Beam Rack
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Pella, Iowa
Bikes: 1966 Western Flyer Cosmic Flyer, 1975 Raleigh Record, BSA 10 Speed
Beam Rack
Anyone here using these? I am thinking of buying one because it would be easy to change between my two 10 speed bikes. I would like one that has a removable bag on it, too. I've been looking at Topeak, but they seem expensive......at least to me. What are some other options? I see some that are straight and some that have a bend to them. I would think the bend would be necessary?
#2
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Pella, Iowa
Bikes: 1966 Western Flyer Cosmic Flyer, 1975 Raleigh Record, BSA 10 Speed
It's good to hear this critique. Although, I don't ride hard and I have no carbon post. lol That being said, which is worse or better.....the quick clamp or the style with bolts?
#3
Jedi Master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 501
From: Lake Forest, IL
Bikes: https://stinkston.blogspot.com/p/my-bikes.html
I have a topeak MTX beam rack with the side frames and an MTX trunkbag. They have different models for different types/sizes of bikes, so you may or may not need a bend depending on the size of your bike. It's fine for what it is, but if you're going to be carrying a lot of stuff a touring type rack or even an arkel randonneur rack will be lighter and more stable, and if you are only occasionally going to carry things, a bikepacking saddle bag would be a much lighter and cheaper option. So the use-cases for the beam rack are pretty limited in my experience. I used mine a lot when I first got it, but I don't think I've used it at all in several years.
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Pella, Iowa
Bikes: 1966 Western Flyer Cosmic Flyer, 1975 Raleigh Record, BSA 10 Speed
I have a topeak MTX beam rack with the side frames and an MTX trunkbag. They have different models for different types/sizes of bikes, so you may or may not need a bend depending on the size of your bike. It's fine for what it is, but if you're going to be carrying a lot of stuff a touring type rack or even an arkel randonneur rack will be lighter and more stable, and if you are only occasionally going to carry things, a bikepacking saddle bag would be a much lighter and cheaper option. So the use-cases for the beam rack are pretty limited in my experience. I used mine a lot when I first got it, but I don't think I've used it at all in several years.
#6
Jedi Master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,728
Likes: 501
From: Lake Forest, IL
Bikes: https://stinkston.blogspot.com/p/my-bikes.html
#7
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Pella, Iowa
Bikes: 1966 Western Flyer Cosmic Flyer, 1975 Raleigh Record, BSA 10 Speed
#8
Senior Member


Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,286
Likes: 3,689
From: Mich
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
I like the beam rack as it shields the rear debris from kicking up. The large saddle bags as pictured above may or may not be always affixed to the bicycle, which then you'd either deal with the kick up mess or put a fender on. Having one do both jobs is my preference. YMMV
__________________
-YMMV
-YMMV
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 108
From: Middle of the road, NJ
Most of this is just not true. The only part that is true is about the amount of seatpost toy need for the clamp. And if you don't have enough seatpost exposed, then your frame is probably to big for you
#10
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,480
Likes: 4,560
From: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
regardless of which rack you choose, I like the idea of each bike having their own rack, comparable with a single trunk bag, that can clip into both. that seems really smart *& convenient!




