Out of the saddle comfort
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: Motobecane USA - Mirage SL
Out of the saddle comfort
What makes riding out of the saddle comfortable?
I imagine it’s partly the bike, but exactly is it how the crankset is positioned?
I imagine it’s partly the bike, but exactly is it how the crankset is positioned?
#3
~>~
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,929
Likes: 187
From: TX Hill Country
-Bandera
#6
Senior Member

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,659
Likes: 2,399
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Bikes: 2015 Charge Plug, 2007 Dahon Boardwalk, 1997 Specialized Rockhopper, 1984 Nishiki International, 2006 Felt F65, 1989 Dahon Getaway V
#7
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,129
Likes: 56
From: Munising, Michigan, USA
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
#8
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
#10
Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,180
Likes: 5,312
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
I find handlebar and brake lever hood setup matters a lot. I want my hoods to be both in the right location and at the right angle for my wrists. Now, I am one who loves to climb out of the saddle and I have been known to not sit down for miles at a time (where the hills are that long). I call riding out of the saddle, "the dance". Like a good dance partner, the bike should just feel completely natural and "there". The handlebars and brake hoods are the arms and hands of you partner.
Now, I think the concept of crank location is backwards. I see the bottom bracket as being the center of the bike; the point from which the geometry and dimensions are measured. The handlebars are measured to the BB, not the other way around.
Ben
Now, I think the concept of crank location is backwards. I see the bottom bracket as being the center of the bike; the point from which the geometry and dimensions are measured. The handlebars are measured to the BB, not the other way around.
Ben
#12
Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,180
Likes: 5,312
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
I stood a real portion of the climb up Dead Indian Memorial Rd (50%?) when I did it 6 years ago with Cycle Oregon. ~3000' in 16 miles. Fix gear, 42-23. Day 4 of 5000' plus. I probably had the highest gear there. I have to choose my brake levers very carefully or I will chafe my fingers through the skin. (I am a big fan of the full fingered Dankine MTB gloves.)
Ben
Ben
#13
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 14,779
Likes: 743
From: Northwest Georgia
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Fixed gear on the road, of course.
MTB requires standing more as well.
Road really requires very little standing. I think many have gears too high and stand too often and/or too long when riding road bikes. Comfort out of the saddle is something that would never occur to me apart from a thread like this. The only thing I'm thinking about when I stand is how quickly I can sit back down.
Fit is fit and comfort is comfort. If your bike doesn't fit out of the saddle then your bike doesn't fit in the saddle either.
-Tim-
MTB requires standing more as well.
Road really requires very little standing. I think many have gears too high and stand too often and/or too long when riding road bikes. Comfort out of the saddle is something that would never occur to me apart from a thread like this. The only thing I'm thinking about when I stand is how quickly I can sit back down.
Fit is fit and comfort is comfort. If your bike doesn't fit out of the saddle then your bike doesn't fit in the saddle either.
-Tim-
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: Motobecane USA - Mirage SL
Huh, that's all interesting, as much as I've seen it done in professional races, and pro/ams alike, I rarely ever do it, heck I did it more when I was a kid than I do now. But I do agree that it has a rhythm/feel to it, I think because my bike is a bit of a "boat" and awkward it's just not as fluid as maybe a higher end carbon fiber type triathalon is, those seem much more adapted to the ergonomics of a good climbing bike.
#15
~>~
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,929
Likes: 187
From: TX Hill Country
Bikes designed for Time Trials and Tri Bike-legs are optimized for aerodynamic efficiency on flat-ish parcours not climbing.
The TT position and machine configuration would indeed make for an awkward beast to stand for any length of time since that is as non-aerodynamic as would be possible.
Not exactly what the designers had in mind for operational control and rider positioning except for a few pedal strokes launching out of the start house.
-Bandera
#17
~>~
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,929
Likes: 187
From: TX Hill Country
Check out real "climbing" bikes in this vid of a brutal mountain finish in the Giro:
Last Km of Stage 14 - spoiler (2018/giro-d-italia)
#18
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: Motobecane USA - Mirage SL
I believe Lance Armstrong also practiced spinning a high cadence, and it proved successful for him too. I find when I'm on my trainer and I hit a cadence of 80-84 rpm, its comfortable and my output is almost 15% better.
#19
Me duelen las nalgas

Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 13,519
Likes: 2,832
From: Texas
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
For me it's the angle of the dangle.
I'm most comfortable standing to pedal on my hybrid with riser bars at saddle height. I can stand upright, straight over the pedals. It transfers my weight efficiently to the pedals. The downside is it's less aero so beyond a certain speed, or climbing into headwinds, it's not faster. It's just comfortable for longer distances.
Until recently my road bike had a long stem. I was too stretched out and when I stood to pedal I was leaning too far forward. It was more aero, but I had to physically push back to pedal. My weight wasn't transferred as efficiently. I'd become exhausted more quickly.
Recently I swapped the road bike to a shorter stem. Much more comfortable sitting and standing to pedal. My weight is better balanced when standing to pedal. I can pedal more efficiently, longer and without much compromise in aero positioning. For me it's more efficient for short, steep climbs. And it feels like I can transition between sitting, standing, sitting again, along with using the downtube shifters, without losing momentum. That's primarily a balance thing.
FWIW, my road bike is an old school '80s thing, 7-speed freewheel. Currently 13-24 original, and I have a 13-25. I swapped the 52/42 chain ring for a 39T small chain ring. It's still an old school combo, not really suited to serious climbing. But we don't have any serious climbs around here, nothing longer than a mile of continuous climbing at worst. Most of my climbs are maybe 100-400 yards of continuous climbing with plateaus or dips before the climb resumes. Lots of roller coasters with those 4%-9% or so short steep bits. For a strong rider that 52/39 chain ring with 13-24 freewheel is good enough. But I'm not a particularly strong climber. I'm tempted to try a 13-28 freewheel, but I know the spacing would be weird, too jumpy and herky jerky. So either I get stronger with the gearing I have now, or switch to a newer bike with more gears and better spacing.
I'm most comfortable standing to pedal on my hybrid with riser bars at saddle height. I can stand upright, straight over the pedals. It transfers my weight efficiently to the pedals. The downside is it's less aero so beyond a certain speed, or climbing into headwinds, it's not faster. It's just comfortable for longer distances.
Until recently my road bike had a long stem. I was too stretched out and when I stood to pedal I was leaning too far forward. It was more aero, but I had to physically push back to pedal. My weight wasn't transferred as efficiently. I'd become exhausted more quickly.
Recently I swapped the road bike to a shorter stem. Much more comfortable sitting and standing to pedal. My weight is better balanced when standing to pedal. I can pedal more efficiently, longer and without much compromise in aero positioning. For me it's more efficient for short, steep climbs. And it feels like I can transition between sitting, standing, sitting again, along with using the downtube shifters, without losing momentum. That's primarily a balance thing.
FWIW, my road bike is an old school '80s thing, 7-speed freewheel. Currently 13-24 original, and I have a 13-25. I swapped the 52/42 chain ring for a 39T small chain ring. It's still an old school combo, not really suited to serious climbing. But we don't have any serious climbs around here, nothing longer than a mile of continuous climbing at worst. Most of my climbs are maybe 100-400 yards of continuous climbing with plateaus or dips before the climb resumes. Lots of roller coasters with those 4%-9% or so short steep bits. For a strong rider that 52/39 chain ring with 13-24 freewheel is good enough. But I'm not a particularly strong climber. I'm tempted to try a 13-28 freewheel, but I know the spacing would be weird, too jumpy and herky jerky. So either I get stronger with the gearing I have now, or switch to a newer bike with more gears and better spacing.
Last edited by canklecat; 05-23-18 at 06:27 PM.
#21
15 min +
Agree that bar & hood position has a lot to do with comfort, but I have that optimized for a low sitting position-
can't have everything...
Also cleat position- cleats forward will make your calves uncomfortable sooner.
Agree that bar & hood position has a lot to do with comfort, but I have that optimized for a low sitting position-
can't have everything...
Also cleat position- cleats forward will make your calves uncomfortable sooner.
#22
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 14,779
Likes: 743
From: Northwest Georgia
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
I can't imagine how much effort is required to stand and pedal for 15 minutes vs sitting.
The only time I stand is to sprint, stretch a little or for the sake of blood flow on long ride. Even then it is for 30 seconds, maybe.
To each his own, I guess.
The only time I stand is to sprint, stretch a little or for the sake of blood flow on long ride. Even then it is for 30 seconds, maybe.
To each his own, I guess.
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 764
Likes: 5
From: Long Beach
Bikes: Fitz randonneuse, Trek Superfly/AL, Tsunami SS, Bacchetta, HPV Speed Machine, Rans Screamer
i am big, so a long time out of the saddle is 2 minutes. Here is what has worked for me.
First is feeling comfortably balanced over the bottom bracket. I don’t want to be leaning on the bars nor bumping my knees. Also with the bars not too low.
Next is a lively feeling bike. My muscles burn out quickly on a stiff aluminum bike, but a steel bike with thin wall tubing is like floating, so I can put out more power longer. Super light aluminum was too wobbly to be any fun. Haven’t tried carbon because stock frames don’t fit, but sounds like they are all over the map.
This one is probably really personal, but I find a shorter top tube with a longer stem feels more steady. I had a road bike the other way around and it was really hard to hold a line, simply no fun out of saddle.
This is one few get to try, but I have a bike with low trail geometry (30mm), and it is silky smooth and easy to ride out of saddle.
I have not had one bike with all the ingredients, but any bike that didn’t ride well out of the saddle didn’t last long in my stable.
First is feeling comfortably balanced over the bottom bracket. I don’t want to be leaning on the bars nor bumping my knees. Also with the bars not too low.
Next is a lively feeling bike. My muscles burn out quickly on a stiff aluminum bike, but a steel bike with thin wall tubing is like floating, so I can put out more power longer. Super light aluminum was too wobbly to be any fun. Haven’t tried carbon because stock frames don’t fit, but sounds like they are all over the map.
This one is probably really personal, but I find a shorter top tube with a longer stem feels more steady. I had a road bike the other way around and it was really hard to hold a line, simply no fun out of saddle.
This is one few get to try, but I have a bike with low trail geometry (30mm), and it is silky smooth and easy to ride out of saddle.
I have not had one bike with all the ingredients, but any bike that didn’t ride well out of the saddle didn’t last long in my stable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
butterfinger15
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
14
04-12-11 01:55 PM





