Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   General Cycling Discussion (https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cycling-discussion/)
-   -   How learning works (or doesn't) (https://www.bikeforums.net/general-cycling-discussion/1267927-how-learning-works-doesnt.html)

Trakhak 02-26-23 08:16 AM


Originally Posted by Highcad (Post 22812821)
7. Don't be a dick about it.

When I think about this forum, this is my first thought. It's full of snarky a-holes. I belong to other (hobby type) sports forums - and they aren't like this. As I write this, I fully expect a snarky reply.

My (charitable) hypothesis is that most other sports aren't as seasonal as cycling. Cabin fever in cyclists seems to induce inordinate levels of testosterone.

saulgoldie 02-26-23 08:20 AM

On Learning...
 

Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22807179)
We all know BF is full of contrasting opinions and debate, which is what makes it interesting and offers opportunities to learn new things and alternative perspectives. There is a huge knowledge base out there that can be tapped into if only we have an open-mind and are prepared to listen as well as talk. But the whole collective learning experience depends on everyone observing a few general guidelines:-

1. If you are not a recognised expert in a particular subject under debate then it's a good idea to do more listening and less arguing/asserting your own opinion as fact.

2. Be brave enough to admit when you are wrong. It's just a forum, so there's no need to be embarrassed or try to dig yourself out. We are all sometimes wrong and that's when we have an opportunity to learn the most.

3. When you are not 100% sure of something you are about to say then either a) say it with the proviso that you are not sure or b) don't say it at all. Never state your opinion as a fact unless you are 100% sure it is actually a fact.

4. Don't continue to argue a point of fact unless you can actually back it up with some factual evidence from a recognised source of expertise.

5. Don't move the goalposts around in an effort "not to be proven wrong" when you are losing an argument. Everyone can see what you did and you lose respect.

6. When evidence is presented in direct opposition to your own opinion, it is a not a good idea to re-quote that same evidence as if it does actually support your own opposing view. Again everyone sees it and you lose respect. If you do have genuine, credible evidence to the contrary then present that instead.

7. Don't be a dick about it.

Applies to pretty much any topic.

Highcad 02-26-23 08:29 AM


Originally Posted by Trakhak (Post 22812836)
My (charitable) hypothesis is that most other sports aren't as seasonal as cycling. Cabin fever in cyclists seems to induce inordinate levels of testosterone.

When I think of snarky forum members - I think low levels of testosterone. :)

bruce19 02-26-23 08:34 AM

I thought l was wrong about something once. But, then I realized I was wrong.

Lombard 02-26-23 08:43 AM


Originally Posted by Highcad (Post 22812821)
7. Don't be a dick about it.

When I think about this forum, this is my first thought. It's full of snarky a-holes. I belong to other (hobby type) sports forums - and they aren't like this. As I write this, I fully expect a snarky reply.

This seems to be an issue with road cycling forums in general. I belong to a couple of car forums and it is comparatively civil over there. I don't know if it's something about road cyclists or the fact that these cycling forums have a politics subforum where things can get quite heated. I think some of that hostility spills over into the other subforums.

GhostRider62 02-26-23 08:56 AM

It is easy, just try to avoid any screen names with feral animal names, troul or dickcranium type SNs.

genejockey 02-26-23 09:26 AM


Originally Posted by GhostRider62 (Post 22812828)
Some guy named Filippo Ganna uses clinchers to go fast. Imagine if he used tubulars.

My 1972 Masi GC has a very nice set of them along with period correct accouterments. The bike is slow and uncomfortable compared to my aerodynamic carbon fibre bike with disk brakes, Firecrest 303 with 32 mm tubeless and a saddle made by a 3D printer out of plastic. I do still like my Brooks B17 with Ti rails.

Just think how much harder today's pros must be, to constantly set new records on such compromised equipment. Why, if they could only ride one of those funny bikes with the smaller front wheel and about a foot of saddle to bar drop, on box section tubular wheels with 32 spokes, they'd be so much faster! Instead they're forced to ride those heavy, unaerodynamic plastic bikes with heavy plastic wheels that still somehow weigh less than the older bikes.....

PeteHski 02-26-23 10:10 AM


Originally Posted by seypat (Post 22812812)
I took the initial post as a masked way to insult some posters that didn't agree with the OP in some other threads. By starting the thread however, the OP insulted mostly himself. He doesn't have the ability to look in the mirror and evaluate/change the person looking back at him. Thread should never have been started. As usual, OP just looking for an argument. Nothing but a troll thread.

Is your glass always half empty?

Lombard 02-26-23 11:05 AM


Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22812938)
Is your glass always half empty?

The optimist says the glass is half full.

The pessimist says the glass is half empty.

The pragmatist says use a smaller glass.

Maelochs 02-26-23 11:15 AM

B.F. Skinner suggested making glasses tall enough that when filled with the desired amount of fluid, the glass was still half-empty, to minimize the chances of spilling.

tomato coupe 02-26-23 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by Lombard (Post 22812981)
The optimist says the glass is half full.

The pessimist says the glass is half empty.

The pragmatist says use a smaller glass.

8 oz. was enough for Eddie Merckx. Why do we now need 12 oz.?

wolfchild 02-26-23 11:20 AM


Originally Posted by Trakhak (Post 22812836)
Cabin fever in cyclists seems to induce inordinate levels of testosterone.

.....or lack thereof..... Being sedentary instead of performing their favorite activity outdoors can't be all that good for the mind or the body.

genejockey 02-26-23 11:33 AM


Originally Posted by Lombard (Post 22812981)
The optimist says the glass is half full.

The pessimist says the glass is half empty.

The pragmatist says use a smaller glass.

The engineer says the glass was over sped'd for its intended use.

The scientist says it depends on the most recent previous state of the glass.

genejockey 02-26-23 11:35 AM


Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22812938)
Is your glass always half empty?

What if you had a magical glass of beer that never stayed empty, but only refilled to half the available volume?

L134 02-26-23 11:46 AM


Originally Posted by GhostRider62 (Post 22812828)
Some guy named Filippo Ganna uses clinchers to go fast. Imagine if he used tubulars.

Interesting. I've been wondering why he hasn't really been living up to all the hype.

GhostRider62 02-26-23 11:58 AM


Originally Posted by seypat (Post 22812812)
I took the initial post as a masked way to insult some posters that didn't agree with the OP in some other threads. By starting the thread however, the OP insulted mostly himself. He doesn't have the ability to look in the mirror and evaluate/change the person looking back at him. Thread should never have been started. As usual, OP just looking for an argument. Nothing but a troll thread.

Science at some point isn't a popularity poll.

What is the point of your post?

Maybe you need to look in the mirror?

There are a lot of trolls on BF, Pete is not one of them and I disagree with him pretty hard on subjective matters. The relative contribution of wheel MOI isn't really a discussion or something to agree or disagree about.

seypat 02-26-23 12:22 PM


Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22812938)
Is your glass always half empty?

I'm usually a glass have full kind of person, but you have to consider the source. In this instance, the OP, you, decided he needed to start a post on a bike forum, "schooling, mansplaining," whatever you want to call it, the rest of the forum on ways to act in life. In doing so, you projected, whether you wanted to or not, that you are the annointed superior being of knowledge and it's your calling in life to gift your wisdom on the rest of civilization whether they want it or not. I'll admit, I got a big laugh out of it because it's so ridiculous. I guess you got bored because most of the other hotly debated threads had cooled off. You did make me laugh, I'll give you that.

Maelochs 02-26-23 12:25 PM

That is certainly one of the many possible explanations.

seypat 02-26-23 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by GhostRider62 (Post 22813028)
Science at some point isn't a popularity poll.

What is the point of your post?

Maybe you need to look in the mirror?

There are a lot of trolls on BF, Pete is not one of them and I disagree with him pretty hard on subjective matters. The relative contribution of wheel MOI isn't really a discussion or something to agree or disagree about.

He started a thread on a bike forum instructing others how to act in life. That speaks for itself.

Maelochs 02-26-23 12:38 PM

It might ... but again, maybe it says different things to different people.



On a slightly different note: Not sure how you do things ... but for me BF is part of my life .. . I am alive, right now, typing this, and if you respond and I read that ... that will also be part of my life.

elcruxio 02-26-23 12:48 PM

Looking at some of these discussions more or less from the outside there seems to have been two distinct cliques. There's the science folks who look at issues objectively and provide calculations. Then there's the 'feel' folks who.. don't...

disconnecting from earlier beliefs is difficult, but if the math is provided, I don't see how people can so staunchly hold on to their opinions. Or perhaps it's because the math has not been understood? But if I can understand simple stuff like provided in the wheel thread, most people should be able to. I suck at math. Objectively.

And then there's the pony who doesn't contribute and just spews disctracting pseudo babble chocking out every thread it patricipates in. Truly a force of negativity.

wolfchild 02-26-23 12:48 PM


Originally Posted by PeteHski (Post 22812212)
I see the usual trolls have arrived. Like moths to a flame.

They're not trolls, they're just cycling enthusiasts who happen to have a different approach to cycling and have different preferences from yours.

tomato coupe 02-26-23 12:48 PM


Originally Posted by seypat (Post 22813071)
He started a thread on a bike forum instructing others how to act in life. That speaks for itself.

I think it was clearly meant to address how to act on this forum, not life in general.

wolfchild 02-26-23 01:01 PM


Originally Posted by Lombard (Post 22811762)
I really think the issue most of the time is that some people just cannot stand to be proven wrong.

The other issue is personal preferences for bikes, riding style, components, clothing etc etc etc...People are branded as trolls and wrong for having a different preference because that particular preference isn't very popular amongst the majority.

wolfchild 02-26-23 01:04 PM


Originally Posted by tomato coupe (Post 22813095)
I think it was clearly meant to address how to act on this forum, not life in general.

This forum already has guidelines on how to act, post and behave and the MODS are in charge to make sure that posters abide by those guidelines.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.