![]() |
It’s understandable that some people will ask “why” and up to OP to answer or ignore.
I am curious why he wants this too. But his choice if he wants to tell us. |
For example, suppose I posted that I want a freehub body that will work backwards, ie I want to pedal opposite to the “usual” direction. An unusual request is going to trigger lots of us to say “why would you even want that?”
|
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...22895937a4.jpg
So basically this but without the 80mm length. This part is used on recumbents so it's not going to help me. (also, certainly NOT red) [moderator note: removed political content] As for the people who actually answer the question and confirm that 0 reach stems aren't the work of 'teh debbil': I sincerely thank you. PeteHski PDKL45 SkinGriz icemilkcoffee skidder LesterOf Puppets You guys are the best! |
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
(Post 22987694)
I absolutely love the: "We're not going to answer your question so you need a whole new bike" response
|
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...c1969825a.jpeg
This thing has the hands close to in line with the steering axis. Rumor has it that it steers fine. |
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
(Post 22986859)
Pretty damn close.
Still hard to get ahold of. I appreciate a real answer. Unlike the rest of these knucklleheads.... I get that people want to think that because someone didn't validate their bad ideas they must be bad people but I can assure you we aren't. Saying you need a bike that fits isn't trying to be nasty towards you nor is it a political statement or anything like that it is literally telling you something you may not want to hear but you need to hear. Some people actually care about your safety despite your negative thinking that somehow we don't. I also understand an echo chamber can be fun but sometimes you need to hear something else. |
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
(Post 22986820)
I need a zero reach (length?) stem.
It's the one that lets the handlebar sit directly on top of the steering tube. I know there are stems that have an adjustable angle but I don't want an additional moving part and they usually add 65-120mm of height and I don't need that. I've tried several searches but I'm probably messing up the terminology. |
Originally Posted by squirtdad
(Post 22987739)
IMHO it is more you really did not fully explain why you need a zero length stem and how you plan on suing it i.e need, design, expectation. opening up the conversation to speculation.
so my speculation is you have a super secret prototype handle bar that is still in stealth development mode that requires that type of stem :D
Originally Posted by datlas
(Post 22987776)
It’s understandable that some people will ask “why” and up to OP to answer or ignore.
I am curious why he wants this too. But his choice if he wants to tell us. |
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...5aaf909f7d.jpg
Oh so close. Made for a kid's bike. Only 2 bolts for the bar and 1 for the clamp, but still close. |
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
(Post 22987795)
...
As for the people who actually answer the question and confirm that 0 reach stems aren't the work of 'teh debbil': I sincerely thank you. PeteHski PDKL45 SkinGriz icemilkcoffee skidder LesterOf Puppets You guys are the best! |
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
(Post 22986820)
I need a zero reach (length?) stem.
It's the one that lets the handlebar sit directly on top of the steering tube. I know there are stems that have an adjustable angle but I don't want an additional moving part and they usually add 65-120mm of height and I don't need that. I've tried several searches but I'm probably messing up the terminology. https://analogcycles.com/collections/stems |
People tend to fixate on bike fit and other things, sometimes ignoring practical considerations like health. Providing yourself with a very upright position on a bike can have enormous benefits if, for example, you have a bad back, prone to slipped and/or herniated discs. In consultation with a chiropractor who is also a cyclist, I was told to get myself as upright as possible. The bent forward position works to alleviate pressure from some backs, but not mine and I was told in no uncertain terms that my bike fit was hurting my back, but that I didn't need to stop bike riding. You often don't need a new bike, or someone freaking out about your bike fit (if they're not your chiropractor), you need to adapt what you have to allow your body to be healthy. I don't know if OP is driven by health concerns, but there is nothing wrong with someone wanting to tinker with their own equipment to suit themselves.
|
|
From this page:
Crupi's I-Beam stems are CNC machined from 6061-T6 billet aluminum and are amongst the lightest stems on the market! The I-Beam features extensive external machining; the stem is visually appealing yet stiff and strong. The CNC-machined and embossed Crupi logo on the faceplate gives this stem its unique look. The Crupi 0mm "No Reach" stem has 0 mm of reach, which means the stem holds the bars directly above the steer tube, making the bike's front-end length shorter. https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/TrsAA...tpM/s-l400.jpg |
Originally Posted by abdon
(Post 22988092)
|
Universal Cycles has some. I'm glad someone mentioned motorcycles, and many "Downhill" MTB's have zero offset stems OEM. Increasingly, with the growing number of 29'er e-bikes, the zero offset stems will be de rigueur because those bikes are so damn big.
|
The only thing this thread proves is that people don't understand how bike steering works and what makes it stable. Has nothing to do with stem length. Zero length stems are a current fad in mountain biking, and I'm pretty sure mountain bikers need to be able to steer their bike. Someone mentioned the Pacenti P-dent stem above. Old news by now, but they were one of the first to offer really short stems. Only problem is you have to use their handlebars, so I imagine it will be short-lived. https://bikerumor.com/pacenti-p-dent...new-20mm-stem/
I had a related exchange on another thread where I offered to exchange free body diagrams (mechanical engineers should be able to draw an fbd) with anyone who thinks that stem length is an important element of bicycle steering. For some reason, nobody took me up on that. But one person suggested that the stem was required for the tiller effect. The the tiller on a boat has to be a certain length so the steering forces from the rudder can be counteracted by a person. For a bicycle, the tiller is the handlebar, not the stem |
Originally Posted by unterhausen
(Post 22988114)
For a bicycle, the tiller is the handlebar, not the stem
|
My road bike has bullhorns that put my hands a good 8-10 inches in front of the stem. That requires a little finesse to ride. the bike is stable but had to train myself to not pull sideways on the bars when coming out of the saddle. Almost went down the first time I rode it. No problems now.
My recumbent has the bars a good foot behind the stem. Just modified my ebike with a stem riser and Jones H bar to get a more relaxed, upright ride. Getting old sucks. My hands sit probably an inch or so behind the steering axis. When one thinks about it doesn't really matter where your hands are, they are still turning in a circle about the steering axis. In my experience having the bars in line with the steering axis make the bike more stable. |
So many factors; it's really a "try it and see" thing. A big part is "what will the rider be doing?" The use case of "riding the boardwalk at the beach" is a lot different than "descending at 40mph" and a lot different than "snowy trails on a fatbike." While a modification may work fine for some situations, it might not be great for others. I imagine a Schwinn Sting-ray with frankenbike "double fork" extensions (think 15" of trail). That would be cool for riding around the cul-de-sac in the suburbs. Down a 7% two-mile hill at speed? Ummm, maybe not for me. This question of stem length seems very conditional on the use case. It's a pretty wide spectrum between "barely functional" and "truly optimal." User requirements do vary.
|
Originally Posted by Eric F
(Post 22988367)
Wouldn't it be both? (I could be wrong).
|
Originally Posted by unterhausen
(Post 22988520)
The stem only contributes significantly to the tiller length at unusual front wheel angles. When the front wheel is straight, the stem doesn't contribute to the tiller length at all.
|
|
Originally Posted by Eric F
(Post 22988367)
Wouldn't it be both? (I could be wrong).
|
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
(Post 22988062)
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...5aaf909f7d.jpg
Oh so close. Made for a kid's bike. Only 2 bolts for the bar and 1 for the clamp, but still close. What’s your use case? For a road bike rider or hybrid rail trail type riding, this amount of clamping force seems perfectly adequate. For someone riding downhill at a ski resort, it probably isn’t adequate. Maybe if you and or bike are significantly heavier than normal it may also be inadequate. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.