Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   General Cycling Discussion (https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cycling-discussion/)
-   -   The Need for Basic Bikes (https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cycling-discussion/1226638-need-basic-bikes.html)

downhillmaster 03-27-21 11:12 AM


Originally Posted by BFisher (Post 21987378)
You're obligate cyclists are a small enough percentage of the population to be served entirely by the used market.

Unfortunately, most don't want that option.

Bowing out. Happy riding. :)

This!

cbrstar 03-27-21 03:38 PM

A big fundamental problem here is people don't truly understand poverty. I collect and restore vintage bmx bikes and over the years I get modern ones that I like to donate to kids in need. When I see the kids a month or two later a) The bike is stripped of all the good parts b) The bike was "Stolen" aka sold. I made up my mind to not let this bother me and if the cash helps the kid it's all good.

You can make the best quality bike in the world but if is too cheap then it won't be cared for properly. It will be stolen, sold or what ever. It's the attitude of the people that makes the bike "Unreliable". When people have to work hard and the bike is not easily replaceable people start taking better care of it. Locking it up etc.

$200 Walmart bikes get trashed quickly from misuse and not always from wear and tear.

Dominae 03-27-21 03:52 PM


Originally Posted by livedarklions (Post 21987127)
Uhh, no. Actually no one here cares what you want to do with your time. But the whole point is to enable people to obtain decent, well-assembled bikes at Walmart-like prices. This would actually compete with Walmart. How would that enable Walmart to sell more?

I've owned a couple of Walmart bikes over the past couple decades. My observation is the ones I had were so poorly manufactured as to be maintenance proof.

A distinction without a difference. So some other for profit company is going to be selling these bikes for profit and I am expected to provide the free labor necessary to make the company profitable.

Koyote 03-27-21 04:24 PM


Originally Posted by cbrstar (Post 21987849)
A big fundamental problem here is people don't truly understand poverty economics.

fify.

livedarklions 03-27-21 04:46 PM


Originally Posted by Dominae (Post 21987879)
A distinction without a difference. So some other for profit company is going to be selling these bikes for profit and I am expected to provide the free labor necessary to make the company profitable.


Literally no one expects you to do a damn thing.

UniChris 03-27-21 11:27 PM


Originally Posted by Dominae (Post 21987879)
A distinction without a difference. So some other for profit company is going to be selling these bikes for profit and I am expected to provide the free labor necessary to make the company profitable.

No, you're not. Nor is anyone else.

This is the hole you dig for yourself when you pretend someone said something other than what they actually said.

UniChris 03-27-21 11:31 PM


Originally Posted by cbrstar (Post 21987849)
I collect and restore vintage bmx bikes and over the years I get modern ones that I like to donate to kids in need. When I see the kids a month or two later a) The bike is stripped of all the good parts b) The bike was "Stolen" aka sold. I made up my mind to not let this bother me and if the cash helps the kid it's all good.

Your target audience doesn't actually need a bike (if they did, you'd be handing out something more practical than a BMX...)


You can make the best quality bike in the world but if is too cheap then it won't be cared for properly. It will be stolen, sold or what ever.
Those who need their bikes for transport don't sell them. As for stolen, if the employer doesn't offer a secure place to lock it up, that is indeed a risk - its all but impossible to sufficiently secure one.

Theft is enough of an issue that a basic transport bike had better not be worth all that much, if it were it would be too valuable to use for no-indoor-parking commuting and utility.


$200 Walmart bikes get trashed quickly from misuse and not always from wear and tear.
Um... they come pre-trashed - that's the problem I'm focusing on.

Doc_Wui 03-27-21 11:58 PM

I remember my Free Spirit as pretty basic, but not very nice bike. Steel rims for exanple and heavy. I got married in 75 and we bought two nice Euro 10 speeds for about $200 each, One was a Raleigh and the other a french make I cannot recall the name, The Sears bike was given away.

bwilli88 03-28-21 01:59 AM


Originally Posted by jack pot (Post 21984403)
... what you want is an AK 47 shaped like a bicycle

I get bikes here in Cambodia that came from Japan in a container, they are anywhere from $40 to $60 and probably would be one of the best bikes that LBS should provide.
Here is one of them.
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...d06b918d8b.jpg
1x7 speed and it just works. Cheap build but it works
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...8a64e93c3d.jpg
Here is one like above I stripped and made into a coaster brake only bike.
Besides most people do not understand the idea of the front shifter therefore the 80s mt bike is not optimum, make it a 1x and get rid of the triple chainring would be simpler and easier to work on.

livedarklions 03-28-21 05:14 AM


Originally Posted by Doc_Wui (Post 21988264)
I remember my Free Spirit as pretty basic, but not very nice bike. Steel rims for exanple and heavy. I got married in 75 and we bought two nice Euro 10 speeds for about $200 each, One was a Raleigh and the other a french make I cannot recall the name, The Sears bike was given away.


Just for perspective, realize that $200 in 1975 is about $978 in 2021 money.

Ramshackle 03-28-21 04:53 PM

I read the post a little differently. It seems to me that the underlying issue is how you build a bike transport culture as opposed to a bike enthusiast culture. That would require cheap but sturdy standardized bikes with interchangeable parts and maybe a 3-5 speed rear derailleur. The problem is that biking in a lot of major cities is dangerous given the roads, speeds and the lack of designated bike lanes. To build a bike transport would require rebuilding the urban infrastructure to make biking safer.

UniChris 03-28-21 06:38 PM


Originally Posted by Ramshackle (Post 21989241)
I read the post a little differently. It seems to me that the underlying issue is how you build a bike transport culture as opposed to a bike enthusiast culture. That would require cheap but sturdy standardized bikes with interchangeable parts and maybe a 3-5 speed rear derailleur.

Yes


The problem is that biking in a lot of major cities is dangerous given the roads, speeds and the lack of designated bike lanes. To build a bike transport would require rebuilding the urban infrastructure to make biking safer.
That is indeed a problem - but despite it, there are already people using bikes for transport
  • Because they enjoy it
  • Because they believe strongly in minimizing the use of motor vehicles
  • Because their financial situation gives them no alternative
Making bike-based transport safer and more popular is indeed important. But the linked article and this thread is focused specifically on the needs of that last group - the people who already see a bike as their only choice, but need to find one suitable without sinking a lot of time into chasing the variations of the used market.

Not that what works there couldn't also be appealing to those who could afford (and may in fact own) a better bike for enjoyment rides, but would prefer to only risk a budget bike where having to lock up outside, winter road salt, etc aspects of commute/utility cycling are concerned.

downhillmaster 03-29-21 04:06 AM


Originally Posted by UniChris (Post 21989374)
Yes



That is indeed a problem - but despite it, there are already people using bikes for transport
  • Because they enjoy it
  • Because they believe strongly in minimizing the use of motor vehicles
  • Because their financial situation gives them no alternative
Making bike-based transport safer and more popular is indeed important. But the linked article and this thread is focused specifically on the needs of that last group - the people who already see a bike as their only choice, but need to find one suitable without sinking a lot of time into chasing the variations of the used market.

Not that what works there couldn't also be appealing to those who could afford (and may in fact own) a better bike for enjoyment rides, but would prefer to only risk a budget bike where having to lock up outside, winter road salt, etc aspects of commute/utility cycling are concerned.

The linked article is contradictive and rambling, and in the end it is nothing more than a co-op advertisement written by a co-op founder, with links to their donation page.

flangehead 03-29-21 04:33 AM

Sladda Fate; Priority?
 
https://medium.com/@helikes.it/updat...-0-42d413ff925


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-sladda-bikes


I have zero experience with either one, but they are real attempts to scratch this itch.

prj71 03-29-21 08:57 AM


Originally Posted by BFisher (Post 21986775)
Solution: It's called the old bicycle. There are millions of them out there and they fit the bill of cheap, reliable, easily maintained transportation. They can often be had for less that $100 (plenty of personal experience there) and are often a few consumable parts away from being just as good or better than new. Most nine-year-olds can be taught to replace a tire or a chain. Here is a good example. This type of bicycle is the most produced vehicle of any kind ever, and it does exactly what it was designed to do.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...1b1132a38a.jpg

Other excellent options include the tons and tons of English three speeds sitting unused across the country, Chicago Schwinns, Free Spirits, etc.
We don't need new bikes. We need to use the ones we already made.

Except nobody wants to ride something that ugly looking.

UniChris 03-29-21 09:33 AM


Originally Posted by prj71 (Post 21990085)
Except nobody wants to ride something that ugly looking.

Eye of the beholder - that's a nice looking bike for a few miles around town.

sloppy12 03-29-21 09:47 AM


Originally Posted by prj71 (Post 21990085)
Except nobody wants to ride something that ugly looking.

Yeah at least color match the frame pump. jeez lol

UniChris 03-29-21 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by flangehead (Post 21989747)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-sladda-bikes

I have zero experience with either one, but they are real attempts to scratch this itch.

Somewhat... Ikea trying something sounds like the right kind of idea. However, at a reported $499 and very basic capability, it's not really a viable price for an economic need, as opposed to a desire.

And then there's what actually killed it, which was doing something quirky. Belt drives are not of course unknown, and seem viable in concept and other's execution, but whatever they went with broke too many times and lead to a recalling all the bikes and abandoning the idea.

One of the lessons there is probably "be boringly ordinary" - any contemplated "innovation" needs to have a fallback alternative of long proven, widely understood technology. Also, pilot before going large. And then beware of component substitutions, since part of going large is finding the cheapest suitable volume source for each part, rather than the off-the-shelf ones likely used in a pilot.

(Ikea also tends to locate their huge stores in areas that are very time consuming to get to without a car...)

spelger 03-29-21 10:01 AM


Originally Posted by prj71 (Post 21990085)
Except nobody wants to ride something that ugly looking.

Funny, i was thinking "work of art."

jack pot 03-29-21 11:15 AM

the rise of the utilitarians has been foreshadowed.................................1 rear cog, coaster brake?, heavy tire, 100 years to rust thru

CoachPerry19 03-29-21 11:50 AM

Bike Inequality?
 
If you take some time to read the article you get with the inevitable dribble like - "it's time for the activists to up their game and end this horrible oppression" - like somebody got up this morning and planned to place somebody else at a disadvantage? I live in the Connecticut RIver Valley as it runs between NH and VT and within a 30 minute drive I can go to five agencies and co-ops that will give anybody a refurbished bike for free. So the question of a gap that just HAS to be closed is rubbish. The author runs a bike-coop and guess what he wants funding for...? Decent bikes are available to most who want one. As a retired mechanic I spend all winter working on a new batch of used bikes and sell them all for the price of the parts come Spring.

Could always try to get a bike the old fashioned way? Save your money and buy one.

BadGrandma 03-29-21 11:52 AM


Originally Posted by HerrKaLeun (Post 21983802)
How much did a bike cost in 1920? Probably a worker's monthly wages or more and that was a heavy single speed bike. For a monthly wage, even at minimum wage, you can buy a decent commuter bike nowadays.

People say they want a simple bike, then buy the colorful full suspension bike at Walmart. Walmart sells exactly what people actually buy. If people buy a decent rigid commuter bike for $500, Walmart would sell it. But people only talk about buying a decent bike, then end up with the cheap one.

The terrible truth is, to buy a decent bike people would have to give up smoking, drinking, drugs and Starbucks. And that actually tells us people's priorities.

It is not different with cars. Many years ago I worked at Starbucks. People came every day to buy a $5 coffee. But didn't have money to fix their driver side mirror that had fallen off. 1 month brewing coffee at home would have paid for a life saving safety feature. Priorities....

If you're smoking, drinking, buying Starbucks and drugs, you're middle class, at least.

oddjob2 03-29-21 11:55 AM

NFPs and Locally Built
 
You can't send those without transportation to a big box store, because they don't have transportation.
Not for profits fulfill the roll of refurbishing bikes and teaching people about bikes in Detroit and other cities. They must give away the department store bikes after they teach young people. But of course the Hub hasn't been open since Covid struck except for a garage sale this weekend. I assume a few still get paychecks and insurance, but don't need to work. Additionally, I don't understand the prices for the refurb and sell model. I am baffled that they charge $300 and up for a 3 speed, and everything else is more, often more than 50% I charge for a well worn refurbished bike. Then there is the Madison WI NFP that asks $1000 for a steel TREK MTB on ebay. Go figure, cause I can't.

https://thehubofdetroit.org/back-alley-bikes/

I prefer this concept more and always find 5-6 bikes for them annually.
http://fb4kdetroit.org

As far as local manufacturing, see below.
Locally built - moderate pricing
https://detroitbikes.com

Locally built - not so moderate pricing
https://detroitbikes.com

GM just abandoned it's electric bike venture after only a year in this mobility space.

UniChris 03-29-21 11:59 AM


Originally Posted by CoachPerry19 (Post 21990394)
If you take some time to read the article you get with the inevitable dribble

Indeed, it wouldn't be streetsblog without a large helping of such - this article seemed to have relatively few leaps of illogic compared to their usual.


I live in the Connecticut RIver Valley as it runs between NH and VT and within a 30 minute drive I can go to five agencies and co-ops that will give anybody a refurbished bike for free.
Not that far south of you and the used market seems to be slim pickings, a fact that's comes up frequently in local forums. That said, the article was actually talking about NYC in particular.


So the question of a gap that just HAS to be closed is rubbish. The author runs a bike-coop and guess what he wants funding for...?
Bike co-ops are part of the solution - as you pointed out above yourself - but I don't see that being pushed as the only solution. A bit part of it was pointing out how the current offerings of the bike box stores are part of the problem, rather than a solution.


Could always try to get a bike the old fashioned way? Save your money and buy one.
Saving is indeed "old fashioned" in today's culture - and even in income tiers where it shouldn't be. I hesitate to be too critical of low wage (and in more than a few cases, under the table wage) people not managing to do what plenty of folks with salaried jobs, houses, and multiple cars aren't managing to do either.

There's a huge gap between having the funds available to do something but deciding you can't afford to, to not having the funds and having no way to do it, to not having the funds and going ahead and doing it with ready consumer credit - I suspect we're getting to the point where many individuals live their whole lives in one of those categories with little more than a dim awareness that the other categories even exist.

bongobike 03-29-21 12:53 PM


Originally Posted by UniChris (Post 21982629)
Streetsblog surprised me today by having an article which highlights a real issue without bending it all out of shape: How the ‘Budget-Bike Trap’ Creates Inequality

To some extent, this is a rant against department store bike-shaped-objects, but it's also a recognition of the lack of affordable alternatives, and as such, it's food for thought.

There should exist a budget bike built for utility, not bogus marketing features. No shocks, perhaps not single speed but maybe only a rear derailleur. Probably rim brakes for simplicity and easy of maintenance. Standard size interchangeable components. It probably already even exists in the developing world, it's just not what is imagined to appeal to, and shipped for sale to, throwaway culture consumers.

And the big box stores should carry it. It might not look fancy on the floor, but word would get around that it was a good choice - maybe not for the child gift market, but at least for the adult utility one.

Assembly should be local - sure, import containers of components, but putting them together in an organized fashion locally would make sense, and from pallets of like parts, not individually boxed "kits" mis-assembled by someone isolated in the back room of the store for a few bucks per "bike" as these stores currently do. Think what the bike coops do, but feed them with sound components rather than be rescuing basket cases. Would make a good jobs program.

There should be a camp where you build your own - there's a huge market for both adult "experiences" and summer programs to fill kids time, and nothing creates self-reliant ownership like knowing how all the parts went together. And while the prebuild has machine assembled wheels, for the camp on day one you're handed the front rim, hub and spokes and walk through lacing it as group, day two you do the dished rear...

In my town, San Antonio, we have the Earn a Bike Project where people, mostly young, volunteer to help clean up the place and learn how to build bikes. A lot of bike owners me included, donate parts. In my case some vintage parts. Same thing goes in Austin, Texas with the yellow bike project


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.