Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Mixte frame sizing

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Mixte frame sizing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-21 | 12:15 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Full Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 421
Likes: 331
From: Portland
Mixte frame sizing

I’ve searched and read quite a few postings and various websites and it would seem that on a mixte the effective top tube length is the determining factor on sizing for a frame.

Over the weekend I picked up a built Buena Vista with a 42cm frame with 650b wheels. My girlfriend is 5’7” with a slightly longer torso than legs. I would assume 50cm, possible a 54cm would fit her better, but the differences are so small I’m not sure how much it would matter. There is more seat post in the tube than showing, and the stem is 90mm. I’m 5’10” and my bike is 56/56cm and I find her new bike comfortable.

She tried out a 50cm Rivendell Cheviot and an 18” 1985 Bridgestone 300 mixte. Including the Soma, all three feel the same size wise while riding, at least to me.

It would seem a mixte frame allows for a greater range of rider specs than a standard diamond frame.

Yes, no? Mixte frame sizing is new to me.
Lbxpdx is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-21 | 05:19 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 85
Likes: 4
Virtual top tube length gets you in the ballpark. I have a Buena Vista in 58 and am 5’ 9” with swept back Albatross bars and a long stem and it fits great for me. Are you using drop bars on you girl friends bike? Drop bars will work a lot better on the small frame for her height based on the geometry you posted. It seems she (and you) would be cramped on the small frame and bars that are flat or come back. Any pictures of the bike? As always, fit is individual and where you ride, how far you ride, how fast, etc. all factor in.
Tom Palmer



Originally Posted by Lbxpdx
I’ve searched and read quite a few postings and various websites and it would seem that on a mixte the effective top tube length is the determining factor on sizing for a frame.

Over the weekend I picked up a built Buena Vista with a 42cm frame with 650b wheels. My girlfriend is 5’7” with a slightly longer torso than legs. I would assume 50cm, possible a 54cm would fit her better, but the differences are so small I’m not sure how much it would matter. There is more seat post in the tube than showing, and the stem is 90mm. I’m 5’10” and my bike is 56/56cm and I find her new bike comfortable.

She tried out a 50cm Rivendell Cheviot and an 18” 1985 Bridgestone 300 mixte. Including the Soma, all three feel the same size wise while riding, at least to me.

It would seem a mixte frame allows for a greater range of rider specs than a standard diamond frame.

Yes, no? Mixte frame sizing is new to me.
TomPalmer is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-21 | 05:49 AM
  #3  
blakcloud's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 421
The bike frame is too small.

Just because someone can straddle a bike and pedal it, doesn't mean it fits.

They make different sizes for a reason. If she was going to use Albatross bars as TomPalmer points out above, then the 54 cm. Drop bar or something with less pull back then maybe the 50 and I am hesitant on that one.

She is 7" taller than the person that bike was designed for. You wouldn't buy a bike for yourself that was designed for someone who was 5' 3" would you?

I have always liked the look of that frame and think it makes for a great bike, just buy the right size.
blakcloud is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-21 | 10:00 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Full Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 421
Likes: 331
From: Portland


The seat height is set up for her. There is no toe overlap and her knee is above the center of the pedal.

Looking at the chart, I realized that the bottom bracket drop is 30mm less on the 42cm than the other sizes. I’m not schooled in bike geometry, but this bike feels better, less cramped, than a 50cm Cheviot with Albatross bars or an 18” Bridgestone mixte.


There is a shop local that has a 54 frame built up that I’m going to have the GF try out and see if she likes that size better. If we need to order a larger frame, that’ll be fine. I’ll just swap the parts over and sell the smaller frame.

She doesn’t do long rides yet, just short rides with me and my son to grab burritos downtown.

Last edited by Lbxpdx; 04-27-21 at 10:10 AM.
Lbxpdx is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-21 | 12:35 PM
  #5  
blakcloud's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 421
The photo just reaffirms my thoughts on this bike. As beautiful as it is, the spacers under the stem alone tells me that this isn't the correct size. The length of the seat post also is a good indicator it just isn't right.

That frame size was designed for 26" wheels so that is why the brake pads are at top the slots with your 650b wheels. If she has been riding this one and gets on the 54 she is going to feel like the bike is a monster bike but in time she will get use to it. My wife who is 5' 3" rides a 50 cm 650b Rivendell Betty Foy, though with Albatross bars.

My buddy is building up the Soma bike for his girlfriend and is using the 650 wheel size like you and she isn't 5" tall. He is also going with a 155 crank if I recall correctly.

You have done a nice job with the build, I like the IGH choice, very clean looking. Good luck with everything.
blakcloud is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-21 | 12:54 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Full Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 421
Likes: 331
From: Portland
Originally Posted by blakcloud
You have done a nice job with the build, I like the IGH choice, very clean looking. Good luck with everything.
I didn’t do the build, I bought it this way. A local shop built it up. The original owner is now in her 70’s and unable to ride. Per her son, it sat unused for at least 5 years. She bought it around a decade ago and paid $1200 for it.

with regard to the brakes, they are tektro 559’s. I’m sure the shop knew that the frame was meant for 26” wheels, but felt the 559’s would make the 650’s work. My gut said the bike was too small, but I felt in the long run it would be cheaper to buy this bike, get a larger frame and swap parts if need be. We all know the secondary market for used bikes is goofy. The components are nice and the bike didn’t seem to have been ridden much.

Last edited by Lbxpdx; 04-27-21 at 12:58 PM.
Lbxpdx is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.