![]() |
Here you go:
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...0e7502cd1.jpeg https://bemorebikes.com/raised-reversed-stems.html Edit: never mind, I see this already got mentioned. |
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
(Post 22987694)
I absolutely love the: "We're not going to answer your question so you need a whole new bike" response
|
Originally Posted by SkinGriz
(Post 22988649)
In case I missed it.
What’s your use case? For a road bike rider or hybrid rail trail type riding, this amount of clamping force seems perfectly adequate. For someone riding downhill at a ski resort, it probably isn’t adequate. Maybe if you and or bike are significantly heavier than normal it may also be inadequate. Also you're somewhat limited in bar choice with a 25.4mm clamp. I don't think the OP has divulged their intended uses yet either which still makes this an unanswerable question. |
Originally Posted by Eric F
(Post 22988367)
Wouldn't it be both? (I could be wrong).
Now this is if you are spinning the handlebars like they are a near horizontal version of the wheel of a ship. If your input is just push/pull, then your input is parallel to the stem and its length has no effect at all. So the stem contributes between zero and 11% to the leverage (for this pretty typical road bike). |
Originally Posted by urbanknight
(Post 22988057)
Yep, but I'm a knucklehead for trying to help. Lesson learned.
|
Originally Posted by CrimsonEclipse
(Post 22986859)
I appreciate a real answer. Unlike the rest of these knucklleheads.... |
Originally Posted by wolfchild
(Post 22989237)
Don't listen to all the knucklleheads. All the negativity comes from people who haven't even tried this type of a set up. Typical bikeforums where if you show yourself a little different and don't follow what is mainstream you will be ridiculed.
|
I am late to the party.
My understanding is that at anything above walking speed bikes steer by camber thrust, not slip angle, and the bars are turned (steered) to keep from falling over. As was pointed out in one of the early posts, rake and trail (and to a lesser extent wheelbase) really affect the handling at speed. That is why it is easy to ride no hands on a touring bike or cruiser, harder on a crit bike. Having said that, stem length will affect weight distribution, although probably not any more than going between the tops and the hoods. |
One thing BiekForumz tends to forget, is that not all bikes are drop-bar road bikes, and that not everyone rides the same kind of bike you do. Heck, most of my bikes are set up very much differently than the others; (2 drop-bar road bikes, a swept-bar Townie, an XC MTB, and a 26” BMX Kruizer; stem lengths range from 50-140mm). I mean, why have 5 bikes, if they’re all just copies of a same thing?
That said, a 0mm stem is a weird ask, ad CrimsonEclipse hasn’t come back to tell us exactly what they’re doing with it. A little bit more about the “why” would help understand what the results they’re trying to achieve. There may be a solution using more readily available components, but we don’t know what that is, because they won’t tell us. :foo: |
generally speaking - typically but not always
when a fit / set-up / whatever looks odd - very different - it can be cause for question if not concern seat slammed way back or forward ... excessive seat angle ; seat pointing up to the sky / seat pointing down ... goofy looking seats ... no seatpost showing - or too much showing ... excessive stem riser height - or excessive drop ... a zero length stem possibly fits into this category but who knows maybe this will be a trend in the future |
LOL. Buys wrong size bike then wants zero reach stem to make up for buying the wrong size bike. Vegan Bikes has it right.
|
Fit is an entirely different matter. I doubt OP is looking for a high performance fit. That would be an adventure.
I was riding on a rail trail last week and someone came riding past me at very good pace with a very upright fit. Their handlebars were so high they were riding with their elbows out and they were still very upright. Their muscle development must be very different than most cyclists. |
It's amazing to read all the perceptions and misperceptions about how a bicycle works. Such a seemingly simple machine....
|
Originally Posted by unterhausen
(Post 22993097)
I was riding on a rail trail last week and someone came riding past me at very good pace with a very upright fit. Their handlebars were so high they were riding with their elbows out and they were still very upright. Their muscle development must be very different than most cyclists.
|
The one place where a zero length stem would have an issue, is trying to ride with no hands.
One of the self-steering mechanisms on the bicycle, is that when the bike starts falling to one side, the handlebar will also flop to the same side because of the weight of the bar at the end of the stem. This helps arrest the fall. (there are other effects to help self-steering too. Namely gyroscopic precession and tire camber). This effect is especially pronounced at low speed. If the stem is zero length, the weight of the handlebar will not cause the fork to turn, hence less self steering. If the stem is pointing backwards, it's even worse- it's working at cross purpose now. If you are running a zero length stem, you could attach a lead weight to a stick that attaches to the bars or stem. A front reflector holder for example. This will help replace this self steering effect lost by going to zero length stem. |
Originally Posted by Johnny Alien
(Post 22986864)
It will handle differently but won't be problematic. You might prefer it. I have seen people try out stems reversed and coming back toward them. The report was that shockingly it didn't ride weird.
|
Originally Posted by Eric F
(Post 22988542)
That makes sense to me.
|
Originally Posted by veganbikes
(Post 22992687)
I figured you would pile into the insult van. There is a little different and then there is people who say in a thread about what geared bike to buy "I only run single-speeds gears are stupid" which is not helpful. You have sadly proven yourself in the not helpful crowd on many occasions. I enjoy fixed gears and single speeds and am a lot different but I don't believe that a single speed is the only answer and nor do I think mentioning that is what I ride all the time in threads unrelated providing zero help to the OP and that is where the difference lies. If you work on giving more helpful advice and get ridiculed then agreed that is a problem but being unhelpful will lead to ridicule. Plus it is the internet and not to excuse all the bad behavior but it is par for the course.
|
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
(Post 22993191)
The one place where a zero length stem would have an issue, is trying to ride with no hands.
One of the self-steering mechanisms on the bicycle, is that when the bike starts falling to one side, the handlebar will also flop to the same side because of the weight of the bar at the end of the stem. This helps arrest the fall. (there are other effects to help self-steering too. Namely gyroscopic precession and tire camber). This effect is especially pronounced at low speed. If the stem is zero length, the weight of the handlebar will not cause the fork to turn, hence less self steering. If the stem is pointing backwards, it's even worse- it's working at cross purpose now. If you are running a zero length stem, you could attach a lead weight to a stick that attaches to the bars or stem. A front reflector holder for example. This will help replace this self steering effect lost by going to zero length stem. In the picture in post #22, the majority of the weight is behind the steerer, which should have the opposite efffect; but I will bet the bike could be ridden no hands. I think the other effects are the relevant ones. |
Originally Posted by MikeWMass
(Post 22993635)
I question this.
In the picture in post #22, the majority of the weight is behind the steerer, which should have the opposite efffect; but I will bet the bike could be ridden no hands. I think the other effects are the relevant ones. The real reason this is contentious is because the cycling culture is incredibly conservative with regards to what a bike is. Especially the roadies. You can flip the stem backwards and slam the seat on a bike that’s too big if you want. Will it look ridiculous? Yes. But it will ride fine. |
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
(Post 22993191)
The one place where a zero length stem would have an issue, is trying to ride with no hands.
One of the self-steering mechanisms on the bicycle, is that when the bike starts falling to one side, the handlebar will also flop to the same side because of the weight of the bar at the end of the stem. This helps arrest the fall. (there are other effects to help self-steering too. Namely gyroscopic precession and tire camber). This effect is especially pronounced at low speed. If the stem is zero length, the weight of the handlebar will not cause the fork to turn, hence less self steering. If the stem is pointing backwards, it's even worse- it's working at cross purpose now. If you are running a zero length stem, you could attach a lead weight to a stick that attaches to the bars or stem. A front reflector holder for example. This will help replace this self steering effect lost by going to zero length stem. Stem length has little to do with whether a bicycle will self-steer or not. Head angle, fork rake/offset and trail, along with overall wheelbase, determine how stable a bike will be, hands-free. Stem length does affect a couple of things, though “above the headset,” as it were; firstly, stem length, along with bar width, changes the leverage ratio between the movement of your hands (distance) and the amount of angular deflection of the front wheel. Shorter stems and narrower bars will produce more change in the front wheel angle for a given input at the grips, for more responsive or “twitchy “ steering. The other thing stem length can affect is how much of the rider’s weight is placed on or ahead of the front wheel. Working in combination with top tube length, moving the rider’s weight forward of the steering axis uses that weight to counter forces from the road conditions (like bumps) from deflecting the front wheel as much. That’s why you see long, low stems on short-wheelbase, fast-steering bikes like Crit bikes and XC racers, to impart some straight line stability, while still being highly responsive when called for. |
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
(Post 22993191)
The one place where a zero length stem would have an issue, is trying to ride with no hands.
One of the self-steering mechanisms on the bicycle, is that when the bike starts falling to one side, the handlebar will also flop to the same side because of the weight of the bar at the end of the stem. This helps arrest the fall. (there are other effects to help self-steering too. Namely gyroscopic precession and tire camber). This effect is especially pronounced at low speed. If the stem is zero length, the weight of the handlebar will not cause the fork to turn, hence less self steering. If the stem is pointing backwards, it's even worse- it's working at cross purpose now.
Originally Posted by Ironfish653
(Post 22993741)
Ya, notsomuch.
Stem length has little to do with whether a bicycle will self-steer or not. Head angle, fork rake/offset and trail, along with overall wheelbase, determine how stable a bike will be, hands-free. |
I see a number of people want to disagree with me, without giving any reasons. It's an easy experiment to do for anyone who has a fixed gear bike. loosen the stem and turn the stem /bars around 180 degree. And then tilt the bike to the left or right. See if the fork steers into the turn or steers away from the turn.
BTW I''ve never done this experiment myself so I'd be interested in the outcome too. |
Originally Posted by icemilkcoffee
(Post 22994002)
I see a number of people want to disagree with me, without giving any reasons. It's an easy experiment to do for anyone who has a fixed gear bike. loosen the stem and turn the stem /bars around 180 degree. And then tilt the bike to the left or right. See if the fork steers into the turn or steers away from the turn.
BTW I''ve never done this experiment myself so I'd be interested in the outcome too. Can you walk the bike around a corner with your hand only on the saddle? Or, more to the point, can you ride it no hands? |
Originally Posted by MikeWMass
(Post 22994030)
Can you walk the bike around a corner with your hand only on the saddle?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.