Does this bike (of my dreams) exist? 700c monster cross w/ disc brakes?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Does this bike (of my dreams) exist? 700c monster cross w/ disc brakes?
Well, I'm actually just looking for a frameset.
Anything I've missed?
EDIT: oh, forgot adding one of the most important points: short reach. I have short torso and I prefer an upright position.
- Steel frame and fork.
- Minimum 700x45mm tire clearance with fenders.
- Sub 405 mm reach (I have a short torso, giant legs).
- Front rack eyelets.
- Disc brake ready.
- Near horizontal top tube (not the sloping kind).
- Big frame size available (~60 cm C-C seat tube). ~85 cm standover or above.
- Sub $1000.
- Quick release, not thru-axle (not a deal breaker).
Anything I've missed?
EDIT: oh, forgot adding one of the most important points: short reach. I have short torso and I prefer an upright position.
Last edited by not_hip; 05-16-18 at 11:51 PM.
#2
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've been looking to get this one for awhile.
It states that you can fit up to 45mm tires. I'm not sure if you could do so with fenders.
It is single speed, because I like single speed. I'd imagine they have a similar bike with gears.
It states that you can fit up to 45mm tires. I'm not sure if you could do so with fenders.
It is single speed, because I like single speed. I'd imagine they have a similar bike with gears.
#3
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
If it were me, I'd commit to disc or rim brakes, and embrace thru-axle if the former. It's much wiser for the front wheel.
#5
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Soma wolverine. Also look at the masi giaramondo, but I think it may only come as a complete.
Last edited by stringsonbikes; 05-16-18 at 08:50 PM.
#6
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,519
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4355 Post(s)
Liked 3,994 Times
in
2,665 Posts
Specialized Sequoia Pro Module would be a neat bike to build up. It ticks a few of your boxes but overall as a complete bike is an excellent ride. If I wasn't already working on so many projects and didn't have an excellent touring bike, I would probably build one up. Sure it may not be perfectly horizontal or quick release but meh on both of those for that kind of bike these days. You can get a 61 with carbon fork with mounts on it disc brakes and plenty of clearance. Plus it is well made and well reviewed.
The Soma Wolverine mentioned above me is another option but it lost me at no thru axles and non-tapered steerer and while I don't dislike sliding dropouts I don't know that I would want them on a build. I am not normally opposed to a non-tapered steerer but all the great new forks are tapered such as the Rodeo Labs Spork or the Ren Cycles fork with their Ti rando rack. It is an excellent bike for a more old school build but as I get older my tastes have changed in some forms and I want all that modern stuff on the bike (minus press fit and non-27.2 seatposts)
The Soma Wolverine mentioned above me is another option but it lost me at no thru axles and non-tapered steerer and while I don't dislike sliding dropouts I don't know that I would want them on a build. I am not normally opposed to a non-tapered steerer but all the great new forks are tapered such as the Rodeo Labs Spork or the Ren Cycles fork with their Ti rando rack. It is an excellent bike for a more old school build but as I get older my tastes have changed in some forms and I want all that modern stuff on the bike (minus press fit and non-27.2 seatposts)
#7
Senior Member
Specialized Sequoia Pro Module would be a neat bike to build up. It ticks a few of your boxes but overall as a complete bike is an excellent ride. If I wasn't already working on so many projects and didn't have an excellent touring bike, I would probably build one up. Sure it may not be perfectly horizontal or quick release but meh on both of those for that kind of bike these days. You can get a 61 with carbon fork with mounts on it disc brakes and plenty of clearance. Plus it is well made and well reviewed.
The Soma Wolverine mentioned above me is another option but it lost me at no thru axles and non-tapered steerer and while I don't dislike sliding dropouts I don't know that I would want them on a build. I am not normally opposed to a non-tapered steerer but all the great new forks are tapered such as the Rodeo Labs Spork or the Ren Cycles fork with their Ti rando rack. It is an excellent bike for a more old school build but as I get older my tastes have changed in some forms and I want all that modern stuff on the bike (minus press fit and non-27.2 seatposts)
The Soma Wolverine mentioned above me is another option but it lost me at no thru axles and non-tapered steerer and while I don't dislike sliding dropouts I don't know that I would want them on a build. I am not normally opposed to a non-tapered steerer but all the great new forks are tapered such as the Rodeo Labs Spork or the Ren Cycles fork with their Ti rando rack. It is an excellent bike for a more old school build but as I get older my tastes have changed in some forms and I want all that modern stuff on the bike (minus press fit and non-27.2 seatposts)
#9
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,519
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4355 Post(s)
Liked 3,994 Times
in
2,665 Posts
#11
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To make things even more complicated... I forgot to mention that I have very long inseam and short torso, so a short reach frameset is a must. I added that to my OP.
I wrote it off because of the rather long reach and sloping top tube. But, it's a beauty (and available as frameset)!
Quick release is fine, but bikes with a sloping top tube looks ridiculous with my 93 cm inseam. Seat post in the sky. Also, I prefer the steel fork look (Wolverine style).
Wolverine I've looked at. Wrote it off because of the long reach. But surprise, it looks like it's one of the few frames with 45 mm (with fenders!) clearance. Didn't notice that. The Disc Trucker has a 401 mm reach for the 62 cm model, that might be on the large side but will probably work. I'd be very happy to keep it at ~395. The Wolverine is 412 mm.
The Giramondo is sloping but looks excellent aside from that. Too bad I got stuck with that one. Found no reseller in Europe and not available as frameset.
Specialized Sequoia Pro Module would be a neat bike to build up. It ticks a few of your boxes but overall as a complete bike is an excellent ride. If I wasn't already working on so many projects and didn't have an excellent touring bike, I would probably build one up. Sure it may not be perfectly horizontal or quick release but meh on both of those for that kind of bike these days. You can get a 61 with carbon fork with mounts on it disc brakes and plenty of clearance. Plus it is well made and well reviewed.
The Soma Wolverine mentioned above me is another option but it lost me at no thru axles and non-tapered steerer and while I don't dislike sliding dropouts I don't know that I would want them on a build. I am not normally opposed to a non-tapered steerer but all the great new forks are tapered such as the Rodeo Labs Spork or the Ren Cycles fork with their Ti rando rack. It is an excellent bike for a more old school build but as I get older my tastes have changed in some forms and I want all that modern stuff on the bike (minus press fit and non-27.2 seatposts)
The Giramondo is sloping but looks excellent aside from that. Too bad I got stuck with that one. Found no reseller in Europe and not available as frameset.
Last edited by not_hip; 05-17-18 at 01:54 AM.
#13
Senior Member
Due to your particular geometry requirements, you'll probably want a smaller frame size but with higher ground clearance (so cyclocross would work well), to fit longer crank arms to take advantage of your long legs. Your unique body type is not readily served by an off-the-shelf geometry, so some tweaking will be required regardless of what frame you go with.
#14
Senior Member
This will bust your budget, but only a little.
https://www.oasiscustomcycles.com/
$1399, and you get *exactly* what you want!
Well, maybe. He does not specifically make CX bikes, but he does do tandems... and a tandem has wider tires and heftier tubes, so the translation might be possible. Have to call the guy and ask.
Believe me, a custom steel bike is a thing of wonder, especially if you have weird body types like we do. I am the opposite, 5' 11" and 29 inch inseam. Dropping top tubes are a MUST for me. Which is why I had a custom frame built 18 years ago, it has a slightly dropping top tube to make all the other geometry work.
BTW, QR and Disc have some issues. Because clearances are so precise on disc brakes the relative inaccuracy of a QR mount can be problematic. Thru Axle is there to do two things:
Add more rigidity to the fork.
Ensure consistent positioning of the wheel relative to the disc brake.
They are not mutually exclusive, but if you don't get that QR set just right, you will probably get dragging from the disc brake.
https://www.oasiscustomcycles.com/
$1399, and you get *exactly* what you want!
Well, maybe. He does not specifically make CX bikes, but he does do tandems... and a tandem has wider tires and heftier tubes, so the translation might be possible. Have to call the guy and ask.
Believe me, a custom steel bike is a thing of wonder, especially if you have weird body types like we do. I am the opposite, 5' 11" and 29 inch inseam. Dropping top tubes are a MUST for me. Which is why I had a custom frame built 18 years ago, it has a slightly dropping top tube to make all the other geometry work.
BTW, QR and Disc have some issues. Because clearances are so precise on disc brakes the relative inaccuracy of a QR mount can be problematic. Thru Axle is there to do two things:
Add more rigidity to the fork.
Ensure consistent positioning of the wheel relative to the disc brake.
They are not mutually exclusive, but if you don't get that QR set just right, you will probably get dragging from the disc brake.
#15
Senior Member
As said, check out Soma. Kona, Waterford, Surly, Salsa would be good too.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 646
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 36 Times
in
31 Posts
If you were flexible on the 700c part (it will take 700x42, but 650bx48 with fenders), the All City Gorilla Monsoon checks most of the boxes, particularly the reach in their 61cm size is 401, standover 87.
#17
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,519
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4355 Post(s)
Liked 3,994 Times
in
2,665 Posts
For some reason I thought you wanted a carbon fork! Then a non-tapered steerer makes sense for you. I know it is more but Co-Motion makes some excellent frames and would be a great choice. I am quite happy with my Cascadia but you would probably want something a touch different because of wider tire clearance but I believe the Deschutes is right up your alley or close to it.
#18
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Due to your particular geometry requirements, you'll probably want a smaller frame size but with higher ground clearance (so cyclocross would work well), to fit longer crank arms to take advantage of your long legs. Your unique body type is not readily served by an off-the-shelf geometry, so some tweaking will be required regardless of what frame you go with.
This will bust your budget, but only a little.
https://www.oasiscustomcycles.com/
$1399, and you get *exactly* what you want!
Well, maybe. He does not specifically make CX bikes, but he does do tandems... and a tandem has wider tires and heftier tubes, so the translation might be possible. Have to call the guy and ask.
Believe me, a custom steel bike is a thing of wonder, especially if you have weird body types like we do. I am the opposite, 5' 11" and 29 inch inseam. Dropping top tubes are a MUST for me. Which is why I had a custom frame built 18 years ago, it has a slightly dropping top tube to make all the other geometry work.
https://www.oasiscustomcycles.com/
$1399, and you get *exactly* what you want!
Well, maybe. He does not specifically make CX bikes, but he does do tandems... and a tandem has wider tires and heftier tubes, so the translation might be possible. Have to call the guy and ask.
Believe me, a custom steel bike is a thing of wonder, especially if you have weird body types like we do. I am the opposite, 5' 11" and 29 inch inseam. Dropping top tubes are a MUST for me. Which is why I had a custom frame built 18 years ago, it has a slightly dropping top tube to make all the other geometry work.
It's a beauty, but I want 700c wheels and a minimum 45mm tires with fenders. The Monsoon is limited to 42mm. Without fenders, it seems. It's a no go.
Last edited by not_hip; 05-18-18 at 02:54 PM.
#19
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For some reason I thought you wanted a carbon fork! Then a non-tapered steerer makes sense for you. I know it is more but Co-Motion makes some excellent frames and would be a great choice. I am quite happy with my Cascadia but you would probably want something a touch different because of wider tire clearance but I believe the Deschutes is right up your alley or close to it.
#20
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
You are looking for custom in a generic world.
use cantis- they work fine.
or use a sloping top tube- it works fine.
lose the ideal perfect look and get the ideal perfect fit.
i have a black mountain canti frame- love it. The disc version will be harsher since the fork is overbuilt(i guess properly built) to handle the disc brake twisting, but i bet itll be great still.
use cantis- they work fine.
or use a sloping top tube- it works fine.
lose the ideal perfect look and get the ideal perfect fit.
i have a black mountain canti frame- love it. The disc version will be harsher since the fork is overbuilt(i guess properly built) to handle the disc brake twisting, but i bet itll be great still.
#21
Senior Member
Velo Orange Piolet?
#22
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,519
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4355 Post(s)
Liked 3,994 Times
in
2,665 Posts
If you could sacrifice your desire to have a steel frame or disk brakes you'd have many options.
The problem being, steel bikes are rare nowadays and generally only seen on the really low end.
You are asking for something so niche. Cyclocross bikes are already niche, then you add a bunch of other niche desires. Cyclocross is a weird middle ground between street and mountain bike.
The problem being, steel bikes are rare nowadays and generally only seen on the really low end.
You are asking for something so niche. Cyclocross bikes are already niche, then you add a bunch of other niche desires. Cyclocross is a weird middle ground between street and mountain bike.
Steel is alive and well. Sure Carbon and Aluminum are bigger at this point but steel is, has been and always will be, REAL!
I have 38s on my Cascadia with fenders granted if I could go back in the past I probably would have gone Americano so I have more clearance with the fenders. Though I wouldn't suggest the Cascadia for your use, I just happen to own one and love it and love the brand over all.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,266
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 714 Post(s)
Liked 800 Times
in
475 Posts
As a framebuilder, who just built a similar frame for a friend with the same long legs/short torso body, I will warn you about focusing too heavily on the short reach aspect of the frame. Shortening the reach on the frame also increases the toe overlap with the front wheel. In my friends case, we had to go with a short stem(50mm) to get the reach he wanted without his size 12 feet hitting the front tire. A short stem may not be aesthetically pleasing, but its not hard to get used to and I think its better for off road riding to have the front wheel pushed out a little more. I built my personal gravel bike(650b x 1.9" tires) with a 50mm stem and it handles great.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East Tennessee
Posts: 1,616
Bikes: Basso Luguna, Fuji Nevada
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4261 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
1 Post
https://westridgeoutdoors.com/collec...=4577150631974
I was considering buying this one for a trail/gravel bike but ended up getting a Schwinn Vantage instead. I still like that AMOK, even just the 1x8.