actual Strava app? I'm wondering if a lot of my jaggedness is because I have a third party app that uploads my data to Strava in GPX form.
Really, I just like it for YTD mileages and general trends in improvements as the season progresses. I know I'm not winning any KOMs. It was cool to log the actual route of my tour, too.
Thanks for posting the data, though, because it turned out to be a perfect illustration of my point: you weren't lying about anything, but yet the data revealed an incomplete understanding behind what you were trying to say.
Trust, but verify!
#60
meh

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 1,129
From: Hopkins, MN
Bikes: 23 Cutthroat, 21 CoMotion Java; 21 Bianchi Infinito; 15 Surly Pugsley; 11 Globe Daily; 09 Kona Dew Drop; 96 Mondonico
I've used GPS tracking for years, and I'm more concerned about over reporting than padded my stats. My 2016 Almanzo 100 ride was showing too much elevation in Strava (tracked with my Garmin 510), so I use a tool in Strava to 'fix' it.... it over corrected and the ride stands with 2,000 ft less elevation gain than is reported by the race organizers. Oh well.
Coming home from the 2015 Westside Dirty Benjamin, I was a few miles short of 150 miles and I wanted to brag about my 150-mile day. So I biked past the house and round the neighborhood to hit the round number. Funny part, Lisa was sitting on the deck and saw me go past and couldn't figure out why I rode past the house. She quickly guessed, she knows that I'm a stats-geek.
Most people I've encountered that exaggerate their stats are using non-GPS devices (ie Cateye), and haven't put in the correct wheel diameter. So they don't believe they are exaggerating, they just don't know they have bad data.
Beyond that, why would anybody want exaggerate their stats? You think you'll get a sponsor to pay to ride
#61
Banned.
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Ask a silly question, get a silly response. He only has himself to blame.
hot mess
nounUSinformal
noun: hot mess; plural noun: hot messes
hot mess
nounUSinformal
noun: hot mess; plural noun: hot messes
- a person or thing that is spectacularly unsuccessful or disordered.
"this outfit is definitely a hot mess"
#62
Senior Member


Joined: May 2016
Posts: 4,214
Likes: 1,948
Bikes: Trek 1100, Raleigh R-500, Cannondale R800, Roadmaster gravel/beater mountain bike
I'm not going to lie because I don't have anything to prove to anybody. I'm just a guy who enjoys riding a bike, and it's not like I'm going to break any speed records on my hybrid, anyway. As far as distance and endurance, I'm basically just starting out from last August so I'm not going to impress anybody with the distances I've ridden. I just have to be better than myself.
#63
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 684
Likes: 8
From: Jersey City, NJ
Bikes: Jamis Coda Elite - custom 1x9 setup
actually, it's a question that puts everyone on the defensive - there really isn't a legitimate answer - it may not be a legitimate question, because no one can answer for anyone except themselves, and that includes the OP.
I'm only casually interested in speed, never clock mine. Keep up with my miles, which is the goal I set for myself. And I guess I gauge myself by taking 10 min off a standard ride (32mi has become common for me - I have a couple of routes laid out). My real goal is I get off the bike and go, ahh, this is the way I'm supposed to feel.
Occasionally will ask my buddy what he's clocking for us, especially when I'm chasing their tandem.
Or like last weekend, when Tad was leading and setting the group pace on a '36 Rollfast balloon tire bike.
It was a hoot that he set a pace of 17-18 mph. There were four of us in the lead group, we added two more to the lead group in the back half, and it was fun to be part of it. Yes, Tad is an animal.
But, intended or not, the OP is purely rhetorical and pretty much calls everyone a liar.
Answering rhetorical questions? well...
I'm only casually interested in speed, never clock mine. Keep up with my miles, which is the goal I set for myself. And I guess I gauge myself by taking 10 min off a standard ride (32mi has become common for me - I have a couple of routes laid out). My real goal is I get off the bike and go, ahh, this is the way I'm supposed to feel.
Occasionally will ask my buddy what he's clocking for us, especially when I'm chasing their tandem.
Or like last weekend, when Tad was leading and setting the group pace on a '36 Rollfast balloon tire bike.
It was a hoot that he set a pace of 17-18 mph. There were four of us in the lead group, we added two more to the lead group in the back half, and it was fun to be part of it. Yes, Tad is an animal.
But, intended or not, the OP is purely rhetorical and pretty much calls everyone a liar.
Answering rhetorical questions? well...
Last edited by idiotekniQues; 08-19-16 at 03:47 PM.
#64
I could tell you I lie when I post my speeds and distances. But then I might be lying.
On how reliable Strava is; wasn't there some threads on impossible mileages logged on Strava a few months ago? A few years ago I was tracking a hike on Endomondo. Forgot to turn it off when done. Got in the car and drove off. I was hiking 60mph for a few minutes.
#65
Full Member

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 316
Likes: 43
From: nola area
Bikes: 2017 giant TCR, 2019 Santa Cruz tallboy
only been at this for a couple of weeks not sure why i would lie about a 14.6 mph over 20 miles but i was really happy with myself for doing it on my first 20 mile ride, i've been riding this week without the bike computer just trying to learn to pedal properly so i have no idea of my speed or time. i'm in this for fun and fitness and there is a bit of a learning process to proper technique, so i'm not proud and you guys encourage me to get better.
no need for fish stories as i have nothing to prove to anyone but myself.
rob
no need for fish stories as i have nothing to prove to anyone but myself.
rob
#66
What happened?
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,918
Likes: 298
From: Around here somewhere
Bikes: 3 Rollfasts, 3 Schwinns, a Shelby and a Higgins Flightliner in a pear tree!
I'm happy to get there.
__________________
I don't know nothing, and I memorized it in school and got this here paper I'm proud of to show it.
#67
Senior Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
The only times I lie about performance, especially on the internet, is when I'm trying to appear modest.
Average mph speeds:
- 13 smelling the roses
- 14 normal daily
- 15 laying it on
Normally 10-15 miles/day
Average mph speeds:
- 13 smelling the roses
- 14 normal daily
- 15 laying it on
Normally 10-15 miles/day
Last edited by ltxi; 08-19-16 at 06:11 PM.
#68
Senior Member
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 13
Everyone pumps up their avg speed. It's so common in cycling that it's like saying we have to have air in our tyres or we have to have water in our bottles.
I looked up the definition of cheating and the definition is "to gain an advantage on a rival or foe". I do not view inflating my avg speed that way. I view it as a level playing field.
I looked up the definition of cheating and the definition is "to gain an advantage on a rival or foe". I do not view inflating my avg speed that way. I view it as a level playing field.
#69
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,767
Likes: 85
in the same way everyone in this thread seems only capable of talking about average speed inflation, I think most people don't understand how to discern the important elements of speed reporting, and so whether they're truthful or exaggerating, they're usually not communicating what needs to be expressed, so I wish they'd just post the ride data file from Strava or somewhere and let the numbers do the talking. That shuts down all the haters who think it's impossible for humans to pedal beyond 32mph or whatever random speed they can't acheive themselves, and also seems to effectively shortcut all the flakes who want to argue dumb points like elapsed time vs. ride time, as if anyone cares if they stop to toilet or how long it takes for them to pinch off a loaf.
I prefer to trust but verify, so essentially I'm like, "Strava, or it didn't happen."
I prefer to trust but verify, so essentially I'm like, "Strava, or it didn't happen."
Of course, Strava can never be doped, can it?
#70
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,767
Likes: 85
Average speed tells me how long it's going to take to get there, knowing the distance. Or how long a training ride will take if I schedule a certain number of miles. So it's probably my number one metric. But I think that's a different average than what people tend to talk/brag about.
For mine, the only average that I have to worry about is 15km/h, not even a paltry 10mph. That's the minimum average speed to complete a randonnee or brevet on sealed roads up to 600km. Anything faster than that is a bonus.
#72
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 347
From: Nashville, TN.
Bikes: 2020 Specialized Roubaix Comp SC - 2016 Specialized Roubaix SL4 - 2015 Giant Roam 2 Disc
Holier-than-thou type, are ya?
#73
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 11
From: Middletown NY
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix EVO w Hi-Mod frame, Raleigh Tamland 1 and Giant Anthem X
#74
Member
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
I track my distance, average speed, and heart rate just to see if there is a trend over a specific period of of time and to satisfy my need to know how I'm doing. I doubt I will ever share the information with others and if I do, it will be with complete honesty as I could care less what others think about me...
#75
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 388
From: NE Indiana
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
The truth? Since when does anyone in America care about the truth?




