Grant Petersen Has Lost It
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Grant Petersen Has Lost It
Even when I disagree with Grant Petersen (and I tend to agree with him more often than not), his opinions are typically interesting, well thought through, and often amusing. His opinions are often well-informed also, which is why his recent anti e-bike rant is so disappointing and confusing. He clearly has not ridden an e-bike and seems bent on never doing so. Moreover, he's clearly strongly inclined to discourage others from riding e-bikes, or at least on changing existing legislation so that e-bikes would be re-classified as mopeds or motorcycles.
The blog piece is littered with endless contradictions, half truths, obscurantism and uninformed opinion passed off as fact. Be forewarned; this is Grant Petersen at near rock bottom. I'm going to give him a pass on this one. I tend to believe he was drunk or otherwise compromised when he wrote this piece. Sad that he didn't actually edit, re-write or simply delete this awful piece once he came to:
https://www.rivbike.com/blogs/peekin...-knothole/reno
TL, DR:
1. GP says he attended Interbike in order to open new accounts, but money isn't really important to him.
2. The declining popularity of Interbike means the industry is in peril ("oh no, support your local ripoff I mean bike shop!")
3. The Big Three (T, S, G) are baddies for not attending Interbike, but no big deal, Interbike was awesome anyway, except when it wasn't
4. helmets are cool (if you like them) but they suck otherwise
5. no one pedals an e-bike, the motors automatically "take over" kinda like sky net
6. bikes won't displace cars (DUH!)
7. Japanese components are awesome
8. Interbike is so small now he mentions and photographs two people at random for no reason whatsoever.
9. Cycling gear is dorky. A hard seam up your wazoo is a MUST!
10. Racing and competition are stupid. Buy a Rivendell and you'll go slower. A lot slower.
11. Anagrams are cool because, LSD
The blog piece is littered with endless contradictions, half truths, obscurantism and uninformed opinion passed off as fact. Be forewarned; this is Grant Petersen at near rock bottom. I'm going to give him a pass on this one. I tend to believe he was drunk or otherwise compromised when he wrote this piece. Sad that he didn't actually edit, re-write or simply delete this awful piece once he came to:
https://www.rivbike.com/blogs/peekin...-knothole/reno
TL, DR:
1. GP says he attended Interbike in order to open new accounts, but money isn't really important to him.
2. The declining popularity of Interbike means the industry is in peril ("oh no, support your local ripoff I mean bike shop!")
3. The Big Three (T, S, G) are baddies for not attending Interbike, but no big deal, Interbike was awesome anyway, except when it wasn't
4. helmets are cool (if you like them) but they suck otherwise
5. no one pedals an e-bike, the motors automatically "take over" kinda like sky net
6. bikes won't displace cars (DUH!)
7. Japanese components are awesome
8. Interbike is so small now he mentions and photographs two people at random for no reason whatsoever.
9. Cycling gear is dorky. A hard seam up your wazoo is a MUST!
10. Racing and competition are stupid. Buy a Rivendell and you'll go slower. A lot slower.
11. Anagrams are cool because, LSD
Last edited by radroad; 11-29-18 at 03:26 PM.
Likes For radroad:
#3
Senior Member
Certainly Rivendell's frames represent "product development". Note that they have many new frames and haven't just been making the Atlantis for 20 years. Also, he has his own "Silver" line of components. They design the "Sackville" bags. Nitto makes them numerous custom racks, stems and bars to their designs. They collaborate with Panaracer on tires under the "Jack Brown" label. Etc. Also, let's not forget that Peterson designed all of Bridgestone's classic 80's lineup. The XO, to take one example, had most of the ideas of modern gravel bikes in place thirty years ago. There's an entire cottage industry of modern brands like Crust, Surly/Salsa/All City or Jones that are heavily inspired by Peterson's work. The Rivendell aesthetic is central to Bicycle Quarterly, The Radavist and any number of PNW or California-style bike shops like Golden Saddle. You might not like his work, but Peterson has done and continues to do tons of product development and I would say he's more influential than ever right now.
Last edited by Hiro11; 11-29-18 at 04:37 PM.
#4
Banned
Lots of Velo Orange components are polished versions of parts ,
shipped to other outlets selling black ones..
shipped to other outlets selling black ones..
#5
Senior Member
Peterson is simply stating that ebikes should be categorized as mopeds as they have a motor, just like gasoline powered mopeds do. Motor+pedals= Moped. I don't think he is nuts at all. I'd say he is likely ahead of the curve, again.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 761
Bikes: 1969 Peugeot PX10, 1992 Della Santa, Linus Roadster 8, Biria 700C ST-8
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 511 Times
in
325 Posts
I liked that article. I’d much rather think about something different than read someone’s slavish devotion to whatever is fashionable. But then I’m still trying to figure out what a 29er is and why I should have a huge cluster of gears on my back wheel. And why those three companies should control most of the bicycle production, especially since they all make basically the same thing.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,135
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1583 Post(s)
Liked 1,212 Times
in
614 Posts
I do not understand why threads on these motor vehicles have been started here in General Cycling Discussion. There is an "E-bike" sub-forum on BF. That is where this thread belongs.
"E-bikes", whether the motor is activated by spinning some pedals or by twisting a throttle, are not bicycles, and riding on them is not 'cycling'. I disagree with many of Mr. Peterson's views, but on this point he is quite right.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Richmond VA area
Posts: 2,618
Bikes: '00 Koga Miyata Full Pro Oval Road bike.
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 475 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
I agree. I don't need to ride an e-bike to know I don't like what they represent - another way for already overweight and out of shape people to skirt any kind of exercise. I'm all for e-bikes being classified as mopeds, which is essentially what they are.
#10
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 6,001
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1957 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times
in
1,682 Posts
Seemed a perfectly reasonable post to me.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
GP also derided suspension and later disc brakes as "motorcycle" gear with no place on bicycles. That means 100% of mtb's are not mtb's. They must be motorcycles as well.
Not to mention just about every single road bike above $1K has disc brakes. That means 100% of road bikes above $1K are not bicycles either.
Not to mention Trek and Specialized have multiple lines of bicycles with front or dual suspension. So Trek and Specialized are no longer bicycle manufacturers.
Trigger shifters and electronic shifting don't belong on bicycles either: any two wheeled vehicle with Di2 or ETAP are no longer bicycles by definition.
Not to mention just about every single road bike above $1K has disc brakes. That means 100% of road bikes above $1K are not bicycles either.
Not to mention Trek and Specialized have multiple lines of bicycles with front or dual suspension. So Trek and Specialized are no longer bicycle manufacturers.
Trigger shifters and electronic shifting don't belong on bicycles either: any two wheeled vehicle with Di2 or ETAP are no longer bicycles by definition.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Actually, it's the other way around. You will burn at least twice as many calories on a non motorized bicycle. This means you will have to:
a. eat a lot more food and drink a lot more water. This means that a lot more trucks, ships and planes have to transport a lot more food and water since you are burning far more calories
b. burn more coal for your electricity since you will need to wash twice as many clothes or wash the same clothes twice as often.
In actuality then, ebikes save electricity by reducing food production and transport and save on pollution from washing and drying machines.
a. eat a lot more food and drink a lot more water. This means that a lot more trucks, ships and planes have to transport a lot more food and water since you are burning far more calories
b. burn more coal for your electricity since you will need to wash twice as many clothes or wash the same clothes twice as often.
In actuality then, ebikes save electricity by reducing food production and transport and save on pollution from washing and drying machines.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
398 Posts
Actually, it's the other way around. You will burn at least twice as many calories on a non motorized bicycle. This means you will have to:
a. eat a lot more food and drink a lot more water. This means that a lot more trucks, ships and planes have to transport a lot more food and water since you are burning far more calories
b. burn more coal for your electricity since you will need to wash twice as many clothes or wash the same clothes twice as often.
In actuality then, ebikes save electricity by reducing food production and transport and save on pollution from washing and drying machines.
a. eat a lot more food and drink a lot more water. This means that a lot more trucks, ships and planes have to transport a lot more food and water since you are burning far more calories
b. burn more coal for your electricity since you will need to wash twice as many clothes or wash the same clothes twice as often.
In actuality then, ebikes save electricity by reducing food production and transport and save on pollution from washing and drying machines.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Also, you own and ride a carbon disc bicycle. But it's not really a bicycle. Disc brakes belong on cars and motorcycles, therefore you are no longer riding a bike. Not to mention carbon is bad for your health since it splinters and impales riders. All of this is true because Grant Petersen says so.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
Uhh... I think you have really misrepresented GP in your synopsis. His blog post was quite even keeled IMO.
Here's a good example. You paraphrase Grant as writing:
What he actually wrote:
That's Will in his favorite helmet. He "sometimes" doesn't wear one, but he likes the look of this, and if you know Will you understand why. He is the Pro-tec helmet model perfectified.
Just one example of many. Once you do that your rant loses credibility
Here's a good example. You paraphrase Grant as writing:
What he actually wrote:
That's Will in his favorite helmet. He "sometimes" doesn't wear one, but he likes the look of this, and if you know Will you understand why. He is the Pro-tec helmet model perfectified.
Just one example of many. Once you do that your rant loses credibility
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,173
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
398 Posts
Also, you own and ride a carbon disc bicycle. But it's not really a bicycle. Disc brakes belong on cars and motorcycles, therefore you are no longer riding a bike. Not to mention carbon is bad for your health since it splinters and impales riders. All of this is true because Grant Petersen says so.
#18
Senior Member
Actually, it's the other way around. You will burn at least twice as many calories on a non motorized bicycle. This means you will have to:
a. eat a lot more food and drink a lot more water. This means that a lot more trucks, ships and planes have to transport a lot more food and water since you are burning far more calories
b. burn more coal for your electricity since you will need to wash twice as many clothes or wash the same clothes twice as often.
In actuality then, ebikes save electricity by reducing food production and transport and save on pollution from washing and drying machines.
a. eat a lot more food and drink a lot more water. This means that a lot more trucks, ships and planes have to transport a lot more food and water since you are burning far more calories
b. burn more coal for your electricity since you will need to wash twice as many clothes or wash the same clothes twice as often.
In actuality then, ebikes save electricity by reducing food production and transport and save on pollution from washing and drying machines.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,249
Bikes: 1964 Legnano Roma Olympiade, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Peugeot PR10, 2002 Specialized Allez, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2013 Culprit Croz Blade
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 818 Times
in
421 Posts
I love my vintage steel bikes, and my carbon bikes. I even love my disc brakes and Di2. I've never been tempted to try an E-bike. I'm 69 years old, and take pride in BEING the motor. I know this thread is not really an E-bike or not thread, but in analyzing the OP's posted article, I'm on board with the E-bike as not a being real bike argument. I'm good with modern advances, as long as YOU are the motor. I've always found Rivendell a little quirky (OK, a lot quirky), but totally refreshing attitude. Several years ago, having completed a Solvang Century, I was watching other riders finish, to applause from the crowd. A guy came in on an Iacocca e-bike (remember them?) and he got booed. I almost felt sorry for him, but not that much.
Now, get off my lawn with your E-bike! 😉
Now, get off my lawn with your E-bike! 😉
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Alabama
Posts: 519
Bikes: Konas: Jake the Snake-Fire Mountain-Zing Supreme, Dew Deluxe,Zone Ltd. (frame, needs parts), Surly Long Haul Trucker, Santana Arriva tandem, Montagues: Paratrooper-Fit, Trek 1200, Bianchi Ocelot, Fantom Cross Uno, Bridgestone 200
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 108 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
122 Posts
While I'm not pursuing the ebike route, I can see where a lot of folks can use them to get out and ride when they otherwise would not have.
I'm NOT a fan of letting slavering, moronic bureaucrats and politicians dictate what I can put between my legs, or make me beg permission to do so.
The current power/speed limits listed for the U.S. could (being something of a devil's advocate just for the sake of this topic) be a boundary for non-licensed
bikes and "electric mopeds", and even carry the caveat that they be pedelecs requiring the rider to pedal for the motor to do anything.
Heck... I've always kinda thought it would be a neat way for cars to work. They'd still be powered, but the speed would be controlled by your pedaling.
As stated in this post, I don't have a dog in the fight otherwise, just tossing an idea out there. Of course, if an idea makes any real sense, the aforementioned pols and burs
will probably shy away and plug their ears.
I'm NOT a fan of letting slavering, moronic bureaucrats and politicians dictate what I can put between my legs, or make me beg permission to do so.
The current power/speed limits listed for the U.S. could (being something of a devil's advocate just for the sake of this topic) be a boundary for non-licensed
bikes and "electric mopeds", and even carry the caveat that they be pedelecs requiring the rider to pedal for the motor to do anything.
Heck... I've always kinda thought it would be a neat way for cars to work. They'd still be powered, but the speed would be controlled by your pedaling.
As stated in this post, I don't have a dog in the fight otherwise, just tossing an idea out there. Of course, if an idea makes any real sense, the aforementioned pols and burs
will probably shy away and plug their ears.
#22
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,674
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11033 Post(s)
Liked 7,579 Times
in
4,227 Posts
GP also derided suspension and later disc brakes as "motorcycle" gear with no place on bicycles. That means 100% of mtb's are not mtb's. They must be motorcycles as well.
Not to mention just about every single road bike above $1K has disc brakes. That means 100% of road bikes above $1K are not bicycles either.
Not to mention Trek and Specialized have multiple lines of bicycles with front or dual suspension. So Trek and Specialized are no longer bicycle manufacturers.
Trigger shifters and electronic shifting don't belong on bicycles either: any two wheeled vehicle with Di2 or ETAP are no longer bicycles by definition.
Not to mention just about every single road bike above $1K has disc brakes. That means 100% of road bikes above $1K are not bicycles either.
Not to mention Trek and Specialized have multiple lines of bicycles with front or dual suspension. So Trek and Specialized are no longer bicycle manufacturers.
Trigger shifters and electronic shifting don't belong on bicycles either: any two wheeled vehicle with Di2 or ETAP are no longer bicycles by definition.
some impressive jumps to conclusions in your post.
#23
Junior Member
GP is a man of strong opinions. He's not advocating violence against anyone for their choices, just stating his thoughts. No one else has to support nor agree with GP's thoughts if they think differently.
I'm beginning to think e-bikes were invented to give cyclists something to argue about :-) I own an e-bike but don't ride it much and it's just an expensive toy that I don't ride because it makes me lazy. However, if e-bikes allow less-able people to get out on bikes and, as long as they actually have to pedal to make them go, then they aren't completely evil.
I'm beginning to think e-bikes were invented to give cyclists something to argue about :-) I own an e-bike but don't ride it much and it's just an expensive toy that I don't ride because it makes me lazy. However, if e-bikes allow less-able people to get out on bikes and, as long as they actually have to pedal to make them go, then they aren't completely evil.
#24
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,634
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaña pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 881 Post(s)
Liked 733 Times
in
404 Posts
The only qualitative difference between a bicycle and a motorcycle is that one is propelled by its rider and the other by a motor. So for me e-bikes are motorcycles.
#25
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,215
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2764 Post(s)
Liked 2,539 Times
in
1,434 Posts
I just read the blog post and It all seems pretty par for the GP course. I don’t think your characterization of him is very fair.
Yes, he has string opinions and he is very clear about where he stands, what he likes, and what he sells, but I generally don’t find he condemns other for not feeling the same.
I don’t think he is particularly anti-ebike, either. He is just expressing the opinion (which I agree with) that they are are motorized, and therefor not really bicycles.
I don’t agree with some of GP’s views (I love disc, and if I never see another threaded quill stem again it will be too soon), but I always get a lot out of reading what he has to say. I think his appoach to bikes and riding is something that was sorely missing in the industry for a long time.
Yes, he has string opinions and he is very clear about where he stands, what he likes, and what he sells, but I generally don’t find he condemns other for not feeling the same.
I don’t think he is particularly anti-ebike, either. He is just expressing the opinion (which I agree with) that they are are motorized, and therefor not really bicycles.
I don’t agree with some of GP’s views (I love disc, and if I never see another threaded quill stem again it will be too soon), but I always get a lot out of reading what he has to say. I think his appoach to bikes and riding is something that was sorely missing in the industry for a long time.