Saddle question
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 898
Likes: 337
From: Saulkrasti, Latvia
Bikes: Focus Crater Lake
I'm not sure if it's really true. In any case, the sit bones are the points that carry most of the weight that rests on the saddle, and their width is fixed anyway. In my experience, wider saddles can be comfier for shorter rides, especially if your bum hasn't gotten used to long hours in the saddle. But on longer and faster rides a wider saddle can attribute to excess rubbing and chaffing in the groin area.
#3
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
I'm not sure if it's really true. In any case, the sit bones are the points that carry most of the weight that rests on the saddle, and their width is fixed anyway. In my experience, wider saddles can be comfier for shorter rides, especially if your bum hasn't gotten used to long hours in the saddle. But on longer and faster rides a wider saddle can attribute to excess rubbing and chaffing in the groin area.
Not strictly true, the bones that support your weight are curved and set at an angle, so they are closer together at the front. When your pelvis is leaned forward, the contact points are laterally closer together than when it is upright.

google "pelvic bone ischial tuberosity and greater trochanter"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shp4man
Classic & Vintage
66
12-04-15 05:23 PM
wstandis
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
23
04-29-10 09:01 PM






