Why do so few "endurance" bikes have rack mounts?
#26
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Any road bike frame without rack mounts is dead to me.
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
12 Posts
You don't need p-clamps, fender/brake bridges, or eyelets either. And you can even get a carbon rack:
https://www.tailfin.cc/products/t1-u...urable-package
https://www.tailfin.cc/products/t1-u...urable-package
#29
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
Yup, the Niner RLT 9 series was on my short list but the only authorized dealer that was close to me isn't really a dealer other than in name. They are a typical Specialized/Trek/Cannondale dealer and they don't actually have a single Niner bike in the store at all. I have two Jamis dealers within 10 miles. It really came down to Fuji, Kona (which doesn't make a 61cm frame so they were out), Jamis or one of the Specialized/Trek/Cannondale/Giant quadrumvirate if I wanted to buy local.
I had $5k and was ready to hand it to the first shop which could meet my needs.
I walked into Performance Bike intending to buy a Jamis Renegade Elite, one of the "Performance exclusive" bikes with an odd parts mix. The manager was great but he said there were zero in stock at any Performance Bike in the US.
The only authorized Niner reseller in the Atlanta area is a Trek chain and a Niner dealer in name only. I went there to order a $2300 RLT 9 RDO frame and was clear that I had money and was ready to order. They took my name and number but never bothered to call me back.
I wanted a local shop in case there was an issue but wound up driving 3 hours to another city just to order, then drove back a week later to pick up the frame. It happened that the regional rep for Niner lived in that City and the shop arranged for him to drop off his personal RDO so that I could look at it. That's what I'm talking about for service - they clearly wanted my business. It was a super easy sale.
Never thought it would be so difficult to get rid of a few thousand dollars.
-Tim-
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 6,432
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 539 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times
in
38 Posts
It's fashion and ego.
The racers look sleek. The people watching races, who are willing to spend big bucks on bikes the racers ride, and to look and feel like the racers. The thing is the racers look so sleek because they have a support car following them with spare bikes, etc...and you don't have that. But the bike companies try to make bikes look as much like the exact bikes the racers ride as possible, then a lot of people following the fashion trend try to do the same, stuffing as much of their backup great into their jersey pockets as possible to keep their bike looking "clean". For a while every bike review would complain if their were any rack mounts on the bike.
It is quite annoying though.
My brother has a full carbon specialized sirrus (flat bars) and they compromised by putting a rack mount near the bottom bracket, but requiring a rack-attachment seatpost. It works and if you don't want a rack you really have to go out of your way to notice the rack mounts on the bottom.
They make racks for bikes without rack mounts, but when I tried to put one on my brothers sirrus it was really ugly, and I returned it when I found out I could mount a regular rack on the bike and it looks much better.
The only consolation I have is that they seem to make much more comfortable aluminum frames now than they used to, which do come with rack mounts. Used to be it was "comfortable ride with skinny tires and carbon but no rack, vs worse ride with aluminum and a rack". Nowadays the ride quality of aluminum bikes is much closer to carbon and it's not such a dilema.
The racers look sleek. The people watching races, who are willing to spend big bucks on bikes the racers ride, and to look and feel like the racers. The thing is the racers look so sleek because they have a support car following them with spare bikes, etc...and you don't have that. But the bike companies try to make bikes look as much like the exact bikes the racers ride as possible, then a lot of people following the fashion trend try to do the same, stuffing as much of their backup great into their jersey pockets as possible to keep their bike looking "clean". For a while every bike review would complain if their were any rack mounts on the bike.
It is quite annoying though.
My brother has a full carbon specialized sirrus (flat bars) and they compromised by putting a rack mount near the bottom bracket, but requiring a rack-attachment seatpost. It works and if you don't want a rack you really have to go out of your way to notice the rack mounts on the bottom.
They make racks for bikes without rack mounts, but when I tried to put one on my brothers sirrus it was really ugly, and I returned it when I found out I could mount a regular rack on the bike and it looks much better.
The only consolation I have is that they seem to make much more comfortable aluminum frames now than they used to, which do come with rack mounts. Used to be it was "comfortable ride with skinny tires and carbon but no rack, vs worse ride with aluminum and a rack". Nowadays the ride quality of aluminum bikes is much closer to carbon and it's not such a dilema.
#31
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,525
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4357 Post(s)
Liked 3,994 Times
in
2,665 Posts
Bikepacking bags work just fine. I commute a lot now on my road bike and use a Topeak Backloader to carry my clothes and occasionally a burrito on the way home. I wouldn't want rack mounts on my road bike just as I wouldn't want a shorter wheelbase on my touring bike or multiple gears on my fixed gear. Different bikes for different purposes.If I went mad and could only have one bike I would go with something like the Specialized Sequoia Comp or maybe a Moots Baxter or Routt 45 or Jamis Renegade Escapade or something similar to that which has rack and fender mounts. It won't be a racier road/cross bike or a full on touring bike but would kind of hit every box in some capacity.
#32
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#33
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,638
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4736 Post(s)
Liked 1,532 Times
in
1,003 Posts
This is probably a stoopid question, but why do pros need endurance geometry for cobbles? That is, why aren't there standard racing geometry bikes with forks/seatstays able to take wider tires (plus whatever new-fangled shock-absorbing doodad they're installing these days)?
#34
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 201
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
2 Posts
I use my carbon fiber endurance bike (Specialized S-Works) for commuting, and my best solution has been to use a seat mounted (not seatpost) Arkel 15 Liter Bikepack. I have sufficient room to carry just about everything I need. I might add a lightweight backpack for bulky, but light items.
#35
Senior Member
This is probably a stoopid question, but why do pros need endurance geometry for cobbles? That is, why aren't there standard racing geometry bikes with forks/seatstays able to take wider tires (plus whatever new-fangled shock-absorbing doodad they're installing these days)?
#36
Kamen Rider
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: KL, MY
Posts: 1,071
Bikes: Fuji Transonic Elite, Marechal Soul Ultimate, Dahon Dash Altena
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 351 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
164 Posts
I think the term "endurance" fits into a broad range. There are race bike manufacturers who make "racing" bikes and use that term to distinguish it from one of three "racing" groups: aero, endurance, climbing, whereas other non-racing bike brands/models may use the term more for what a lot of people expect in their view of endurance bikes: long distance comfortable or light touring bikes that more likely will provide rack mounts and all that stuff.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,680
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 776 Times
in
402 Posts
The bikes also have longer chainstays that lend to better stability along with the extra tire clearance. On most companies endurance frames we are only talking about a 1cm difference in headtube height or .5cm difference in top tube length. It's not like they are riding around bolt upright like the postman.
Last edited by downhillmaster; 08-03-18 at 04:50 AM. Reason: Typo
#39
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
Endurance bikes are single day, touring bikes are multi-day without returning to your starting point.
Best way I can think about it.
You'd want an endurance bike for a 100 mi fondo if you don't ride 500mi a week like a pro does. But, you wouldn't need racks for a fondo.
But, you'd need racks if you commute or are touring.
Best way I can think about it.
You'd want an endurance bike for a 100 mi fondo if you don't ride 500mi a week like a pro does. But, you wouldn't need racks for a fondo.
But, you'd need racks if you commute or are touring.
#40
Senior Member
Just get the right tool for the job? Almost all my bikes are mt bikes, except for the cross check. Gravel, endurance, cross, adventure etc. Yes I realize there are small differences in those, but mostly just marketing. My most recent " ride" involved 260 some miles on the Karate Monkey, fully loaded. Pave, gravel, dirt, washed out roads and singletrack, check. And 3' overgrown grassy trails too. Plus 29er tires all good. Big fan of options for changing the bike to suit my needs for that week or trip.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 540
Bikes: Novarra Randonee 2016, Trek Verve 2 2015
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
My REI Novara Randonee has both fender and rack eyelets. Most would categorize it as a touring bike, but the geometry (and the name) says 'endurance'...
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,931 Times
in
2,556 Posts
Why do so few "endurance" bikes have rack mounts?
The answer is really simple. If you could bring along comforts, there would be less to endure.And a little more serious and on the subject of true endurance events, if you want to know of one of mankind's greatest endurance feats, read the book of that name, "Endurance". It is the story of the epic journey of Ernest Shackleton and his crew. Or watch the excellent documentary film of the same name. (Sadly though, knowing that story will put endurance bikes into true perspective, They are playthings.
Ben
#44
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10964 Post(s)
Liked 7,491 Times
in
4,189 Posts
REI calls it a touring bike. The geometry follows whats considered a touring bike. The drivetrain screams touring bike.
its pretty much as classic a touring bike as it gets.
of course bikes can play double duty and be a touring bike while also being ok for endurance rides.
#45
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Even my racks have rack mounts.
#46
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 56 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times
in
12 Posts
This just makes no sense to me at all, sorry. You are comparing a feature that you don't have to use, that is barely visible, and that has no impact whatsoever to how your bike rides and performs to major geometry changes that obviously have a substantial impact on how your bike rides and performs. Apples and oranges.
#47
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
This is probably a stoopid question, but why do pros need endurance geometry for cobbles? That is, why aren't there standard racing geometry bikes with forks/seatstays able to take wider tires (plus whatever new-fangled shock-absorbing doodad they're installing these days)?
Even in that "endurance" setup shown, your average B and many A group riders wouldn't be able to ride those for more than an hour.
To answer the question posed.......they do. The 3T takes 28's. The current versions of all the aero bikes take 25's, to my knowledge anyway.
#48
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,525
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4357 Post(s)
Liked 3,994 Times
in
2,665 Posts
This just makes no sense to me at all, sorry. You are comparing a feature that you don't have to use, that is barely visible, and that has no impact whatsoever to how your bike rides and performs to major geometry changes that obviously have a substantial impact on how your bike rides and performs. Apples and oranges.
My road bike is not a fruit salad but that one perfect peach of summer that needs nothing more or less and is best on its own.
#49
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've ridden a Carbon bike for years with a rear rack attached to a longer than standard skewer. It works but it's inconvenient. I think frames should have proper mountings.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,491
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7652 Post(s)
Liked 3,478 Times
in
1,836 Posts
Can we be honest and admit it is an alien conspiracy? We should have wiped them all out after they landed at Roswell. Now that they have taken over all the major bike companies they will be changing our culture into theirs, one step at a time. And we let it happen.